Jai Shree Krishna

@mikejava85 @VenkateshwarHos @IMAIndiaOrg @IMAIndiaOrg @NMCBharat @VenkateshwarHos he's also a racist look into his tweets omg how on the earth wil he behave with patients it's scary @GovtofPunjabPK plz take cognizance

Hi @VenkateshwarHos , do you agree with the racist remarks of the Consultant Pediatric Oncologist Dr Aditya Gupta towards a community/state abusing Punjabi community ? Is this ethical ? CC @IMAIndiaOrg are such remarks ethical ??

@mikejava85 @VenkateshwarHos @IMAIndiaOrg @VenkateshwarHos plz take strict action..he has abused entire punjab and Indian farmers @OfficialDPRPP @GovtofPunjabPK @sphavisha @OfficialDPRPP

@mikejava85 @VenkateshwarHos @IMAIndiaOrg @IMAIndiaOrg can u plz enlighten me if such scumfilthy hate mongers are working in ur hospital how can patients from poor backgrounds be trusted fr such teroor filled minds @DrAditya2935 @VenkateshwarHos

@ECISVEEP @RCBTweets Wtf .wth @ECISVEEP wat a low and bafoonery fr a moment I thought it was 2rs troll account...btw ur no diff .

Congratulations to #RCB on lifting the #IPL2026 trophy! 🏆 Champions prepare for their moment. So should you. Turning 18? Fill #Form6 today and get ready to fulfil your democratic duty like a champion. 🇮🇳 🫵 Your Vote Matters. Credit: @RCBTweets #IPLFinal #RCBvsGT #ECI #Elections #IPLFinal2026

@RahulGandhi @INCIndia @PiyushGoyal @AshwiniVaishnaw @DrSJaishankar @SudhanshuTrived common start karonsab @dpradhanbjp RG ne firse apka chitti khola .ab bonklo sabke sab

CBSE’s May 2025 tender required answer sheets to be scanned with automatic robotic scanners, spines preserved, at a minimum of 300 DPI. The tender re-issued in August quietly removed all of it. “Scanners” became generic. Resolution dropped to 200 DPI. Now we know what that meant in practice. It has been exposed that COEMPT scanned the answer sheets using mobile phones. The blurred copies, the missing pages, the unscanned books - they are not “errors.” They are the predictable outcome of a contract written to fit a vendor. This is fraud. And every child whose marks were wrongly evaluated is a victim of it. This morning, the Prime Minister had time to speak about mangoes. He has not had time to speak about 18.5 lakh children whose answer sheets were scanned with phones. Dharmendra Pradhan ji still sits in office. Modi ji’s silence is no longer indifference. It is complicity.

@anjanaomkashyap Btw satraa saal ke bache apse hazar guna behatar kam kiya jitna muh kam kole itna ijjat milega apko khair muh band karke chup baito..for God sake @anjanaomkashyap ur blot on journalism by all means sit down and worship ur masters

मासूम बच्चे और उनके माता-पिता की गाढ़ी मेहनत की कमाई का पैसा लूटने वाले कुछ कोचिंग सेंटर के सेलिब्रिटी टीचर्स आज भाड़े के वीडियो बना बनाकर ज्ञान दे रहे हैं। सार्वजनिक रूप से महिलाओं को गाली देने वाले, उनकी नक़ल उतारने वाले ये छिछले यूट्यूबर बच्चों की कड़ी मेहनत पर अपनी दुकान सजाते हैं। असल हीरो बच्चे हैं, ये माँ बाप की मेहनत की कमाई के लुटेरे कितना भी कूदें, देशभर के बच्चों को live जोड़कर हमने पेपर लीक के पिड़ित बच्चों को आवाज़ दी तो इनके स्टारडम को बड़ा धक्का लगा है! शिक्षा को धंधा बनाने वालों को दर्द हो तो अच्छा है।वैसे कोचिंग माफिया के खिलाफ मेरा विडियो वायरल करने के लिए धन्यवाद! मेरे शो पर सभी panelist ने बोला कि कोचिंग माफिया पर नकेल कसी जाए।

@anjanaomkashyap Anjana jii @anjanaomkashyap kud journalsim pe aap ek dhaag ho I don't know frm u hv graduated u hv zero ethics and zero credibility btw khan sir ke sath me knowledge me apka aukaat zero se neeche rhaeg .chup Karo drama and do wat urgud at subservient to master shame on u thu chi

@rishilectual @aajtak @anjanaomkashyap ji...ap sch me khan sir ko target karke kiya kya .sach me matlab sach me apko samj me aara ki bi nai uske samne apka aukat kya hi gyaan me .donu even know that he wil blew you away hardly under 30 seconds with his gyan..jara sa bi sharm thu thu @anjanaomkashyap

We request @aajtak to host an open debate on any topic between Khan Sir and Anjana Om Kashyap (without a teleprompter) I am backing Anjana. I believe she can take on 10 Khan Sirs in a debate. Make it happen, please.

