Julius Wallblom

475 posts

Julius Wallblom banner
Julius Wallblom

Julius Wallblom

@juliuswallblom

Building @checkbonsai. Do the hard thing.

Sweden Katılım Ekim 2020
127 Takip Edilen1.2K Takipçiler
Julius Wallblom
Julius Wallblom@juliuswallblom·
24 hours has passed since I launched @checkbonsai on the App Store. some stats: * 6k+ views (across 4 different brand new, warmed up TikTok and Instagram accs) * 120 installs * 4 trials started using @usefastlane for content creation, @superwall and @revenuecat for paywalls will keep you posted
English
1
0
6
141
Julius Wallblom
Julius Wallblom@juliuswallblom·
daily reminder to do the hard thing
English
2
0
4
38
Martin Shkreli
Martin Shkreli@MartinShkreli·
Talking peptides and happy to debate anyone! Join the space!
English
54
7
444
87.1K
Julius Wallblom
Julius Wallblom@juliuswallblom·
daily reminder to do marketing. you can’t just build and expect customers to pour in hand over fist 🫰
English
1
0
5
35
Jon Kaplan
Jon Kaplan@aye_aye_kaplan·
everyone thinks they can make bugbot
English
16
7
163
14.9K
Abhishek B R
Abhishek B R@abhitwt·
unpopular opinion: Cursor is better than Claude code or Codex
English
75
1
79
8.5K
Claude
Claude@claudeai·
Code Review optimizes for depth and may be more expensive than other solutions, like our open source GitHub Action. Reviews generally average $15–25, billed on token usage, and they scale based on PR complexity.
English
265
122
3.1K
7.2M
Claude
Claude@claudeai·
Introducing Code Review, a new feature for Claude Code. When a PR opens, Claude dispatches a team of agents to hunt for bugs.
English
2.1K
5.1K
62.6K
23.5M
Julius Wallblom
Julius Wallblom@juliuswallblom·
@jarredsumner Why are we acting like existing code review platforms don't also use SOTA coding agents? Devin review, Greptile, Coderabbit and OpenDiff definitely catch a lot more than 'surface level stuff'
English
0
0
0
73
Jarred Sumner
Jarred Sumner@jarredsumner·
What’s especially interesting: it catches different bugs. Other code review products tend to be better at surface-level stylistic issues like “filename doesn’t match the project conventions” Claude Code Review regularly catches bugs that only surface from reading tons of code
Jarred Sumner tweet media
English
5
0
89
9.8K
Julius Wallblom
Julius Wallblom@juliuswallblom·
90% of SaaS could be a n8n automation or a scheduled prompt. guess what? companies still pay for saas.
English
0
0
1
32
Julius Wallblom
Julius Wallblom@juliuswallblom·
untitledui icons is the premium lucide helvetica now is the premium inter the only UI kit worth paying for is tailark ur welcome
English
0
0
1
50
Julius Wallblom
Julius Wallblom@juliuswallblom·
@initjean seriously, start building these features yourself with the opencode SDK. you’ll be able to use any inference provider subscription quotas
English
0
0
0
20
Cursor
Cursor@cursor_ai·
Cursor can now automatically fix issues it finds in PRs with Bugbot Autofix.
English
73
77
1.1K
141.3K
Julius Wallblom retweetledi
toly 🇺🇸
toly 🇺🇸@toly·
Didn’t @jack have 10k people running this website when only 75 were needed even before AI?
jack@jack

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

English
134
82
2.4K
311.1K
Cloudflare
Cloudflare@Cloudflare·
We rebuilt Next.js in a week. No, really. The team ported the framework to run natively on Workers to prove what’s possible with edge-first architecture. Dive into the technical hurdles we solved to eliminate Node.js dependencies. cfl.re/4ciNc3L
English
174
535
5.3K
1.9M
Julius Wallblom
Julius Wallblom@juliuswallblom·
@orcdev opendiff.dev open source code reviews with skills, sensitivity tuning, rules, orgs, all self-host able and self-deployable :)
English
1
0
1
152
OrcDev
OrcDev@orcdev·
I want to boost some open source projects ⚔️ Drop your GitHub repos below. I'll share the best ones and maybe even make videos about them. Let's get some deserving projects the attention they need 💚 Open source deserves more love in this AI crazy world
English
119
2
113
11.2K
Julius Wallblom
Julius Wallblom@juliuswallblom·
someone very wise once said when in doubt, console.log it out here1 here2
English
0
0
0
22