Jonathan Lis

59.2K posts

Jonathan Lis banner
Jonathan Lis

Jonathan Lis

@jonlis1

Journalist, commentator, think tanker. Views here are mine but you’re welcome to take them 🏳️‍🌈

London Katılım Temmuz 2010
1.8K Takip Edilen108.5K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Jonathan Lis
Jonathan Lis@jonlis1·
OK, everyone. I think it’s time I told my Boris Johnson story. It’s a story about the time as foreign secretary where Johnson committed a straightforward resigning offence, got caught out, then got away with it. Thread.
English
979
11K
15.5K
0
Jonathan Lis retweetledi
Molly Ploofkins
Molly Ploofkins@Mollyploofkins·
Shout out to Qatar for the worst return on a $400M bribe in history.
English
178
5.8K
52.3K
1.2M
Jonathan Lis retweetledi
Mike Nellis
Mike Nellis@MikeNellis·
This should be a much bigger story: Pete Hegseth is lying about what the families of fallen American soldiers are saying about this illegal war. It’s disturbing how easily these people lie, and how rarely the media holds them accountable.
Kyle Griffin@kylegriffin1

BREAKING NBC: Pete Hegseth says 'family after family' of service members killed urged the admin to "not stop until the job is done." But the father of one of those service members says he never said that. "I can't speak for the other families. When he spoke to me, that was not something we talked about." nbcnews.com/politics/donal…

English
32
1.3K
7K
147.2K
Jonathan Lis retweetledi
Shashank Joshi
Shashank Joshi@shashj·
"I think the war is very complete, pretty ​much"—Trump, ten days ago.
English
17
139
807
194.7K
Jonathan Lis retweetledi
Gideon Rachman
Gideon Rachman@gideonrachman·
Unfortunately threatening escalation after you have already killed Iran’s leadership and made it clear that you want regime change is unlikely to persuade Iran to back off. They believe they have less to lose than their adversaries and they are right
English
48
476
1.9K
97.9K
Jonathan Lis retweetledi
Will Manidis
Will Manidis@WillManidis·
we live in age of great moral panics about things that don’t matter at all and zero moral outrage over some of the most egregious societal sins we’ve ever seen
English
122
6.5K
36.4K
610.4K
Jonathan Lis retweetledi
Daractenus
Daractenus@Daractenus·
For the record, the president of the United States is now simultaneously claiming that he has won the war, is currently winning the war, needs help to win the war, and needs no help to win the war. All to destroy the nuclear program he claims to have already destroyed last year.
English
928
27.6K
132.9K
2M
Jonathan Lis retweetledi
Arnaud Bertrand
Arnaud Bertrand@RnaudBertrand·
It's now unarguable that the war on Iran is one of the most blatant crimes of aggression in history. You now have not 1 but 2 external participants of the US-Iran talks (Oman’s foreign minister and the UK's National Security Advisor) who confirm that the US and Israel attacked despite Iran effectively meeting US conditions for a deal - ensuring it could never build a nuclear weapon, permanently. As per The Guardian article (theguardian.com/world/2026/mar…), Jonathan Powell "believed the path remained open to a negotiated solution to the long-running issue of how Iran could reassure the US that it was not seeking a nuclear weapon," and "UK officials [...] were impressed that Iran was prepared for the deal to be permanent." Concretely, this means the war wasn't a failure of diplomacy but a deliberate destruction of it. And it also means that the US and Israel have irresponsibly plunged the entire world in an unprecedented energy crisis, affecting the livelihoods of billions of people worldwide, when it was completely avoidable. It's beyond me how you can look at this and not conclude that the real threat all along wasn't Iran but the US-Israeli axis - they're the only parties at the table who wanted war and are making every person on the planet pay the price for it. Extraordinarily, even the UK National Security Advisor is now basically saying this.
Arnaud Bertrand tweet media
English
296
6.7K
12.8K
330.6K
Jonathan Lis retweetledi
Adam Mockler
Adam Mockler@adammocklerr·
You literally just said there was no threat
Adam Mockler tweet media
Karoline Leavitt@PressSec

