John Duff

9.2K posts

John Duff

John Duff

@johnduff_web

Katılım Mayıs 2016
238 Takip Edilen67 Takipçiler
Lico零号機🇯🇵
中国人さん🇨🇳 高圧塔の下で放尿したところ感電してしまう
日本語
1.7K
1.2K
8K
1.8M
Guru Ben
Guru Ben@gringo504·
@RasmusJarlov @Bgrew11 We're about to. I'm excited for it. We've slaves for you all for 80 years. Time for Europe to be adults
English
14
0
4
833
Rasmus Jarlov
Rasmus Jarlov@RasmusJarlov·
Nobody in Europe cares any longer what he says. It was a big mistake to agree to the ridiculously unfair trade deal that he demanded last year. Since then Europe has learned that the unreasonable demands just keep coming and never stop. So we just ignore it or say no, and he is not going to do anything about it. He is an old man yelling at clouds, and we dont care.
Savchenko Volodymyr@SavchenkoReview

🇺🇸🇪🇺❗️Der Spiegel: Trump has effectively given Europe an ultimatum: within days, they must commit actual military forces—like warships—to the Strait of Hormuz.

English
464
1.3K
8.5K
348.2K
John Duff
John Duff@johnduff_web·
@iamlouay Quel niveau de stupidité alors qu'elle se prétend 'journaliste'.
Français
0
0
17
616
Ryo
Ryo@iamlouay·
🔵⚪🔴 Sur LCI, le général Yakovleff recadre les choses face à Noémie Halioua. Le général rappelle que si l'Iran rançonne les navires aujourd'hui, c'est parce que Trump a initié cette guerre. L'Iran ne faisait pas payer de droits avant la guerre américaine. Il ajoute que les Européens devraient présenter la facture à Trump ! De son côté, Noémie s'indigne qu'on excuse les preneurs d'otages iraniens. Mais Téhéran a juste compris qu'étrangler le commerce mondial était le racket parfait, offert sur un plateau en or par Donald Trump ! #LCI #Trump #Iran #IranWar #Ormuz #Yakovleff
Français
92
384
1.5K
69.8K
Patrick Edery
Patrick Edery@patrick_edery·
Une pensée pour les «experts🇫🇷», du mainstream comme de la «dissidence», qui ont cru CNN & les mollahs affirmant que #Trump avait accepté les conditions iraniennes; et qu’il s’agissait donc d’une défaite totale. Cela en dit long sur leurs capacités d’analyse et surtout leurs facultés cognitives...
Français
53
49
197
8.8K
John Duff
John Duff@johnduff_web·
@RodDMartin It’s all just for show, if the "invincible" US fleet can’t manage the Strait of Hormuz, a few European ships aren’t going to make any difference other than serving as scapegoats for Trump if things go wrong.
English
0
0
0
8
John Duff
John Duff@johnduff_web·
@TrumpFrance Il a manifestement déjà obtenu ta bouche et ton cul.
Français
0
0
6
51
John Duff
John Duff@johnduff_web·
@mehdirhasan @TheOmniLiberal I used to always be on your side, but you’ve really let me down on this and you’re just going from bad to worse.
GIF
English
1
0
1
57
Mehdi Hasan
Mehdi Hasan@mehdirhasan·
@TheOmniLiberal Are you seriously suggesting Zelensky hasn’t been tacitly supporting this illegal war against Iran, since the start? Because this is what he said when the war began:
Mehdi Hasan tweet media
English
114
33
815
26.1K
Destiny | Steven Bonnell II
Destiny | Steven Bonnell II@TheOmniLiberal·
Where is Zelensky supporting illegal attacks on Iran in his original tweet????????? He's literally just imploring the UN to do something about the closure of straits that are having massively negative impacts on markets across the world.
Mehdi Hasan@mehdirhasan

@TheOmniLiberal I give a fuck about it so you’re just lying about that. That’s why I am so disappointed to see Zelenskyy who faced down an illegal attack on his country supporting an illegal attack on another country. Sorry for wanting consistency.

