The Bitcoin Bartender

161 posts

The Bitcoin Bartender banner
The Bitcoin Bartender

The Bitcoin Bartender

@jonathanjisaac

Colorado, USA Katılım Mayıs 2017
87 Takip Edilen53 Takipçiler
The Bitcoin Bartender retweetledi
Rand Paul
Rand Paul@RandPaul·
Requiring an ID and proof of citizenship to vote is common sense. It’s time to pass the SAVE America Act. RT if you agree.
English
3.6K
23.3K
97.6K
1M
The Bitcoin Bartender
The Bitcoin Bartender@jonathanjisaac·
@thevivafrei You are one of the only reasonable people when it comes to this issue. Thank you for providing actual rational thought.
English
0
0
0
9
Viva Frei
Viva Frei@thevivafrei·
I have been following this "debate" for a while. And the ultimate problem is that two things can be true at once, and people will connect the dots based on what patterns they want to find. It is now pretty clear that Charlie was changing his views on Israel, the Israeli lobby, and was increasingly repulsed by pressure from donors. And at the same time, he was assassinated. Not having Netanyahu on your show is a big deal and a big statement. I suspect it was the statement Charlie wanted to convey - if only to Netanyahu. If you want to find a "motive" to connect the assassination to Israel / Netanyahu government, you certainly can. But there is zero concrete evidence of it. As of now, ZERO. And the "exploding mic" theory is just immediately discrediting and utterly absurd. To assert that no one heard a shot that day is also factually incorrect from live streams of people there that day who immediately panned over to the area where the shot came from. You want to believe it was Israel ./ Netanyahu by positing theories that have not been proven and can not be disproven by way of proving it *didn't happen*, fine. The easier way to do that is to suggest that some Israeli agents radicalized Tyler Robinson online and insiders left the roof unsecured. Unproven and unable to be disproven, but at least not insanely idiotic. I don't believe it. I believe it is more likely other assets who may have had a hand in radicalizing Tyler Robinson. Do recall both Tyler and Crooks were radicalized at roughly the same time. Imagine the scandal should it be revealed "assets" were somehow involved in Charlie Kirk's assassination. Again, no evidence of that now, except for the fact that we know Tyler was involved in radical stuff online. But that Israel / Netanyahu did it (no evidence) and that if they did, they would complicate the assassination with an exploding mic (how do you control the direction of something floating pretty freely on a shirt?) as opposed to going with the logistically easiest method is John Grisham fantasy nonsense. And it allows the believer to justify tormenting everyone who is a victim of this assassination - from Erika to Andrew to TPUSA - by putting forward a wild conspiracy involving all of them - either in the act or in the "coverup" - that can never be disproven because it requires people to prove a negative. My humble two cents.
Andrew Kolvet@AndrewKolvet

Again, this is Candace admitting she has ZERO proof. I ask for proof, and she screams “I’ll take a lie detector test, guys, I promise!" She's adding caveats, hedging, and changing her story... But it’s important to point out what she just did here. The psychology behind it is wild. She gets called out for a bald-faced lie - a central lie to her entire narrative - then immediately retreats back to two true things that are insignificant, in an attempt to confer truth onto the original, key lie. Yes, we politely declined having Netanyahu on the show. So what? And yes, months later CK took a call from him after he wrote him a letter. Again, so what? Neither are extraordinary, and neither explain her next ridiculous leap that Netanyahu offered “to take TPUSA to the next level” and that I lost out on either "millions" or "billions" when CK declined (all complete idiocy). Originally I was supposed to be her source for this fairytale, but I deny it. So all she has left is a friend of the family, someone in the general familial "orbit." Lol Originally it was about "taking TPUSA to the next level," but now apparently TPUSA wasn't really going to get any of that money, only The Charlie Kirk Show. She can’t admit to her audience that she’s just wrong about this because it’s a core, foundational myth fueling her daily YouTube soap opera (where she’s the one actually making millions of dollars!). She has no proof, and she knows it. She probably fell for an internet rumor from wackjob Max Blumenthal and now she’s flailing to save face. Enjoy the show.

