krvopije

31

Petar 🇧🇬🇭🇰@petar_analyst·5 Ara

@EconomyApp I guess the acquisition will fuel the top line growth of $NFLX because it’s currently slowing down due to maturing subscribers count and fading effect from password sharing

English

0

1

2.4K

App Economy Insights@EconomyApp·5 Ara

Netflix acquires Warner Bros. Studios + Streaming (HBO). $72B deal financed with $59B of debt. $2-to-3B of annual cost savings by year 3. IP roster they just unlocked: ⚡️ Harry Potter 🦇 DC Universe 🐉 Game of Thrones 💍 Lord of the Rings (film rights) ☕️ Friends ⚛️ The Big Bang Theory 🐰 Looney Tunes 💊 The Matrix 🦍 Monsterverse (Godzilla x Kong) 📺 Succession, The White Lotus, Euphoria

English

19

208

1K

139.7K

krvopije@krvopije·25 Haz

@DanRamsFan @joecarlsonshow Can you provide the source for these numbers for me?

English

0

14

Daniel Dickinson: 💙🐏💛 LA Rams@DanRamsFan·25 Haz

@joecarlsonshow Waymo operation LOST per quarter Q1 2023 =$805 million Q2 2023 =$813 million Q3 2023 =$923 million Q4 2023 =$955 million Q1 2024 =$1.02 billion Q2 2024 =$1.13 billion Q3 2024 =$1.10 billion Q4 2024 =$1.18 billion Q1 2025 =$1.23 billion How is expansion going to lose less money?

English

0

30

Joseph Carlson@joecarlsonshow·24 Haz

Last week they doubled the area they're operating in California, today they're starting rides in Atlanta. Waymo sure seems to be scaling fast for a company that can't scale.

Waymo@Waymo

The A is going Autonomous! 🎉 Waymo rides are now live in Atlanta, only on @Uber. Increase your chances of getting matched → open the Uber app, go to settings, and toggle Waymo ride preferences on.

English

144

38

1.4K

280K

krvopije@krvopije·12 Haz

@bballbreakdown Are you trying to argue they missed a call here?

English

0

6

2.1K

BBALLBREAKDOWN@bballbreakdown·12 Haz

Subtle difference btwn the fouls SGA gets on these drives and this one: Sheppard's vector is directly towards camera, not towards SGA. Also, not a ton of contact, so good no call. Fans tend to miss the no calls when getting upset at SGA calls

English

136

30

966

594.8K

krvopije retweetledi

LaurentMT@LaurentMT·9 Haz

gm. Now that the op_return PR fiasco is behind us can we talk about serious stuff like the fact that the minRelayTxFee and the miscellaneous dust limits should be divided, at a minimum, by 100?

English

12

53

4K

krvopije@krvopije·3 Haz

@gladstein @hasufl The fees will never be too expensive over a sustained period of time. Fees are meant to go down, that is part of human nature, stuff get's better and/or cheaper. x.com/krvopije/statu…

@BitcoinIsaiah @tiredfornow The fees are so low, because they were always gonna be so low, on chain has to compete with every other way to transact. It can't be simply 10 times as expensive as a Visa transaction or PayPal or some shitcoin for the rest of time. When that happens businesses and customers..

English

0

31

Alex Gladstein 🌋 ⚡@gladstein·3 Haz

@hasufl Eventually it will be very expensive to do on chain tx. Hopefully we will figure out ways for people to collaboratively spend to bring the per tx cost way way down without making security tradeoffs. But this kind of thing won’t last forever, enjoy it while you can

English

0

10

2.9K

Hasu⚡️🤖@hasufl·3 Haz

Moving $1B for just $1 on Bitcoin looks amazing but it should also worry you for Bitcoin's future - at least a little bit. The problem is, that tiny fee doesn't pay for transaction finality of the transfer. Neither does that entire block, which only had ~$3k in fees. Even the last hour of blocks total just ~$15k in fees. Why does this matter? Finality comes from the economic cost to reverse mined blocks. Right now, 99%+ of Bitcoin’s economic security comes from new issuance, not fees. But issuance trends toward zero over time. Without subsidies, you'd need around 600 blocks (~4 days) for today's finality. Caveats: - Maybe we currently "overpay" for security, leaving some room as issuance decreases. - Finality isn't purely economic—social consensus helps too. But relying too much on social consensus leads back toward tradfi-like trust. - For a $1B transaction, waiting days is manageable. For smaller transactions, it's not practical. - Longer finality times can decrease demand, further extending finality times—a dangerous spiral. Bitcoin's economic problem isn't getting much attention right now, and with Bitcoin L2s we are arguably in a better position than ever to solve it. But it's still looming, and the Bitcoin community's inability to ship even simple updates like op_cat or op_ctv don't bode well for solving this 1000x bigger issue. What I want to see over the next few years is a more functional community that proves it can either agree on things and move forward, or disagree and commit and move forward.

