johnwmerva

2.8K posts

johnwmerva banner
johnwmerva

johnwmerva

@johnwmerva

Techno, drum n bass DJ as well as professional communicator. All views my own. He/him

England, United Kingdom Katılım Nisan 2011
740 Takip Edilen101 Takipçiler
johnwmerva
johnwmerva@johnwmerva·
@benfowlkesMMA I guess that’s the sometimes dangerous level of confidence a fighter needs. Just no room for a voice saying, ‘I dunno man, these guys are pretty tough.’
English
0
0
1
11
Jillian DeCoursey
Jillian DeCoursey@lionheartjill·
Do Italian restaurants that give you breadsticks with every meal still give them to you if you just order breadsticks as your meal?
English
2
0
13
430
johnwmerva
johnwmerva@johnwmerva·
@benfowlkesMMA Of all the things in the 21st century to be concerned about, that a film based on a collection of myths collected by a Greek, set across Greece and Asia, featuring a cyclops, sirens and people being turned into pigs shows people who aren't all the same race seems minor....
English
0
0
0
41
johnwmerva
johnwmerva@johnwmerva·
@benfowlkesMMA ‘The most viewed sports YouTube ever?’ There’s no way that’s even half believable. Particularly when you remember that other sports exist.
English
0
0
0
2
johnwmerva
johnwmerva@johnwmerva·
@benfowlkesMMA Such a sitcom dad injury. 'Oh hey, you kids like skateboards? I was quite the skateboarder in my day. Let me show you some moves.' WHOOSH, CRASH, CLACK, THUMP, AAAAARGH
English
0
0
0
20
johnwmerva
johnwmerva@johnwmerva·
@benfowlkesMMA I guess I’d be confused until I realised that Jon Heder is probably a bit too old for Napoleon Dynamite 2.
English
0
0
0
9
johnwmerva
johnwmerva@johnwmerva·
@benfowlkesMMA It’s the purest form of betting. Zero predictability, zero outside influences, zero impact of experience or form. Just two men of dubious athletic ability and less nutritional know-how flinging paws until one falls over, even if that happens independently of the other’s actions.
English
0
0
0
10
Ben Fowlkes
Ben Fowlkes@benfowlkesMMA·
I mean, do what you want with your money, kids. But we’re talking about HEAVYWEIGHTS. They could always slip on a banana peel and ruin your night.
shadore66@shadore66

@benfowlkesMMA I enjoy how in almost every mailbag Ben has to remind people not to bet on heavyweight mma fights

English
3
0
26
4K
Jillian DeCoursey
Jillian DeCoursey@lionheartjill·
I can’t think of a single Kevin Costner movie I’ve ever liked.
English
27
0
12
4.4K
johnwmerva
johnwmerva@johnwmerva·
@BellegardeSZN I’d like to see him win, abandon the gimmick and turn up to Parliament in a suit and actually be a great MP for the area. (Binface, not Farage, Nige is too entrenched in his gimmick.)
English
0
0
0
105
johnwmerva
johnwmerva@johnwmerva·
@joannadangerfd Guys, I’m starting to think exiling Kyoji for his entire prime after a title shot he wasn’t ready for then bringing him back when he was starting to slow down wasn’t actually the best way to develop a promising talent for UFC stardom.
English
0
0
1
22
Joanna Dangerfield 🏳️‍⚧️
Damage is (mostly) invisible. I agree with the first half of this from Samsara, damage is the most important part of the scoring criteria but it is impossible to rate. Broken ribs vs a small cut, one is visible one is not, how do you score what you can't see? Topuria lands 1/2
samsara lover@lovecraftiande1

@amerisreali @joannadangerfd Damage is invisible to us. If you define damage dealt by how bloody an opponent's face gets, you are fucking stupid. If that is your metric, the Diaz brothers lost every fight 50-42. It is objective fact that an overhand right does more damage than a jab.

English
7
0
49
5K
johnwmerva
johnwmerva@johnwmerva·
@joannadangerfd Just to add, if we're using damage to gauge effective striking then Gane is an absolute terror on brain stems.
English
1
0
1
15
johnwmerva
johnwmerva@johnwmerva·
@joannadangerfd Isn't this why there are multiple scoring criteria and levels of importance? Individually, each is imperfect and often subjective but, added up they should give a relatively accurate picture of success. IIRC, damage is used to gauge effective striking, not a sole criterion.
English
1
0
1
28