Stef

@stuntbaby1 @ShakeLS So she pays to have garbage written about her? Are you stupid?

@ShakeLS That’s Meghan’s PR. She pays for this drivel

The British press, RRs are beyond ridiculous. Once again 😂 changing their narrative. Yesterday all articles were how all powerful people were against Meghan. After Kris Jenner posted Meghan thanking her for her Asever gifts, now it's how powerful women plotting to help Meghan lol 🤣 sp bipolar

A new report claims that the Princess of Wales has declined the chance to attend the Met Gala multiple times over the past few years despite Anna Wintour's many efforts. skynews.com.au/lifestyle/cele…

@nazrien @DailyTPodcast @CamillaTominey @timothy_stanley Meghan is more educated and more accomplished than Harry, are you stupid?

@DailyTPodcast @CamillaTominey @timothy_stanley Stop infantilizing Harry. He's not 12 anymore. William was also a little boy. People seems to forget about him. Meghan is never divorcing Harry. He is her meal ticket to everywhere. She knows it. Without him all doors will be shut in her face.

'Meghan found in Harry the perfect empath because she found somebody who wants to save her' On today's Daily T, we're in Worthing for the last stop in our road trip. @CamillaTominey and @timothy_stanley are joined by Lady Colin Campbell and Phil Dampier, royal reporter extraordinaire to discuss all things Royals 👇 Let us know your thoughts below 🎧 Listen to the full episode now through the link in our bio

@DailyTPodcast @CamillaTominey @timothy_stanley This camila woman accused Meghan of supporting terrorism after she helped the Grenfell women after the fire and you are wondering why Harry protected her? Fvck off many times.

@royalnotebook You weirdos dream about that woman. You can’t live without her.

The only way Meghan Markle could even attempt to overshadow the King’s U.S. visit would be revealing the faces of Lilibet and Archie on the cover of People. But let’s be real—she’d probably save that for a bigger moment, like Prince William’s coronation. Mark my words.

@poppy71799 @KarolynCairns @NileGardiner Look at this sexist idiot. If she owns him why are you concerned? Did she steal him from you?

@kaiastephani @KarolynCairns @NileGardiner The Pink Poodle’s owner? Of course she would be brought up. She owns him, he does as he’s told.

The biggest irrelevance of this week's magnificent State Visit has been Prince Harry, not even included in The White House State Dinner for his own father King Charles III. Harry's track record of undermining both the Royal Family and the US President has been a disgrace.

@jujubean367 @KarolynCairns @NileGardiner You’re an idiot, using hustler to insult Meghan only proves that you are a racist. Harry loves that woman and y’all white Karens will never recover from that. Cope harder.

@kaiastephani @KarolynCairns @NileGardiner He wouldn’t be in this mess if he had had enough intelligence to see Meganut for what she was or listened to those who knew a hustler when they saw one

@KarolynCairns @NileGardiner This is about Harry but of course you have to bring up Meghan. You are an obsessed cow.

I feel sorry for him. This world can always find a way to forgive and repurpose someone as atrocious as Meghan Markel. I've never seen it forgive a member of the royal family the same way. It's a funny thing when the world expects You to be 'better'. You might actually have to be.😉

@NileGardiner Is that why you are here talking about him instead of talking about the state visit?

@BBCNews Got their mojo back from visiting a pdfile? 😂😂

Have the royals got their mojo back from US visit? bbc.in/48yz3N1

There’s a contradiction at the heart of all of the Mail’s Meghan coverage. It consistently argues that no one is interested in her while expending considerable energy on ensuring that her every move is reported ✏️ Mic Wright buff.ly/Ti62Ib2

@NoraKarns @lynnbettney @TheSpectator So, they are royals but also they are not because some Karen from Nashville doesn’t see them that way. Talk about low IQ! Zero self awareness whatsoever.

@kaiastephani @lynnbettney @TheSpectator We recognize the low IQ Sussex minions when they appear. H and M are desperate to be seen as ‘royals’ but they are not. He may still be technically ‘royal’ we don’t see him that way. I refuse to use any titles in reference to the grifters. They are beyond tiresome.

King Charles III’s state visit to Washington this week is the monarchy executing its core diplomatic function with precision and dignity. In Donald Trump’s Washington, an invitation to an event with the British monarch remains the most sought-after in the city. By stark contrast, the King’s son and daughter-in-law careen around the globe representing no one but themselves. They dress up as royals in a sustained exercise in self-promotion and profiteering that repels observers and belittles the very institution that gave them their platform. One upholds the Crown’s purpose, while the other commodifies it. The King and Queen travel as invited guests of the US government. President Trump will receive them at the White House. A state dinner follows. The King will address a joint session of Congress – the first British monarch to do so since his mother in 1991. There will be a military review and engagements marking the 250th anniversary of American independence. Every element has been arranged through official channels. Buckingham Palace has published the itinerary. The Foreign Office has underwritten the diplomatic framework. The visit projects British soft power and will act as a balm to a relationship strained by politics. This is the modus operandi of the King and Queen and the working royals, who discharge their obligations with no expectation of personal reward. Harry and Meghan prefer pantomime. Their recent tour of Australia replicated the pattern set in Nigeria and Colombia last year: private invitations, curated panels, hospital visits and cultural events staged to mimic royal tours. No state banquet. No parliamentary address. No military honors extended as sovereign courtesy. They retain the titles and parade about as if still in service to something other than themselves. The choreography flatters their hosts and sustains their brand. It achieves nothing for Britain. ✍️ @TheTeaWithLee spectator.com/article/what-h…

@lilith221789 @Telegraph Even a duck reasons better than this.

@kaiastephani @Telegraph Black woman who calls herself caucasian never have black people around never have a black man her body is more white than me just a grifter black just when is to make the victim in her retreat in Australie just withe rich even her surrogate children are more withe than withe

✍️ 'The strings on that violin must be almost worn through. If there is a statute of limitations on Meghan Markle's complaining, we’ve surely reached it' | Writes Celia Walden 🔗: telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/04/2…

@ms_oz23 @TheSpectator Your original response was garbage. If you were intelligent enough you would quickly figure out that none of other royals with all the HRH titles are nowhere near Harry and Meghan’s level. Some of them were begging Epstein to give them loans and marry them..

@kaiastephani @TheSpectator How refreshing to have such a well thought out reply that addresses the point, and not just a pointless one.

@ms_oz23 @TheSpectator Whatever makes you clowns sleep at night.

@kaiastephani @TheSpectator Who knew diplomacy was “nonsense”, but self promotion is everything. Pity they didn’t reject the titles. They know, like everyone else with a functioning brain that the titles are the ONLY thing that keeps them in the news, but it’s not enough. They are still a joke.

@RoseRut91411361 @TheSpectator Because Harry is the son of the king, his kids are royality. His wife is a duchess as long as she’s married to him. You can decide to be stupid however much you want, that won’t change the facts. And the fact is they left and they’re not coming back.

@kaiastephani @TheSpectator Rejected what. Still using there titles still saying kids are prince and princess. Even though Harry called we have never seen a birth certificate for either. A doll was shown as Archie. No doctor’s signature. Which for a royal birth has to be on them

@Savanna221988 @wuikle @KerryLy4 Show us the part where it shows any other founder other than Prince Harry.

@wuikle @KerryLy4 love you dare post this shit and think no one will notice

WRONG!!!! Harry is NOT the founder of Invictus. He joined as a partner. Later they gave it to him to look after it as he has always been a dumb loser and a drug addict. The royal family thought at least this will keep him busy and not indulge in drugs. But till date he’s still on drugs.

@wuikle Cope harder you dumb idiot