jtmoorman

BREAKING: Tom Homan just confirmed that because of President Trump, TSA agents will get PAID! As soon as TOMORROW! Huge!

@teslaownersSV @elonmusk 🤣 🤣 You just can’t make this up!!

@elonmusk Actual screenshot from ChatGPT 😂😂

Troubling

@Teslaconomics @elonmusk Seriously!!! This cannot be said enough. Trust the individual who was literally willing to put his money on the line to ensure freedom of thought, speech, and expression on X, the United States, and globally. That’s the guy you want ensuring AI will honor those same freedoms.

@elonmusk This is why I only trust Elon running an AI company, just being honest.

@GuntherEagleman The ostrich syndrome is real with this one! 🤣 🤣

@Jules2322698 @GuntherEagleman Oh yes…clearly I’m the one who doesn’t understand rhetoric. Tuck tale and run little libby. Time to ostrich up. 🤣 🤣

🤦🏻‍♂️ You just conceded the point in your opening line. “Irony didn’t need a eulogy” is precisely the rebuttal to your original claim that irony was dead. If irony didn’t need a eulogy, then it wasn’t dead. Which means your first post collapsed under its own weight before the rest of us even arrived. And your appeal to “real-world hypocrisy” does not rescue the argument. It only shifts the ground. The issue was never whether hypocrisy exists. Of course it does. The issue was whether your original post was itself ironic. It was. As for “felon” rhetoric, repeating a politically convenient label does not transform a disputed prosecution into moral clarity. Many of us reject the lawfare, the “trumped up charges,” the biased judge and predisposition jury pool of “peers,” the selective outrage, and the theatrical pretense that weaponized institutions of justice suddenly become noble when aimed at the hostis humani generis as only the illiberal regressive left may define. So no, this was not a display of insight. It was a self-own in two acts: first, declaring irony dead while depending on irony to make the joke work; second, claiming philosophical seriousness while dodging the contradiction entirely. How utterly ironic.

I don't get it... why do democrats protect criminals so hard?

“MAGA 1984, war is peace” is a cute line, but it dodges the actual issue. No serious person thinks war is peace. The argument is that limited force can prevent a larger war later. You may disagree with that judgment, but pretending the position is literally “war is peace” is just bumper-sticker rhetoric for people avoiding the harder question. Was “no wars” a pledge against every conceivable military action? Of course not. It was a rejection of endless, ideology-driven, nation-building disasters. If you cannot distinguish that from a targeted operation against a hostile regime with a 47-year record of attacking and killing Americans, destabilizing an entire region, and acting as the number 1 sponsor of terror globally (which included harboring elements of al-Qaeda pre and post 9-11) then your problem is not moral clarity. It is category confusion.

@jtmoorman2 Hahaha ! Welcome to MAGA 1984 where “war is peace.” Trump campaigned “no wars,” Netanyahu finally hooked him after 30 years of trying, and Trump bit hard. You cultists still spinning excuses. What part of “no wars” confused you ? 'Netanyahu’s 30-Year Iran Nuclear Warning'

Do you support President Trump’s decision to take out the Ayatollah regime in Iran? I do! 💯% Let me count the ways… 1️⃣ We are dismantling the #1 state sponsor of terrorism in the world. ✅ 2️⃣ We are removing the single largest destabilizing force in the Middle East. ✅ 3️⃣ We are eliminating a major global flashpoint agonising factor for WWIII. ✅ 4️⃣ We are bringing China back to the renegotiation table over energy usage (including fuel for their navy). ✅ 5️⃣ We are preventing nuclear proliferation to prevent a nuclear arms race in the Middle East. ✅ 6️⃣ We are guaranteeing protection of global shipping lanes. Iran repeatedly threatens the Strait of Hormuz and Red Sea trade routes that carry a massive share of the world’s energy. ✅ (Also refer back to 3). 7️⃣ Finally, and most importantly, we are ending a conflict that didn’t start today. The Iranian regime has been attacking Americans since 1979. Hostages. Beirut barracks. Khobar Towers. IEDs killing U.S. troops in Iraq. Decades of proxy attacks. Assassination attempts. This isn’t starting a war. It’s ending one. ✅ Operation Epic Fury is surgical. It’s removing an ulcer that’s been festering for 45 years. Previous US administrations have used less invasive measures only to watch the situation fester and boil. No more sanction salves. No more appeasement creams. No more covering up the source without treating the underlying condition. President Trump is acting for the U.S. and, as usual, helping out the world in the process.

@DrChungus319 @RealJessica @HartshornFrank Throwing out an ad hominem claiming the opposition is dumb because you can’t deal with the facts. Classic illiberal regressive.

@jtmoorman2 @RealJessica @HartshornFrank You cult members are the dumbest fucks on the planet

The number of No Kings protests by state... Alabama - 16 Alaska - 19 Arizona - 62 Arkansas - 12 California - 325 Colorado - 74 Connecticut - 51 Delaware - 9 Florida - 113 Georgia - 72 Hawaii - 14 Idaho - 17 Illinois - 105 Indiana - 71 lowa - 61 Kansas - 33 Kentucky - 40 Louisiana - 11 Maine - 56 Maryland - 74 Massachusetts - 162 Michigan - 121 Minnesota - 106 Mississippi - 9 Missouri - 54 Montana - 31 Nebraska - 21 Nevada - 11 New Hampshire - 43 New Jersey - 64 New Mexico - 28 New York - 140 And just like that...the left aren't concerned about gas prices anymore when it comes to driving to locations to protest a king that we do not have..🤣🤣

@BillTomphson @RealJessica @HartshornFrank The left when you point out their hypocrisy: “How can I deflect and make it look like I’m not a hypocrite?”

