Jernej Strasner

158 posts

Jernej Strasner banner
Jernej Strasner

Jernej Strasner

@jernejstrasner

Engineer, founder. Building AI infra that's actually built for developers @ https://t.co/aiqyWgolPs

Slovenia Katılım Haziran 2025
341 Takip Edilen54 Takipçiler
Jernej Strasner
Jernej Strasner@jernejstrasner·
@ThibaultJaigu @business It’s shocking how this is moving. I thought for us “European” will be just kind of a bonus for some. Turns out it’s a huge driver in reality.
English
0
0
0
3
Thibault Jaigu
Thibault Jaigu@ThibaultJaigu·
@business Sovereign AI went from conference talk to military procurement in about a year. Europe is moving faster than people think
English
1
0
1
31
Bloomberg
Bloomberg@business·
NestAI is launching an AI engine that the Finnish and Estonian militaries will use to create sovereign models for planning operations bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
English
4
6
19
24.7K
Jernej Strasner
Jernej Strasner@jernejstrasner·
@maxlmns Just visited Toronto and I’m bullish as well! Such a nice place!
English
0
0
0
192
Jernej Strasner
Jernej Strasner@jernejstrasner·
@SaidHaschemi True! But how does a founder filter out the insane amount of VC inbound if not for VC tier and/or partner name?
English
2
0
1
1.1K
Said A. Haschemi
Said A. Haschemi@SaidHaschemi·
If you think dating is hard in SF, try getting meetings with founders as tier 3 VC junior
English
22
0
162
22.7K
Jernej Strasner retweetledi
antirez
antirez@antirez·
Worth stressing.
antirez tweet media
English
18
36
545
29.4K
Jernej Strasner
Jernej Strasner@jernejstrasner·
@AFitzgerald1992 @sarahdrinkwater Private prisons lobby for stricter laws & longer sentences to increase incarceration (more profit). Insurance companies lobby for safer cars, roads & driving laws to decrease claims (less payout). Incentives point in opposite directions. Not the same.
English
1
0
0
23
Alexander Fitzgerald
Alexander Fitzgerald@AFitzgerald1992·
@jernejstrasner @sarahdrinkwater Insurance is when bad things happen. Therefore under your logic we shouldn’t have an insurance industry! Incentivises are set by humans. if the right humans in the right businesses set the right incentives the world gets better
English
1
0
1
34
Alexander Fitzgerald
Alexander Fitzgerald@AFitzgerald1992·
i think i'll build these one day: - prison company. software+hardware prison company that builds and operates better prisons. - tax collector. a software/AI first tax collector for the government. $33 trilion undisrupted market. - security company. physcal plus cyber.
English
4
0
27
2.9K
Lucas Meijer
Lucas Meijer@lucasmeijer·
Slovenia not messing around
Lucas Meijer tweet media
English
3
0
22
954
Armin Ronacher ⇌
Armin Ronacher ⇌@mitsuhiko·
Europeans please wake up.
Jukan@jukan05

CHINA CONSIDERS RESTRICTING OVERSEAS ACCESS TO CUTTING-EDGE AI MODELS China’s Ministry of Commerce has led meetings over the past month with major AI companies, including Alibaba, ByteDance, and Z.ai, to discuss measures that would restrict overseas access to cutting-edge AI models, including models that have not yet been released. The discussions reportedly include not only closed-source models but also open-weight models. However, the scope of application is still under debate, and the rules may ultimately apply only to future frontier models. Officials have also discussed designating the leakage or theft of proprietary AI technologies as a national security crime, with stronger penalties, as well as restricting the types of foreign capital that can invest in Chinese AI startups. The backdrop is the U.S. move to strengthen export controls on AI models, along with national security concerns over cutting-edge models that could possess advanced cyberattack capabilities. Chinese authorities are reportedly concerned that advanced U.S. cybersecurity AI models could be used to exploit vulnerabilities in Chinese software. Since the beginning of this year, China has continued to tighten measures to prevent AI technology from being transferred overseas. Authorities have investigated whether Chinese AI startups that relocated abroad violated export control laws, while also strengthening oversight of overseas transactions involving Chinese investors, technology, data, and national security concerns. Future regulations could take the form of a tiered framework based on technological capability. Basic open-source AI models may be managed through a filing system, high-performance models may be subject to security reviews, and the most sensitive frontier models may be banned from public release or restricted to use within China.

