Johnny Rock

@semitic_jew People rewrite history all the time, it’s mostly agreed upon lies. And people argue about what happened only a few days ago.

People keep trying to rewrite history, but the documents are public. The Confederacy officially consisted of 11 states that seceded from the Union: • South Carolina • Mississippi • Florida • Alabama • Georgia • Louisiana • Texas • Virginia • Arkansas • North Carolina • Tennessee The Confederacy also CLAIMED Kentucky and Missouri. West Virginia broke away from Virginia during the Civil War because many people in the western counties opposed Virginia’s decision to secede from the Union in 1861. And let’s be very clear: many of these states plainly stated WHY they were leaving the Union. Mississippi said: “Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery...” Texas defended “the servitude of the African race.” Georgia, South Carolina, and others complained about abolitionists, Black freedom, and threats to slavery. This wasn’t hidden. It wasn’t subtle. It was written down in their own declarations. The Civil War never ended. And many of these same states later: • created Black Codes • enforced Jim Crow • fought school integration • resisted the Voting Rights Act • used terror, media, politics, and violence to suppress Black political power History leaves patterns. That’s why studying history matters — because some of the same states still struggle with the same racial tensions and political battles today. Read the documents for yourself. Don’t let people sanitize history to make themselves comfortable. CarthanEnterprises.com

@JamesTate121 Actually the middle class props up both the rich and poor. Either have to do much to get middle class money.

All day long.

@_OKJ__ All of us are very easy to program and control one way or another. We are all stuck in the same prison. 🤷‍♂️

Yesterday I posted a fictional dialogue that culminated in a dilemma for Christianity. Ironically, most of the Christian responses only convinced me that the argument is even stronger and more difficult to escape than I originally thought. In simple terms, the dilemma is this….either people who never heard of Jesus, Christianity, or the Gospel can still make Heaven, or they are condemned to Hell purely because of ignorance of something they never had access to or heard about. Think about the billions of people throughout history who never even had the opportunity to hear of Christianity before and AFTER Jesus …Native Americans before European contact, isolated tribes in the Amazon or Sentinel Island, ancient Chinese dynasties, precolonial Africans, Indigenous Australians…..entire civilizations that lived and died before the Gospel ever reached them. Even today, there are still remote groups all over the world who have never encountered Christianity or the gospel. If such people can still be saved without knowledge of Jesus or the Gospel, then Christianity as religion and Christian evangelism becomes irrelevant and unecessary for salvation BY DEFINITION. At that point, salvation depends on sincerity, morality, conscience, or how one lives ….not on accepting Christ, believing the Gospel, or even knowing Christanity exists. Gladly, almost every Christian who responded rejected the idea that these people automatically go to Hell. Most instead argued that God judges them “by the light they had,” “by their hearts,” or “by how they lived.” But that only strengthens the conclusion that Christianity is unnecessary for salvation. Other Christians appealed to verses about Jesus descending to preach to the dead. But this does not solve the dilemma either. If people can accept salvation after death without ever hearing the Gospel in their lifetime, then earthly evangelism and preaching of the gospel becomes unnecessary…also this explanation only counts for people who were already dead at the time of Jesus.. not the hundreds of millions that never encountered the gospel after his alleged resurrection and ascension. Worse, it raises another problem…..many people would actually be in a BETTER position never hearing Christianity at all, since exposure to competing doctrines, denominations, fear based preaching, or disbelief could supposedly place them at greater risk…regardless of how they lived their lives. A risk they wouldn’t have had if they just lived their lives. Some Christians then retreat to the usual “Gods ways are mysterious,” but mystery is not a solution to a contradiction . The dilemma still stands. If ignorance of Christianity can still lead to salvation, Christianity is not necessary for salvation. If ignorance condemns people eternally for circumstances beyond their control, thenthe Christian soteriological system is deeply unjust. Have a beautiful week!

@MetamateDaz You’d really want US bureaucrats to be totally in charge of health care? Really? Are you sure?