English
52
161
4.1K
139.6K
John Duff
John Duff@johnduff_web·
@neoavatara If the US Navy can’t do anything and is staying away from the Strait of Hormuz, what can the Europeans do apart from acting as cannon fodder? Trump doesn’t need a few European ships; what he wants are scapegoats in case things go wrong.
English
0
0
0
15
Pradheep J. Shanker, M.D.
I'm totally on Trump's side in this. I agree Trump behaved poorly. But either you are allies or you aren't. The strait is a common issue for everyone, and having Europe step up is totally reasonable.
Michael Weiss@michaeldweiss

.@derspiegel: "The US is increasing pressure on its European partners to commit military forces in the Strait of Hormuz. According to information obtained by SPIEGEL, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has informed European capitals that US President Donald Trump expects concrete commitments within the next few days for the deployment of warships or other military capabilities from Europe. Political pledges, such as those made in the days since the start of the war, are no longer sufficient." tickaroo.com/e/GBgQUSZnrHEI…

English
606
12
114
51K
BooksandTrees
BooksandTrees@maximusic320·
@michaeldweiss @derspiegel I honestly don’t understand how this is a point of contention for europeans. I’m german and we are totally reliant on oil and gas coming through the strait. Yet we sit back and let someone else do the heavy lifting. Idiotic.
English
33
1
6
1.6K
Michael Weiss
Michael Weiss@michaeldweiss·
.@derspiegel: "The US is increasing pressure on its European partners to commit military forces in the Strait of Hormuz. According to information obtained by SPIEGEL, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has informed European capitals that US President Donald Trump expects concrete commitments within the next few days for the deployment of warships or other military capabilities from Europe. Political pledges, such as those made in the days since the start of the war, are no longer sufficient." tickaroo.com/e/GBgQUSZnrHEI…
English
112
134
310
103.2K
John Duff
John Duff@johnduff_web·
@fthegurus @WarMonitor3 The US Navy doesn’t need the help of a few European ships. What Trump wants are scapegoats in case things go wrong.
English
0
0
0
6
Fthegurus
Fthegurus@fthegurus·
@WarMonitor3 I don’t understand why Europeans are so reluctant to just send 2 fucking ships to the strait and keep Trump happy. Because they are risking the US leaving NATO and we all know Europe alone against Russia isn’t looking good. I am saying this as someone that lives in Europe.
English
473
4
91
41.7K
WarMonitor🇺🇦🇬🇧
BREAKING: Trump has set a deadline for European countries to militarily open the strait of Hormuz.
English
1.6K
664
7.6K
751.6K
Isaac
Isaac@isaacrrr7·
🇺🇸🇪🇺 ÚLTIMA HORA: Donald Trump evalúa trasladar tropas de Italia, Francia, España y Alemania hacia Rumanía, Polonia, Lituania y Grecia porque considera que los primeros no apoyaron lo suficiente el esfuerzo militar de EE.UU. en la guerra con Irán. - WSJ
Español
2K
5.3K
24.3K
805.2K
John Duff
John Duff@johnduff_web·
Gandalv@Microinteracti1

Let me explain something to the MAGA crowd, because clearly someone needs to. They seem to think NATO is cosmic room service. You pick up the phone, say “hello, we’re having a bit of a war here,” and thirty-one countries march to your rescue. A continental Uber for military adventures. That is not how it works. Article 5 is a mutual defense clause. The clue is in the word mutual. And it has been triggered exactly once in NATO’s entire history. After September 11. When America was attacked. Not Europe. America. Every NATO member showed up. They went to Afghanistan. They fought. They bled. They died. In America’s war. On America’s behalf. Now imagine they hadn’t. Over 1,100 allied soldiers died in Afghanistan. British, Canadian, German, Danish, Polish. And yes, even Ukrainian soldiers, who had no NATO obligation whatsoever. Gone. Without them, those are American names on those graves. Sons from Ohio. Fathers from Georgia. Kids from Nebraska who never came home. Then there is the money. NATO allies spent over 100 billion dollars on a war that started on American soil. Without that, Washington pays every cent. On top of the 2 to 3 trillion the war already cost. And without allied bases across Europe and Central Asia, American supply lines collapse entirely. Without British forces in Helmand and Canadians in Kandahar, the Taliban reconstitutes in three years instead of ten. The gaps get filled one way. More American deployments. More American coffins arriving at Dover. Afghanistan was bloody. But NATO took the hit. Without them, every single one of those casualties would have had an American name. Trump called allies like these losers. Suckers. If you are a certain kind of broken person, that probably makes sense to you. But for the rest of us, what those soldiers did has a different name. Honor. The bond between men who have been in the same dirt, under the same fire. Between Brits and Americans, Frenchmen and Norwegians, Canadians and Danes. Not a diplomatic relationship. A blood bond. Brotherhood forged in places most people will never see and cannot imagine. In that culture, you do not mock a fallen ally. You do not sneer at the dead. It is the lowest thing a human being can do. Trump did it to a standing ovation. If you are a MAGA supporter travelling to NATO countries, understand this. There are no friendly pats on the back waiting for you. No one will buy you a beer. The governments who share your worldview sit in Minsk, Moscow and Pyongyang. Brutal dictatorships where journalists disappear, elections are theatre and dissent is a medical condition treated in basements. Not London. Not Paris. Not Rome, Stockholm, Copenhagen, Berlin or Ottawa. You have abandoned the open societies, the free press, the rule of law, the places where people actually want to live. You traded the best of civilization for a very small, very dark room. Frankly, it serves you right.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ Gandalv / @Microinteracti1

