Stardust 💫

10.5K posts

Stardust 💫 banner
Stardust 💫

Stardust 💫

@k63504

Katılım Ocak 2025
377 Takip Edilen1.2K Takipçiler
Stardust 💫 retweetledi
Elon musk X pages
Elon musk X pages@Elonmube·
This side of Elon melts my heart ❤️ Beyond the business magnate, engineer, memelord & visionary… he’s a proud, loving dad teaching his boys about rockets & the future. Moments like this make me respect him even more 🫶
English
133
175
710
10.4K
Food Crush
Food Crush@CozycupC6149·
What’s a good side dish for lasagna?
Food Crush tweet media
English
1.6K
127
1.6K
123.9K
Kekius Maximus
Kekius Maximus@Kekius_Sage·
Is it possible to “download” knowledge directly into the brain?
English
644
39
620
33.2K
Stardust 💫 retweetledi
London4REFORM 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧
🚨 BREAKING: Reform UK has just hit 25% in Cardiff and SE Wales, pushing Labour into second place! The biggest surge in Welsh politics is happening right now. 🩵 Retweet so people in Wales see that change is coming very soon. 🗳️ Ordinary people are done waiting. 💥 #ReformUK #CardiffVotes
London4REFORM 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 tweet media
English
168
1.6K
3.6K
58.2K
Robbie
Robbie@Robbie_Reasons·
Is there one good reason why we shouldn't leave the European Court Of Human Rights?
Robbie tweet media
English
550
261
1.4K
14.2K
James 𝕏ond
James 𝕏ond@james_xond·
Do you hold the door open for the person behind you regardless of their sex, age, color and religion?
English
259
25
686
12.3K
ClarksonsFarm
ClarksonsFarm@ClarksonsFarm1·
Happy Easter to you all!
ClarksonsFarm tweet media
English
345
766
10.4K
92.4K
Miss Jo
Miss Jo@therealmissjo·
I didn’t mind if you were gay. Until you paraded in the streets in chaps and with dildos in front of families. I didn’t care if you were trans. Until you wanted access to my kids in school and wanted them to question their own sexuality and gender. I didn’t care if you were black or white or brown. Until you wanted to pull down statues, destroy our history, re-write our novels and pay you reparations. I didn’t care if you wanted to cross borders. Until you decided to do so illegally and then started criminal enterprises in the country you entered or lived off the welfare system. I even didn’t mind if you wanted an abortion, until you started celebrating them and calling the fœtus a “clump of cells”. I am not the only one. There are millions of people just like me. And we are angry now and will fight back. The line must be drawn here.
English
2.7K
15.7K
54.5K
3M
Astro Greek
Astro Greek@astro_greek·
When Elon invites you to show you his big rocket 😳
Astro Greek tweet media
English
165
82
480
8.3K
Molly Pitcher
Molly Pitcher@AmericanMama·
Go fuck yourself.
Molly Pitcher tweet media
English
6K
5.2K
29.5K
669.4K
Defiant L’s
Defiant L’s@DefiantLs·
Keir Starmer says he is "strongly" in favor of free speech, and he vows to protect free speech. He has an interesting way of showing it though.
English
936
340
1.5K
49.3K
James Melville 🚜
James Melville 🚜@JamesMelville·
No shit, Sherlock… Natural carbon capture machines. 🌳 🌳 🌳 🌳
James Melville 🚜 tweet media
English
131
596
2K
23.2K
Stardust 💫
Stardust 💫@k63504·
@JChimirie66677 Ridiculous. You cannot expect people to join the services if they are going to go through this damaging prosecution years later. They were doing their job. He definitely is the son of a tool maker.
English
1
0
20
294
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧@JChimirie66677·
Three former soldiers will appear at Belfast magistrates court on April 20th. One is charged with a killing that took place in May 1972. He is not accused of acting outside his orders. He is accused of acting within them. The distinction no longer appears to matter. This is the reality behind Labour's Northern Ireland Troubles Bill, a piece of legislation dressed in the language of reconciliation that functions, in practice, as an engine of persecution. The state that sent these men to Northern Ireland, that gave them their orders, that relied on their judgment in circumstances no minister has ever faced, is now the state that funds the machinery pursuing them through the courts half a century later. That is not a technicality. It is the central fact. Taxpayer money flows to the lawyers challenging the actions of soldiers whose actions were sanctioned by the taxpayer. The government calls this justice. General Sir Peter Wall, who commanded the British Army for four years, calls it something without moral backbone. He is right. The operational consequences are already visible. Elite soldiers are leaving the SAS and SBS rather than face the prospect of prosecution decades hence for missions carried out under government orders. The crisis has become sufficiently acute that reservists are being brought into the regular SAS to fill roles vacated by those walking out. Britain's most capable fighting force is being quietly hollowed out by a bill whose architects appear indifferent to the result. Seven former SAS commanders have warned that the legislation is doing the enemy's work, that operational secrets exposed through inquiries give hostile states a narrative of lawless troops. Moscow, Tehran and Beijing do not need to discredit British special forces. Westminster is doing it for them. The asymmetry at the heart of this legislation is not incidental. It is structural. IRA members were released under the Good Friday Agreement. Many destroyed evidence, stayed silent, or received letters guaranteeing they would not be pursued. Soldiers kept records, gave statements, and remained traceable. Decades later, only one group remains available for scrutiny. Not because they are more culpable, but because they are more reachable. The Coagh ambush of June 1991 illustrates the logic perfectly. Three IRA men were stopped by the SAS on their way to murder someone. A coroner ruled the force used was justified. Years later a family challenged that ruling, arguing the soldier should have paused after each shot to consider whether to fire the next one. A judge described that argument as ludicrous and utterly divorced from reality. The challenge continues, funded by legal aid, heard at the Court of Appeal just days ago. No verdict ends the process. The process is the punishment. Keir Starmer has said publicly he is absolutely confident there will be no vexatious prosecutions. Three soldiers will be in a Belfast court in sixteen days. His confidence has not reached them. The government insists its bill provides robust protections for veterans. General Sir Nick Parker, who oversaw the final operations in Northern Ireland, says ministers do not understand the duty of the state to stand by those who serve it. The duty to stand by those who serve is contractual, not sentimental. A soldier who follows orders in a war the state authorised cannot later be offered up as payment for political convenience. What is being constructed here is not a legacy process. It is a permanent legal industry, sustained by public money, targeting the most traceable participants in a conflict the state itself waged. The soldiers kept their records. That is now their liability. A serious country does not behave this way. This one, apparently, does. "Keir Starmer has said publicly he is absolutely confident there will be no vexatious prosecutions. Three soldiers will be in a Belfast court in sixteen days. His confidence has not reached them."
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 tweet mediaJim Chimirie 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
724
3.7K
8.6K
434.2K
Robbie
Robbie@Robbie_Reasons·
Zack Polanski vows to slash motorway speed limit to 55mph. Who is actually thinking of voting for this lunatic.
Robbie tweet media
English
282
92
440
12K