VRFD

Learn more about VRFD at Catlumpurr ✅✅✅

@wenmellow @JupiterExchange nope! the submission on VRFD is enough

@JupiterExchange do tokens still need to make a post mentioning @jup_VRFD to get token verified after being submitted via Express Verification?

People see the updates. The ships. The speed. What they don't see is the why. Hear it from the builders themselves.

@JupDevRel get on the same tokens api that we dogfood ourselves on the daily!

Everything you need to know about any token on Solana — metadata, safety audits, trading stats, and the most widely used token verification system in the ecosystem (shoutout to @jup_VRFD). All from one API. That's the Jupiter Tokens API 👇

@mooncatonmoon @JupiterExchange hey! mind submitting this through verified.jup.ag? it helps the reviewers follow everything in one place. if you also want the old token untagged, you can request that at the same time too 🙂

Hey @JupiterExchange can you put the gas on the verification for the new CA? Same community, different platform.

Hey there 🙂 Note that the optional Express fee only guarantees a faster review timeframe, but projects still need to demonstrate healthy levels across the review indicators listed on the application page. The standards around verification are necessary to ensure it remains meaningful and promote a healthy ecosystem, and these are applied consistently for all applications. While the metrics are assessed holistically, we have also introduced a warning for submissions under 100k MC to provide additional clarity during the application process. We do understand this can be frustrating for teams building in good faith, and we appreciate the work you're putting into your project. As previously mentioned, we're happy to reassess your project via Express in the future without requiring a new payment once the token shows stronger traction.

Because Jupiter does not care about genuine tokens. For them, it is important to get 1000 JUP for token update + 1000 JUP for verification. Someone from Jupiter told me in email that liquidity is not important, nor whether the token is genuine or from a known builder. Well, let’s be honest: Jupiter prefers scams from unknown developers paying 0.1 SOL per deployment, let’s call them token deployers instead of developers, who have made 3600–5600 scams in total while seeking viral events. To cut a long story short: Assistant Hinata contacted Jupiter Discord. She was told that the 1000 JUP payment for token update is not enough and the developer needs to pay another 1000 JUP to get verified. I paid. After I contacted Jupiter support myself via web to ask why they refuse to verify a genuine token, they absolutely did not care. I explained that it is harming my Raydium pool since @Raydium no longer does strict listing and now uses Jupiter verified status. It is harming Solana Chinchilla Haton. Yes, it harms visibility in the Solana ecosystem and trust. If you do not need to sell crypto because of actual crypto market. Just HODL Chinchilla $HATON and relax. Friends of Chinchilla: Orca Whirlpools, RugCheck Meerkat, Phantom and others. Enemies threatening to destroy or harm Chinchilla $HATON will only drop the stone on their own feet! Trust the Chinchilla with a plan! Here couple of Gems verified by Jupiter 👇 that number is massive!!!

Behind every “Jupiter just works” moment is infrastructure that makes it faster, safer, and more cohesive. @espicodes walks through our Platform Layer

Hey! Just to clarify the timeline: Express submissions get up to 3 reviews at 24-48hrs apart. The first one happened before the token was live, which is why it wasn’t approved at that stage. When the application came back into view for the next review, the token was already trading and was verified straight away.

Guys I need your help. @JupiterExchange @weremeow @0xSoju I have launched many times using Met and jup, I was one of the largest pools at one point for metav. We did this yesterday and delayed so it would be good. It was rejected. I even paid the jup fee. I’m trying to get this token verified, we keep getting rejected even when it’s nearly at 1m with, plenty of volume. The community might need to spam this a bit so it can get verified faster so it shows properly in peoples wallets.

@goyimcoinsol received!

hey @jup_VRFD update the info thanks

@arifkazi_ @monad @pareen @d3t3 @HarryAlford3 @buntyverse @snubeaver @yungbij @BoxMrChen @Joey_Anthony_ hi @arifkazi_, we have flagged this AI summary for rework. thanks! as a side note, u can report inaccurate info via the link in your screenshot and someone will attend to it.

Hey! Thank you for raising this 🙏 We’re going to surface a warning when a token is below key thresholds, so teams have more clarity before applying. Burning JUP for Express isn’t necessarily wasted if thresholds aren’t met right now. Please open a support ticket and we’ll walk through your submission directly and share guidance on what to improve and next steps

So the $VISION and $CLAWGRID verification on JUP was rejected because the required thresholds weren’t met? We burned 2,000 JUP for the express lane, which ended up being a waste of funds. Would it be possible to add a validation step before allowing a token to burn JUP - something that checks whether the required thresholds are already met before proceeding? @JupiterExchange @jup_VRFD @

@LindaSunshine66 @SallyLondon72 @JupiterExchange hi there. we look at a range of indicators and sometimes tokens don't get verified until they meet them. please feel free to reach out via support.jup.ag if we missed any context, a human will be there to walk you through.

@SallyLondon72 @JupiterExchange @jup_VRFD That’s not up to $HATON no mater what’s the best project intentions, that is always on Jupiter employees decision

Are you on your way?

@D3f4ult_tv hi there, express submissions are reviewed within 48 hours, usually faster! we'll be right there with you -- the status can also be tracked on the submission dashboard with any feedback

can yall please give some insight into the verification process? this is our second time trying to verify @jup_VRFD this time we used Express and its been 24hours people literally cant even buy the $DFLT token anywhere else besides Pumpfun

@Vanguard0x @MagicalTux @JupiterExchange this is now verified, enjoy!

@MagicalTux @JupiterExchange Yo @jup_VRFD 👀

@JupiterExchange Let me know if you need anything more for verification

@Or_Jah_ @JupiterExchange @dymension hey there! we'll look into it right away.

yo @jup_VRFD @JupiterExchange DYM is officially on Solana. Paid the $JUP tax. Official @dymension bridged token is confirmed. NFT drop is days away and users are still waiting on verification @JupiterExchange. Don't make users trade into "unverified" warnings. Fix please. x.com/dymension/stat…

@wildgoatcoin @JupiterExchange Hi there, our verification process considers a range of indicators and this token hasn't met them yet. If we missed any context, please reach out via support.jup.ag and we'll be right with you

@JupiterExchange @jup_VRFD @jup_VRFD

@JupiterExchange @jup_VRFD 8aB8hdzyqjCJdtP1rfdLNX8bGDjjM8S42BZ3j4zNVtRN

For on-chain finance to scale, we need trustworthy, verified token information. Introducing VRFD: where anyone can contribute token verification, metadata, and news. Because trustworthy token information doesn't come from one team. It comes from all of us.

WE ARE LIVE FROM CATLUMPURR! twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1…

@jup_VRFD May I meet you at Catlumpurr? 👀

Learn more about VRFD at Catlumpurr ✅✅✅

@AngelonSOL3 Hey! see this support.jup.ag/hc/en-us/artic…

Hey @jup_VRFD how do I submit an update on meta data for a coin I verified ?