Josh Pasek (Frozen Account)
876 posts

Josh Pasek (Frozen Account)
@jmping
Assoc. Prof. in Comm & Media, Political Science, and Data Science at the University of Michigan - No longer using Twitter - find me elsewhere
Ann Arbor, MI Katılım Mayıs 2007
906 Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler

@kevin_dorst @RaBhui @DG_Rand @DmitriGallow @KieranSetiya @hakeemjefferson @FabianNeuner and I found strong evidence that this happens with racial attitudes and police shootings cambridge.org/core/journals/…
English

...soon. (Looking at you, @RaBhui and @DG_Rand!) If you're interested, please get in touch!
For now, many thanks to many people for questions, objections, encouragement, and making the project 1000x better than it would've been. On Twitter: @DmitriGallow, @KieranSetiya...

English

"Rational Polarization" is now forthcoming in The Philosophical Review!
philpapers.org/rec/DORRP-2
(Shorter version: kevindorst.com/uploads/8/8/1/…)
5 years in the making; still lots more to figure out. Here's the TLDR, and a detailed summary:

English

@BillyJoyner More likely to be purchased by some foreign government though after we have all abandoned the place.
English

also proud to have published a scientific study based in part on street interviews from a @JimmyKimmelLive clip
English

Is the influence of question wording about framing or comprehension? We find it is often both.
International Journal of Public Opinion Research@IJPOR_Journal
👏👏New paper "Do you prefer #Obamacare or the Affordable Care Act? Simulating an informed public to improve survey measurement" by @gabrielmiaoli and @jmping bit.ly/3WYwrR6
English

@apearlma @gelliottmorris That was the source of my best-ever NYT Quote: “If somebody’s not transparent you can generally assume they’re crap.”
English

@zeynep We have a repository of data here at Michigan, but may only be internally usable; happy to try to find a local collaborator if you want - can you share a little more info/send an email?
English

@NathanKalmoe @ntdPhD The marginal question is whether things change the probability of chaos if we had a perfect replication of the 2020 election scenario. To that Q, it seems the answer is the likelihood went down rather than up. Reps would need to win in 2024 rather than just pretend they did.
English

@NathanKalmoe @ntdPhD Yes, but the chance that we can avoid that madness is considerably higher today than we thought it would be yesterday. For madness to occur, Reps need to take the house more decisively than they are going to this cycle.
English

@ntdPhD At best, the election temporarily slowed the descent into madness.
English
Josh Pasek (Frozen Account) retweetledi
Josh Pasek (Frozen Account) retweetledi

@davekarpf @cmMcConnaughy I wasn’t implying that you *would* do it, just that you are one of the few who could
English

@dfreelon I’d be in - I could also host it here through the Michigan Institute for Data Science if desired
English








