Joe Gitchell

54.8K posts

Joe Gitchell banner
Joe Gitchell

Joe Gitchell

@jgitchell

Consult to Juul Labs on nicotine vapor for tobacco harm minimization.

Bethesda, MD Katılım Haziran 2008
4.9K Takip Edilen3.6K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Joe Gitchell
Joe Gitchell@jgitchell·
"It seems to be a law of nature, inflexible and inexorable, that those who will not risk cannot win." John Paul Jones #USPassportQuotes
English
9
18
68
0
Joe Gitchell
Joe Gitchell@jgitchell·
No specific mentions of nicotine and tobacco research, but goodness does @Musa_alGharbi ring some bells with this engaging and #BrutalTruths-laden talk at @HdxAcademy West. How Researcher Homogeneity Distorts Knowledge Production | Musa al-Gharbi 1/2
English
1
0
1
59
Jim McCarthy
Jim McCarthy@JMacNYC·
@jkelovuori @jgitchell Of course not -- even though it underscored the main thesis of the piece and impacts vastly more people than any other drug/issue mentioned. Also, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA:
Jim McCarthy tweet media
English
1
2
5
83
Joe Gitchell retweetledi
Super 70s Sports
Super 70s Sports@Super70sSports·
What odds could you have gotten in 1991 on “Magic Johnson will still be alive in 2026 and also the most jovial, healthy looking motherfucker in every room he enters.”
Super 70s Sports tweet media
English
382
354
9.8K
708.9K
Joe Gitchell
Joe Gitchell@jgitchell·
@DrJMarine Amazing!! And in the circle of life file, check out fox kits!
Joe Gitchell tweet media
English
1
0
1
24
Joseph Marine
Joseph Marine@DrJMarine·
Bluebirds have been productive. Hatching started today!
Joseph Marine tweet mediaJoseph Marine tweet mediaJoseph Marine tweet media
English
4
0
30
471
Joe Gitchell
Joe Gitchell@jgitchell·
TFW you get to work with so many talented, savvy professionals who are trying to improve public welfare, even tho essentially no one agrees with what we're trying to do. #JohnStuartMill (ht @HdxAcademy @JonHaidt) "Cherish those who seek the Truth; Doubt those who have found it." - Voltaire (TY, @ConscienHealth, as ever!) #gratitude
GIF
English
0
0
2
53
Frank Sinisterra
Frank Sinisterra@recoqnitions·
@JunkScience @LanceChurchill 6. We should not compare the cancer risk from vaping with no use. We should compare the cancer risk from vaping with the cancer risk from smoking cigarettes.
English
2
0
7
86
Steve Milloy
Steve Milloy@JunkScience·
Behavior nannies try to link vaping with cancer. What you need to know: 1. Vaping (like many other everyday activities) includes exposures to chemicals that, at very high/atypical/unrealistic exposures, have been linked with cancer in either humans and/or lab animals. For example, @grok estimates benzene exposures among heavy e-cig users at orders of magnitude below what was the threshold for cancer risk among mid-20th century industrial workers. 2. But typical exposures to vaping chemicals are much lower and so not likely to be carcinogenic. 3. E-cigs have been around for about 20 years. There are an estimated 18 million e-cig users. There have been two case reports in the US of oral HPV-negative squamous cell cancer (rare in young people) in young and heavy e-cig users. But these are anecdotal and causation has not been established. 4. But despite decades of use and tens of millions of users, there is no epidemiology associating e-cigs with cancer. That is not to say that cancer from e-cigs hasn't or can't happen, but if it does it is so rare that no one can detect it. If it does happen, it is probably confined to heavy use among the genetically vulnerable. 5. Finally, risks and reality may be different for users of black market e-cigs vs. FDA-approved products. Black market products may contain anything. washingtonpost.com/wellness/2026/…
Steve Milloy tweet media
English
8
13
49
2.8K