There are many false claims in this letter but let me address one specifically: that "Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation."   This is the same false claim that Democrats and some in the liberal media have been repeating over and over.   As President Trump has clearly and explicitly stated, he had strong and compelling evidence that Iran was going to attack the United States first.   This evidence was compiled from many sources and factors. President Trump would never make the decision to deploy military assets against a foreign adversary in a vacuum.   Iran is the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism. The Iranian regime is evil. It proudly killed Americans, waged war against our country, and openly threatened us all the way up to the launch of Operation Epic Fury.   Iran was aggressively expanding their short-range ballistic missiles to combine with their naval assets to give themselves immunity – meaning they would have a degree of a capabilities that would give them immunity to hold us and the rest of the world hostage.   The regime aimed to use those ballistic missiles as a shield to continue achieving their ultimate goal – nuclear weapons.   The President, through his top negotiators, gave the regime every single possible opportunity to abandon this unacceptable course by permanently giving up their nuclear ambitions in exchange for sanctions relief, free nuclear fuel, and potential economic partnerships with our country.   But they would not say yes to peace because obtaining nuclear weapons was their fundamental goal.   President Trump ultimately made the determination that a joint attack with Israel would greatly reduce the risk to American lives that would come from a first strike by the terrorist Iranian regime and address this imminent threat to America’s national security interests.   All of this led to President Trump arriving at the determination that this military operation was necessary for U.S. national security, which is why he launched the massively successful Operation Epic Fury. The Commander-in-Chief determines what does and does not constitute a threat, because he is the one constitutionally empowered to do so - and because the American people went to the ballot box and entrusted him and him alone to make such final judgments. And finally, the absurd allegation that President Trump made this decision based on the influence of others, even foreign countries, is both insulting and laughable. President Trump has been remarkably consistent and has said for DECADES that Iran can NEVER possess a nuclear weapon. As someone who actually witnesses President Trump’s decision-making process on a daily basis, I can attest to the fact that he is always looking to do what’s in the best interest of the United States of America — period. America First.

English
385
5.6K
38.7K
1.5M
Jonathan Lis retweetledi
Jonathan Lis retweetledi
Mehdi Hasan
Mehdi Hasan@mehdirhasan·
Think about the implications of this: the president of the United States is openly telling the media that, apparently, he “always thought” his director of counterterrorism “was weak on security”. Well, why did he appoint him then? Why didn’t he fire him?
Disclose.tv@disclosetv

NOW - Trump says it's a "good thing" that Joe Kent resigned over the Iran War: "When somebody is working with us that says they didn't think Iran was a threat—we don't want those people."

English
0
4K
16.5K
309K
Jonathan Lis retweetledi
Circe
Circe@vocalcry·
Everything is perfectly clear. Iran could not be allowed to get a nuclear weapon, which they have been months away from developing for well over a decade. Also, Trump is the only president who could have kept us out of war with Iran, as he himself repeatedly told us. So we destroyed their nuclear capabilities, which Tulsi said they didn't have, in 2025. Then we attacked them last month because Israel was going to attack them because they were months away from developing a nuclear weapon since we destroyed their nuclear capabilities, and that would lead Iran to attack American bases. Iran has never posed a threat to the United States, but we had to attack them first, not because of Israel, but because they posed an imminent threat to the United States. Fortunately, we have won the war, which was not a war but a special operation, in Iran now several times in the last two weeks. It is basically over but might not be over for some time because we already won. We also don't need anyone to help open the Strait of Hormuz, which we knew they would close, which is why we didn't prepare, and we now need allies to help open. What are you guys not understanding?
Karoline Leavitt@PressSec