English
125
12
201
34.4K
Libs of TikTok
Libs of TikTok@libsoftiktok·
BREAKING: Samuel Nutt charged for allegedly filming a child in a bathroom stall at a mall in Illinois. Another customer filmed the confrontation and turned it over to police. He still had his pants down when he was confronted! Absolutely sick
English
1.1K
5.7K
25.7K
1.8M
The Bitcoin Bartender retweetledi
Rand Paul
Rand Paul@RandPaul·
I have re-referred Anthony Fauci to the DOJ for prosecution. The evidence is clear. He funded dangerous research, knew the likely origin of COVID as early as January 2020, and spent years lying to Congress and the American people. 15 million people are dead. Justice demands accountability. @MariaBartiromo
English
2.1K
9K
47K
683.2K
The Bitcoin Bartender retweetledi
DNI Tulsi Gabbard
DNI Tulsi Gabbard@DNIGabbard·
Today, on my final day as Director of National Intelligence, I’m releasing never-before-seen communications and documents exposing how Dr. Fauci provided millions in US taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, worked with politicized elements within the Intelligence Community to suppress the truth about his actions and hide the virus’ lab-leak origins, and lied to Congress while under oath in 2024. It’s time you know the truth. odni.gov/index.php/news…
English
24.1K
113.8K
370.2K
48.5M
Bit Paine ⚡️
Bit Paine ⚡️@BitPaine·
@jonathanjisaac Happy that you’ve volunteered to adopt a downs baby to help people on this position not abort. Christ would be proud of you! You’ve done that, right?
English
8
0
33
965
Bit Paine ⚡️
Bit Paine ⚡️@BitPaine·
I think it is an act of extraordinary compassion to raise a child with Down syndrome. It requires a lot from the parents, physically and emotionally. There are some people who are built for a life of selfless caregiving - of acceptance of endless suffering - and there are some who are not. But 99.9% of the people commenting on this post have 0 real life experience and are piling on this guy from a place of abject hypocrisy. They are being explicitly, vociferously un-Christian in their signaling of imagined virtue. Matthew 23: “[D]o not do what they do, for they do not practice what they preach. They tie up heavy, cumbersome loads and put them on other people’s shoulders, but they themselves are not willing to lift a finger to move them. … The greatest among you will be your servant. For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.” It is possible to celebrate those who choose an act of extraordinary compassion without judging those who do not.
Jesse Ridgway@McJuggerNuggets

This week, my wife and I made the very difficult decision to terminate the pregnancy due to Trisomy 21. The choice was not made lightly. We really appreciate all of the personal stories that you guys shared with us, especially the unconditional support we received from fans with no matter what we decided. I know some of you may be very disappointed to hear this news. We are devastated. This has been extremely traumatic for both of us, especially Ashley. She underwent the procedure earlier this week and is on the mend. Thankfully, everything went smoothly, but emotionally we are drained. Trisomy 21, also known as Down Syndrome, is caused by an extra chromosome. It is caused by an error in cell division, like a glitch. The odds of a baby having it is 1 in 1000. When I first confronted this news, I was shocked but optimistic. If they’re a little slow intellectually, then we’ll make it work. I signed on to be a parent, come what may…but I just didn’t fully understand what Down Syndrome entailed. Once we made it public, it became clear that MOST people don’t know what Down Syndrome entails (and no, it’s not the same as Autism): 50% of babies with DS have heart defects. 75% will have hearing challenges. Over 50% will have vision problems. Impaired immune function, developmental disabilities, learning disabilities, delayed physical development, poor muscle tone, structural issues with face, decreased lifespan, etc…Sadly, the list is long, feel free to look it up…Down Syndome isn’t a “blessing”, it is objectively shitty from a health perspective. I didn’t realize just how rough it is for the child, let alone the family…more often than not, they would be fully dependent on others for the rest of their life. The miscarriage risk is also close to 50%, which made matters worse…they may never see the light of day and it puts Ashley further at risk. We spoke with doctors, friends, family and genetic counselors and learned that up to 90% of women terminate their pregnancy after learning the baby has Trisomy 21. This was WAY higher than I expected, I thought it would be lower given that I hear so many say they kept or would keep the baby. I believe that’s because most terminations happen privately, it feels shameful. A lot of judgment being cast. You never think you’d be in this type of situation until it happens to you and then things change. To all of my fans who have weighed in on this topic who have Autism, Down Syndrome or any other conditions…we appreciate you. You matter a lot and we’re glad you’re here. I commend you and your families for having the strength and courage to push forward. As for us, we made a difficult decision that we believe in the long-run will be beneficial for our family. Thankfully, we had a choice. It will take a little time to move on, but we are excited to try again in the future and hopefully have a better outcome. Love you guys & thank you for understanding. ❤️

