Joel Morgan

@CasiTrades Your at risk of getting chopped up here, this could go higher for the bear trap

🚨The Bounce Is Over on XRP. Now Watching for W3 Down 🚨 That ceasefire push over the last several hours sent XRP perfectly into the .618 retracement and finally gave us a clean W2. 📉It knocked out the one of the smaller subwave counts but the bigger structure hasn't changed. The REAL move hasn’t happened yet! I’m still expecting a W3 down toward ~$1.09, and this should accelerate fast! 🔥 #xrpnews #CryptoMarkets #CeasefireAgreement

@nichoxbt @grok help

$BTC If you know you know...

@UFOwitness2017 @SomeSirGuyDude @Mr_BenPrime Because the lady didn’t give him a date! Just the alignment

@SomeSirGuyDude @Mr_BenPrime Why do you need an astrologist when astral lady tells you whats good anyway?

Apparently you can just "push back" celestial alignments to a date that suits better.

@UAPLuigi @MSten80120 @chrisbledsoeufo @ufoofgod Read what you have actually circled and reflect on your own comment. The lady did not tell him Easter, she told him about the alignment. The lab that run the alignment originally said Easter but they corrected it months ago, Chris pushed it back based on their bad data months ago

He wrote a book and gave the day Easter 2026 after being told this by ““ the lady for 14 years; however now as the day has approached he changes the date? You understand how bad this looks and hurts the Bledsoe’s credibility and anyone associated with them? He stated the lady TOLD HIM EASTER 2026 and now it’s “NASA had it wrong” — so was he told by the lady or was he told by NASA bc now your colt starting to make a lot of mistakes

🧃Chris Bledsoe is a liar, a grifter and a charlatan 🤥 Until recently he has been repeating since 2012 “THE LADY TOLD ME EASTER 2026” - that is today brother. “Easter 2026. Date of Easter 2026”. - Bledsoe @chrisbledsoeufo @ufoofgod His own book states Easter 2026, his YouTube transcripts state today April 5, 2026. Please people I beg you all to wake up from the Bledsoe Cult (#UFO #UAP #UFOTwitter)

@SunWeatherMan He said this months ago, not on Easter Sunday!

Because of course it’s pushed back.

@planethunter56 October 7th!! He was given bad data the first time around, the lab re-ran the calculations. He’s been saying October for months

Alright, it’s showtime folks. 🧝‍♀️

@PatrickQJackson @Rick_Buggy @MCsquizie @DrBeaVillarroel 😂 I’m still only a third of the way through

@joeleballs @Rick_Buggy @MCsquizie @DrBeaVillarroel if you have my book there is entire chapter on it.. LOL

So i figured out what type of light i need to use to attract and trigger the sphere network in the sky above.. Here is a video of them swarming. Also keep an eye out for the moving V formations in perfect trilateration. #transients #thespherenetwork @DrBeaVillarroel #uaptwitter #ufotwitter #uap

@Rick_Buggy @MCsquizie @PatrickQJackson @DrBeaVillarroel It’s because he wants to try to make money off it, or write a book about it. Sorry Patrick I was a fan but your book is going in the bin tomorrow

@MCsquizie @PatrickQJackson @DrBeaVillarroel I find it odd that Patrick doesn't say specifically what type of light/laser is used? Does Dr. Beatrice know?

@PatrickQJackson @KaliforniaNati2 @DrBeaVillarroel To keep it all for yourself instead of allowing others to explore the phenomenon? Wreaks of money making to me…

@KaliforniaNati2 @DrBeaVillarroel Costs me a lot of time and money to work this stuff out..

@brandilwells It was originally Easter, but he got some help to check the astronomical calculations and it came back as October 7th. This isn’t a recent development, he’s being saying October now for at least 2 months

We shifted timelines. This video was posted on TikTok on 3/18. In it, Chris Bledsoe says the star of regulus will be over the sphinx on October 7, 2026. For the past couple of weeks he’s been on every podcast saying April 5, 2026. WTF happened?!

@PatrickQJackson @DrBeaVillarroel I’m a fan, but are you going to tell us all so we can try it?? 🙌🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🙏

@CCPool_Daniel are you short in BTC yet ? 👀🙏

Want to hold several different longs or shorts on the same pair? Bitunix just added a brand new feature ‘multi trade mode’, so instead of having to compound you can hold many different trades on the same pair! EPIC bitunix.com/activity/basic… < link for $20,000 giveaway signup 💚💸

@CCPool_Daniel In terms of your short zone for BTC have we been front run (off previous ATH) or are you still expecting higher?

I called where I would Long weeks in advance. Followed my plan and bought EVERYTHING (Stocks, Gold, Bitcoin) while everyone was Bearish. Today I’m already up several millions of dollars. All my plan and levels were shared in advance. Never miss a Champions update 💚🎁

@ChentoTrades Everyone is expecting a Wednesday dump today - so we pump 🚀

75.3% probability of going up today $btc Sorry bad quality picture, flying

@Rektlife_ @joao_wedson Cool what indicator is that??

