Jhalil Timazee

@DMVFootballGuy @gullett_james @AdamSchefter Top 6? How when I can name more than 6 that are better than him, are more consistent, and have better production.

@gullett_james @AdamSchefter I don’t, but how the NFL structures their contracts, this a completely normal for a player of his caliber. Top 6 WR in the league.

Highest paid receivers in the NFL on a per-year basis: 🏈Jaxon Smith-Njigba: $42.15M 🏈Ja’Marr Chase: $40.25M 🏈Drake London: $35.25M 🏈Justin Jefferson: $35M 🏈CeeDee Lamb: $34M

@AdamSchefter @marcraimondi Crazy amount of money for a non All Pro player! 30+ is for top 10 top 15. Drake London is good and a WR1 but he’s not elite.

More about the Falcons and WR Drake London reaching agreement today on a four-year, $141 million extension, via @marcraimondi: espn.com/nfl/story/_/id…

@AdamSchefter @bepryor As a Ravens fan I absolutely love this! Spend that kind of money on non All Pros! Yes! Keep doing it! Now we just have to worry about beating Bengals and only Bengals!

More about the Steelers and Nick Herbig reaching agreement today on a four-year, $100 million extension, via @bepryor: espn.com/nfl/story/_/id…

This is exactly what I’ve been talking about with Lamar Jackson discourse for years People want to hold him to an all-time great standard and level of criticism but then don’t want to give him credit as one of the best Can’t have it both ways

““If the world hates you, remember that it hated me first. The world would love you as one of its own if you belonged to it, but you are no longer part of the world. I chose you to come out of the world, so it hates you. Do you remember what I told you? ‘A slave is not greater than the master.’ Since they persecuted me, naturally they will persecute you. And if they had listened to me, they would listen to you.” John 15:18-20 NLT #IDONTEVENBELONGHERE🫶🏾🙏🏾💜 #ThankYouJESUS

As it should be everywhere.

@Lj_era8 gotta get that boy @cheetah ! Forget about AJ Brown!

@Lj_era8 Tell our boys in the front office to give up 2 rd pick this year, 1st next year, get @CrosbyMaxx STILL, trade the first THIS year for AJ Brown and go win the Super Bowl! You might have to take the Tom Brady discount but that monkey will be off your back bro!! God bless!

YES!

A girl asked, “Be honest. What do you think when you see a girl whose face and body look better than your wife’s or girlfriend’s?” And a man replied, “Why light a candle when the sun is shining?” And honestly, that response stayed with me. Because it was not about pretending other women do not exist. It was about perspective. There will always be someone prettier, someone different, someone new. But when a man truly values the woman he has chosen, he does not measure her against passing faces. He sees her as his sun. And when the sun is shining, you do not go searching for small lights to impress you. Real loyalty is not blindness. It is intention. It is waking up every day and choosing the person you already have. It is understanding that attraction is common, but commitment is rare. that kind of mindset is what makes a relationship feel safe. Not because no one else is beautiful, but because to him, she is home.

Over 2 million “views” now… 🤔🥲

@Lj_era8 tell @Ravens to go get @camjordan94 and Trey Hendrickson! Pass rush would be wild bro! 😎

@THEICODON @TorreySmithWR Respectfully disagree. Zay Flowers isn’t a WR 1 and struggles against press coverage. That’s why Lamar has to run around so guys can get open. Diggs is better in nearly every way. The Ravens are my team but we’ve needed a WR1 forEVER!

@TorreySmithWR As a raven fan we good without him. Sadly it’s right up edc alley. Receiver with name but no game

Time to come on home. Either side of the Beltway works 🤷🏿‍♂️

A woman without her men is easier to control. A father wants to protect & take care of his daughter. A husband wants to protect & take care of his wife. A son wants to protect & take care of his mother. These 3 are the most emotionally invested people in a woman's life. They gain nothing from her harm & everything from her well being. So naturally… they had to be removed. First, the father. His concern is reframed as control. His discipline becomes oppression. His experience with men… suddenly irrelevant. He's told he's a tyrant for wanting to know who his daughter marries. Not because he hates her freedom… but because he knows exactly how men can destroy a woman's life. That possibility is never discussed. Only one word is allowed: patriarchy. Next, the husband. If he values family, he's controlling. If he values motherhood, he's reducing her to a womb. If he expects contribution at home, he's exploiting her. If he worries about her safety, he's restricting her freedom. Conclusion is pre decided: He must be an oppressor. Divorce must be incentivized. The family must be weakened. Now only the son remains. But even he is a problem. She's told having fewer children is progress. She's told to be proud if the child is a daughter. If it's a son… he's a future tyrant in training. His masculinity must be corrected. Softened. Neutralized. He must not become the kind of man who protects. And just like that… Father sidelined. Husband discarded. Son reprogrammed. The 3 men who would die for her well being are removed from influence. What remains are: The state. Corporations. NGOs. Elites. People with zero emotional investment in her life… but full authority over it. Because here's the truth they don't want spoken: Without love, there is no real protection. Without emotional investment, there is no genuine concern. And a woman isolated from those who love her most is infinitely easier to control. Too many are taught to call this liberation. It isn't. It's abandonment... sold with better branding labelled as FEMINISM.

"A soft woman can influence a man... more than a loud woman ever will."

The men you deal with today are not the men from 500 years ago. We are not responsible for actions, systems, or norms from centuries before we were born. None of you lived in that time, yet you keep dragging up history to justify double standards and avoid accountability in the present. That’s not equality…that’s using the past as leverage. So when you talk about “independence” or claim men can’t handle successful or independent women, it doesn’t land. We grew up going to school with girls, being taught by female teachers, raised by working mothers, and surrounded by women with careers and ambition. Female success isn’t intimidating or new…it’s normal life. Stop acting like modern men are threatened by something we’ve seen our entire lives. Most of us don’t have an issue with successful women…we have an issue with excuses, entitlement, and lack of accountability being dressed up as empowerment. You can’t demand equality while also expecting special treatment. You can’t preach independence while shifting blame and responsibility onto others. Adults are responsible for their own choices, regardless of history.

🚨🚨THIS IS BEAUTIFUL🚨🚨 #Patriots quarterback Drake Maye spoke about his favorite Bible Verse at Super Bowl media night. “Proverbs 16: 9. The heart of a man plans his way, but the Lord establishes his steps.“ Maye is a devout follower of Jesus Christ. x.com/Fatslob1123/st…

Helen Andrews drops two bold, provocative claims on feminization's impact on civilization: 1. Feminization isn't neutral—in key institutions, it's actively harmful. - Rule of law crumbles when judges prioritize "context & relationships" over strict, objective rules (even if outcomes feel harsh). - Academia loses its purpose when it censors "dangerous" ideas instead of pursuing truth relentlessly. - Business innovation stalls when HR-compliant niceness trumps bold, disruptive leadership. - Immigration policy becomes paralyzed: laws exist on paper, but enforcement is blocked if it might "make someone sad." Without rule of law, truth-seeking, secure borders, and innovation, a fully feminized society risks collapse. 2. Demographic feminization → substantive feminization Can we have majority-female professions (lawyers, judges, professors) while keeping the old uncompromising standards? Andrews says no—not enough women consistently embody the hard-edged, truth-first, outcome-over-feelings ethos that historically defined those fields. Some women absolutely do, but scaling to majority-female shifts the institutional culture inevitably. She calls it difficult but true: "A thoroughly feminized civilization will set itself on the road to collapse." Uncomfortable, politically incorrect, and worth debating. What do you think—does she overstate the case, or is there truth here?

Do not go there..👏🏽