English
144
6
248
25.9K
Walker⚡️
Walker⚡️@WalkerAmerica·
I see a lot of people in the comments (who also presumably wear fancy bracelets and can’t podcast after a glass of wine) trying to sound smart by saying “yEaH buT aVerAgE liFe eXpEctANcY wAs oNLy LiKE 35 YeArs!” No shit, Sherlock. Because infant mortality was 300+ deaths per 1000 (vs 5 per 1000 today)… also, they didn’t have antibiotics or other marvels of modern medicine we take for granted today… life expectancy at the dawn of America had nothing to do with men in 1776 being massive high T drinkers. You’re just a soft little statist cuck. Sobriety is a psyop created to keep you docile. Sober men don’t start revolutions. Men who gather together in a tavern and drink heavily won’t stand by and let their country get fucked. It’s that simple. Also, with regard to the truly legendary founding fathers, they will have outlived most of the soy boy, can’t-podcast-after-a-glass-of-wine, childless, bracele-wearing biohackers today: • Benjamin Franklin: 84 (1706–1790) • George Washington: 67 (1732–1799) • John Adams: 90 (1735–1826) • Thomas Jefferson: 83 (1743–1826) • James Madison: 85 (1751–1836) But it’s more than just life expectancy. These men actually LIVED. They didn’t let a fucking bracelet rule their lives. Yes, alcohol is poison, but so is fucking life, man. No one escapes entropy. Certainly not some fucking bracelet-wearing muppet. If it’s good enough for literally all of our ancestors for all of recorded history, it’s good enough for me.
Walker⚡️@WalkerAmerica

Men 250 years ago: “I’ve been drinking Madeira wine, ale, rum, and hard cider since I weened off my mother’s tit. Water? Never touched the poison. On the morrow, I shall overthrow the most powerful empire in the history of the world. Men today: “I drank a glass of wine and it ruined my life. I couldn’t even podcast. My bracelet told me I was dying.”

English
33
16
173
23.1K
James 𝕏ond
James 𝕏ond@james_xond·
Trying to prove a point. How old were you when you became a homeowner for the first time?
English
9.6K
40
1K
624.3K
The Bitcoin Bartender
The Bitcoin Bartender@jonathanjisaac·
@Tyler_Neville_ At 24, I smoked a bowl, had probably 12-15 drinks... Slept on a couch for 3 hours, drove back to the armory at 6am and got a perfect score on my PT test at 7am.
English
0
0
1
136
Tyler Neville
Tyler Neville@Tyler_Neville_·
My finest athletic performance was in college after my 21st birthday where I took 21 shots of a mix of jaegermeister, Popov vodka and fireball whiskey and topped it off with a couple Irish car bombs at 3 am. Woke up for bball practice at 7 am and went 6-6 from 3 point range and was torching future pros. True story. It’s incredible how resilient the human body is 😂 There was probably some Bacardi limon somewhere in there.
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta

Two glasses of wine. Didn't get drunk. Couldn't function for three days. This is being celebrated as self-awareness. A healthy 33-year-old body should metabolize two glasses of wine and recover by morning. Billions of people throughout history did exactly that while building civilizations, fighting wars, and running companies. Bartlett has restricted his inputs so aggressively that a single normal human experience sent his entire system into a 72-hour reboot. Engineers call this brittleness. A system optimized exclusively for peak performance under ideal conditions that shatters the moment conditions change. The opposite of antifragile. Remove every stressor for long enough and your body loses the ability to absorb even minor ones. The generation that tracks every HRV reading, weighs every macro, and sleeps in temperature-controlled darkness has accidentally built the most fragile humans in history. Previous generations drank, ate badly, slept rough, and still recovered because constant low-level stress kept their systems adaptable. Two glasses of wine registered as a catastrophic shock because he's spent three years stripping every form of variance from his life. A body that can only perform under perfect conditions is the definition of a fragile system.

English
14
0
131
28.8K
Camus
Camus@newstart_2024·
Jordan Peterson dropped an uncomfortable truth on Triggernometry. The U.S. military that is desperate for recruits won’t accept anyone with an IQ under 82. That’s roughly 10% of the population. They’ve tested this for decades and found these individuals become a net drain, no matter how hard they work. In complex environments, the disadvantage is real. This lines up with ASVAB data. The military generally requires the 31st percentile (~IQ 92) but can dip to the 10th percentile (~IQ 81-83) in limited cases, confirming Peterson’s core point. Conservatives struggle with it. Liberals often claim anyone can be trained to do anything. Both approaches fall short. This one made me pause. We talk a lot about equality, but raw cognitive differences create real limits that are hard to solve. Ignoring or sugarcoating these realities doesn’t help the people at the lower end, it leaves them without practical paths forward. Do you think society can have an honest conversation about IQ differences, or is it too dangerous?
English
520
705
5.5K
938.1K
Lyn Alden
Lyn Alden@LynAldenContact·
Let Jon Stewart know if you want a nuanced bitcoin expert on his show. Like this post, and then comment on your favorite expert.
Lyn Alden@LynAldenContact

@jonstewart Big fan of your work Jon, for like 20 years. But you could find better guests on this topic. More nuanced.

English
392
209
5.2K
200.7K