@PranavaBhardwaj @raghav_chadha Still not cleared dues. Omg itna logonkosath khela kya. Never knew ur this fraud @raghav_chadha 4 lakh apko kitna ?? @ParineetiChopra mam plz help 🙏 ..lady self proclaimed bhagat singh @SwatiJaiHind aap bi tho dhokebaz ho naa

पैसे क्यो नहीं दे रहा भाई तू @raghav_chadha

@NarinderMudii @Chinmayi @Sub5_human @NarinderMudii omg wtf on earth I'm not at all surprised despite after neet cbse and yet ugc net hapd and above all couldn't post thier own link correctly all clearly says ganta farak padta leaks wil happen,we all are doomed

Lawdena Bhojyam! Clowns didn't even remember the correct URL for their own website. CC @Sub5_human

@Chinmayi I think it's fake @dpradhanbjp for God sake plz stop opening ur mouth ..have some shame and resign

Please blame the Mughals. That's the best.

@UnSubtleDesi Bitch??? U disgusting scum filthy fellows in which world r u a journalist . Pathetic psychopath go get a life .u hate mongering moron @UnSubtleDesi

Shut up, bitch.

@AtishiAAP @dpradhanbjp Omggg seriously bhai @dpradhanbjp bhai hat jaao yar. .thoda tho sharm karo ..uff india face this. U voted to this scum bags thrice. We all wil die in the end fr sure .

First NEET, then CBSE, now CUET… Today CUET has been delayed due to a ‘technical issue’. Lakhs of students were to take the exam in all parts of India today and after waiting for hours, such notices have been put up outside all centres. Remarkable incompetence @dpradhanbjp!

@sardesairajdeep @Phogat_Vinesh @sardesairajdeep pl give ita big breaking on ur channel sir so that nation can know.nation wants to know @mansukhmandviya is this wat ur dng with atheletes ..wow amrit kaal

MORE SHAME: now the WFI stops @Phogat_Vinesh from competing in the 53 kg category trials and tells her only this morning on the day of trials that she can compete only in 50 kg category! PURE VENDETTA being carried out against a world class athlete only because she took on the ‘ESTABLISHMENT’. Will anyone from GOI, sports ministry or our sporting fraternity speak up? No wonder we can never be a great Olympic nation: too much politics, too little sport.😡

@bismil_prasad @TVMohandasPai @manoj_216 @TVMohandasPai this fool doesn't reply to any of such accusations sir all their life is build on without integrity and honesty all they do is lecturing ppl on nationalism after exploiting india to the core

Mr @TVMohandasPai जवाब दो. @manoj_216 की बात की पुष्टि करो . Manoj Arora has exposed your connection with Coempt . #Coempt #CBSE_MESS

@Malay4Product @Chinmayi @SauravDassss bhai this guy just blew my mind. Gonna be tough competition fr you. I'm sure ul love it ❤️❤️🥳😅 @sidhant_sarthak keep it up boy. Nation is proud of you .