Free Universal Healthcare is so complicated and expensive that only 32 of the 33 wealthiest countries in the world have figured it out.

@RossKneeDeep So racial segregation is key to Democrat political success? You may wonder to what links Dem officials have went to maintain the segregation.

Hey Black MAGA. Are you happy with the Supreme Court's ruling on eliminating black voices? Are you happy that you voted for a guy who has taken us back to the Jim Crow era? How does it feel to be part of the destruction your ancestors fought so hard for? How does it feel to watch your history conveniently erased? One final word of advice, keep your shine box ready. They're gonna need you at some point.

@SecretSunBlog @mattforney I have to say I find Gummo endlessly fascinating. Reminds me of my childhood … 😳

@mattforney Larry Clark was born in 1943. By what metric does that make him GenX? And Harmony Korine is a worthless little tapeworm who no one cares about.

KIDS was just one of a wave of godawful GenX 90s indie auteur films that had no deeper message than "the suburbs are bad and scary." GenXers have a pathological hatred of normal suburban life. Film companies handed them a budget in the 90s due to the VCR boom creating an entirely new market for limited release movies and home video rentals and their response was to make whiny, bathetic movies about the nonexistent Caligulan degeneracy of commuter town Republicans. GUMMO, directed by Harmony Korine (who wrote the script for KIDS), is another famous lowlight of the era. A recurring theme with GenX "suburban evil" movies is that they're almost always made by people who either have little direct experience with suburban life or have ethnic/sexual grievances that they never got over. Korine is a Jew from Marin County, one of the most liberal parts of California. AMERICAN BEAUTY, the most famous movie of this genre, was written by Alan Ball, a gay man from suburban Atlanta who never got over his evil hick Southern classmates calling him a queer. He later went on to direct TOWELHEAD, a movie about a 13-year-old Lebanese girl fucking and sucking her way through the Houston suburbs. Thanks, dude. GenXers are STILL obsessed with hating the suburbs. A few years back, Tim Heidecker was developing a TV show that would parody HOME IMPROVEMENT (a sitcom about a suburban dad). First, nobody cares, that show's been forgotten. Second, Heidecker is like 50. Grow up, dude. The only films from the indie auteur bilge era that hold up are comedies like THE HOUSE OF YES and pretty much anything that Todd Solondz has done. The "suburban evil" genre only works when you don't take it seriously and play it for laughs. Additionally, most of Solondz's work is about parodying his fellow Jews and not suburbia in general. The bit in STORYTELLING where the vegan Jewish kid tells his parents that "without Hitler, I would have never been born" only for them to freak out always makes me laugh.

@nxt888 You obviously believe everything you read in the “history” books.

The slavery apologists said: but we fed them. Housed them. Gave them religion. Brought them from savagery into contact with civilization. The colonial apologists said: but we built railways. Hospitals. Legal systems. Brought order to chaos. Raised the standard of living. Gave them modernity. The contemporary apologists say: but we give aid. Promote democracy. Protect human rights. Stabilize fragile states. The world would be more violent without our presence. The structure is identical across five hundred years. The framing is always: We gave. We brought. We raised. We provided. The passive voice is always assigned to the other person. They received. They were brought. They were raised. They were provided for. Never: They had. They built. They governed. They decided. They were capable, before and without you, of existing as full human beings with the right to determine their own conditions. That sentence. That is the sentence that colonial ideology, in all its iterations, cannot say. Because once you say it, once you actually believe it, not as a liberal sentiment but as a foundational reality, the entire justification structure collapses. And all that's left is what it always was. Taking. Just taking. From people who had every right to what you took.

@_OKJ__ How do you the creator of the universe isn’t as fu—-up as we are? Maybe worse. 🤷‍♂️

Once you read the bible from cover to cover (something most Christians have actually never done) you’d quickly realise two things.. First, the Old Testament (Jewish bible) and the New Testament have absolutely no business being lumped together Secondly and most importantly, the book is very very human…you cannot read it with a non indoctrinated mind and come out thinking the eternal creator of the universe inspired this…it has the pettiness, ignorance and creativity you’d expect from humans living in that time. A very entirely man made book.

