sh

@SeerahDawah loll Jake blocked me too😂 crybaby

Jake “crybaby” Brancatella makes another post on me because he’s stalking my page while having me blocked like a 45 year old no life. Jake you keep saying I said this but refuse to show anywhere where I said this despite the $100 challenge I gave out and I know you so desperately want since your always debating on MDD. Jake again for the 4th time now I think, show me anywhere where I said Sinai thinks the previous scripture is inaccessibley corrupted 😭😭😭😭 I literally said I know he has a different position on Tahrif, I never quoted him because of this. But you keep ignoring the whole point that in the debate from 35-37 he talks about occasional textual distortion and the Quran being a Muhaymin by disagreeing with this ocasional textual falsification. So even though he doesn’t think the Quran says the previous scripture is in accessibly corrupted. He still believes there’s occasional narrative textual distortion that the Quran corrects when it explicitly “authoritatively modifies or recitifies” the story. Jake I get ur pushing 45 and maybe you have dementia so you probably forgot twice now. But I already acknowledged Sinais belief that theirs very minimal textual distortion. However he still says Muhaymin can mean arbiter of the contents, and you keep coping saying “he leaves it as a hatchway” idc moron. He said it 😭😭😭😭😭 and u MUST acknowledge it, and again in his interview like I said in 35-37 he still yet again ACKNOWLEDGED IT. He just said it’s minimal. Idc if he thinks it’s minimal that’s not the point of why I cite him in the debate with IP, when I cite him it’s to show that Muhaymin according to academic scholars can mean it disagrees with textual falsification from later scribes, which again for the 3rd time in this post, he said in timestamp 35-37. Gramps you’re getting too old for this.

@MMetaphysician SeerahDawah is far more educated than you on this matter. You are twisting his words and claiming things he never said. Fear Allah for lying about your brother publicly.

The child who calls himself "seerahdawah" is both dishonest and slow. He's incapable of following a conversation correctly. I've stated several times that Sinai explains in the interview that his discussion of "muhaymin" in his book was purposely vague to leave himself an "escape hatch." He says that he did not want to commit himself to a clear view on the topic because he hadn't research it enough to definitively settle on an opinion. On the other hand, Sinai made clear in his recent interview on the subject that he does not understand the Qur'an as a muhaymin or "arbiter" in the sense that it determines what is textually corrupted in the previous scriptures and what isn't. So, although Sinai accepts "arbiter" as a faithful translation of "muhaymin," he understands it merely as an arbiter when it comes to the correct meaning of the previous scriptures. You shouldn't be worried about whether my book contradicts itself as you commented that you are worried about that. Sorry "seerahdawah," I'm not contradicting myself and my book doesn't dishonestly engage with scholarship in the manner that you do. Now, here's what Sinai says in this clip: "I don't think that the Quran supports this later post-Qur'anic/Islamic idea of textual corruption in the deep past. I think there are some verses in the Quran, surah al-Baqarah, I think 75-79, where the ahl al-Kitab, probably the local Israelites or Jews, are accused of writing things with their own hands and then claiming that to be God's word. So that could be read as a form of, I guess, textual falsification. But clearly the Quran doesn't assume that the original authoritative version of these scriptures is irretrievable. That the damage was done centuries ago and is basically unrecoverable now. I think there's a lot in the Quran that contradicts that. So in Surah 5, when the ahl al-Injil are asked to judge by what's in the Injil, I mean, it wouldn't make sense if the Injil were incorrigibly corrupted." Let me help you focus on the most important part: "But clearly the Quran doesn't assume that the original authoritative version of these scriptures is irretrievable. That the damage was done centuries ago and is basically unrecoverable now. I think there's a lot in the Quran that contradicts that." Anyone who claims that Sinai believes that the Qur'an is claiming that the previous scriptures are textually corrupted and that the original, authoritative, uncorrupted texts cannot be accessed is either ignorant or dishonest. As Muslims, we need to do better. We shouldn't lower ourselves to level of dishonest and ignorant Christian apologists. Regardless, as I said before, what Sinai believes about the Qur'an is irrelevant to Muslims. Muslims should aim to raise the bar with our research and honesty.

@Everyone_on_X @muslimorthodoxy @ModernDayDebate why are you verified at 300 followers? no one knows u 🤣

@kingdee167 @muslimorthodoxy @ModernDayDebate 2024 account. Another "authentic" account 😂

James Kunz, @ModernDayDebate the founder & host of Modern Day Debate has been losing his mind on Twitter because we are boycotting his absurd platform. I hereby declare that NO prominent Muslims will debate on your platform anymore. You are boycotted! You have publicly blasphemed, insulted the prophet, shown bias to Christians, and we simply have better hosts. Bye, bye Kunz! You lost!

@TrickleDownMan @zyxwv1224 Let’s debate this

@zyxwv1224 No one cares what Islam or Muslims believe. Muslim is an 8th-century term being backdated.

I can prove Islam is the one true religion The word “man” and “woman” are both mentioned 23 times in the Qur’an. We have 23 pairs of chromosomes.

@ls_redline @MarcusLedger5 @Goatedko Is Jesus gay in ANY sense?

@kingdee167 @MarcusLedger5 @Goatedko Oh from the muslims men going after her? The weak kind of men who go after a mans wife cause they cant beat him in debate and never will.

The Orthodox Muslim was SHOCKED after Cliffe Knechtle said printed presses count as manuscripts. 😭 Orthodox: "You think printed presses are manuscripts?" Cliffe Knechtle: "Yes."

@MarcusLedger5 @Goatedko How does it feel knowing Cliff subscribes to Subordinationism?

@kingdee167 @Goatedko Then bring him on

@MarcusLedger5 @Goatedko you know very well that doglogic would get BAKED. he couldn’t even defend his wife🤣

@Goatedko Bring GodLogic on. Why won’t Sneako do it?

Popular Christian apologist @GodLogic_GL just said Jesus is gay in a sense in a debate with a Muslim 😂😂😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