Jonathon Ruzich

Modern worship music: “I wAnT to tOuCh yUr fAcE daDdY gOd lEt’S hoLd hAnDs.” The Psalms: ‘God strengthened me in war to run a spear through the guts of all my enemies’ (Ps. 18:34-38). Modern churches try to make religion palatable to lonely women. That’s why they’re gay.

@pureMetatron A number 1/The Duke of New York

What do you say to someone who asks you: "What are your pronouns?"

@drinkonsaturday I encourage my customers to watch and be as involved as they want to be. Sometimes it's a pain, but more often than not, it's led to more trust and repeat business.

Does the client need their contractor on-site for every little issue...? Construction pros have a saying: “Trust the process.” It exists for good reason. Constant client presence slows crews, creates pressure for show-work over smart work, and drives up costs through endless explanations, mid-step changes, and “while you’re here” requests. Foundations get poured right because the crew knows soil, rebar, and code—not because you’re watching. Floors get leveled and framed efficiently when the sequence isn’t interrupted. That “extra” cinder block or minor adjustment? Often it’s value engineering or future-proofing you can’t see yet. Micromanaging turns invisible efficiency into visible theater. Best practice: Agree on clear milestones (foundation complete, framing done, rough-ins passed, etc.), schedule inspections, and do periodic walkthroughs with your contractor. Otherwise, let the men work. You pay for expertise and speed, not an audience. Fewer boots on site = faster, cheaper, better build.

There's a clay tablet with the founding charter of a 12-partner company on it. Twelve merchants pooled 33 pounds of gold to start the firm. The contract has the partner names, the starting capital, the profit split, and the penalty for cashing out early. The tablet is nearly 4,000 years old. It was found at a site called Kanesh, in central Turkey. Archaeologists have dug up 23,500 of these clay records there, most of them business documents: receipts, loan contracts, shipping orders, lawsuits. The houses they were stored in eventually burned. The fire baked the clay solid and preserved every record. The merchants came from Assur, in modern-day Iraq. They loaded donkeys with tin and cloth and walked them 1,000 kilometers across mountain passes to Kanesh, roughly the distance from New York to Atlanta. Each donkey carried about 180 pounds and the trip took two to three months. They came home with silver and gold. The company ran for twelve years under a merchant named Amur Ishtar. A third of the profits went back to the investors. Pull your share out early and the firm gave you four kilos of silver per kilo of gold, half the normal rate. Locked-up money was meant to stay locked up. That one company was just a tiny piece. The tablets show a complete economy with partners suing each other in commercial court, husbands writing home about prices, and wives writing back complaining the husband had been gone too long. A woman named Ahatum quietly lent silver to four different men over nine years. People bought up other people's loan documents and used them as collateral for new loans, the same thing Wall Street does today with mortgage-backed securities. One merchant got caught smuggling tin in his underwear to dodge a 10% import tax. In 2019, four economists from Harvard, Sciences Po, Chicago, and Virginia ran the tablet numbers through a gravity model, the math economists use today to predict how much two countries will trade based on size and distance. The Bronze Age numbers matched modern trade numbers almost exactly. Trade fell off with distance at nearly the same rate it does between countries today. The paper ran in the Quarterly Journal of Economics. There was no economic theory yet. The idea didn't even have a name. The word "capitalism" wouldn't be coined for another 3,800 years, and Adam Smith was 3,700 years away from writing a sentence about markets. Just a guy named Pushu-ken writing a clay tablet to his business partner about a shipment of cloth, and a woman in Assur recording who owed her how much silver. Capitalism was already there, doing its full job, almost four thousand years before anyone wrote down a theory of how it worked.

Democrats like to claim that their voters are wayyy more educated than Republican voters. They also insist their own voters are too dumb to get an ID to vote. Pick a lane, retards.

@weave2u @EndWokeness

@EndWokeness Well, walmart should ALLOW people who have been marginalized by the country to freely take whatever they want... Yes, the tax payer pay out BILLION$ every single month to them, but they can't help being stinkin' no good scumbags... know what I mean?

