Jukka

1.6K posts

Jukka

Jukka

@jugibuilds

Cooking an agent orchestration platform • I use Claude Code 12 hours a day

Katılım Ocak 2012
1.2K Takip Edilen826 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Jukka
Jukka@jugibuilds·
@fynnso If Composer is just Kimi And Cursor is just VS Code Where’s the moat bro
English
15
1
199
22.4K
Jukka
Jukka@jugibuilds·
@svpino If it works it works. Better to have well-configured alerts to spot real bugs early.
English
0
0
0
168
Santiago
Santiago@svpino·
I don’t read AI generated code. I don’t read AI generated tests. If AI says everything is good, I ship to production. This is a flawless strategy.
Moses Xu@mosesxu

@svpino i don't read every line CC writes for me. i define what needs to be tested and CC writes the tests too. if they pass it ships. "i understand every line in my codebase" was already a lie before AI showed up, now we just can't pretend anymore

English
57
8
225
30K
Jukka
Jukka@jugibuilds·
Applies to new features too not just first launches. Better to get users to use the stuff and spot obvious bugs. When they report something it tells you they care and they too want to get it working. Also a signal to build more. And a great opportunity to get to know the users.
English
0
0
0
34
Viktor Seraleev
Viktor Seraleev@seraleev·
I failed with StorySDK Spent a year building features. Waiting for the “perfect” launch. Then I finally launched… And no one used those features. Not even once. But users started messaging me: asking for things I never even considered. They had problems to solve. I was thinking in features. Lesson: Start with the problem. Features can come later. Don’t delay the launch.
Viktor Seraleev tweet media
Viktor Seraleev@seraleev

A lot of developers obsess about features Users rarely care. They care about solving one small problem quickly

English
2
0
13
2.6K
Jukka
Jukka@jugibuilds·
@zach_yadegari how do you estimate/calculate LTV for new businesses? pretty easy to just believe that yes our users stay 3 years
English
0
0
0
84
Zach Yadegari
Zach Yadegari@zach_yadegari·
It's really interesting how so few people truly understand how distribution works. There is no magic sauce. If it's a sole-user experience, you just need to learn how CAC : LTV works and then how to operate social media platforms on both the organic and paid side. If it's a social experience, you need to learn how k-factor works (much harder). Stop doing stupid shit like throwing flyers out of airplanes.
English
46
37
1.3K
73.5K
Jukka
Jukka@jugibuilds·
@EXM7777 easier to just 1. buy a business 2. automate with agents 3. sell it as an agentic business repeat
English
0
0
1
21
Machina
Machina@EXM7777·
the biggest AI opportunity right now isn't building agents it's understanding businesses well enough to build the RIGHT agent marketing agents specifically every business needs one... almost nobody is building them properly what i see instead: > generic "content teams" that pump out forgettable posts > bullshit automations that feel like spam > systems built around AI capabilities instead of business needs flip that start with the business problem, map the funnel, understand the audience... then build a system that fits like a glove the AI part is honestly the easy part, understanding businesses is harder
English
57
7
206
8.3K
Jukka
Jukka@jugibuilds·
@ky__zo Congrats. Keep on building.
English
0
0
0
33
kyzo
kyzo@ky__zo·
Fluar just got acquired in an all cash, 6-figure deal I built it solo for 14 months, now it’s going to an industry leading team that can really scale it this is the second startup I’ve sold since I learned to code 3 years ago life is incredible, what a time to be alive 🫡 LFGG
kyzo tweet media
English
149
5
523
31.8K
Jukka
Jukka@jugibuilds·
@tminusdev @fynnso Yeah they add some magic on top of models. It’s actually a great way to monetize deep knowledge that others don’t (yet) have. Modern consulting.
English
0
0
3
854
Dev
Dev@tminusdev·
@jugibuilds @fynnso Probably the system prompt, which is arguably better than GitHub copilot
English
2
0
2
904
Jukka retweetledi
Jukka
Jukka@jugibuilds·
@fynnso If Composer is just Kimi And Cursor is just VS Code Where’s the moat bro
English
15
1
199
22.4K
Jukka
Jukka@jugibuilds·
@seraleev Game over if doing paid and somone still outbids.
English
0
0
0
54
Viktor Seraleev
Viktor Seraleev@seraleev·
Let me tell you a story. When I launched my first app, it started growing purely on ASO. No ads. Just organic. Then something happened. A competitor showed up. First: they used incentivized traffic to climb to the top. Then: they turned on ads. And just like that… I lost my traffic. That was the moment I learned: ASO alone is not a strategy. It’s a vulnerability. If you rely only on organic, sooner or later someone will come in, spend money, and take your position. Since then, I always combine ASO + paid acquisition. Because ASO has another problem – it’s capped. There’s only so much traffic you can get. If you want to scale, you need ads. You need social. You need distribution outside the store. Otherwise you’re just waiting for someone to outbid you.
Thomas Burkhart 💙@ThomasBurkhartB