0
0
0
1
The White House
The White House@WhiteHouse·
“NATO WASN’T THERE WHEN WE NEEDED THEM, AND THEY WON’T BE THERE IF WE NEED THEM AGAIN. REMEMBER GREENLAND, THAT BIG, POORLY RUN, PIECE OF ICE!!!” - President Donald J. Trump
The White House tweet media
English
14.8K
11K
59.4K
5.8M
John Duff
John Duff@johnduff_web·
@mehdirhasan Everyone makes mistakes, and there’s no shame in realising it and apologising.
GIF
English
0
0
0
2
Mehdi Hasan
Mehdi Hasan@mehdirhasan·
For all the haters in the replies, making dumb, dishonest or inane comparisons & putting words in my mouth, it is a simple fact that Russia's attack on Ukraine was illegal & the US & Israel's attack on Iran was illegal & so both Ukraine & Iran are the victims.
English
763
140
2.8K
339.7K
Mehdi Hasan
Mehdi Hasan@mehdirhasan·
It's astonishing that you, a world leader who many respected for standing up to an illegal attack on your country, now support an illegal attack on another country. It completely kills your credibility. Right now. Iran is Ukraine. You may not like to hear that but that is a fact
Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський@ZelenskyyUa

It is unfortunate that the UN Security Council has once again failed to demonstrate effectiveness and act decisively in the face of such a global threat as the Iranian regime's blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. No one should be allowed to block such globally significant sea lanes or undermine the security of dozens of nations through terrorist attacks against the freedom of navigation. We faced a similar challenge in the Black Sea when the Russians attempted to block our ports and civilian shipping—Russia was trying to suffocate our economy. And we found a way to solve that problem through decisive action, not inaction. Now, we see a similar problem on a global scale. The Strait of Hormuz must remain open to all vessels that sustain vital economy lifelines and maintain normal international trade. Countries in the region have spoken clearly on this, and we support the aspirations of the people of the Middle East and the Gulf for peace. Peace and security in this region directly impact stability, market predictability, and the cost of living in every single country. Such problems and this war must not be prolonged. The world needs a functional UNSC that acts more decisively to resolve acute security challenges of global magnitude.