Chicago Alderman William Hall wants to see Walgreens face charges for closing (over a shoplifting crisis)

@MTV You misspelled degenerate man.

Pretttiestt girl in the whole world! 📍 Hunter Schafer at the #MetGala

When the man drops bangers, he drops bangers. While I just want to sit back and enjoy this post, I also want to dig into why it’s so good: Just think about Europe itself. For the vast majority of its history prior to 1945, Europe had a conflict in it. Hell, let’s just go back to the 1800s. I won’t (i.e., can’t) name them all but consider... - Napoleonic Wars from (1803-1815) - Greek War of Independence (1821-1829) - French invasion of Spain (1823) - Schleswig War (1848-1851) - Crimean War (1853-56) - Austro-Prussian War (1866) - Franco-Prussian War (1870-71) - Serbo Bulgarian War (1885) - Balkan Wars (1912-13) - Two World Wars If I go back further centuries, you’ll find conflicts between nations at least once a decade. And massive wars every few decades. The fact is, Europe is a continent of conflicts. All those nations crammed in together. It’s bound to happen. Then WWII (not 11, Omar) ended. With the US-led Allies and Soviets butting heads in Germany. Famously, some US generals (Patton), wanted to keep steaming east to push Stalin out of Europe. He was probably right. Instead, you get the Cold War. The U.S., not wanting it to turn into a hot war, defended Europe with massive amounts of military, and a nuclear umbrella, to inhibit any further Soviet aggression. From 1946 to 1989, the US spent, on average 8% of its GDP on military. Hundreds of billions of dollars. Adjust that for inflation and you're talking trillions a year. Even after the Cold War, the US spends nearly a trillion dollars every year (if not more) on its military. And we're supposedly at "peace" most of that time. The U.S. has subsidized Europe’s defenses for over 80 years. During that time, many of these countries have gone socialist: free healthcare, free this, free that. And at the same time giving a finger to the cowboys across the Atlantic. But crying when we threaten to pack up and go home. NATO (the US) gave Europe relative peace, and avoided a nuclear war. But the question is, what does NATO do today? NATO has lost its focus. It has to be whipped for its non-US members to increase defense spending. It has been proactive (read as: aggressive) in expansion, forcing the conflict in Ukraine. Thumbs its nose to its biggest member when that member tries to stave off an Islamofascist regime getting a nuclear bomb. So on and so forth. Pretty much, against US interests. So, yes, maybe we should consider spending all the money elsewhere.

@MissSassbox Got a mouse in your pocket?

we don't want one hour shipping, we want the workers to have one hour for lunch instead

@FAFOFarmsTX Between my guineas and peafowl, I have no ticks on my 8 acres. When we moved in, they were everywhere.

I have a solution to your tick problem but you may not like it. So far we've had ZERO issues with ticks, chiggers, and other tiny terrible insects since we got these guys...

@MissJilianne Still cheaper than the Access Lifetime. It says free, but it cost me an arm and a leg.

I think it’s disgusting the United States charges $100 per person visiting our country to enter a National Park. Embarrassing too!

A lot of people have this completely twisted. There is no constitutional right to “protest” in the United States. What the First Amendment actually protects is the right to peacefully assemble. That’s it. You have the right to stand peacefully, hold a sign, and express your views — without violence, without blocking roads, without destroying property, without intimidation, and without screaming obscenities. The second it becomes loud, destructive, coercive, or threatening, it stops being a protected right and becomes lawlessness. Simple as that.

@SteveOnSpeed GC in west central IL. Sounds low to mid-range on price.

Just got a quote for a new garage at our lake house. $70,000. Includes: Foundation. 24x30 garage. Loft area upstairs with full plumbing. Earth leveling. Running utilities, like power, water, and sewer. This is good, terrible, or about right?