English
38
26
600
67.2K
Jernej Strasner retweetledi
antirez
antirez@antirez·
If that happens Europe is officially fucked.
Jukan@jukan05

CHINA CONSIDERS RESTRICTING OVERSEAS ACCESS TO CUTTING-EDGE AI MODELS China’s Ministry of Commerce has led meetings over the past month with major AI companies, including Alibaba, ByteDance, and Z.ai, to discuss measures that would restrict overseas access to cutting-edge AI models, including models that have not yet been released. The discussions reportedly include not only closed-source models but also open-weight models. However, the scope of application is still under debate, and the rules may ultimately apply only to future frontier models. Officials have also discussed designating the leakage or theft of proprietary AI technologies as a national security crime, with stronger penalties, as well as restricting the types of foreign capital that can invest in Chinese AI startups. The backdrop is the U.S. move to strengthen export controls on AI models, along with national security concerns over cutting-edge models that could possess advanced cyberattack capabilities. Chinese authorities are reportedly concerned that advanced U.S. cybersecurity AI models could be used to exploit vulnerabilities in Chinese software. Since the beginning of this year, China has continued to tighten measures to prevent AI technology from being transferred overseas. Authorities have investigated whether Chinese AI startups that relocated abroad violated export control laws, while also strengthening oversight of overseas transactions involving Chinese investors, technology, data, and national security concerns. Future regulations could take the form of a tiered framework based on technological capability. Basic open-source AI models may be managed through a filing system, high-performance models may be subject to security reviews, and the most sensitive frontier models may be banned from public release or restricted to use within China.

English
222
173
3.5K
526.6K
Jernej Strasner
Jernej Strasner@jernejstrasner·
I don’t think people realize how bad things in Germany really are. I’m actively avoiding even flying through german airports at this point. The latest comedy: 1 out of 2 staircases were late to the airplane. 90% of the plane disembarked on the rear. We waited on the bus for 20min for the other staircase to arrive so the 10% of the plane could disembark through the front. Like, what? It’s seriously a joke.
English
0
0
0
61
Nikesh Arora
Nikesh Arora@nikesharora·
Just finished north of 200 meetings in Europe with customers and technologists. The conversations were primarily around AI, common questions include: 1. Are there examples of organizations who have been able to demonstrate production level systems and do those developments show a return in lower cost, efficiency or better top line? 2. What do you think about agents? How will we discover, govern and stop agents if need be. Perhaps the biggest security concern ATM. 3. The frontier AI models are expensive, what's the business case at these token prices to embed AI in our customer facing products? Where will token prices be in the future. 4. What are the longer term implications of Mythos like models? Do we need to update cyber infrastructure or all IT infrastructure? 5. What do you think of Chinese opensource models? Are they secure and what is the downside of using them if they can be secured and they are cheaper? The parts that surprised me were: 1. The pausing of Mythos and Fable 5 caused more consternation and concern in Europe both short term and raised longer term concerns on single model reliance or reliance or models not in ones control. I hadn't seen it from their POV. 2. Sovereignity which was always a topic and still is, is getting more nuanced - they want data residency, data localization and local resources, but there seems to be more willingness to accept global services on clouds. Classified systems continue to be an issue. Net net - we need to ensure we continue to build trust both on our Frontier models and their consistent availability, we need to get the right economics in place and spend more time in Europe communicating and building presence if we want AI adoption to keep pace with the US.
English
94
216
2.4K
1.3M