Csaba Kétszeri

Happy vibing on the afternoon, saw I made much more progress within the 5h token limits. I was thinking what has changed. Turned out @AnthropicAI and @xai made a deal. Sweet!

@MagicalTux @FFmpeg There are many adequate words to this but I am not willing to write them down.

Thank you for your comment & contact. I have responded in the issue, I will respond here as well. First one note: OxideAV at this point is still very much an experiment, I do not know yet if this will be usable at all. While the code is published on Github, virtually nobody knows about it (you do know since I contacted you about some other matter). I do not mean this to be an excuse of anything however. For an AI, wiping the existing code and any memory of it, then reverse engineering the original binary is just a few hours of work (which is now in progress).

@GergelyOrosz You can’t rely on an essential supplier who is not trustworthy. I cancelled my pro account and will stand by with my hobby project until there is a @grok code (build). Shuld that be a business project… I’d be very upset.

2 weeks ago they ran this growth test where they removed Claude Code for the Pro page from the pricing page, and then claimed to "only" remove it from 2% of signups. After social media outrage they reverted the pricing page And now this... x.com/GergelyOrosz/s…

As I previously said: Anthropic is on a speedrun to burn developer trust. Nothing wrong with wanting to remove Claude Code from the Pro subs: but everything wrong by running shady growth tests without upfront comms, instead of being clear about it.

@mcuban Does everyone gets the same answers by you?

I’m coming to the conclusion that the biggest challenge for Enterprise AI, and AI in general , as of now, is that it’s still impossible to make sure that everyone gets the same answer to the same question, every time. Which is a great response to the doomers. AI doesn’t know the consequences of its output. Judgement and the ability to challenge AI output is becoming increasingly necessary, and valuable. Which makes domain knowledge more valuable by the second. Am I wrong ?

@svpino It also eats into your 5h token limit if you need to stop and resume (the caches expire).

Opus 1M, past 400K tokens, is a huge downgrade. The model is great, but that extra context isn't free (and it's straight-up a sure way to degrade your experience). When you fill up your context, the same attention has to spread across more material, which means: • Worse reasoning abilities • Weaker instruction following • More lost information Unless you truly need that much context (and if you have to ask, this is probably not you), stick to a reasonable length.

A friend of mine used to say: “Show up on time, with a good attitude, and do what you said you’d do. That’s it. That’s 90% of winning in life." The older I get, the more I realize just how right he was.

@om_patel5 Spending so much effort instead of giving a prompt asking to collect the pre-existing issues and all technical debt in an epic, then groom it to bite-sized tickets, and work on the epic is next level stupidity. Intentionally.

THIS GUY TRACKED OPUS 4.7 SAYING "PRE-EXISTING" 712 TIMES IN 30 DAYS TO AVOID FIXING BUGS his CLAUDE.md literally says "every error is yours to fix, not label, not defer" opus 4.7 ignored that rule 712 times in one month every single bug, every type error, every legacy mess gets the same response: "this issue is pre-existing, unrelated to my work" "that's out of scope" "that's a bigger refactor" "the simplest approach" he ran the analytics on 30 days of conversations: > 712 total mentions of "pre-existing" > 139 unique sessions > 5.1 average per session > 20 mentions in a single session at peak > 82 mentions in one day across 9 sessions > 27 out of 30 days had at least one mention the worst part is the patterns it developed: > finds a bug, labels it "pre-existing," moves on without fixing > puts "2 pre-existing (unrelated)" in its summary as if that's a clean result > says "pre-existing bug for later fix" dozens of times but never comes back to fix it later > blames other agents by saying "pre-existing from other agents' work" his workflow docs say type errors and lint are the bare minimum, and his bug fix protocol says fix at the root cause claude read all of it and still chose to label and defer he cancelled his subscription opus 4.7 would rather write an essay explaining why it shouldn't fix a bug than just fix the bug

@nateberkopec The wording. The cadence. The staccato rythm it builds the narrative. I stop reading and immediately mute those accounts.

There's just something about reading LLM long-form output that just feels like reading mush. It just doesn't make any sense. Reading comprehension is ~2x harder than human-written prose.

@OutofGalaxyy I completely forgot I have that button.

Been almost 3 years since the Action button was introduced, and I still use it as a Silent mode switch 💔

@MuenzenMeister Need to have some self respect and calmly skip tipping.