Had a real conversation today… A man told me: “Black people just lost their ability to vote.” I asked him one question… Why only Black people? Why not Asians… Indians… Germans… Italians? He pivoted… Said the Supreme Court “won’t give Black people special circumstances anymore.” So I asked him plainly… You’re saying Black Americans need permanent federal oversight to vote? Indefinitely? Because without it… what… they can’t participate? He had no answer. Let’s deal in facts… The 15th Amendment already guarantees the right to vote regardless of race. That protection never went away. What changed is this… The Court questioned whether decades-old emergency provisions should continue without current, measurable evidence. That’s a constitutional question… not racial suppression. If your argument is that one group needs a permanent exception to the standard applied to every other American… You better be able to explain why. Because if you can’t… You’re not defending rights. You’re defending dependency. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

Are you wondering why the entire Left Wing of America is melting down over this Supreme Court decision right now? Constitutional⚖️lawyer here — Allow me.👋🏼 Today, SCOTUS dropped a 6-3 reality check in Louisiana v. Callais that has the usual race-hustler brigade frothing at the mouth. Justice Alito’s majority opinion just ruled that Louisiana’s congressional map — with its extra majority-Black district snaking across the state like Michelle Obama on Cialis — was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. Why? Because Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act didn’t require the state to play racial bean-counter and subordinate every traditional districting principle (compactness, communities of interest, you know, actual geography) to skin color. No compelling interest under strict scrutiny = GAME OVER. Boom. Equal Protection Clause wins again. This isn’t “gutting” the VRA, you professional outrage farmers. It’s interpreting it correctly for the first time in decades. Alito laid it out crystal clear: The VRA is a SHIELD🛡️against actual discrimination, not a sword🗡️for engineering racial spoils systems or proportional representation by melanin quota. You see, Louisiana’s map prioritized race above everything else without the required justification. That’s textbook reverse discrimination — treating non-Black voters as second-class citizens whose votes get diluted so Democrats can lock in “safe seats.” The 14th Amendment doesn’t do “equity” carve-outs; it demands equal protection for everyone. No more “but it’s for the minorities!” loopholes that just flip the racism script. And yet, here come the usual suspects — the Congressional Black Caucus, their media megaphone, and every blue-check race baiter on X — screaming that this “dismantles Black voting power,” “revives Jim Crow,” and “ends democracy.” Spare us the crocodile tears. These are the same folks who cheered on the race-based admissions, hiring quotas, and DEI hiring that screwed over Asians and whites… but suddenly “racism” is back on the menu when the Court says voters aren’t interchangeable racial pawns. Hypocrites. Your entire grift depends on keeping Americans sorted into victim blocs so you can harvest votes and donor cash. NEWSFLASH: Treating people as individuals instead of skin-color commodities isn’t “suppressing” anyone — it’s the literal definition of civil rights. This opinion is chef’s kiss well-reasoned constitutionalism. It flows straight from Shaw v. Reno-era precedents and the Framers’ vision: Race is the most suspect classification, not a magic wand for map-drawers. The VRA was born to crush poll taxes and literacy tests that kept Black Americans from the ballot box. It was never meant to mandate racial gerrymandering as a permanent feature of American elections. SCOTUS just slammed the door on that perversion, forcing states to draw maps based on people, not pigmentation. Result? More competitive districts, less racial polarization, and an actual shot at post-racial politics. The left can’t handle it because their power model collapses without the division. Fun fact for the woke warriors clutching their pearls in the replies: The Constitution is colorblind by design. It doesn’t care about your feelings, your “disparate impact” spreadsheets, or your need for perpetual victim status to stay relevant. Real equality means one set of rules for all — no reverse-racism exceptions, no matter how loudly you cry “systemic!” Cry harder, identity-politics vampires. The adults in the robe just reminded everyone why we have a Constitution: to protect US from YOU.🫵🏼 America moves forward when we judge ballots by content of character, not color of district. Deal with it.🔥🇺🇸

@Yatoplayz @PwrSlep Yes.

