Michael Keferl
1.7K posts

Sabitlenmiş Tweet

@SFL_Poke @Crashwinder @ReelzChannel Harboring fugitive slaves was against the law. Would you have made that exception? If so your whole premise is retarded.
English

@Crashwinder @keferl @ReelzChannel Do you criminal simps have any other response other than “boot licker”?
If you don’t break the law, you don’t have to worry about the cops
English

@JohnDoe75692933 @keferl @SFL_Poke @ReelzChannel Weird that you liked my comment then made that reply...
English

@Garett_Huber @marklevinshow You can’t just walk into a secure facility deep underground, walk out with uranium, and fly it out. It would take ages to do that in a peaceful scenario. This isn’t TV
English

This is it: Everyone comparing this to Iraq is wrong. This war has one objective: get the uranium out of Iran. Everything else is leverage. Here’s the play 🧵
STEP 1 — OWN THE AIR. Done. Four weeks of strikes destroyed Iran’s air defenses, radar, missiles, drones, and navy. The U.S. owns the airspace. The next move comes from the sky, not the sea.
STEP 2 — READ THEIR HAND. We’ve watched Iran via satellite for years. When they let 20 ships through Hormuz, that wasn’t diplomacy — it was an intelligence gift. They showed us what they’d enforce vs. what was bluster. They blinked.
STEP 3 — SEIZE KHARG ISLAND. Five miles long, handles 90% of Iran’s oil exports. Trump bombed every military target March 13 and left the oil standing. That’s not mercy — that’s a hostage. Interfere with what’s next and your economic future vanishes.
STEP 4 — EXTRACT THE URANIUM. 82nd Airborne drops onto an airfield. JSOC enters tunnels at Isfahan and Natanz using diagrams built from years of satellite intel. We photographed trucks moving uranium into those tunnels before the 2025 strikes. They locate 40-50 cylinders, load C-17s, fly out.
STEP 5 — LEAVE. Weeks, not years. No occupation. No nation building. Defined entry, defined objective, defined exit.
This is NOT Iraq. In Iraq, foreign fighters flooded in to build a theocratic nightmare. Iran is the opposite — millions protested the regime in January before we fired a shot. Nobody’s defending the mullahs’ uranium. Khamenei’s dead. The IRGC is gutted.
The strategy is leverage stacking: Own the air ✓ Degrade military ✓ Probe their capabilities ✓ Seize Kharg as economic hostage. Extract uranium under that umbrella. Iran’s choice: hand it over or watch it get taken.
Trump is playing this like a negotiation. Control what the other side values most, dictate terms from strength. This isn’t an invasion force — it’s an extraction team with air superiority and an economic kill switch 16 miles offshore.
Trump went to New York Military Academy. I spent 5 years at Lyman Ward Military Academy. Military school teaches tactics and leadership, not just marching. That’s why this president sees the right move — and why I can read this board for what it is.
This is the right move to protect America and every country that needs protecting — whether they think they need it or not. I am proud to be an American today on this one issue. Remember this post.
English

YES, THE WAR AGAINST THE IRANIAN REGIME IS GOING VERY WELL
Despite the fact that the war against the Iranian regime is going very well -- it is only a few weeks old, after all, and casualties are less than when we went into Panama to capture Noriega, rescued college students in Grenada, and virtually every other military action, the voices of despair -- some real, some contrived -- are seemingly everywhere. But are they really?
First, the President's base has never been more solid, and that includes MAGA and the GOP generally. Second, the Democrats, including the Marxists and Islamists, are strongly opposed for a variety of reasons, including TDS, political exploitation, and a growing population of hate America constituencies (both homegrown and imported). They're a very loud crowd and overrepresented in the public square. Third, the Woke Reich isolationists oppose all military action and certainly any preemptive actions, even against a regime with a half-century record of killing American soldiers and citizens, and even when that regime is provably and unequivocably developing nuclear material and missiles to reach our shores (short of that, they can still explode a dirty bomb). They are ideological kindred spirits with the extremist left. Fourth, the public has been relentlessly fed negative stories and fearmongering by a nearly unanimous media and organized ops campaigns on social media. Fifth, the rising antisemitism and Israel-hatred serves as a useful tool of the Marxist-Islamist left and Woke Reich for scapegoating, claiming the President was forced in the war by the Jews. Sixth, the public cares about affordability and the military campaign is said to be a distraction (although if the operation came to an immediate halt, that issue would not disappear; indeed, it predates the military campaign). Seventh, the latest propaganda point is to blame the military operation for potentially costing the GOP the mid-term elections, should that election cycle be lost to the Democrats (although polls showed the mid-term elections to be a challenge before the military campaign). Eighth, it is easier to explain and understand military action taken after a catastrophic attack, which focuses the attention and demands a strong response. A preventive military campaign, based on explanations of threats and subject to even disingenuous debate, muddies the water for some if not many. Talk of the threats from Islamists prior to 9/11, and the need to go to war with al-Qaeda, wouldn't have galvanized the nation.
No doubt, there are other reasons.
There is constant pressure for the President to abandon the military campaign -- gas prices (which are temporarily up), claims of violating campaign promises against forever wars (this is hardly a forever war), the cost of the military campaign (of course, the cost of a nuclear Iran with thousands of ballistic missiles is incalculable), the charge that the war is illegal (it is not), that there was no imminent threat (the inexactitude with which one can precisely determine what's imminent or not is ridiculous, preemption is a better measure), and so forth. The geopolitical, economic, and national security consequences of an early or premature cessation (an off-ramp as they say) could be devastating. Few Presidents would seek a ceasefire and precipitous end under present-day circumstances. It would be stunningly unwise. The Iranian regime would have enough power as a police-state to continue on and rebuild, both domestically and internationally, and with the help of countries like China, Russia, and North Korea. It would be the biggest gift to the Axis of Evil imaginable, and a disaster for our national security.
Opposition to nearly all military campaigns is a given, as history demonstrates. But let me suggest that in the current situation, much of it is politically partisan, ideological, emotional, contrived, and unwarranted. In each case, it is important to discern who is in opposition (both individuals and groups) and their motivations. Of course, they will claim good intentions and love of country. No doubt, some are. But for too many, that obviously is not the case. It is more sinister than not.
In the end, victory has endless benefits, including political. And here, victory is the elimination of the current threat against us and our allies in the region, and the people of Iran. The opponents in our country want everything done yesterday, even though they wanted nothing militarily done at all in the first place. They had no and have no strategy as their previous approaches -- appeasement, massive payoffs, and the lifting of sanctions -- did nothing but further empower the regime.
This is not intended to be a comprehensive review. More later.
English