@washingtonpost Years of anti-male PSYOPs?

Labor Department data from March showed that 1 in 3 men across the U.S. are not working or looking for a job. wapo.st/4whGItb

@lunamuse_ Many ancient cultures worshipped female deities like Isis, Semiramis, Mithras, Nyx, Gaia, Shakti, Kali …

@queenie4rmnola People are very easy to program.

The path from the Confederacy to the Klan to MAGA is a straight line

@LeeMerrittesq But isn’t it curious that Democrats political power resides on racial segregation?

This isn’t the 1950s. This is the 1970s—almost twenty years after the Supreme Court said segregated schools were illegal. And still, white adults lined the streets to scream at Black children for trying to enter a desegregated school. The law had changed on paper. Their hearts and behavior hadn’t. When people say “that was a long time ago,” remember: many of the folks in these crowds are the parents and grandparents shaping school politics today. 🎥 @politicsinthewild (IG)

@JezziiB They probably realize those programs would be ran by govt bureaucrats. 😳

I can’t wrap my head around American lower and middle class people thinking free healthcare, universities, and public services would HURT them financially? Literally allowing the billionaire class to flourish with YOUR tax dollars. It’s delusional.

@Atomsmade Everyone, all of us, are very easy to program. Very easy …

Because they were indoctrinated and brainwashed from childhood. By the time they grow up, the delusion is so deeply embedded they can’t break free without a mental breakdown.

@RossKneeDeep They are all intelligence agency PSYOPs to keep folks running in circles and getting diverted from any real change or purpose.

You know what's extremely funny to me? It's how MAGA and Black MAGA continue to point out how the Democrats started the KKK. Yet, they never talk about it in real time. What about now, today? The KKK and every hate group in America endorsed the Republican party in 2016, 2020 and 2024. When you see a KKK or a Nazi flag waving, which party's event is it at?

@nxt888 Perfect example about how the “past” is used to mentally manipulate people. Very clever, and by design.

American culture has a specific, well-practiced response to historical accountability. It is called: "That was then." Slavery? That was then. The genocide of indigenous peoples? That was then. The internment of Japanese Americans? That was then. The overthrow of democratic governments across Latin America? That was then. "That was then" does its work efficiently. It acknowledges just enough to avoid denial while refusing enough to avoid consequence. It creates the impression of reckoning without the substance of it. It lets the speaker feel honest while changing absolutely nothing. But the wealth accumulated from slavery is now. The land taken from indigenous nations is now. The economic distortions created by a century of Latin American intervention are now. The past is never only then. It is also the ground you are standing on.

@Bigqadi Everything in culture is mixed up and filtered through many different people.

Rock is a Black genre. Its roots trace to Black pioneers like Chuck Berry, Sister Rosetta Tharpe, and Little Richard. This isn’t about joining. it’s about reclaiming a whitewashed legacy.

@aimieeee___ It does create cognitive dissonance for many people. I assume they just ignore it and move on to Jesus …

I genuinely do not understand how anyone can read this book, ESPECIALLY the Old Testament and not see the Christian God as a complete psychopath.

@JesseKellyDC Kind of like mass mind control programming.

Understand what “liberating tolerance” is and you’ll understand what looks like hypocrisy from the communists. Everything to the left is tolerated. Everything to the right is NOT tolerated. They call it “liberating tolerance.”

@fire_starter457 I’d bet you are better off not going to “heaven”. But we all go somewhere. Best to give it some thought while you can. Make a plan. 🤓

“Atheists will never get to Heaven!” Most of us know this. We also know we won’t get to Oz, Middle-earth, Narnia, or Valhalla. But we can still choose to be decent people anyway, right?