@PwrSlep If you and all your loved ones and friends were immediately dropped into the voting room with no time to talk to each other about it do you think they’re all picking red? Your mom,dad, son, daughter, friends etc ? And if they die because they chose blue they’d be stupid?

Am I high why are people saying red when picking blue saves everyone

@SamaHoole All my kids take part in butchering even if they don't hunt. If you wanna eat it, you help clean it.

The American deer camp was, between approximately 1880 and 1990, the autumn ritual of every rural family in the upper Midwest, the Northeast, and the Appalachians. A cabin in the woods. Three or four men, three generations sometimes, who got there on the Friday before opening day, lit the wood stove, drank coffee that had been on the burner since 4am, played cards, told the same stories they had told the year before, and went out at first light on Saturday with rifles their grandfathers had owned. A buck taken cleanly with one shot. Field-dressed in the snow. Hung in the woodshed. Butchered the next weekend in the garage with the family. Forty pounds of venison in the chest freezer. Steaks for the winter. Sausage made by the grandfather with a recipe nobody had written down. A roast for Thanksgiving. The hide tanned and turned into mittens for the youngest grandson. The deer was free. The freezer was full. The boys learned to shoot, to clean a rifle, to gut an animal, to butcher it, to thank the woods for the deer, to be quiet for hours at dawn in the cold and notice things. Roughly 14 million Americans hunted in 1980. By 2020 that number was 11.5 million, and the average hunter age had risen from 35 to 51. The next generation is not coming up. Suburbanization removed the woods from the back door. Liability fears closed private lands. Public hunting access shrank. Time pressure on working families killed the long weekend at camp. The cultural drift made hunting socially suspect, then unfashionable, then, in some quarters, taboo. The number of American teenagers who have ever fired a rifle, gutted an animal, or watched their grandfather butcher a deer in the garage on a November Sunday afternoon is, in 2026, statistically vanishing. The freezer that used to be full of free, lean, grass-fed wild protein is full of ground beef from a Smithfield CAFO in Iowa. The skill is one generation deep. If the grandfather did not pass it to the father, and the father did not pass it to the son, the chain is broken. YouTube is, at the moment, where the few remaining young hunters are getting most of their training. A small American tradition that fed families for a century, taught a sequence of practical and moral lessons no textbook can replace, and connected three generations to the land their ancestors lived on, is closing down quietly, camp by camp, season by season. The cabin is still there. The stove still works. The buck is still in the woods. The grandfather is in the cemetery on the hill above the cabin. He cannot take the boy himself. Somebody else has to.

@JackDangerLIVE Did you assume her gender? Besides, men and women are the same, so anyone can catch hands.

🚨 BREAKING: PURE EVIL CAUGHT ON CAMERA Nick Fuentes, part of the twisted “WOKE REICH”, just got exposed as the MONSTER he truly is. A woman shows up at his Illinois home… and this coward SPRAYS her with mace, then SHOVES her down the stairs like a ragdoll. She crashes hard onto the concrete, crawling in pain while he stands over her like some deranged predator. This is the same Fuentes who is telling everyone to ”VOTE DEMOCRAT” to stick it to Trump and Republicans, and physically assaults women for daring to confront him. Battery charges? Mysteriously dismissed. But the video doesn’t lie. This is not a “man.” This is a dangerous, violent woman-hater who belongs behind bars. How many more have to get hurt before America wakes up? SHARE THIS IF YOU WANT REAL MONSTERS EXPOSED. 🔥 #NickFuentesIsAMonster #ViolenceAgainstWomen #YourBodyMyChoiceExposed #DoxxingHisOwnMedicine

@ClassyNobleman @teameffujoe They killed themselves for not picking the smart option. Sounds like survival of the fittest to me.

@jruzich @teameffujoe Ah yes because being willing to kill up to 49 percent of the world definitely doesn't mean you're a weak cowardly pussy

This isn’t a test of morals it’s a test of reading comprehension.