John Fitzpatrick

@Alinavisoo_life yes

🚨BREAKING: Elon Musk says UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer "is guilty of terrible crimes against the British people." Do you agree with Elon? YES or NO?

@0IvankaTrumpRV2 yes

Do you think he will make a good king?

@LizaRosen0000 what a nasty little man

t.co/SWAYW6ANBl London’s Muslim mayor, Sadiq Khan, insists that all criticism against him is nothing more than “Islamophobia” and “Pakistanophobia.” As you can see in the video, he explicitly claims: “People attack me because I am Muslim and Pakistani.” No, Sadiq—people criticize you because of your disastrous leadership, skyrocketing crime rates, and your repeated defense of extremists. What’s your response to his pathetic victim card? x.com/Suffragent_/st…

@GSGB01 @mike_coppin he will have to be dragged out screaming

🚨BREAKING: Leaders of every single political party are now calling for the resignation of Keir Starmer following his blatant lies over Peter Mandelson. Starmer is finished.

@Neccccy hopefully very few

How many HOURS do you think Starmer the liar has got left?

@Maryambutt56_ 42

Only For Genius 🧐🧠 Guess the right Answer 🤔🤔

@Artemisfornow of course, not, which politician would?

💣 The question we’re all asking ourselves this morning is? “Will he do the decent thing and resign”

@Nova_adams2210 100

What comes next ??? Let's go and solve it

@Neccccy A slap on the wrist

What do you think the verdict will be on the Manchester airport thugs? 1. Guilty 2. Innocent 3. Retrial again 4. Something else made up

@MAGANEWS_X A

@0IvankaTrumpRV2 no, muslims should be removed from schools to respect the Christians

SHOULD PORK BE REMOVED FROM SCHOOL CAFETARIAS OUT OF RESPECT FOR MUSLIMS? A. YES B. No

@Liza_6610 22

How many people are still in the room?

@ToonDazza tell him to go back to the desert

.......buy more dogs.

@JessicaArt74033 light

What is that?

@Axel0__ Tent trait trust twist

No word starts with"T"and ends with"T" ?

@boot15_vu No

Is there a bigger CUNT on the planet?

@MAGANEWS_X A

@TrumpsHurricane go home

A Islamic Muslim man cries because an American ate a bacon sandwich outside a mosque in Florida. What advice would you give him ??

@davidwebb1961 @AllForProgress_ Sweet F A

@AllForProgress_ And what did the Prime Minister do?

On Saturday morning, a woman in her twenties was raped outside Epsom Methodist Church on Ashley Road. She had left a nightclub; she was followed by a group of men; the attack took place between two and four in the morning, in the heart of a market town in Surrey that most of the country thinks of, if it thinks of it at all, as somewhere you go to see the horses run. The residents of Epsom have asked Surrey Police reasonable questions. "Who are the suspects? What do they look like? Is there CCTV?" Surrey Police has declined to answer. They have said they do not have "sufficient information" to release descriptions. They have urged the public "not to speculate," because speculation "may lead to additional tensions within local communities." Translated from the institutional dialect, this means: we know what you are likely to conclude from the descriptions, and we would rather you didn't. On Tuesday evening, hundreds of residents gathered in the town centre to ask the question again. The police response was to deploy public order units, riot shields, and helmets against people standing on the pavement of their own high street demanding to know what the men who raped a woman six doors down from them actually look like. The local Lib Dem MP - who represents these people and the town - told the protesters to "take it elsewhere." "Take it elsewhere." This is the settled posture of the modern British state toward its own citizens. When a town asks for the most basic information about a violent sexual offence committed on its streets - information that, thirty years ago, would have been on the front of every regional paper within hours - it is met first with bureaucratic evasion, then with riot police, then with a sitting member of parliament telling them to do one. Epsom is not an unruly place. It is not a place with a history of disorder. It is a comfortable commuter town in Surrey whose residents have been told, in the space of seventy-two hours, that the police will not tell them who is hunting women on their streets, that asking about it constitutes a threat to community cohesion, and that if they persist in asking they will be treated as a public order problem. There is a specific and ugly contempt encoded in this response. It is the contempt of an administrative class that has decided the British public cannot be trusted with the truth about anything happening to it, and that the job of the state is no longer to solve the crime but to manage the reaction to it, forcibly. The people of Epsom have not misbehaved. They have done the thing that citizens of a serious country are supposed to do when something terrible happens where they live: they have turned up and asked questions. And the answer they have received, delivered in riot gear, is that their questions are the problem.

@AllForProgress_ and more flood into our once great country every day unhindered, thanks to Starmer and his lefties who see them all as potential future Labour voters.