@unusual_whales Scott Bessent’s biggest fantasy always involves taking control of a straight
English

@wendyp4545 @Kylestevie1 At least you don't have to admit it since the space between your eyes says it all
English

@Kylestevie1 I think that it's really brave of you to admit that you have a learning disability.
English

Please don't reelect him.
Under no circumstances should Rand Paul be anywhere in our government.
Rand Paul@RandPaul
You can like President Trump and still support @massieforKY. Thomas stands for a lot of the same principles as the President, but brings an independent spirit we should want in every legislator.
English
Michael Keferl retweetledi

We have been told many times that there won’t be boots on the ground. Many (almost all) of the pro war accounts here have given breezy assurances that there won’t be boots on the ground. If we do end up with boots on the ground, prepare yourself for the most shameless gaslighting campaign we’ve ever witnessed, as all of the same voices insist that no such assurances were ever given, and in fact we always knew there would be boots on the ground and were never told anything different.
English

@SFL_Poke @ReelzChannel Nah he escalated immediately and was showing off for the cameras. Try not licking boots sometime.
English

@keferl @ReelzChannel Cop matched the passengers attitude and energy. Try being nice for once, it goes a long way.
English
Michael Keferl retweetledi

@aimeeterese And yet he is correct and everyone who debates him looks like a fool and gets dog walked. It’s weird
English

@scotthortonshow “Failed comedian who nobody likes wants your children to die”
English


@piersmorgan @benshapiro Garbage take. I’ve been challenging Dave to debate for more than two years. He’s had time to insult me and misrepresent my views, both here and on Biblical Anarchy, yet he won’t debate me. Yet by your logic, he must be afraid!
English

@Fair_and_Biased @grezdaed @MegynKellyShow Tell that to the families of the Americans who already died. Are you calling them “nobodies”?
English

@grezdaed @MegynKellyShow Nobody’s dying for Israel except the Israelis.
English

🚨 WATCH: Megyn definitely won't be staying home in the midterm elections after the murder of Sheridan Gorman:
"You have to vote Republican. I don't care what you think about the Republican Party. You get death on the American streets if you vote Democrat... They opened the borders without a thought of what it would do."
English

@thomaschattwill In a perfect world no one outside of Iran would know who the "ayatollah" is because it wouldn't matter. Their pleasant beachside ignorance of the word is aspirational.
English

A lot of the problems in the world right now can be explained by this video. For one thing, it’s a big reason why the US government is so unaccountable to public opinion. These are *college students.* A significant amount of the country is totally checked out and comfortable enough not to think it matters.
New York Post@nypost
TV reporter finds the dumbest spring breakers in America: ‘Who the f–k is ayatollah?’ nypost.com/2026/03/24/us-…
English

@BlueBoxDave You have no idea how comedy shows work. The biggest comics routinely do 200-500 capacity rooms, take 80% of the door, and do two shows back to back. Plus get travel/hotel subsidies. A single sold out weekend at the Irvine Improv is half your yearly salary.
English

@JillJillybeanco @bungarsargon @wrong_speak If someone self-identifies as a "maga republican" they are implicitly endorsing Trump at this point. If they are against the war they are much less likely to identify as "MAGA" are would therefore be excluded. This is basic stuff.
English

@keferl @bungarsargon @wrong_speak She referenced 10 polls. How do you cherry pick information that way? You guys are just in denial. People don't agree with you they don't they're going about their life.
English

Despite the braying of podcasters, 10 polls now show 80-90% support for the President's operation in Iran with Republican voters.
One even asked if voters agree with President Trump or podcasters like Tucker Carlson on foreign policy. The results:
Trump: 84%
Podcasters: 6%
Batya Ungar-Sargon@bungarsargon
The war in Iran has nuked the fiction that the Right-wing podcasters and youtubers and Twitter personalities and content creators who turned against Trump wield any power. They are influencers without influence—on the President or his followers.
English

@zerohedge Japan has a decent relationship with Iran what are you on about
English

@bungarsargon “Anyone I don’t agree with is an unserious podcaster, YouTuber, or content creator, unlike me who is a serious journalist at NewsNation”
-Batya
English

@ThomasEWoods @NickSzabo4 My father truly thinks he was against Iraq War II, much like many boomers truly think they were at Woodstock. Despite that, he’s totally for this Iran thing and will remember being against it a decade from now.
English







