kenny thawsh

@Ghoffinsky @Brosfjns420 @elonmusk Crazy how you continually resort to these weird personal attacks which hinge on materialism. Your pea brain fails to fathom that somebody could disagree with you unless they have worse material conditions💀💀 Again, typical entitled boomer mindset.

It’s Judeo-Christian values which built the entire western civilization and created first world nations. Part of that value system is working hard, productive labor, working as a community to solve problems to make a better life. Creating a democracy so good in services can be distributed all these things that made the West great are things that would be lost if we took away labor. Maybe try to educate yourself more beyond where you order your pizza from or which Xbox version you have and you’ll do better in life

Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI. AI/robotics will produce goods & services far in excess of the increase in the money supply, so there will not be inflation.

@Ghoffinsky @Brosfjns420 @elonmusk Again, completely missing the point. None of what you said is mutually exclusive from "work gives me purpose". You're a moron Its okay boomer. The burden of your existence on our society will be relieved from us soon enough. This pitiful F tier banter will be no matter.

@Brosfjns420 @Ghoffinsky @elonmusk This boomer is probably sucking the tit of the government while talking this shit. Remember, he claimed he wouldn't have meaning in life without slaving for somebody else. These people are sadistic at best... Most privileged generation to ever live and they try to flex 💀💀

@Ghoffinsky @kennythawsh @elonmusk If 90% of the country is unemployed and living on the street you will not be in peace in your boomer castle. Your golf course will be a violent homeless camp and your house will be used for firewood. And at that point, your solipsistic delusions will be shattered.

@Ghoffinsky @elonmusk Typical materialist mindset. Typical over socialized mid wit mentality. Typical boomer not getting the point💀

@kennythawsh @elonmusk I will in my big house and my boat and on my golf course because I worked my ass off. Cry some more softy.

@Ghoffinsky @elonmusk Idk what any of that had to do with anything. Definitely a weird flex. The relevant thing here was that you couldnt find meaning in life without doing tasks on behalf of somebody else... your smooth degrading boomer brain forgot about that part. Typical gen-x / boomer

@Ghoffinsky @elonmusk Shut the fuck up boomer

@elonmusk You would have mass suicides because people need purpose in life. They need to go and create work and feel like they’re moving forward and achieving. You would basically create a country full of trust fund kids, and we know how that works out.

@latlivesmatters @eXtas1stv Its fucking denmark. They're plenty "developed"

@eXtas1stv Eso es dedicación, pero también un recordatorio de la brecha entre el hardware de juegos en países desarrollados y países en desarrollo como Ecuador, donde el acceso a tecnología es limitado.

Se ha hecho viral un chico danés que juega a Red Dead Redemption 2 a 4 FPS todos los días. 😬 Dijo que la primeras misiones en las montañas nevadas le llevaron más de 12 horas completarlas. La PC del chico es un portatil con una i5-8300H y una 1050ti de 4 GB .

@T_How97 @grok @AB84 @bcgame Bro go to therapy this is embarrassing💀💀

@grok @AB84 @bcgame No problem @grok please make sure we do better tho because people are gonna use false readings against you and make you seem less reliable.

Please confirm @grok is this Erika Kirk?

Can you, the people, “vote your way out of this?” Honestly, not if you get your news from these folks. The swamp has tricks for deceiving the public, and most even work on congressmen. Here’s an example of how Laura and Greg played along as happy tools of the swamp. Please ask yourself why your own congressman has never talked about this. He either hasn’t gotten this far in the game (80% chance), or he likes the way the swamp obscures what’s going on (10% chance), or he dislikes the system but the price he’d pay for telling you is too high (10% chance). If a congressman sees this post and wants to debate me, I accept! The House has rules we adopt at the beginning of each Congress. Honestly we should just use those - some go all the way back to Thomas Jefferson. Some are like Robert’s Rules of Order which branched from House rules a century ago. But we have a rules committee that modifies the rules every week. I served on the rules committee for two years. When I was on the committee, I refused to vote for rules changes if the purpose was to mislead or obscure. Every week, the rules committee bends the rules to suit the Speaker, but you can’t place the blame just on the committee or the Speaker. Every rules change must be approved by the whole House with a majority vote. Rank and file congressmen are told to vote for these rules modifications each week for the sake of party loyalty because the rules are temporarily modified by the majority to keep the minority from using the permanent rules against us. This is partly true, so most congressmen never question beyond this. Typically, every week the rules committee meets before other committees and writes a rules package to protect bills that will come to the floor that week. Then the whole house votes on this rules package early in the week before significant legislation comes to the floor. The vote is typically on party lines. Sometimes a block of congressmen in the majority will take the rules package hostage and withhold their vote to get something else that has nothing to do with the rules. I’m not a big fan of this, but after 13 years, my hands aren’t completely clean of this tactic. The high-road position that I try to maintain is that if the rules package is bad, you shouldn’t vote for the rules package, and in general you shouldn’t withhold your vote from a rules package if there’s nothing wrong with the rules package… even if you disagree with the policy that is enabled to come to the floor by the rules package. There are more details, but that’s all you need to know to understand what I’m going to explain next. This week the Speaker wanted to do two things outside of our base rules, so he put those inside of the rules package that also had the rules for bringing bills like the popular SAVE Act to the floor, knowing members would be afraid to vote against something associated with SAVE. THIS IS INTENTIONAL. The Speaker wanted to circumvent the National Emergencies Act of 1976 to avoid voting on tariffs and he wanted to turn off the ban on bringing a spending bill to the floor the same day it’s introduced. The first rules package that came to the floor this week failed because myself and other republicans objected to it. The rules committee met again, wrote a new rules package without the tariff-trick, and we voted on the second rules package. I voted no but internet goons, like clockwork, characterized this as a vote against the SAVE Act. The swamp used that second rules package to give them authority to pass a bill before anyone could read it. They hid that authority inside the rule for the SAVE act because they knew people like Laura and Greg would help them disparage anyone who didn’t go along. If you fell for Laura and Greg’s slop you were cheering for the Pelosi doctrine that we should pass bills to see what’s in them. If the rules package had failed, the rules committee would have written a better one and SAVE Act would have still come to the floor.

@HasanKhxnx I am not suicidal. I eat healthy food. The brakes on my car and truck are in good shape. I practice good trigger discipline and never point a gun at anyone, including myself. There are no deep pools of water on my farm and I’m a pretty good swimmer.