knitwise

459.4K posts

knitwise banner
knitwise

knitwise

@knitwise2

Conservative, patriot. Love my country 🇺🇸

Katılım Ocak 2021
2.4K Takip Edilen2.5K Takipçiler
knitwise retweetledi
UnveiledChina
UnveiledChina@Unveiled_ChinaX·
Lets talk “Professor Jiang” and why is he suddenly everywhere? Who is he? The man behind the “Predictive History” channel is Jiang Xueqin (江学勤). He is not a tenured professor at a major Chinese university, but an educator who has taught at international schools in China and has been involved in curriculum development and writing. The “professor” label used online is, at best, loosely applied. His YouTube channel “Predictive History” has grown rapidly, producing polished English-language geopolitical content for a global audience. Here’s where it gets interesting. YouTube is officially blocked in mainland China. Yet his content is consistently uploaded, high production quality, and clearly targeted at Western viewers. That does not prove anything on its own, but it does raise a basic structural question about how and from where this operation is run. Now look at the messaging. Across videos, the themes are highly consistent: - U.S. decline is inevitable - China’s system is more stable and long-term oriented - Western alliances are weak or hypocritical - A China-led multipolar world is both natural and preferable These positions closely mirror narratives promoted by the Chinese Communist Party in its external messaging. At the same time, there is little to no direct criticism of Beijing on politically sensitive issues — something that is notable given how tightly speech is controlled inside China. So you end up with a pattern: A “professor” without a clear traditional academic footprint. Content produced for Western platforms that are blocked in China. Messaging that consistently aligns with state narratives. And growing visibility at a time when information competition is intensifying. None of this proves coordination. But it does raise a legitimate question: Is this simply an independent commentator who happens to align with Beijing’s worldview or part of a broader ecosystem shaping how China is understood abroad? And more importantly, how should audiences evaluate credibility when labels like “professor” are used so loosely in geopolitical discourse? #China #CCP #InformationWarfare #Geopolitics #MediaLiteracy #Influence #YouTube #Narratives
UnveiledChina tweet media
Matt Morse@MattMorseTV

Chinese "professor" Jiang says that the United States should willingly forfeit it's role as the #1 global superpower to China and Russia, to which Tucker Carlson agrees and then blames Israel for preventing that from happening. Dude, what happened to Tucker?

English
158
304
1.3K
196.5K
knitwise retweetledi
knitwise retweetledi
knitwise retweetledi
knitwise retweetledi
Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations
"Christian Nationalism" and the entire cabal of Integralists, Francoists, Monarchists, Distributists etc etc are not concerned with the things that they say they are concerned about. They are concerned about the revolution. And what is the eventual end result of this revolution? Eternal digital slavery and the replacement of a Biblical eschatology with a theosophical, distinctly Russian, Sci-Fi end of history. And the end of mankind.
Michael O'Fallon - Sovereign Nations@SovMichael

The Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies has reviewed "Aleksandr Dugin's Foundations of Geopolitics", the book chosen by Jack Posobiec for his summer reading in 2017, and it contains the following: "Russia should use its special services within the borders of the United States and Canada to fuel instability and separatism against neoliberal globalist Western hegemony, such as, for instance, provoke "Afro-American racists" to create severe backlash against the rotten political state of affairs in the current present-day system of the United States and Canada. Russia should "introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social, and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S. It would also make sense simultaneously to support isolationist tendencies in American politics." And this is exactly what Mike Flynn, Jack Posobiec, Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Auron MacIntyre (not his real name), Steve Bannon, the crowd of Roman Catholic Integralists and the Protestant Christian Nationalists (Integralism with Protestant characteristics) have done: Introduced geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social, and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S. This is what our constitutional republic has been enduring over the past 4 years: an attempt to create a color revolution model on the Faux-Right that will compliment the color revolution model on the Radical Left that will tear our nation to pieces that will only leave behind a sublated, fractured, techno-feudalist shell of what was once the most powerful nation on earth. So while the crowd of Poso, Flynn, Tucker, MacIntyre (not his real name), the TechBros and the Integralists are whispering in Donald Trump's ear to embrace the mantle of the "Unbound Executive", the same operation on the Left is running the very astroturfed "No Kings" rallies across the country. Dialectical political warfare: back-and-forth, one staged conflict after another to destabilize our nation. And somehoe, many of these men and women who are hell-bent on fracturing our nation, are the hand-picked representatives of the press pool at the White House. Simply amazing. I am hoping that @realDonaldTrump is beginning to see the treasonous betrayal of these bad actors. My guess is that he is just now beginning to become aware of the scheme - or at least a few pieces of the strategy.

English
4
21
66
7.2K
knitwise retweetledi
Stella Escobedo
Stella Escobedo@StellaEscoTV·
@ConceptualJames Meanwhile - in Nigeria, on Palm Sunday, Christians are being massacred. They don’t care.
English
8
21
136
3.6K
knitwise retweetledi
knitwise retweetledi
Seth Keshel
Seth Keshel@RealSKeshel·
Walsh is right to ID a disconnect between social media and real life. However, here is the response 2 weeks ago at a Pima County gun show. 87% in favor of Trump’s actions in Iran. The doom and gloom is largely based on “what if” and memories of Iraq. I will agree that conventional brigade combat teams pouring in and setting up semi permanent encampments with 12-month tours will be doom for the political right. But now we all know counterinsurgency is a failed strategy and I just don’t think that will happen.
Seth Keshel tweet media
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog

I’ve never seen such a disconnect between the commentary on this site and what I hear in the real world. I’ve talked to dozens of normal conservatives in real life about the Iran War and I haven’t met a single one who’s actually enthusiastically in favor of it. At best they’re warily optimistic. In most cases they’re opposed. In some cases they’re not only opposed but deeply furious. And yet here if you utter a word of criticism about the war you’ll be shouted down by throngs of alleged American conservatives who allegedly have wanted nothing more than for America to go to war with Iran. It just doesn’t reflect what I see on the ground. That’s not just cope because my position is unpopular with “my side.” I’ve held plenty of unpopular positions. I really don’t care. But in this case the social media vs real world divide is stark and unlike anything I’ve seen before.

English
50
70
409
21.2K
knitwise retweetledi
Jackie Chea ⚖️
Jackie Chea ⚖️@Fair_and_Biased·
Matt says the polls don’t reflect the reality on the ground. They do for me. My conservative friends support Trump’s Iran effort. I just asked a friend who was deployed in Iraq if he supports the war, and he said yes. Nobody wants it to be a long, bloody conflict, but the conservatives I know support the mission so far.
Marc Thiessen 🇺🇸❤️🇺🇦🇹🇼🇮🇱@marcthiessen

But everyone I talk to opposes the war…

English
39
42
189
10.8K
knitwise retweetledi
Catturd ™
Catturd ™@catturd2·
CPAC … Corporate Ponies And Crooks.
English
60
104
850
41.3K
knitwise retweetledi
knitwise retweetledi
Jacktron
Jacktron@jacktronprime·
@MegynKellyShow If you actually think that Trump was pushed into doing this, you clearly don’t understand the man at all. After all, you’re the same person.
English
8
28
181
2.5K
knitwise retweetledi
Mark Changizi
Mark Changizi@MarkChangizi·
@MegynKellyShow “Going poorly” apparently means “going well for Israel.”
English
0
3
10
247