Chabellita Villain (is now a shade)

16.4K posts

Chabellita Villain (is now a shade) banner
Chabellita Villain (is now a shade)

Chabellita Villain (is now a shade)

@kittych0cklit

New account. All my meatspace oomfs and bookmarks gone. The Bird App is Hell and here I remain as a shade.

Katılım Temmuz 2023
330 Takip Edilen160 Takipçiler
Chabellita Villain (is now a shade) retweetledi
Jathan Sadowski
Jathan Sadowski@jathansadowski·
“Someone decided to compress the kill chain. Someone decided that deliberation was latency. Someone decided to build a system that produces 1,000 targeting decisions an hour and call them high-quality. Calling it an “AI problem” gives those decisions and people a place to hide.”
Jathan Sadowski tweet media
English
1
6
18
521
goma
goma@soigomaa·
What the actual fuck is wrong with yall? The idea of keeping brain dead women alive just to use their bodies as incubators is beyond DYSTOPIAN. Women are NOT breeding machines, NOT spare wombs, NOT some biological resource you can harvest once their brain stops working. The fact that anyone in medicine can even say this out loud shows how deeply misogynistic this thinking is. It's dehumanizing, grotesque, and straight out of The Handmaid's Tale. Can all of you just leave us the fuck alone already? Ew.
​𝐥𝐲𝐫𝐚@sunnkssdseraph

They don't even view us as humans

English
397
6.9K
23.2K
296.2K
Chabellita Villain (is now a shade) retweetledi
Stupid Twink
Stupid Twink@ThisStupidTwink·
Matthew 5:14 - "Nor do they light a lamp, and put it under the bushel, but on the stand, and it giveth light unto all that are in the house."
English
0
6
351
8.6K
🔻ha Diyorum Sex
🔻ha Diyorum Sex@hateamerikkka·
@clmintines this may seem woke but in reality its the ultimate conservative impulse to not even be able to critically think about your own culture
English
1
0
1
174
🔻ha Diyorum Sex
🔻ha Diyorum Sex@hateamerikkka·
woke 1 idpol has been such a corrupting influence on people that if you say that a language having default masculine terms for things is misogynistic you are a colonizer
English
5
0
8
3K
Chabellita Villain (is now a shade)
@hateamerikkka because it's *not* defaulted to masculine. only the word was loaned, not the gender. insisting that ppl subscribe to genders they don't even acknowledge only to fingerwag at them is in fact colonizing.
English
0
0
0
43
Chabellita Villain (is now a shade)
kaya attempts at a 3rd position synthesis just come across as sad to me, parang one-sided yung effort from "mainlanders". is it possible? sure. pero do they want it to be possible? or do they think we're rubes who need a lecture on the "generic masculine"? x.com/anthropam/stat…
Dr. Pamela Cajilig@anthropam

Like many Pinoys born/raised in PH I say "Filipino" in a gender neutral sense I use "Filipina" to emphasize womanhood I understand that migrant/FilAm groups need "Filipinx" to show queer BIPOC solidarity in the US Pluralistic & intersectional nationalism is possible 🤷‍♀️

English
0
0
3
223
Chabellita Villain (is now a shade)
ambobo ng ganitong argument sa totoo lang. hindi naman maitatanggi na may kasarian pa din sa lipunan at natural lumalabas ito sa wika. ang pt of contention ay *grammatical* gender at anong ginagawa ng intervention ng -x bilang pulitika re: actual gender issues, awareness kemerut
ali@M4GD4MG0

Pagdepensa sa "Filipinx" ng mga Pilipinong estudyante ng BA Linggwistiks includes: the supposed "gender neutral" Filipino/Tagalog language (weh?) a thread 🧵

Filipino
1
0
8
496
Chabellita Villain (is now a shade) retweetledi
Chabellita Villain (is now a shade)
in other news, any bible scholar worth their salt would tell you that, yes, the passover story is indeed a "myth" - that isn't a disqualifier for anyone not a literalist. x.com/academic_la/st…
Shaiel Ben-Ephraim@academic_la

Here is why the Passover story of Egyptian Exodus is completely made up. Not only is there no evidence for it, but it is chronologically impossible. Not on the scale mentioned in the bible or on any scale at all: 1) Decades of intensive archaeological surveys in the Sinai Peninsula have failed to uncover any remains, such as pottery, encampments, or human waste, that would indicate a population of over two million people spent 40 years wandering the desert. Not one piece of pottery, one hearth, or one Hebrew inscription from that era has been found in the Sinai. 2) Ancient Egypt was a highly literate society with meticulous administrative records. Despite this, no Egyptian text from the Bronze Age mentions a mass slave revolt, the devastating plagues, or the loss of an entire army in the sea. 3) Modern archaeology suggests that the ancient Israelites were actually indigenous to Canaan. They appear to have emerged from local Canaanite populations during the Bronze Age collapse, rather than arriving as a conquering force from outside. 4) The biblical figure of 603,550 men (totaling roughly 2.5 million people including families) is logistically impossible for the time. A line of that many people, walking eight abreast, would have been hundreds of miles long, meaning the front would reach the destination while the back was still in Egypt. 5) The Book of Exodus mentions places like the city of Rameses and the land of Goshen, as well as the use of camels, which were not in existence or common at the time the events were supposed to have occurred. This suggests the story was written centuries later. Archaeology shows that at the time the conquest was supposed to happen, Jericho had no walls and was either a tiny village or completely uninhabited. 6) If 2.5 million people entered a land from Egypt, you would expect to see a sudden, massive shift in technology, diet, or burial customs. Instead, we see a slow, internal evolution. The people who became "Israelites" were likely local Canaanite farmers and nomadic herders who moved into the highlands to escape the collapse of the coastal city-states. 7) The Exodus is said to have took place well before there is evidence of Israelites existing. The bible has it at 1446 BCE. The first mention of Israelites is in 1208 by the Pharaoh Merneptah. He mentions them as a foreign people with no ties to Egypt. 8) The biggest hole in the story is that during the 13th century BCE (the time of Ramesses II), Canaan was an Egyptian province. Egypt had forts, tax collectors, and governors all over the "Promised Land."If the Israelites fled Egypt to go to Canaan, they were essentially "fleeing Egypt to go to Egypt." 9) The story appears to have been made up during the Babylonian Exile in the 6th century BCE. They needed a story to give them hope: a story where their God defeats a superpower Egypt) and leads them back to their homeland. By creating a shared "escape" story, they turned a collection of local Canaanite tribes into a single, unified nation. So this is a beautiful story, but a complete myth. Its greatest value is that it has inspired many to pursue freedom, most famously African Americans who identified deeply with the story.

English
0
0
0
19