@jtmoorman2 @RealJessica @HartshornFrank

No new wars does not mean NEVER WAR. War is always awful. Sometimes it’s necessary. I see you dodged responding though didn’t you. So, I suppose you’d rather have to fight war here on American soil. You’d prefer another 9-11 situation. You’re the one with no principals. It’s just blind loyalty to a misunderstood appropriation of old school isolationism. Two extremes exist on one spectrum: Globalism and Isolationism. Both are terrible. Trump exists on the spectrum more toward the isolationism side without being blindly ideologically fixated on it. Trump has, thus far, ended or preempted major conflicts in a number of arenas. He is resetting the globalist agenda. You don’t like it. That would indicate you are either a globalist or an isolationist. Which is it?

@jtmoorman2 Trump/GOP ran on “no wars” and “we’re not Bush neocons.” Voters believed it. The second Trump started one, you flipped to full warmonger, desperately excusing the betrayal. No principles, just blind loyalty. That’s a cult. We see you. 🧐

@wakeupusa Where?

MAGA, feeling scared?

@4thOfJuly365 Ahh…more evidence this comes from a deep seated psychological need for a 60s style piece pipe and hookah “protest.” 🤣 The only light they want shining is the kind that flickers at the end of a zippo lighter.

This is how No Kings Protesters get ready to waste an entire day protesting something that doesn't exist.

Joe Kent is a sold out TC fanboy. Neither Charlie, nor Trump wanted war with Iran. However, tha desire does not change the facts in reality concerning what they were doing to build back up their nuclear program and their ballistic missile program. It was self evident by the missile attack on Diego Garcia 3800 km away. Trump is ending a 47 year hot/cold war tha has been ongoing between us and Iran. The President tried negotiation, but he’s not like previous Presidents who sauce to appease or sanction ad infinitum. Allowing Iran to just build back up after we had to take out their nuclear enrichment programs last year was always a no go. Were Charlie alive today I have no doubt he would have seen the necessity in Operation Wpic Fury. He also would have seen the REAL Iranian people (refugees around the world) celebrating the downfall of the ayatollah. When you find yourself as an advocate for the regime that is the number 1 sponsor of terror in the region and world, that murders 30-40k of its own youth who did nothing more than protest, you are on the wrong side of history my friend. America Only is NOT America First. When we fight an enemy…when we must, is it better to fight here on our soil or seek to preemptively defang the opposition?

@jtmoorman2 No need to speculate or make shit up, someone who actually knew CK, has the answer. Joe Kent: Charlie Kirk told me ‘stop us from getting into a war with Iran’ thehill.com/homenews/media…

@EricLDaugh @_Patriot1776Q_ They should face consequences!

🚨 JUST IN: People are demanding these leftist harassers face consequences after they REPEATEDLY harass ICE agents in airports "Nazi pieces of sht!" ICE: "You're lovely, ma'am. Thank you." 😂🔥 LIB: "F-ing race traitor!!" 🤡

Pretty much.

The following is from The Elsa Kurt Show, and I agree with every single word: "After Charlie Kirk was murdered there was something that felt and looked like revival happening, millions of people responded the way we should - with grief & prayer. And then the noise came back. Speculation, theories, people speaking with certainty before facts were even settled. People with large platforms - like Candace Owens - pushing that wave forward. Not careful, not measured, but CONFIDENT. Suggestive ("I'm just asking qUeSTiOns"). Enough to get people thinking they knew something they didn’t. The same people who have ZERO firsthand knowledge about anything, rage typing on their keyboard about how they “know” his wife plotted to have him killed. And once that door opened, others followed. That’s how this works. Influential voices don’t just share opinions, they set tone. And the tone shifted FAST from mourning to suspicion. I watched it happen. What should have been handled with care turned into content. And a grieving wife and her children ended up in the crosshairs of people who will never have to answer for what they said. That’s the part we shouldn’t be okay with. There’s a difference between wanting truth and wanting to be right. One waits. One rushes. One builds. The other tears down. Scripture doesn’t leave this vague: 'You will know them by their fruits.' Not their reach. Not their confidence. Not how many people repeat them. Fruit. If what’s coming out of it is division, accusation, and people going after a widow without evidence… we don’t need a debate about what that is. When Candace exhausts this topic, she’ll move on to the next tabloid style hit piece, just like she’s done time and again. The damage is done, mission accomplished, pockets lined, no accountability. 'But what if you're wrong, Elsa, and she IS guilty of something?' Well, I say what I've said before: I would rather be the fool who offered undeserving grace and kindness than the one who spewed undeserving cruelty. I'm not afraid of being wrong, I'm afraid of being evil. But you do you." My response: When you err on the side of evil, you're on the wrong side.

@BrandonStraka “Don’t go anywhere alone in these autocratic streets…” Seriously?! Because in a true autocracy she would be disappeared for simply saying those words. She should be thanking President Trump for making those protests safe again! They were much less safe under Biden!!

Jane Fonda and Joy Reid urge supporters to join “No Kings” protests. They encourage turnout with a lighter tone. “You can protest and look cute while doing it.”

The Persian (true Iranian) people are with us in taking down this regime. The Ayatollah regime has attempted to make it regional to their detriment. Charlie Kirk was showing wisdom in thinking on these things, but the time had come to act. I believe Charlie would have been wholeheartedly behind what we have done and are seeking to do in Iran right now.

@jtmoorman2 🧐

@MAGAVoice @davidjmcwalter Nick Shirley is a true American hero.

Raise your hand if you think Nick Shirley should continue exposing fraud in Newsom’s California