@joao_wedson U sure?

⚠️Whale vs Retail Delta shows that whales are increasingly positioning in shorts, while retail is doing the opposite. Retail is chasing an infinite upside, while whales are becoming more cautious about Bitcoin.

@ChentoTrades TPs all done ?

$btc good update

@AlchemyAmerican Waiting for @EricRWeinstein to weigh in on this … I’ll get the popcorn sir 🙌🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🍿

🚨BREAKING: NASA's Lead Electrostatics Scientist claims he’s discovered a “new force” that counteracts gravity with no fuel necessary. Dr. Charles Buhler has run 2,000 vacuum chamber experiments showing a propellantless thrust force that persists after the power is switched off, and cannot be explained by ion wind, magnetic effects, or classical energy conservation. The input is pure electricity and the output is millinewtons of thrust counteracting gravity. He believes his work vindicates the legacy of midcentury antigravity pioneer Thomas Townsend Brown and will lead to a new paradigm of propellantless deep space travel that transcends chemical combustion rockets🚨 Charles Buhler has a PhD in condensed matter physics from Florida State University, spent over two decades at NASA's Electrostatics and Surface Physics Laboratory at Kennedy Space Center (which he now leads), and is the incoming president of the Electrostatic Society of America. He is NASA’s authority on electrostatics. His colleague Andrew Aurigema, a 35-year veteran engineer working from the Townsend Brown electrogravitics lineage, developed a parallel version of the same experiment independently, and the two discovered each other through a mutual colleague who had been watching both of them work in silence for years. Together, under their company Exodus Propulsion Technologies, they have tested nearly 2,000 variations of what they believe is a previously undocumented force. He’s also developed a quantum electrodynamics based theory to explain his results. Buhler’s patent is now under formal examination by the U.S. Patent Office with affidavit-signing witnesses being contacted independently. This is the future of space travel, beyond chemical combustion. With Rocketry, we can only get to Proxima Centauri B in 80,000 years. And you’d burn through the fuel well before that. It’s completely untenable for interstellar travel. 1. Buhler’s Skeptic Mentor Stopped Cold in 2010 The first demonstration happened in a non-vacuum lab using a laser aimed at a wall to detect small displacements. Buhler had his future brother-in-law run the test. His mentor, Dr. Sid Clements, an electrostatics expert who had dismissed the work entirely, watched the laser move and immediately abandoned what he was doing. He walked over, ran through a series of verification steps on the spot, and never questioned the reality of the effect again. That was 2010. It took two more years working with Drew before Buhler realized the force appeared even without any B field or current present. He wasn't in the field momentum regime at all. He was in pure electrostatics. 2. The Force is Not Explainable by Newton’s Laws or Ion Wind Ion wind produces thrust in the same direction the ionized air is traveling. The “Exodus force” (Buhler’s name for his new force) produces thrust perpendicular to the expected ion wind direction, reverses cleanly when the device is flipped, and remains present inside a sealed enclosure where no ionized air can escape. Buhler documented this publicly with video: a balsa lifter placed inside a sealed plastic box on a scale, powered up, lifts internally while the scale reads flat. That is conservation of momentum. That is what ion wind looks like. The Exodus force is something different, and Buhler, as the person who leads NASA's only electrostatics lab, is in an unambiguous position to make that distinction. 3. 2,000 Variations, All Producing the Same Result Since beginning collaboration with Drew, Buhler has tracked nearly 2,000 distinct test articles, each tested multiple times. Pendulums. Spinners. Rotators. Force plates. Scales. Pendulum deflections inside Faraday cages. Reversed polarity tests. Vacuum chamber runs at multiple pressure levels. DC-only configurations that eliminate magnetic field artifacts entirely. Every geometry, every material, every packaging approach. The force appears consistently. When a confounding variable is proposed, they address it, run the modified test, and the force is still there. Buhler says if an exotic explanation remains, it is not one he or any colleague has been able to name. 4. The Device Generates Thrust With the Power Off This is the finding that breaks the classical framework entirely. After charging the device and disconnecting it from the power supply, the thrust continues. The capacitor does not drain in the way a simple energy storage calculation would predict. Put on a scale, the weight reduction persists. Buhler's description: if placed in space with the power off, the device would accelerate. He cannot explain that to the scientific community and says so directly. David Chester, who has independently interacted with Drew through APEC sessions and private communications, said he cannot think of a prosaic explanation for this. The phenomenon has been reproduced enough times across enough configurations that calling it experimental error is no longer a defensible position. 5. The Implications of This for Past Antigravity Work Buhler believes his work is derivative of and related to Townsend Brown’s midcentury asymmetric capacitor experiments also showing thrust with pure electricity as the input. Chemical combustion is limited - plain and simple - we can’t get to the nearest habitable planet (Proxima Centauri B) in close the amount of time we’d need; it would take us 80,000 years and we’d burn through the fuel before we got there. It’s a checkmate in one argument against anyone claiming rockets are the frontier of efficiency. This was the dream of Thomas Townsend Brown – one that got stifled and suppressed behind the veil of secrecy and subcompartments. The common trope from experiments around the world are high electric field differentials seem to result in thrust. Buhler’s experiment exists in this lineage. 