This is an unbelievable piece of work by Sarthak and something that requires amplification. Let me explain what he found, in simple terms. Sarthak is a Class 12 student from the 2025-26 batch, one of the 17 lakh students whose answer sheets went through CBSE's new On-Screen Marking system. He spent days reading through CBSE's evaluation tenders, scraped all 576 tenders CBSE has issued, and tracked how the rules changed across three versions of the same tender. The core finding is that the company that won the contract to scan and grade 17 lakh students' answer sheets is Coempt Eduteck. Coempt used to be called Globarena Technologies. Globarena was the company behind the 2019 Telangana intermediate exam disaster, where software failures led to 3.8 lakh students getting wrong or missing marks, and 23 students died by suicide. A government committee found systemic failure and negligence. Six months later, Globarena rebranded to Coempt Eduteck. So a company with that track record won a contract to handle 17 lakh CBSE students. Sarthak's investigation is about how the rules were rewritten to let that happen. The tender was issued three times. > First tender, February 2025. It existed, then disappeared from the public GeM portal. Sarthak scraped all 576 CBSE tenders and this one was missing from the archive entirely. > Second tender, May 2025. Four companies applied including TCS and Coempt. All four failed the technical evaluation. Cancelled. > Third tender, August 2025. Coempt won. Between the second and third tender, a series of rule changes happened, and every single one made it easier for Coempt to qualify. Here is what changed, one by one. 01. The old rules disqualified any company with a history of abandoning work, failing to complete contracts, or financial weakness. The new rules deleted this clause entirely. Coempt's Telangana history stopped being a barrier. 02. The old rules disqualified any company that was "blacklisted earlier." The new rules changed this to "currently blacklisted." Because Globarena rebranded after Telangana, removing the word "earlier" effectively erased their past. 03. The rules required Rs 50 crore average turnover over three years. Coempt's exact average came to Rs 50.86 crore. They cleared the bar by less than 1%. Earlier, a smaller company had asked CBSE to lower the bar to Rs 30 crore for fairer competition. CBSE refused. So the bar was kept high enough to block small players, but sat exactly low enough for Coempt to scrape through. 04. Software maturity is measured on the CMMI scale, 1 to 5. The old rules required Level 5. The new rules dropped it to Level 3. Coempt is a Level 3 company. 05. The cooling-off period for engaging retired CBSE officials was cut from two years to one. This makes it easier to use recently retired insiders to influence the process. 06. The old rules required experience with large projects of at least 5 lakh students each. The new rules removed the student count and counted cumulative answer-book volume across small projects instead. Coempt has many small fragmented university contracts. This helped Coempt and hurt TCS. 07. The old rules required bidders to own their own data centre and disaster recovery centre on Indian soil. The new rules allowed third-party MeitY-empanelled cloud hosting. Coempt runs on AWS and Azure. This helped Coempt and hurt TCS, which owns its own data centres. It also means student data is no longer on sovereign, Indian infrastructure. 08. The old rules required the bidder to own or control the complete source code of its software. The new rules deleted this. Coempt's platform runs on Microsoft's proprietary IIS, which they don't own. 09. A last-minute corrigendum, issued right before bid submission, removed CBSE's own power to blacklist the firm if its software failed catastrophically. So even a Telangana-scale failure couldn't get Coempt banned from future government tenders. 10. The penalty structure shifted from punishing mistakes to punishing delays. The old rules fined the vendor for wrong scanning, merged pages, and unscanned books. The new rules dropped those and instead levied Rs 50,000 per day for delays. This incentivises rushed scanning over accurate scanning. 11. The old rules had a hard accuracy threshold, error rate not to exceed 0.5%. The new rules removed this number entirely. 12. The old rules specified proper book and robotics scanners. The new rules just say "sufficient scanners." The definition was vague enough that, as Sarthak notes, the scanning could be done with a phone on a stand. 13. On the security side, the contract required a VAPT (vulnerability and penetration test) certified by CERT-In before go-live, and a restricted beta phase before launch. The system clearly wasn't restricted, because the other researcher, Nisarga, was able to access it and find vulnerabilities four days before go-live. So the mandatory security audit appears to have been bypassed. These are more than a dozen rule changes, all between the failed tender and the winning tender, all pushing in the same direction, all benefiting the one company with the worst track record in the field. The security holes Nisarga found last week now have an explanation. The system was built by a vendor that was specifically allowed to skip the security certification, the source code ownership, the data sovereignty, and the quality thresholds the original rules demanded. Following things need to happen immediately; 1. An immediate CAG audit of the tender process. 2. A parliamentary debate on the topic. 3. An independent investigation into > Why the first tender vanished? > Why the disqualification clauses were deleted? > Why the turnover bar was held exactly where it was? > Why the security level was dropped? > Why the blacklisting power was removed at the last moment? Sarthak, this is genuinely exceptional investigative work. Far better than most journalists with full resources ever manage. Take a bow. :)

@LavanyaBallal @SudhanshuTrived ye kya bolre ...sharamse dup ke marjanaa padegaaa saar

If a brain-cell eating amoeba attacked you,it would starve to death Sudhanshu

@manoj_216 @TVMohandasPai acha apka isme bi hi link wah re wah ap sabke sab aakir me bachonko bi barbaad karne baite aur ut the hi bhaarat maat ki jai .Im figuring out to know wil there anyone even in ur family who loves u honestly?

Here is the mystery of Coempt and why the tenders were modified to suit Coempt... 1. The Manipal Group (primarily through its division Manipal Global Education Services) holds a majority stake and controls the Coempt as its EdTech and digital examination arm. 2. T.V. Mohandas Pai - a highly prominent and vocal supporter of BJP - serves as the chairman of Manipal Global Education Services 3. Former BJP Union Minister Rajeev Chandrasekhar is a prominent alumnus of the Manipal Institute of Technology (MIT), which is a crown jewel of the Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE)

@RahulGandhi Wat r u waiting for 2rs troll common start copy pasting agenda msg rahul jis mental state is disturbed he lost many elections @PiyushGoyal @AshwiniVaishnaw @dpradhanbjp @DrSJaishankar if I missed someone plz remind them thanks fr ur attention guys

PM Modi also personally supervised the NEET paper leak.

@catale7a Exactly I hav been saying the audacity that bafoon has to spread fake propaganda to an historian. Matlab kuch bi malik ke saamne gulamgiri keliye. Thu. Thu @authoramish

Now I have seen everything. A fiction writer is mocking a historian, on history 😭