andrea carmel

15.2K posts

andrea carmel

andrea carmel

@kosmikossa

i discover Tara in my Path of Prayer. Her name means Star, and like the North Star in the SKY guiding lost travelers, Tara appears to us when is dark.

Katılım Haziran 2009
899 Takip Edilen258 Takipçiler
andrea carmel retweetledi
Karina Mariani
Karina Mariani@KarinaLMariani·
Pedro Sánchez sigue cosechando adhesiones a izquierda y derecha. Hace días su gobierno ejecutó a una víctima vulnerable. Pero Noelia no servía para nutrir ningún libelo. Hay que entender que sabe leer el signo de los tiempos. Es el más aplaudido.
Karina Mariani tweet media
Español
6
7
41
713
andrea carmel retweetledi
Karina Mariani
Karina Mariani@KarinaLMariani·
Nueva gira europea de Al Golani. La brújula de la indignación del viejo continente está loquita. Señores como Al Golani se van a hacer una panzada en 5 años. Starmer, Meloni, Macron, Sánchez van a estar bien protegidos, claro.
Español
1
14
38
1.3K
andrea carmel retweetledi
Karina Mariani
Karina Mariani@KarinaLMariani·
Ni una palabra de Nigeria. Ni un gesto por Noelia. Pero vamos a lo importante👇🏻
Karina Mariani tweet media
Español
20
62
167
1.8K
andrea carmel retweetledi
Acción y Comunicación sobre Oriente Medio - ACOM
"Netanyahu describe la debilidad de la dirigencia europea frente a su enemigo existencial. Viendo cómo reaccionó la dirigencia europea ante el circo de Pizzaballa, no creo que sea debilidad, es más bien cobardía y complicidad. Como hace un siglo". ✍️@KarinaLMariani
Español
2
27
87
2K
andrea carmel retweetledi
Karina Mariani
Karina Mariani@KarinaLMariani·
👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Karina Mariani tweet media
QME
0
5
27
340
babalu
babalu@babalusilbabalu·
@MeretzArgentina Profundamente avergonzada x esta ley. NO EN MI NOMBRE.
Español
1
0
0
236
Meretz Argentina
Meretz Argentina@MeretzArgentina·
El Parlamento israelí aprobó hoy, con votos del oficialismo, la Ley de Pena de Muerte, que instaura la ejecución como pena para los palestinos condenados por terrorismo. Además de las objeciones morales a la pena de muerte, la ley en la práctica consagra legalmente prácticas discriminatorias y contrarias al derecho internacional e israelí. Expertos en seguridad advirtieron al parlamento que, lejos de disuadir futuros ataques terroristas, la ley puede de hecho tener el efecto opuesto. La aprobación de la ley fue celebrada con champagne en el recinto por su principal promotor, el diputado multicondenado por terrorismo Itamar Ben-Gvir. "Esta ley no es ni ética, ni judía, ni democrática ni aporta a la seguridad", anunció en el parlamento el diputado Guilad Kariv, miembro del partido Hademocratim. Publicó el diputado tras su aprobación: "Israel no se convertirá en un Estado kahanista. Presentaré una petición ante la Corte Suprema de Justicia en los próximos días, junto al Instituto Zulat y la Voz Rabínica por los Derechos Humanos, en contra de la Ley de Pena de Muerte: una ley inmoral que contradice los valores fundamentales del Estado de Israel. Cada día que la ley sea parte del boletín oficial del Estado de Israel es una mancha a nuestra imagen y nuestros valores. No lo toleraremos". La sociedad israelí se organiza para impedir un nuevo ataque a sus instituciones de parte de la extrema derecha en el poder. Compartí para apoyar la causa.
Español
12
41
90
17.6K
andrea carmel retweetledi
USA en Español
USA en Español@USAenEspanol·
SECRETARIO RUBIO: Es decepcionante ver que en un momento de necesidad para Estados Unidos, tengamos países como España, un miembro de la OTAN que nos hemos comprometido a defender, negándonos el uso de su espacio aéreo y presumiendo de ello.
Español
126
511
1.2K
24.6K
andrea carmel retweetledi
Erielle Azerrad
Erielle Azerrad@politicalelle·
Calm down y’all. The Palestinian Authority still has its death penalty for selling land to a Jew. I don’t see any criticisms of THAT policy. Huh. So weird!
English
205
563
4.2K
96.2K
andrea carmel retweetledi
Hermann Tertsch
Hermann Tertsch@hermanntertsch·
La Unión Europea amenaza con sanciones a Israel si aprueba la pena de muerte para los terroristas condenados por asesinatos para evitar así la toma de rehenes con chantajes para liberarlos. La Unión Europea amenaza con sanciones a Israel por la pena de muerte a terroristas, pero financia a Cuba con pena de muerte a inocentes y protege a Irán que tiene vigente con aplicación inmediata con pena de muerte a toda su población en cuanto abren la boca para pedir libertad. La Unión Europea amenaza con sanciones a Israel por la pena de muerte a terroristas pero consiente sin sanciones la pena de muerte hasta en ese socio favorito de Alemania que es la China comunista.
