Jon Kurtis ⚡

6.4K posts

Jon Kurtis ⚡ banner
Jon Kurtis ⚡

Jon Kurtis ⚡

@jonkkillian

Building https://t.co/HpGMka2aIX, the open source multi-tenant RBAC starter kit for Supabase and Next.JS.

Orlando Katılım Ocak 2014
2.7K Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
Jon Kurtis ⚡
Jon Kurtis ⚡@jonkkillian·
@dshukertjr i think the reason why is that it complicates merging oauth identities based on same email. like for email/password login and google oauth. but i think that can be achieved other ways. i would like to be able to do have a tenant_id on auth.users and make email, tenant_id unique
English
0
0
1
16
Tyler Shukert
Tyler Shukert@dshukertjr·
@jonkkillian This does come up a lot as feedback, and it's something that I think would be awesome to unlock. There is probably a lot more work to be done than just dropping the constraint, is the reason why it hasn't been done yet. I will bring it up with the auth team again!
English
1
0
0
70
Tyler Shukert
Tyler Shukert@dshukertjr·
What would you add to Supabase if you could wave a magic wound?
English
47
1
26
12.1K
Matt Pocock
Matt Pocock@mattpocockuk·
Thinking about a series where I look at high quality skills and: - break down why they work - try them out - tell you what you should steal from them
English
56
16
1K
43.1K
Jon Kurtis ⚡
Jon Kurtis ⚡@jonkkillian·
@ArtificialAnlys Are we going to get the rest of the full bench too? would love to see SciCode, AA-Omniscience Index/Accuracy/Hallucination rate, End to End Response Time and all the other benchmarks on the @ArtificialAnlys home page.
English
0
0
0
250
Artificial Analysis
Artificial Analysis@ArtificialAnlys·
Cursor's new Composer 2.5 takes third on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index and is ~10-60x lower cost than the higher-effort Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.5 variants above it. This release puts Composer among the leading coding agent models, something that wasn’t clear for past releases @cursor_ai has released Composer 2.5, the latest model in its Composer line. Composer 2.5 scored 62 on our Coding Agent Index, a 14 point gain over Composer 2 (48). This puts it in third place of our tested agents, behind only Claude Opus 4.7 (max) in Claude Code (66) and GPT-5.5 (xhigh reasoning) in Codex (65). These cost $4.10 and $4.82 per task respectively, ~10x the cost of Composer 2.5 Fast ($0.44) and ~60x the cost of Composer 2.5 standard ($0.07). Key results for Composer 2.5 in Cursor CLI: ➤ Cost-quality Pareto frontier: At $0.07 (standard) and $0.44 (Fast) per task, Composer 2.5 is cheaper than every other agent scoring above 60 on the Index. Medium-effort peers cost $1.24–$2.21 per task; higher-effort variants land 3-4 points above at $4.10–$4.82 ➤ Per-benchmark gains vs Composer 2: +35 points on SWE-Bench-Pro-Hard-AA (12% → 47%), +2 points on Terminal-Bench v2 (64% → 66%), and +3 points on SWE-Atlas-QnA (69% → 72%). At 47%, Composer 2.5's score on SWE-Bench-Pro-Hard-AA is comparable to Claude Opus 4.7 (max) in Claude Code ➤ Among the fastest coding agents: Composer 2.5 Fast runs at an average wall time of 6.7 minutes per task, the third-fastest agent on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, behind only Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) in Claude Code (5.8m) and GPT-5.5 (medium) in Cursor CLI (6.2m) ➤ Fast mode enables better responsiveness at 6x pricing: Fast runs 30% faster than standard Composer 2.5, but is ~6x the cost per task ($0.44 vs $0.07). Token pricing is 6x higher for Fast: $3.00/$15.00 vs $0.50/$2.50 per million input/output tokens Model details: ➤ Base model: Continued training on @Kimi_Moonshot's open weights Kimi K2.5 as with Composer 2, with Cursor reporting ~85% of total compute from its own additional training and reinforcement learning ➤ Pricing: $0.50/$2.50 per million input/output tokens for the standard variant; $3.00/$15.00 for the Fast variant (the default in Cursor) ➤ Available exclusively in Cursor: both Cursor IDE and Cursor CLI, an externally accessible API is not available Congratulations @cursor_ai and @mntruell on the impressive release!
Artificial Analysis tweet media
English
60
146
1.3K
234.6K
Lee Robinson
Lee Robinson@leerob·
Artificial Analysis@ArtificialAnlys