6. The Patent Office is Running the Peer Review Buhler made a deliberate choice not to pursue academic peer review as a primary path. His second patent is currently under examination, and the examiner's office has been reaching out to independent witnesses who have signed affidavits confirming they have seen and reproduced the effect. Buhler describes this as equivalent to scientific peer review, run by people with no financial interest in the outcome. His first patent may have been held under a national security review process before release. He does not confirm this, but he was aware it was a risk when he filed. 7. A QED Theorist Could Poke Holes in the Theory, But Not the Experiment We brought in UCLA PhD David Chester to evaluate Buhler’s ideas on quantum electrodynamics (which might account for the thrust being seen). David Chester's contribution was not to validate the theory Buhler proposed. He found some issues with the specific scalar virtual photon framing Buhler had developed. What Chester could not do was provide a prosaic explanation for the experimental results themselves. He said directly that, of all the anomalous phenomena he has surveyed, Buhler and Drew's work ranks in the top ten for experimental persuasiveness, specifically because of the iteration rate and the self-consistency across configurations. He noted that Drew's innovation rate alone, constantly testing new geometries and material stacks, is unlike anything he has seen from other groups making similar claims. Buhler pointed out that his theories were based on time-independent perturbation theory which Chester admits requires further examination from him. 8. NASA's UAP Investigation Had No Physicists Buhler and his wife, an engineer in NASA's Launch Services Program, were approached to assist with NASA's second UAP follow-on investigation. When Buhler asked to be placed with the physicists on the project, he was told there were none. The group was instrumentation-focused. Buhler says he was genuinely shocked. His reaction, expressed directly: if you are facing objects that defy the laws of physics, why is there not a single physicist in the room. He described the same reaction Eric Davis has expressed publicly. This is either institutional brain death or something else is happening somewhere else. 9. Six Lights Emerged from the Ocean Near Patrick Air Force Base Around 2013, Buhler and his wife were alone on the beach near Cocoa Beach, Florida, three miles south of Patrick Air Force Base. A red light appeared roughly three miles offshore, grew extremely bright, then appeared to explode, lighting the full length of beach. A helicopter launched from Patrick Air Force Base, flew to the location, hovered briefly, and returned to base without intervening. The light did not stop. It began moving toward them. At some point it split from one light into six rotating orange-pink lights that went under the water and re-emerged in a repeating cycle. The lights tracked their movement along the beach for forty minutes, closing to within roughly fifty yards before disappearing. Buhler says similar lights have been reported by others in the same area, and Stephen Greer runs group observation sessions approximately forty minutes south of the same beach. 10. The Force Crosses the Unity Threshold for Space Already The current demonstrated force is in the five to ten millinewton range. For Earth launch, that is not yet sufficient, and Buhler does not claim otherwise. For orbital station-keeping, for preventing satellite orbital decay, for repositioning between orbits in microgravity, the force exceeds what is needed. Buhler calls this hitting unity for space, moon, and Mars applications without any major development beyond what has already been demonstrated. The self-launcher, a device capable of lifting itself from Earth's surface, is the declared goal. No blueprints exist yet for the energy requirements. But the force is real, it is directional, it reverses on command, and it does not require continuous power to sustain. Why This Matters NASA's lead electrostatics scientist ran nearly 2,000 controlled experiments, eliminated every prosaic explanation the field has available, documented a thrust that persists after the power is cut, watched the fine structure constant emerge from the data repeatedly, and submitted a second patent currently under formal examination. A QED theorist with no commercial stake in the outcome reviewed the experimental claims and could not find a conventional explanation. The standard debunking line for this entire lineage of experiments has always been ion wind. That argument has been answered, documented, and filmed. What remains is a force that requires either new physics or an error that two decades of systematic testing has not been able to locate. The patent process will resolve part of this. The vacuum chamber footage will resolve more of it. Full conversation is live now. The next stage in human space travel is here.

@SeverinJutte @CCPool_Daniel Did you get stopped out with the CME dip since you de-risked your position over the weekend?

Congratulations to everyone following my live stream on YouTube yesterday 💸 Walked you exactly through how I am entering this $BTC Long. I am now de-risking this position. One thing to keep in mind for Monday is a weak stock market close. #CCPool #trading #crypto @ChartChampions @CCPool_Daniel

@Coins_Kid That is also the range value area high

There is a hot spot of liquidty above on the #xrp 2 week #heatmap 👀

@SeverinJutte Dr-risk as in move stop loss to entry or take partial profit ?