Hermann Tertsch tweet media
Español
256
1K
1.7K
24.2K
andrea carmel
andrea carmel@kosmikossa·
@EuprepioPadula Este tipo ni sabe escribir apropiadamente. Es un bot mal hecho. Salido del gabinete de Sánchez.
Español
0
0
3
56
Euprepio Padula
Euprepio Padula@EuprepioPadula·
#URGENTE Bezalel Smotrich, judío y Ministro de Defensa de Israel: "Las leyes internacionales no se aplican a los judíos. Esa es la diferencia entre el pueblo elegido y los otros". Hay que aislar estos animales miserable e del resto del mundo y dejarlos solos. Si a Sud Africa se le aplicó un boicot total por el apertheid no se puede seguir ignorando que esta gentuza está destrozando el mundo. BASTA YA IMPUNIDAD
Euprepio Padula tweet media
Español
138
931
1.5K
27.2K
andrea carmel retweetledi
Gabriel Yerushalmi 🇮🇱
Gabriel Yerushalmi 🇮🇱@Defensa_Israel·
Trump: A todos los países que no pueden conseguir combustible para aviones, como Gran Bretaña, que se negó a intervenir ante la arrogancia de Irán, les tengo una propuesta: 🇺🇸🔥🇪🇺 1. Cómprenlo a Estados Unidos, tenemos de sobra. 2. Ármense de valor, vayan a Ormuz y tómenlo. Tendrán que aprender a luchar porque Estados Unidos ya no estará ahí para ayudarlos, igual que ustedes no estuvieron ahí para nosotros. Trump: Irán ha sido prácticamente destruido. Lo más difícil ya pasó. ¡Vayan a buscar el petróleo ustedes mismos!. 🤭
Gabriel Yerushalmi 🇮🇱 tweet media
Español
92
452
1.4K
55.4K
Allie Feuerstein
Allie Feuerstein@AllieFeuerstein·
Wow I can’t believe the pro Israel lobby (which I’m a part of) is proudly parroting these stats. You are relieved that only 25% of Americans support Tucker? This movement isn’t even a year old! Did Hitler rise to power overnight? I am DEEPLY concerned by these numbers and dumbfounded that others aren’t.
English
6
0
4
314
Han Shawnity 🇺🇸
Han Shawnity 🇺🇸@HanShawnity·
BREAKING: According to a new Daily Mail poll, just 24% of Americans have a favorable view of Tucker Carlson. Only 21% believe he represents the future of the Republican party. 39% believe he represents a dangerous future while 40% are unsure. Social media is not real life, guys.
Han Shawnity 🇺🇸 tweet mediaHan Shawnity 🇺🇸 tweet mediaHan Shawnity 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
229
140
902
55.3K
andrea carmel retweetledi
andrea carmel retweetledi
Frank McCormick
Frank McCormick@CBHeresy·
Stop trying to turn Catholicism into a BLM victimhood cult. We number 1.4 billion globally. It’s pathetic. You’re like Jesse Jackson taking every personal attack against you and making it about race/religion.
Frank McCormick tweet media
English
218
434
3.1K
64.7K
andrea carmel retweetledi
John Spencer
John Spencer@SpencerGuard·
WAR CRIMES!! They say. Attacking Iran's power plants is a War Crime they say... I want to thank this journalist, listed as Chief Correspondent for @welt , one of Germany’s largest and most influential publications, for highlighting a massive problem: journalists declaring, adjudicating, and issuing verdicts on war crimes while demonstrating little understanding of the law of armed conflict or military history. This is not a small issue. It is global. And it should concern anyone who cares about journalism, fact-checking, and the integrity of the law of armed conflict. No, it is not explicitly unlawful or automatically a war crime to attack an enemy’s electricity grid. Under the law of armed conflict, such targets can be lawful if they provide a military advantage and strikes meet proportionality, distinction, and precaution. Under the law of armed conflict, such targets can be lawful if they provide a military advantage. Every strike must still be judged under proportionality, distinction, and precaution. That is where the real legal debate belongs. We can argue effectiveness. But history is clear. This has been done repeatedly, each case shaped by its own context: Korea (1950–1953): U.S. forces attacked hydroelectric facilities in North Korea late in the war to pressure the regime. 1991 Gulf War: Coalition air forces deliberately targeted Iraq’s national electrical grid to disrupt command and control, air defenses, and military logistics. The grid was largely incapacitated within weeks. Kosovo (1999): NATO struck Serbia’s electrical system, including using graphite bombs to disrupt transmission. Iraq War (2003): The approach was different from 1991, but the U.S./Coalition was more restrained on the national grid to avoid humanitarian collapse. It still selected and struck electrical and dual use nodes tied to military systems, especially early in the campaign.
Clemens Wergin@clemenswergin