Cursor's new Composer 2.5 takes third on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index and is ~10-60x lower cost than the higher-effort Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.5 variants above it. This release puts Composer among the leading coding agent models, something that wasn’t clear for past releases @cursor_ai has released Composer 2.5, the latest model in its Composer line. Composer 2.5 scored 62 on our Coding Agent Index, a 14 point gain over Composer 2 (48). This puts it in third place of our tested agents, behind only Claude Opus 4.7 (max) in Claude Code (66) and GPT-5.5 (xhigh reasoning) in Codex (65). These cost $4.10 and $4.82 per task respectively, ~10x the cost of Composer 2.5 Fast ($0.44) and ~60x the cost of Composer 2.5 standard ($0.07). Key results for Composer 2.5 in Cursor CLI: ➤ Cost-quality Pareto frontier: At $0.07 (standard) and $0.44 (Fast) per task, Composer 2.5 is cheaper than every other agent scoring above 60 on the Index. Medium-effort peers cost $1.24–$2.21 per task; higher-effort variants land 3-4 points above at $4.10–$4.82 ➤ Per-benchmark gains vs Composer 2: +35 points on SWE-Bench-Pro-Hard-AA (12% → 47%), +2 points on Terminal-Bench v2 (64% → 66%), and +3 points on SWE-Atlas-QnA (69% → 72%). At 47%, Composer 2.5's score on SWE-Bench-Pro-Hard-AA is comparable to Claude Opus 4.7 (max) in Claude Code ➤ Among the fastest coding agents: Composer 2.5 Fast runs at an average wall time of 6.7 minutes per task, the third-fastest agent on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, behind only Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) in Claude Code (5.8m) and GPT-5.5 (medium) in Cursor CLI (6.2m) ➤ Fast mode enables better responsiveness at 6x pricing: Fast runs 30% faster than standard Composer 2.5, but is ~6x the cost per task ($0.44 vs $0.07). Token pricing is 6x higher for Fast: $3.00/$15.00 vs $0.50/$2.50 per million input/output tokens Model details: ➤ Base model: Continued training on @Kimi_Moonshot's open weights Kimi K2.5 as with Composer 2, with Cursor reporting ~85% of total compute from its own additional training and reinforcement learning ➤ Pricing: $0.50/$2.50 per million input/output tokens for the standard variant; $3.00/$15.00 for the Fast variant (the default in Cursor) ➤ Available exclusively in Cursor: both Cursor IDE and Cursor CLI, an externally accessible API is not available Congratulations @cursor_ai and @mntruell on the impressive release!

English
2
0
5
324
Pauline P. Narvas
Pauline P. Narvas@paw_lean·
I’m back with a very overdue life/career update :) 00:00 Hello again! 02:39 My first Community role 12:03 Getting laid off 17:02 Joining Vercel 25:32 Why I left my dream job 27:17 Letting go + what’s next
English
30
6
240
19.3K
Tyler Bosmeny
Tyler Bosmeny@bosmeny·
A mic drop moment @ycombinator tonight @sama just offered $2M in OpenAI tokens to EVERY YC startup in the current batch in exchange for equity Just like Yuri Milner offering to invest in every startup back when Sam was a YC partner I can't wait to see what's unlocked when you let the most driven, creative and formidable founders tokenmaxx
Tyler Bosmeny tweet media
English
252
137
2.1K
2.3M
Jon Kurtis ⚡
Jon Kurtis ⚡@jonkkillian·
@sama How about some love for the builders with a family that can't pick up and move to a hacker house in SF
English
0
0
0
48
Sam Altman
Sam Altman@sama·
i am excited to see what will happen with tokenmaxxing startups, both for how they work internally and the products they can build. openai offered to invest $2M in tokens into every startup in the current yc batch. happy building!
Tyler Bosmeny@bosmeny

A mic drop moment @ycombinator tonight @sama just offered $2M in OpenAI tokens to EVERY YC startup in the current batch in exchange for equity Just like Yuri Milner offering to invest in every startup back when Sam was a YC partner I can't wait to see what's unlocked when you let the most driven, creative and formidable founders tokenmaxx

English
752
242
4.3K
1.2M
Jon Kurtis ⚡
Jon Kurtis ⚡@jonkkillian·
@IanLandsman @aarondfrancis Was fun to hear you guys brainstorm in realtime and come to a much better solution....i was like, yea i wouldn't do a hire-me page and right about that time you called it out
English
0
0
1
59
Ian Landsman
Ian Landsman@IanLandsman·
I think @aarondfrancis and I are onto something with /brag pages. Create a great page about yourself, what you're up to, what you're good at.
English
7
3
34
3.3K
jordi
jordi@jordienr·
just got inside info that supa is working on a new db
English
3
0
13
1.3K
Lee Robinson
Lee Robinson@leerob·
Where could we improve Composer 2.5? We're working on the next model and would love your feedback. Lots of work to do (our CursorBench evals below) in the coming weeks!
Lee Robinson tweet media
English
662
183
2.8K
7.4M
Jean P.D. Meijer ― 🇪🇺 eu/acc
@leerob partly, but especially speed. i know there's fast mode, but that's the hardware part. GPT-5.5 feels a lot faster, even though they didn't switch inference to better hardware, it uses way less tokens
Jean P.D. Meijer ― 🇪🇺 eu/acc tweet media
English
2
0
6
434
Lee Robinson
Lee Robinson@leerob·
@Utkarsh51557661 2 of the 3 benchmarks we included are open source and can be reproduced on your own infra!
English
1
0
11
1.5K
David Hill
David Hill@iamdavidhill·
we’ve been busy redesigning the desktop app from the ground up the beta taught us a lot most importantly, that left sidebars suck hello tabs 🔊
English
215
41
1.5K
268.9K
Jon Kurtis ⚡
Jon Kurtis ⚡@jonkkillian·
@iamsahaj_xyz @mattpocockuk Gotta paid it with learning extraction after each grill me sesh. Extract decisions to ADRs and have the next sesh review and try to answer the questions with prior knowledge. Repeat
English
0
0
1
303