Katif

@nTopology @brad_rothenberg can I get the tech drawing or spec doc for these models?

Farnborough International Airshow, July 20-24. Booth 3938, Hall 3. nTop's @brad_rothenberg, Kevin Chlan, and Marc Jacobs will be there all week for anyone building affordable mass for defense or scaling industrial production.

this is what the model is supposed to do irl

the CAD was fully built by AI the FEA was done manually

just ran basic FEA simulations to test the structural integrity of an AI-generated 3D CAD model object: "stovetop bread toaster" llm: deepseek v4 flash agent harness: my own cost: $0.05

@picocreator cool idea. it's like a line-following-robot but on the ceiling.

Surprised we have yet to see a robotics startup pitching a household rail system, which skips all the current hardware problems of batteries and legs This lets it focus on the MVP, doing chores (in house), and hands.

@Nirajbuilds not 100% reliable yet. needs more work. but it also depends on quality of your prompt if you provide the desired dimensions accurately, the AI will build it accurately

@katifrahim It looks cool bro, how reliable is it?

a beta user just built this workbench assembly using my text-to-cad ai llm: deepseek v4 flash (opensource and dirt-cheap) time: ~5 mins

@oprydai 🫡 i'm building a Text-to-CAD AI agent here's some 3D models it built from scratch via text prompts:

everybody is building software, be a man build hardware.

@dagorenouf good luck, but are you sure? i'm building AI for hardware: Text-to-CAD AI it made this Francis Turbine assembly from scratch

I have zero interest in building software anymore. AI makes it too easy to copy your ideas. The next thing I build will be hardware.

@steveMmattison @BrierRat because my AI agent works great with cheaper, less powerful LLMs too for example, this object was made by Deepseek V4 Flash (an opensource & dirt-cheap LLM)

@katifrahim @BrierRat Nice! Curious why you used Sonnet and not Opus?

Absolutely ridiculous! Level up the drawing, Claude CAD Fable still one-shots. Took longer this time, about 55 minutes. Again, about double the time of the average CAD user. But no interventions. I just paste the drawing, a simple sentence for a prompt and let rip. To put this in perspective, with an earlier version of the memory structure, Fable took a similarly complex drawing, studied it for over an hour, and produced an 85% correct model. It took me another hour of feedback rounds to get it to 100%. Now, 100% in one-shot.

@FangYi11101 @balajis @razibkhan - it's 30 mins away from SG and 5 hours away from KL - you can see Singapore from your room NS respects Malaysia and is boosting its economy 🚀

@balajis @razibkhan Why don’t you just say Malaysia

We’re building Silicon Valley outside Silicon Valley.