Jerome Thomas

@Sebastiansmxth I don’t see how any of this adds up to a logical argument for why monarchy should be desirable.

This scene has done more to promote the monarchy than anything I have seen this year. A mother, married, recovering from cancer, working tirelessly, being booed at with her children as they keep composure, hold their tongue and politely wave back.

@BGatesIsaPyscho Being treated differently is surely the whole purpose of the hijab.

“In one school, they had a White girl wearing a Hijab” The UK Government in South Wales wants all school children to try wearing a Burqa and a Hijab.

@bryan_johnson @WIRED If civilization continues to flourish, a reversal of the ageing process is very likely to come about. Nothing in the laws of physics preclude it. The longer we live, the further medical technology advances, and the better our chance of personally benefitting from that reversal.

What else did people think was impossible? + 1928: There is no likelihood man can ever tap the power of the atom. + 1895: Heavier‑than‑air flying machines are impossible. + 1956: All this talk about space travel is utter bilge.

@bryan_johnson @WIRED Forever is a long long time away. I don‘t want to die in the forseeable future, and a few decades away is very forseeable. The big abstract questions about immortality don‘t interest me that much. Living to tomorrow does.

The advocates of greater censorship, always use words like, ‘firm’, ‘robust’, and ‘decisive’, as if there is something strong and virile about their illiberal attitudes. Censorship is manly!

@elonmusk @CommunityNotes They have no principles at all. They just dance to the mood music played by their leftist-controlled cultural institutions. This is the model citizen. What the culture sets out to create. What it celebrates.

@elonmusk @CommunityNotes Being part of the British “sensible pragmatic adult” set means not giving a fuck about civil liberties. The policewoman making the arrest is a well-adjusted grown up. The person being arrested is not. Good respectable people never think about anything from first principles.

Arrested for making comments on Facebook! Is this Britain or the Soviet Union? Is this accurate @CommunityNotes?

@verymoisturized The assumption is that your views are tailored to the social approval of men rather than women, making you a traitor. Instead, you should demonstrate ingroup loyalty by tailoring your views toward the approval of other women. That neither might be the case is unthinkable.

@verymoisturized I guess the male equivalent is being called a “cuck” People who are invested in fighting for the home team in the partisan gender wars, do not tolerate dissent in the ranks.

@Sargon_of_Akkad Calling women on their bullshit is sexist. Only a misogynist would do so. The ‘best’ people never do.

It's Not About Men or Bears Women are struggling with what feminism has done to them.

@eltiredmoderate @MattWalshBlog Its racist to notice the egregious double standards. The ‘best’ people never do.

@MattWalshBlog We can go more apples-to-apples than that. Europeans (and later Americans) are rightly criticized for slavery, while for every other culture it's gauche to mention it, or viewed as "defensive" or some other weird counterattack. The woke pin universal human sins on white people.

I've read a lot of books about explorers making first contact in the Americas, Africa, Pacific islands, etc. Probably my favorite subject to study. You can't help but notice that cannibalism and human sacrifice was incredibly common in these cultures all across the world. It was much more the rule than the exception. And yet we are supposed to condemn the Europeans for failing to recognize these naked primal cannibals as their absolute equals. Meanwhile we excuse the cannibalism and human sacrifice in the name of "historical context." Europeans never get the benefit of that same context. We judge them -- and no one else -- through a strictly modern lens.

@MrEwanMorrison I shouldn’t worry my low IQ little peasant head about the detail. My betters intend to let me know when I have crossed the line.

The "misrepresentation" narrative around the Scottish Hate Crime Law is political smoke & mirrors. The new law is based on unquantifiable variables that set a legal precent for vagueness & subjective bias: Legally define 'hate'; define 'stirring up hate' - define 'reasonable person'. Now explain why this law needs to go beyond the Equality Act 2010 to determine that there needs to be a two-level, double-standard designation of what constitutes a protected group. And look at how this new law now contradicts the Equality Act 2010. The lawmakers who attempted to rewrite this Act over the last 3 years have only made it even less workable. It is not a misrepresentation to point out that this is a shambles.

@MrEwanMorrison I think the idea is that just like the people who drafted it, the people who will enforce this hate crime law are better than the likes of me. Wiser, smarter, and more nuanced in their judgement than I could ever hope to be. Obviously better looking than me too.

@libsoftiktok Of course they have to make the guy committed to objective truth look like a conplete dweeb, and make him the least articulate person in the room. The typical woke media MO.

This was a teacher training for Charter schools in Los Angeles. Someone objects to being forced to refer to a trans person with his preferred pronouns and he’s told he has to comply and to keep his beliefs out of the workplace. You will be forced to submit to the delusion!

@EndWokeness Dude on the right shouted more loudly. Therefore he is correct.

Holy sh*t JJ Redick just nuked ESPN’s anti-white race peddling on live TV