kimgeiger

561 posts

kimgeiger

kimgeiger

@kimgeiger

Journalist @Capitol_Forum. Former Chicago Tribune, LA Times

Chicago, IL Katılım Şubat 2008
746 Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
kimgeiger retweetledi
The Capitol Forum
The Capitol Forum@Capitol_Forum·
Welcome @jamesoliphant to The Capitol Forum as Deputy Managing Editor on our Antitrust team! He joins us from Reuters, with leadership roles at National Journal and Legal Times, plus reporting experience at the Chicago Tribune and LA Times. 👉 Meet the TCF team: thecapitolforum.com/team/?utm_sour…
The Capitol Forum tweet media
English
0
3
5
748
kimgeiger retweetledi
The Capitol Forum
The Capitol Forum@Capitol_Forum·
Kalshi: Cracks in Legal Theory Beginning to Emerge After Early Court Victory Recent rulings in Massachusetts and Nevada challenge the company’s claim that its sports betting contracts fall solely under federal CFTC jurisdiction. Our deep dive into the case: library.thecapitolforum.com/docs/90ux4huw4… h/t @kimgeiger $DKNG $FLUT $GENI $HOOD $SRAD
The Capitol Forum tweet media
English
0
3
18
24.8K
kimgeiger retweetledi
Vikas
Vikas@vikasxkumarbk·
Anthony Geisler is running it back and has gotten the band back together for it.... sequelbrands.com/press. Some good reporting by my colleague, @kimgeiger, on this today. $XPOF
English
1
2
4
1.1K
kimgeiger retweetledi
Momentum Chaser
Momentum Chaser@electricfutures·
Hi Antonio, you made several outrageous claims last night that I believe warrant more evidence: 1. You claim that "[SS] defaults have been set to max inclusion, max pay" for "these people" - heavily implying that asylum seekers are receiving benefits. However, only those granted asylum are eligible for benefits. As you said yourself, there is a huge backlog of asylum claims, and while there was an influx of asylum seekers in 2023-24, the number of new asylees remained constant. In particular, you claim 1.3 million people "from this cohort" are on Medicaid. Well, given there were only 165,000 new asylees over those 4 years, that seems unlikely. So perhaps you're sneakily referring to other classes of immigrant you didn't spend 5 minutes ranting about. I made a chart with data from USCIS and OHSS reports showing annual approvals for each of the common legal statuses eligible for benefits. We can see a dip during COVID followed by a return to normal levels in 2022 and an increase in 2023-24 to ~1.45x 2017 levels. Not as dramatic as your chart, though, is it? The increase is almost entirely explained by Biden's parolee program - around 1M total in 2023-24. Not asylum seekers who trekked to the border and entered unlawfully. People who were invited here to escape humanitarian crises with temporary legal status. Which leads me to... 2. You said what you really care about here is the human trafficking, that "the human tragedy this created is extraordinary". You said that handing out benefits to people who entered the country unlawfully enticed more to make the dangerous trip, which resulted in children being trafficked by cartels. But wait - that's exactly what the parole program was designed to address. Parolees were sponsored and completed paperwork in advance and flew to ports of entry. The same number of people who entered unlawfully from countries in the program would be deported to Mexico each month. Only the parolees were eligible for benefits. How exactly did this incentivize asylum seeking and trafficking? 3. Finally, you agreed with Elon's insane, incoherent conspiracy theory - that Democrats were enticing immigrants to come so they can vote and make America permanently blue. However, having an SSN doesn't allow any noncitizen to vote, and no past investigation has uncovered any real evidence of noncitizen voting at scale. You claimed you found evidence. How? Using what records? How many people, 5? Why would you make this claim without sharing a single number? An alternate version of the conspiracy Elon offers is that these "imported immigrants" will quickly be given green cards, after which they have a clear path to citizenship. However, the number of green cards granted each year has been essentially constant for decades, and the vast majority are granted to family of citizens or for work-based preferences. Legal immigration pathways have huge backlogs, and the rate at which green cards are granted is not correlated to other immigration flows. Entering unlawfully is a disadvantage; asylees and refugees are approved at miniscule rates; and parolees are only here for up to 2 years. Nothing will increase the rate of naturalization besides process reform by Congress. So tell me again, Antonio, where is the fraud here?
Momentum Chaser tweet mediaMomentum Chaser tweet mediaMomentum Chaser tweet media
agracias@AntonioGracias

Your data is apples to oranges. The data you show for the 2016 to 2020 period is enumeration for all immigrants in ALL forms.  The data we showed in our slide last night in Wisconsin was just Enumeration Beyond Entry ("EBE") immigrants. The difference is Enumerations at Field Offices. These have remained stable at about 1 mln/year excluding COVID. We focused just on EBE because it ramped as a direct result of growth in the various asylum programs.  Your chart mixes the two categories: showing all immigrant Enumerations from 2016 thru 2020 and EBE only from 2021 to 2024.  Here is the chart back to 2019 for Enumeration Beyond Entry which is when the EBE basically started.  I want to thank the good people at the Social Security Administration for their expert help. We would not have been able to understand this complex system without them. There are many terrific people at SSA serving their fellow citizens. We are very grateful. I believe these facts speak for themselves. As the son of legal immigrants to America, I am an ardent supporter of legal immigration.

English
36
125
520
55.2K
kimgeiger retweetledi
(((Matthew Lewis))) cults & consequences
The current meltdown in California insurance market — which is one of the major factors behind the number of homes built in extreme high fire hazard zones — dates to 1988. That’s the year California voters passed Prop 103. A political 🧵
English
31
242
1.4K
195.2K
kimgeiger retweetledi
Ezra Klein
Ezra Klein@ezraklein·
Ah, Yuval Levin makes this point more eloquently: “This is the trap that our 21st-century presidents have tended to fall into. They win elections because their opponents were unpopular, and then—imagining the public has endorsed their party activists’ agenda—they use the power of their office to make themselves unpopular. This is why the public moved left on key issues during Trump’s first term and right during Biden’s.” thedispatch.com/article/what-t…
English
100
275
2.4K
352.6K
kimgeiger retweetledi
Tyrone
Tyrone@TheTyroneP·
I can't speak for the rest of the country, but whoever is controlling the weather in Chicago is doing a terrific job.
English
184
871
12.2K
456.2K
kimgeiger retweetledi
Alex Cole
Alex Cole@acnewsitics·
Meanwhile in Chicago.
Alex Cole tweet media
English
1.2K
15.9K
177.5K
7.2M
kimgeiger retweetledi
Dylan Byers
Dylan Byers@DylanByers·
Respectfully, attacking the moderators for pointing out that it’s illegal to kill babies and that people are not eating pets in Springfield is a losing position.
English
1.8K
7K
87.6K
2.8M
kimgeiger retweetledi
John Myers
John Myers@johnmyers·
I don’t aspire to be a media watchdog, the glass houses of my 29 years in daily journalism, etc. But when I woke up to *this* as the lead online article for America’s most powerful news organization, I winced. And it’s bothered me all day, because of its sweeping assertions. 🧵
John Myers tweet media
English
20
39
176
33.4K