English
4.4K
4.6K
33.8K
4.5M
DannyKPolitics
DannyKPolitics@DannyKPolitics·
@ThomasVLinge Yeah, why doesn’t Russia accept NATO encirclement? It’s not like NATO is actually a threat to Russia. Not at all!
English
11
0
7
1.3K
Philippe Fabry
Philippe Fabry@Historionome·
@jon_delorraine Ben déjà c'est juste un cessez-le-feu, donc parler de victoire ou de défaite est prématuré.
Français
3
1
33
893
Jon De Lorraine
Jon De Lorraine@jon_delorraine·
🔴🇺🇸🇮🇷 DÉBAT ⚔️ Suite au cessez-le-feu entre les Etats Unis et l'Iran : Selon vous, est-ce une victoire ou une défaite pour Donald Trump ?
Jon De Lorraine tweet mediaJon De Lorraine tweet media
Français
435
32
136
21.5K
Patrick Edery
Patrick Edery@patrick_edery·
Soyons factuels : 🇮🇷 Le régime des mollahs exigeait, comme préalable à l’ouverture du détroit d’Ormuz, l’acceptation de 10 conditions. Le détroit a été rouvert sans qu’aucune de ces exigences ne soit satisfaite. 🇺🇸 Les États-Unis conditionnaient toute négociation à cette réouverture. Ils l’ont obtenue. Américains et Iraniens avancent désormais chacun des listes de conditions qu’ils acceptent de discuter, mais qui apparaissent, à ce stade, largement incompatibles. Trois scénarios se dessinent: un renoncement partiel de l’un ou des 2 acteurs, une reprise des hostilités, ou un statu quo prolongé. Dans tous les cas, le régime iranien sort durablement affaibli, exposé à des frappes ponctuelles d’Israël ou des États-Unis, ce qui limitera structurellement sa capacité à se reconstituer.
GIF
Français
38
18
54
6K
Philippe Fabry
Philippe Fabry@Historionome·
@OuranosMK Non mais avant de parler de victoire de qui que ce soit encore faut-il que la guerre soit finie. On a un cessez-le-feu fragile prévu pour quinze jours.
Français
9
1
48
2.2K
Vautrin
Vautrin@OuranosMK·
Il y a énormément de commentaires sur l’accord ; la situation est sûrement plus nuancée que ce qu’ils disent, mais même si l’Iran a pris cher, il est difficile de considérer qu’il s’agit d’une victoire pour Trump. Je pense qu’il avait, de façon quasi certaine, sous-estimé le bourbier, et l’on sentait, dans sa communication récente, qu’il souhaitait en finir. Il ne faut pas oublier que la guerre est totalement asymétrique : Trump est sous pression de Wall Street, des médias, des prix à la pompe, etc. Les mollahs, eux, peuvent jouer les martyrs et parasiter la région avec des conséquences sur l'économie mondiale. Il voulait une opération rapide, comme au Venezuela ; il s’est rendu compte que cela ne fonctionnerait jamais et cherche désormais à sauver la face. In fine, le bilan reste négatif, et la communication de la Maison-Blanche, digne de la Corée du Nord, me conforte dans cette analyse.
Philippe Fabry@Historionome

Si j'écoute BFM TV Trump a perdu la guerre et c'est terminé tout ça pour ça. Si je regarde le X français on est sur le même registre. Sur le détail tout est flou et je lis surtout des interprétations non vérifiées. Les seuls faits qui m'apparaissent certains à ce stade : - il y a un cessez-le-feu de quinze jours - il doit y avoir une réouverture de la circulation dans le détroit - les négociations sont désormais assumées par le leadership iranien C'est tout. Le détail des conditions n'est pas connu plus précisément, et on entend beaucoup de fantasmes. Je ferai une émission ce soir pour envisager diverses hypothèses, mais il n'y a pas de quoi s'exciter.

Français
14
9
88
11.4K
Philippe Fabry
Philippe Fabry@Historionome·
Si j'écoute BFM TV Trump a perdu la guerre et c'est terminé tout ça pour ça. Si je regarde le X français on est sur le même registre. Sur le détail tout est flou et je lis surtout des interprétations non vérifiées. Les seuls faits qui m'apparaissent certains à ce stade : - il y a un cessez-le-feu de quinze jours - il doit y avoir une réouverture de la circulation dans le détroit - les négociations sont désormais assumées par le leadership iranien C'est tout. Le détail des conditions n'est pas connu plus précisément, et on entend beaucoup de fantasmes. Je ferai une émission ce soir pour envisager diverses hypothèses, mais il n'y a pas de quoi s'exciter.
Français
61
24
226
24.1K
Daniel Foubert 🇵🇱🇫🇷
The Iranian regime spent 47 years chanting "Death to America." It took Donald Trump one night to do the job. This is America's Suez. In 1956, Britain threatened Egypt, drew a hard line, and then folded under American pressure — retreating from a canal it had controlled for decades. The world didn't need a formal announcement to understand what had happened. The retreat itself was the announcement. Britain never recovered its imperial credibility. Within a generation, the empire was gone. Tonight, the United States threatened to erase a civilization if Iran didn't open the Strait freely. Ninety minutes before the deadline, it agreed to let Iran run the Strait — on Iran's terms, at Iran's price, in China's currency — and called it a victory. "For a period of two weeks, safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz will be possible via coordination with Iran's Armed Forces and with due consideration of technical limitations." That sentence, published by Tehran, is the tombstone. The US didn't contest it. The US didn't rebut it. The US went to bed. For 35 years, American military dominance in the Gulf rested on a single credible proposition: that no regional power could close the Strait without facing overwhelming consequences. That proposition is now gone. Iran closed it for 39 days, extracted a ceasefire on its own terms, institutionalized a toll system denominated in yuan, claimed sovereign authority over an international waterway, and watched the world's superpower declare victory on social media. Every adversary on earth watched tonight. Every ally did too.
Daniel Foubert 🇵🇱🇫🇷 tweet media
English
48
226
874
83.9K