
Joel
247 posts


@BrandNewPaul @CanadianPolling I’m not arguing policy here, uncomfortable as it is to admit policy is of far less importance than we care to admit in many elections. Perception of policy, vibes, and optics are just as crucial if not more in the modern political climate.
English

@joel40hands @CanadianPolling if you say so... but without being able to point at policy that has swung to the right, all you're left with is subjective observation
English

The question I keep asking is, "Who would replace him"
The CPC base won't go more centrist to appeal to voters, and going further right will just keep them in the pits so
BoredCanadianPolling@cadwaveanalysis
To be honest, I don’t think Pierre Poilievre survives 2026 as CPC leader. That’s just my feeling idk.
English

@BrandNewPaul @CanadianPolling Nonetheless a ‘dubious’ decade of Liberal governance is not cause to disregard millenniums of history in which populism has proven deficient. It’s clear the CPC is foundering, but the burden is on them to be the more compelling party.
English

@joel40hands @CanadianPolling After 11 years of decline, I find it tough to take any political advice the LPC has to offer when it comes to avoiding a doom loop
English

@JamalLloyd1986 @gator_gum Can’t be mocking people’s intellect with this level of literacy I’m afraid.
English

@gator_gum The canadian media and you liberal influencers have canada on lock! Canada will vote whatever way they are told. Since liberal are giving media money, media supports the libes. It will never change no mater how bad things get. Canadians are far to stupid.
English

@BrandNewPaul @CanadianPolling Absolutely, look at how his mannerisms, speech and even aesthetics have evolved to project the strongman right wing populist image.
There is a stark difference over the last number of years.
English

@joel40hands @CanadianPolling And has he really leaned into the contrarian populism? His tone has been this way for far longer than Trump has been in politics
English

@BrandNewPaul @CanadianPolling If the CPC doesn’t understand the importance of optics/perception that’s a strategic failing. The doom loop of populism is well established historically, to the point a feature of modern democratic institutions is reduced suspectibility to populist movements.
English

@joel40hands @CanadianPolling Perception can be wrong - especially when there is no link to policy
They may be more populist than Tories in the past... but is that really a bad thing? When did government stop being about the people?
English

@BrandNewPaul @CanadianPolling In terms of tone Pollievre has leaned pretty hard into the contrarian populism of our southern neighbor’s administration. They’ve also absorbed the PPC pretty much entirely which also shifted their base’s leanings as well. Policy is important but equally so is perception.
English

@BrandNewPaul @CanadianPolling By Canada standards it has absolutely drifted further right, this is just acknowledging the reality lol.
English

@CanadianPolling Only a Liberal would think the CPC is far right... what policy would you ascribe to far right?
English

@dinonuggetzz2 @CanadianPolling A lot of more centrist cons went liberal, and would prefer a CPC leader aligned with their own values.
English

@CanadianPolling Wait, why are so many Liberals trying to get Pierre out?
If he’s so incompetent and bad, wouldn’t you want him as the leader of your opposition party?
English

@Kinamuranyan1 @Osinttechnical There’s nuance here, more limited and targeted strikes against power infrastructure aren’t incredibly controversial but widespread ones definitely lean towards norm violating if not legally dubious.
English

@joel40hands @Osinttechnical It is war, there is no further escalation unless you mean dropping some suns. I am so sick of people claiming "escalation" when the kinetic conflict is in full swing.
English

@Kinamuranyan1 @Osinttechnical I guess people just view it as an escalation, in the 2003 invasion of Iraq the US didn’t deliberately strike any power infrastructure. Not unprecedented obviously as they did in 1991 but nonetheless it does seem like escalation
English

@Osinttechnical ....it is war. "Surrender under pressure" is the whole point. Have we over estimated their sub 80 IQ?
English


@LikeableLobster The Lobster is unaware of the Isfahan and Natanz catastrophes.
English

I don't think I had fully appreciated how this works, but it's obvious now. NASA is aiming for a point in space where they know the moon will be. Like throwing to a receiver, but on a somewhat larger and faster scale.
Lucid™@cammakingminds
If you are using the earth as a reference frame, the moon is actually doing a close flyby of Artemis II.
English

@youngwt @TheBrianMcManus Not all failures are equal; there may be a tolerance for more overall points of failure in exchange for less catastrophic ones.
English

@TheBrianMcManus Surely more mechanical switches would mean more points of failure? Though I do understand software has its own risks obviously
English

I would rather fly with mechanical switches and dials for the same reason I would never buy a piece of shit Tesla
Nathan Commissariat@CommiNathan
Just sayin’
English

@Esoteric_Though @Adolfers316 @AnalyticaCamil1 @InternetTalking Without a shadow of a doubt, it will require months to put together the invasion force but they will win. Casualties could be similar to first two invasion’s of Iraq or it could get nasty.
I dont think any sane person disagrees.
Unlikely at this point lol
English

No, we just understand that military performance is not always correlated to political objectives.
When someone says “Iran is going to kick our ass on the ground” I can reasonably say that is highly unlikely nor is there precedent for it.
Mention Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan - none of those lead me to believe our ground forces or joint forces especially would lose to anyone.
Might the democrats declare a loss, surrender to Iran, pay them billions of dollars, offer them a weekly happy ending and pull out regardless of military reality? Sure that can happen.
English

What universe are these people living in? How mind-raped by third worldist propaganda do you have to be to conclude the US is losing to Iran?
Analytica Camillus@AnalyticaCamil1
Oh my fucking God — our allies have correctly calculated that we’re going to lose (regardless of the assistance that anyone contributes), and they still want to be able to import oil from the Gulf states when the war is over. This is why you don’t engage in patently moronic wars.
English

@Adolfers316 @Esoteric_Though @AnalyticaCamil1 @InternetTalking Virtually impossible to engage with these types; They will intentionally misunderstand the very basis of war and its objectives and somehow think your political views are the reason for the dissonance.
English

@ChrisO_wiki @thomre @Noahpinion Crassus is a shitty comparison tho. Same thing with Caesar. The closest comparison is probably Sulla. Sulla had a similar ideology of returning to a mythologized past based on more vibes and feelings than fact. Even his temperament was quite Trumpian, and his grievance theatre.
English

@ChrisO_wiki @thomre @Noahpinion He wasn’t overly known for any great victories though, even his victory over Spartacus was held in lesser prestige because he was fighting slaves and not foreign powers. And Pompey managed to co-opt a lot of the lime light as well which is part of the reason for their long feud.
English

@HAnne01254673 @Billie327 @RapidResponse47 I hate it when the official White House account posts fake tweets!
English