@SpencerGuard Good article apart from the fact that I think you should discuss if an attack on Iran's energy infrastructure would be a war crime

English
78
339
1.4K
119.9K
andrea carmel
andrea carmel@kosmikossa·
👇👇👇👇
John Spencer@SpencerGuard

WAR CRIMES!! They say. Attacking Iran's power plants is a War Crime they say... I want to thank this journalist, listed as Chief Correspondent for @welt , one of Germany’s largest and most influential publications, for highlighting a massive problem: journalists declaring, adjudicating, and issuing verdicts on war crimes while demonstrating little understanding of the law of armed conflict or military history. This is not a small issue. It is global. And it should concern anyone who cares about journalism, fact-checking, and the integrity of the law of armed conflict. No, it is not explicitly unlawful or automatically a war crime to attack an enemy’s electricity grid. Under the law of armed conflict, such targets can be lawful if they provide a military advantage and strikes meet proportionality, distinction, and precaution. Under the law of armed conflict, such targets can be lawful if they provide a military advantage. Every strike must still be judged under proportionality, distinction, and precaution. That is where the real legal debate belongs. We can argue effectiveness. But history is clear. This has been done repeatedly, each case shaped by its own context: Korea (1950–1953): U.S. forces attacked hydroelectric facilities in North Korea late in the war to pressure the regime. 1991 Gulf War: Coalition air forces deliberately targeted Iraq’s national electrical grid to disrupt command and control, air defenses, and military logistics. The grid was largely incapacitated within weeks. Kosovo (1999): NATO struck Serbia’s electrical system, including using graphite bombs to disrupt transmission. Iraq War (2003): The approach was different from 1991, but the U.S./Coalition was more restrained on the national grid to avoid humanitarian collapse. It still selected and struck electrical and dual use nodes tied to military systems, especially early in the campaign.

ART
0
0
0
2
andrea carmel retweetledi
Dr. Maalouf ‏
Dr. Maalouf ‏@realMaalouf·
The Melkite Catholic community in Jaffa (Tel Aviv) is celebrating Palm Sunday and has a message for the world: “We are Christians and we are Israelis. We are proud of our citizenship. It’s false that Israel persecutes us.” All religious sites are closed in Jerusalem due to Iranian missile threat. But people are still free to celebrate elsewhere in the country.
English
105
1.4K
4.3K
121.5K
andrea carmel retweetledi
Shadi khalloul שאדי ח'לול
Hello @TuckerCarlson , probably you don't read Arabic but I do. The Greek Catholic Patriarchate of Antioch in Syria announced to the Christian community that Easter celebration would take place inside the churches only due to security issues. The issues are threats of Muslim Jihadists supported by Qatar. Did you get it? You could be blamed of these atrocities against Christians in Arab Islamic countries by not exposing them and only being obsessed about us here in Israel where in normal days we celebrate freely outside in the streets of Israel.
Shadi khalloul שאדי ח'לול tweet media
English
18
184
564
10.7K
andrea carmel retweetledi
Matt Tardio
Matt Tardio@angertab·
Who is Trump Talking To? TODAY Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei says there are no direct negotiations between Iran and the USA. According to the Iranian news agency IRNA, Iran will "punish aggressors, create deterrence and ensure war won't repeat itself". SO, WHO IS IT? My opinion, Trump is talking to those HE wants to be in charge. He will publicly back those that the USA is in negotiations with (as an interim government), and call for the current Regime to be toppled.
Matt Tardio tweet media
English
39
10
89
5.3K