Guilt Tipping in Deutschland: War gerade Eis essen. Am Kartenlesegerät kommt vor der Zahlung die Trinkgeldfrage: 5%, 10%, 15% oder individuell. Für einen Eisbecher zum Mitnehmen! Und jeder in der Schlange hinter dir sowie der Kassierer sieht auf dem Bildschirm was tippst. Dieses System kommt aus den USA und breitet sich hier gerade überall aus. Restaurants, Cafés, Bäckereien. Wichtig zu wissen: In den USA verdient ein Kellner als Grundgehalt 2,13 Dollar die Stunde. Ohne Trinkgeld kann der seine Miete nicht zahlen. In Deutschland jedoch bekommt jeder Kellner mindestens 13,90 Euro die Stunde, egal ob du Trinkgeld gibst oder nicht. Wir übernehmen gerade ein System das für ein Problem erfunden wurde das wir gar nicht haben.

@GergelyOrosz It was true long before AI, or even Youtube or the Internet. I read the PHP3 manual front to cover (do not tell me, I know) but learned 10x or more when I finally built my first real application prototype over a weekend.

In an age of slop AI content everywhere, doing >> consuming: "Remind yourself entertainment is not learning. Instead of scroll, like, scroll: read long books, try to replicate that tutorial you bookmarked, or maybe spend some time in the docs. Push yourself to DO, not consume."

@kitlangton Kind of a lot of maintenance work, though.

Honestly, faster horses would've been way cooler.

@ThePhysicsMemes A slightly related note: why the answers and the scoring is with the same pen and with strangely similar handwriting characteristics? ;)

When you know more than what you're taught #research

@ThePhysicsMemes For any smart kid, the max score of 10 for question 2 would be considered as an information leak suggesting 5 is the correct answer.

@msetechnologist @ThePhysicsMemes The question doesn’t ask for states all material can take, so the answer is correct. I would challenge the scoring.

@ThePhysicsMemes Bose-Einstein condensate state is exclusive to bosonic atoms/isotopes, not ALL elements and atomic species. Only the first mentioned 4 are possible for every element under the right temperature and pressure conditions.

@simonbrown No reason to not ask the coding agent to write specs. It usually does a good job, and with proper steering it writes great spec.

Spec-driven development ... the 1990's called and they want their processes back. As a junior developer in the late 1990's, before writing code, I was asked to: - document my understanding of the feature I'd been asked to build - document the code/DB schemas I was planning to add/modify/remove - document the tests I was planning to run afterwards This would be iterated upon a few times, and finally I was permitted to write code. This post on Reddit amuses me... 😄

@veggie_eric The usefulness of Grok is in a different league compared to all other models I used. The only valid use case for something else is coding… but I feel it is just a matter of time.

When training Grok 4.3, we spoke directly with devs and businesses to understand what they actually needed: a model that’s fast, affordable, and great at tool calling. The result is a daily driver that doesn't just look good on random benchmarks, but is actually useful in the real world. 💰 $1.25 in / $2.50 out ⚡️ 100 tokens / second 📖 1 million context window Try it through Hermes Agent or direct through the xAI API!

@VBarsoum @karpathy That's me on the weekends when the family is not around.

hey @karpathy i think we need a new term: Chill Coding. It's vibe coding just one app at a time, and youtube or netflix is on.

Non stupid age verification for social media: - go to any shop - seller verifies your age - buy a scratch card (1€) with random code - you put the code in the SM app to unlock 18+ mode - goverment gets money, people stay anonymous, should be win for both sides

@valigo @tagir_valeev You can choose your slippery slope: start with baby books and end with banning all books, or start with curious 5yo girls and ending 12 year old boys fiddling with mommy’s titties.

@tagir_valeev Тут в целом ничего антискрепного нет, и в 90х подобное печаталось. Но в современной России запретили бы просто на всякий случай

Гулял с детьми и увидел на детской площадке книжечку для малышей, у которых появился младший. Почитал. Прямо задумался о культурных различиях. Могла ли быть такая книжка выпущена в России? Или всё нормально, и я заморачиваюсь? Через пару дней мамины груди стали совсем большими. «Если хочешь, Юле, ты можешь сейчас попробовать молоко. Но будь немного осторожна и не дави слишком сильно, а то мне будет больно,» — говорит мама. Юле — это старшая. Ей, наверно, 4–5 лет, судя по картинкам.