@seraleev Sorry that's wrong. I saw clear growth by better ASO

English
13
2
65
7.3K
Jukka
Jukka@jugibuilds·
@shiftj Those who have tons of followers can get these slop packages trending easily. Most just star & forget.
English
0
0
0
63
JC
JC@shiftj·
Is anyone actually using stuff like this? serious question
Guri Singh@heygurisingh

🚨BREAKING: Someone just open sourced a complete AI agency and it hit 50K GitHub stars in under two weeks. It's called The Agency. And it's not a prompt template. It's 147 specialized AI agents across 12 divisions -- engineering, design, marketing, product, QA, support, spatial computing, each with its own personality, workflow, and deliverables. Here's what you actually get: → 147 agents across 12 divisions, each with unique voice and expertise → Works natively with Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenCode, and more → One-command install for any supported tool → Agents have defined missions, success metrics, and production-ready code examples → Full modding support -- build and contribute your own agents → Interactive installer that auto-detects your dev environment → Conversion scripts for every major agentic coding tool → Lua-style Markdown templates with YAML frontmatter Here's the wildest part: Most people use AI like a generalist intern. One model doing everything from writing copy to debugging code. This repo structures AI like an actual company. Specialized roles. Clear responsibilities. Defined workflows between agents. It started as a Reddit thread. Now it has 50K+ stars, 7.5K forks, and contributions from developers around the world. Greg Isenberg called it out. It hit 10K stars in 7 days. This is what the future of AI-assisted development actually looks like. 50K+ GitHub stars. 7.5K forks. 147 agents. 12 divisions. 100% Open Source. MIT License. (Link in the comments)

English
21
0
12
7.4K
Jukka
Jukka@jugibuilds·
@seraleev > Why people install. Need exists or Curiousity > Why they subscribe. Hard paywalls = good (enough) offer, or Soft paywalls = good (enough) product > Why they churn. Need does not exist anymore or Product does not satisfy needs
English
0
0
3
138
Viktor Seraleev
Viktor Seraleev@seraleev·
One underrated skill for mobile developers: Understanding user psychology. Why people install. Why they subscribe. Why they churn.
English
13
1
72
2.8K
Jukka
Jukka@jugibuilds·
Custom code factories is the way to go. QA is becoming the bottleneck though. The mega productivity unlock is to build an autonomous custom pipeline that wraps a coding agent to do things the way your company wants. I just last week tripled my team's output by developing a custom Docker based agent. The container runs Claude Code with the exact stack we use and completes long running tasks with zero babysitting from start to finish. Exciting times.
English
1
0
1
2.1K
Praveen Neppalli
Praveen Neppalli@praveenTweets·
Agentic software engineering adoption is on fire at @Uber. 1,800 code changes per week are now written entirely by Uber's internal background coding agent, and 95% of our engineers now use AI every month across all the tools we track. This is a real reset moment for engineering; it's one of the most exciting times to lead. This shift requires builders to be curious and hands-on. I’m incredibly lucky to be surrounded by a team that’s doing exactly that. The best part is that the strongest adoption isn’t being pushed top down from leadership announcements; it’s coming from engineers who are quietly experimenting, quietly shipping, and quietly pushing things forward. I love spending time with those engineers because there’s no substitute for being close to the work. Over the last few months, we leaned in hard, and the results have been phenomenal. The bigger shift: going agentic. 84% of AI users are now working with agent-style workflows, not just tab completion. Claude Code usage nearly doubled in 2 months (32% → 63%), while IDE-based tools have largely plateaued. Engineers are moving from accepting suggestions to delegating tasks. Even within traditional IDEs, ~70% of committed code is now AI-generated. Background agents are writing code autonomously. Our internal background coding agent went from <1% of all code changes to 8% in just a few months. There is zero human authoring. Engineers review and approve, but the code is written entirely by AI agents. The role of the engineer is shifting - from writing every line to architecting systems and reviewing AI-generated code. More to come from the @UberEng team in the coming days.
English
178
168
1.8K
472.2K
Jukka
Jukka@jugibuilds·
@thekitze Formatting should be optimized for LLMs. All the tools optimize visual preferences but how about improving code search, understandability, relevancy etc.
English
0
0
0
300