alex@ObadiaAlex

$1b tx, $1.58 tx fee

English

81

63

661

140.9K

krvopije@krvopije·2 May

@StopAndDecrypt Your 3rd point is wrong. There is no sustained high fee environment for a long time. Fees are going down over time and that is unavoidable. x.com/krvopije/statu…

@BitcoinIsaiah @tiredfornow The fees are so low, because they were always gonna be so low, on chain has to compete with every other way to transact. It can't be simply 10 times as expensive as a Visa transaction or PayPal or some shitcoin for the rest of time. When that happens businesses and customers..

English

85

StopAndDecrypt@StopAndDecrypt·2 May

a lot of this Bitcoin Core / spam debate comes down to fees and coffees and i don’t know why im suprised this is all so lost of a lot of people 1: block sizes must be capped for decentralization (this was settled 10’years ago, so if you don’t agree just go away) 2: satisfactory demand *of any kind* will result in full blocks and high transaction fees 3: a successful and decentralized bitcoin network will always have full blocks and extremely high layer 1 transaction fees 4: you will never afford / justify a coffee on L1 in the future, whether it’s jpegs or financial transactions that are pricing you out 5: the jpegs will get priced out too…….

English

48

59

333

46.6K

krvopije@krvopije·27 Mar

@NeoliberaleA Vielleicht kann man denen ein Wörterbuch und einen Deutschkurs spendieren, damit die sehen, dass es neben dem Wort Steuer noch andere Wörter gibt. Wenn tatsächlich mal jemand Deutschland angreifen sollte ist deren erste Antwort wahrscheinlich auch Kriegssteuer.

Deutsch

1

498

Neoliberale Aktion@NeoliberaleA·26 Mar

Das ist Sklaverei. #SPD

Deutsch

180

322

4.2K

226.2K

krvopije@krvopije·21 Mar

@babymohouseman Oder Sparer, falls es über Staatsanleihen finanziert wird.

Deutsch

9

Monique@babymohouseman·20 Mar

„Der Staat“. LOL. Vielleicht sollte da einfach mal stehen „der Steuerzahler“, damit auch der letzte Normie kapiert, dass er für die ganzen Schwachsinnsideen aufkommen soll.

Deutsch

411

637

4.7K

114.8K

krvopije@krvopije·21 Mar

@benjamincola18 @georg_renner Die hohe Filialdichte ist keine der Ursachen.

Deutsch

0

1

27

Bena Cola@benjamincola18·20 Mar

@georg_renner Die Bundesregierung - bzw der Nationalrat - hat Lenkungsaufgaben. Wenn zu hohe Lebensmittelpreise als politisches Problem identifiziert werden und die hohe Filialdichte eine der Ursachen ist, ist das Setzen entsprechender Maßnahmen durchaus Aufgabe des Gesetzgebers.

Deutsch

19

1

12

2K

Georg Renner@georg_renner·20 Mar

Unpopular opinions: 1. Eine Bundesregierung geht es nichts an, wie viele Filialen ein Unternehmen eröffnet oder nicht.

Deutsch

138

55

2K

120.1K

krvopije@krvopije·17 Mar

@MadTitan850 @mrfundman @ZacksJerryRig What did he/they do?

English

0

16

Mad Titan@FM_Master_850·17 Mar

@mrfundman Not sure of the first 2, but @ZacksJerryRig was the go to for honest reviews, teardowns and electronic knowledge but Geezus he went south quick. I used to really like Zack, mostly for the stuff he's doing in the wheelchair community. Even my wife/ daughter were fans BUT not now.

English

0

2

251

mr fundman@mrfundman·16 Mar

Once trusted YouTubers, now virtue-signaling clowns 🤡 $TSLA

English

1.7K

1.4K

31.4K

3.7M

krvopije@krvopije·7 Mar

@evoskuil Big respect for your endurance.

English

1

19

Eric Voskuil@evoskuil·7 Mar

On today's Grokcast, we discuss the meanings of supply, demand, price, and the implications of "fixed supply". x.com/i/grok/share/2…

English

0

6

1.2K

krvopije@krvopije·14 Şub

@salvatoshi @jamesob ..is getting reduced by the too small blocksize and making transacting on-chain less competitive by being unreliable and not worth it at certain periods. It just can't be X times as expensive compared to other ways to transact without having any real benefits.