There are many false claims in this letter but let me address one specifically: that "Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation."   This is the same false claim that Democrats and some in the liberal media have been repeating over and over.   As President Trump has clearly and explicitly stated, he had strong and compelling evidence that Iran was going to attack the United States first.   This evidence was compiled from many sources and factors. President Trump would never make the decision to deploy military assets against a foreign adversary in a vacuum.   Iran is the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism. The Iranian regime is evil. It proudly killed Americans, waged war against our country, and openly threatened us all the way up to the launch of Operation Epic Fury.   Iran was aggressively expanding their short-range ballistic missiles to combine with their naval assets to give themselves immunity – meaning they would have a degree of a capabilities that would give them immunity to hold us and the rest of the world hostage.   The regime aimed to use those ballistic missiles as a shield to continue achieving their ultimate goal – nuclear weapons.   The President, through his top negotiators, gave the regime every single possible opportunity to abandon this unacceptable course by permanently giving up their nuclear ambitions in exchange for sanctions relief, free nuclear fuel, and potential economic partnerships with our country.   But they would not say yes to peace because obtaining nuclear weapons was their fundamental goal.   President Trump ultimately made the determination that a joint attack with Israel would greatly reduce the risk to American lives that would come from a first strike by the terrorist Iranian regime and address this imminent threat to America’s national security interests.   All of this led to President Trump arriving at the determination that this military operation was necessary for U.S. national security, which is why he launched the massively successful Operation Epic Fury. The Commander-in-Chief determines what does and does not constitute a threat, because he is the one constitutionally empowered to do so - and because the American people went to the ballot box and entrusted him and him alone to make such final judgments. And finally, the absurd allegation that President Trump made this decision based on the influence of others, even foreign countries, is both insulting and laughable. President Trump has been remarkably consistent and has said for DECADES that Iran can NEVER possess a nuclear weapon. As someone who actually witnesses President Trump’s decision-making process on a daily basis, I can attest to the fact that he is always looking to do what’s in the best interest of the United States of America — period. America First.

English
311
2.8K
15.8K
921.7K
Jonathan Lis retweetledi
Ben Rhodes
Ben Rhodes@brhodes·
The arrogance of expecting allies to join a war that the US and Israel started for no reason is breathtaking.
Lindsey Graham@LindseyGrahamSC

Just spoke to @POTUS about our European allies’ unwillingness to provide assets to keep the Strait of Hormuz functioning, which benefits Europe far more than America. I have never heard him so angry in my life. I share that anger given what’s at stake. The arrogance of our allies to suggest that Iran with a nuclear weapon is of little concern and that military action to stop the ayatollah from acquiring a nuclear bomb is our problem not theirs is beyond offensive. The European approach to containing the ayatollah’s nuclear ambitions have proven to be a miserable failure. The repercussions of providing little assistance to keep the Strait of Hormuz functioning are going to be wide and deep for Europe and America. I consider myself very forward-leaning on supporting alliances, however at a time of real testing like this, it makes me second guess the value of these alliances. I am certain I am not the only senator who feels this way.

English
459
1.1K
7.4K
254.4K
Jonathan Lis retweetledi
Joe Kent
Joe Kent@joekent16jan19·
After much reflection, I have decided to resign from my position as Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, effective today. I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran. Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby. It has been an honor serving under @POTUS and @DNIGabbard and leading the professionals at NCTC. May God bless America.
Joe Kent tweet media
English
72.5K
219.6K
846.1K
99.1M
Jonathan Lis retweetledi
Daniel Dale
Daniel Dale@ddale8·
For the second time this week…this is Year 11 of Trump telling this lie. His 2000 book contained one passing sentence about bin Laden. It didn’t predict bin Laden would do anything, let alone attack the WTC, and didn’t tell anyone “you’d better get him.” cnn.com/2025/10/06/pol…
Acyn@Acyn

Trump: I predicted all of this stuff. I predicted Osama bin laden would knock out the world trade center. I said it the year before he did it. I said you better get him, that's a bad guy. I wrote it in a book. President Clinton actually had a shot at him and he didn't take it. I'm not blaming him for that, but he didn't take it. And he ended up knocking down the world trade center. But I predicted that, too

English
108
1.8K
5.2K
451.3K