Jmcanboy

yall so corny with these titles

LMFAOOOOO i need someone to turn this into a gif and 2x the speed asap

Certifications expiring😅

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 SEC officially approves ending Pattern Day Trader rule, eliminating the $25,000 minimum for day trading.

Dawg weh yuh mean 15 man?? And him disarm one and shoot dem??? A Jaiison Fraiitham???

all they do on linkedin is regurgitate other people’s Ideas into posts another reason I don’t like it, just too corny

Bítches get 1.1K likes on a pic and start looking for apartments in ATLANTA…😭💀

@skitdetector @EvanLuthra yeah an ai wrapper?

@EvanLuthra What you’re leaving out is a great many of the people that are laid off will now be in power to start their own businesses using AI

🚨RESEARCHERS JUST MATHEMATICALLY PROVED THAT AI LAYOFFS WILL DESTROY THE ECONOMY.. AND EVERY CEO ALREADY KNOWS IT.. BUT NONE OF THEM CAN STOP.. Two researchers from UPenn and Boston University just published a paper called "The AI Layoff Trap".. They proved something terrifying.. Every company replacing workers with AI is also firing its own customers.. Every laid-off employee is someone who used to spend money.. When enough people lose their jobs.. Nobody can afford to buy anything.. And the companies that fired everyone go bankrupt selling products to an economy with no purchasing power.. Every CEO can see this coming.. The math is obvious.. Fire workers.. Lose customers.. Lose revenue.. Collapse.. But here's the trap.. No company can afford to stop.. If you don't automate.. Your competitor will.. They cut costs.. Undercut your prices.. Steal your market share.. And you die anyway.. So every company automates.. Knowing it's collectively suicidal.. Because the alternative is dying alone while everyone else survives.. It's a Prisoner's Dilemma.. And the researchers proved it mathematically.. The numbers are already stacking up.. Block cut nearly half its 10,000 employees this year.. CEO Jack Dorsey said AI made those roles unnecessary and that "within the next year, the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion".. Salesforce replaced 4,000 customer support agents with AI.. Goldman Sachs deployed an AI coder that lets one senior engineer do the work of a five-person team.. Over 100,000 tech workers were laid off in 2025 alone.. AI was cited as the primary driver in more than half the cases.. 80% of US workers hold jobs with tasks susceptible to AI automation.. And here's what should scare policymakers.. The researchers tested every proposed solution.. Universal Basic Income.. Doesn't fix it.. It raises living standards but doesn't change a single company's incentive to automate.. Capital income taxes.. Don't fix it.. They change profit levels but not the per-task decision to replace a human.. Worker equity and profit sharing.. Narrows the gap but can't close it.. Collective bargaining.. Can't fix it.. Because automating is a dominant strategy.. No voluntary agreement between companies is self-enforcing.. Only one thing works.. A Pigouvian automation tax.. A per-task charge that forces every company to pay for the demand it destroys when it fires a worker.. The researchers call it a "Red Queen effect".. Better AI doesn't solve the problem.. It makes it worse.. Because every company sees a bigger market share gain from automating faster than rivals.. But at the end.. Everyone automates equally.. The gains cancel out.. And the only thing left is more destroyed demand.. The paper's conclusion is devastating.. This isn't a transfer from workers to company owners.. Both sides lose.. Workers lose their income.. Companies lose their customers.. It's a deadweight loss that harms everyone.. And no market force can break the cycle.. The AI layoff trap isn't a prediction.. It's already happening.. And the math says it won't stop on its own.

we literally used to write a rough draft and final draft essay BY HAND 😭😭😭

Far Cry 3 NPC pulls off a perfect drift round a corner 🎥: u/VVYREX

@Kayd24 @allldiamonds you must be old, this can’t be a 2026 take

@allldiamonds If jobs are hiring but they’re not hiring you, that means you’re doing something wrong. Either your resume is poorly structured or you’re bad at interviewing and both of those can be easily fixed but it takes personal accountability and self awareness to accept this.

applying to new jobs even when you're highly credentialed right now still feels impossible. when is this bubble going to pop?

you can’t even say “get a job” to people anymore because the market is so bad they’ll be like i have applied to 400 jobs over the past six months

@jxmnop @Hathibel Taking you up on this! I have a paper on cross-architecture failure correlations in visual CAPTCHA benchmarking ViT, YOLOv8, and CLIP on hCaptcha. My endorsement code is NIJPJP. Happy to send the manuscript if you'd like to review it first.

@Hathibel if you did good-faith research and the endorsement is your only barrier to putting it on arXiv, send it to me and i will endorse you

if you have done novel AI research, and considered publishing it on arXiv, but the idea makes you nervous: over 2000 papers about AI were posted last week. the worst case is no one notices. best case is you contribute something meaningful to the field you should just do it

LangChain & LangGraph Interview Q&A drive.google.com/file/d/1MdcZxX…

Average day in Red County

AI could never do something like this

They on LinkedIn and Facebook FRYING him.

This little illuminated dragon is very happy about Pretext. He's too busy having fun to care about people's "hot takes" on how "it's not that special." (This little dragon also only works on desktop right now but maybe I'll do mobile later) illustrated-manuscript.vercel.app

The animator The animation