English

17

krvopije@krvopije·14 Şub

@salvatoshi @jamesob ..to the small block size like to the increased, so it's a question of XMB of 1sat/vbyte or 9XMB of 1sat/vbyte. There wouldn't a proportional correction. The second sentence is a simple statement without any depth in my opinion, ignoring the explanation in my thread why demand..

English

Salvatore Ingala@salvatoshi

0

19

jamesob@jamesob·13 Şub

Everything I've seen over the past 5 years points to the importance of investigating (and engineering around) a blocksize increase

The scaling benefits of rollups are way overstated. Data availability implies that you can only get a small factor improvement over the base chain. The only reason 'crypto' loves them is that it's easy to compose them, deploy EVMs, trading infrastructures, etc Not for scaling.

English

16

1

20

6.7K

krvopije@krvopije·14 Şub

@salvatoshi @jamesob It is necessary if we want to increase fees per block for the miners at some points. x.com/krvopije/statu…

@BitcoinIsaiah @tiredfornow The fees are so low, because they were always gonna be so low, on chain has to compete with every other way to transact. It can't be simply 10 times as expensive as a Visa transaction or PayPal or some shitcoin for the rest of time. When that happens businesses and customers..

English

0

17

Salvatore Ingala@salvatoshi·14 Şub

I'm not absolutely against a (moderate) blocksize increase, but I don't think it's viable, and also I don't think it's that important. The fact that something like Ark wasn't proposed until very recently is a testament to how much untapped potential there is on the L2 front.

English

0

7

235

krvopije@krvopije·11 Şub

@matthewjablack @mononautical That is not the reason, bitcoin is just losing the competition for transactions. x.com/krvopije/statu…

@BitcoinIsaiah @tiredfornow The fees are so low, because they were always gonna be so low, on chain has to compete with every other way to transact. It can't be simply 10 times as expensive as a Visa transaction or PayPal or some shitcoin for the rest of time. When that happens businesses and customers..

English

0

34

Matt Black@matthewjablack·10 Şub

@mononautical Bitcoin L2s are working 🙃

English

2

0

9

813

mononaut@mononautical·10 Şub

ghost town.

English

86

38

655

175.2K

krvopije@krvopije·6 Şub

@nakam0t0_21 @lopp It actually is a tech problem, people get prized out at certain events that create fee spikes and that destroys demand. Bitcoin has to compete for transactions if it wants to survive. x.com/krvopije/statu…

@BitcoinIsaiah @tiredfornow The fees are so low, because they were always gonna be so low, on chain has to compete with every other way to transact. It can't be simply 10 times as expensive as a Visa transaction or PayPal or some shitcoin for the rest of time. When that happens businesses and customers..

English

26

satoshi 40HPW🎧@nakam0t0_21·5 Şub

@lopp People don’t want to operate their own life raft. They want someone else to handle it. Look at the Mempool. This is not a tech problem.

English

4

0

5

233

Jameson Lopp@lopp·5 Şub

If you believe Bitcoin is perfect or not worth attempting to improve then we have little to discuss. I see no reason to be satisfied with the current state of Bitcoin until it is capable of delivering sovereignty to all.

English

100

96

942

84.8K

krvopije@krvopije·2 Şub

@KLoaec There is not enough demand, because people got priced out consistently in the past. You've got it backwards. Bitcoin has to compete for transactions now, you won't get people back easily after you push them out. x.com/krvopije/statu…

@BitcoinIsaiah @tiredfornow The fees are so low, because they were always gonna be so low, on chain has to compete with every other way to transact. It can't be simply 10 times as expensive as a Visa transaction or PayPal or some shitcoin for the rest of time. When that happens businesses and customers..

English

0

2

119

Kevin Loaec 🧙‍♂️🐟@KLoaec·2 Şub

To be clear though, Bitcoin does not scale onchain. The current design of verifying everyone's transactions ever, wouldn't work if millions of people were transacting every day, let alone billions. But that's ok for now, I don't see a rush to "fix it". LN, Ark and all the other current and future designs will help, so will changes at the layer 1. FUD and urgency aren't justified though, we are very far from using the chain enough yet! If people aren't out-priced of the layer 1 to put their random jpegs it means there isn't enough demand yet. I guess these are now out of jpegs or something. So the real usage is visible: even at 1 sat/vbyte, people aren't rushing for block space. What a time we live in!

English

5

2

35

1.8K

Kevin Loaec 🧙‍♂️🐟@KLoaec·2 Şub

When blocks were full: Bitcoin doesn't scale, we need to fork right now otherwise Bitcoin is done for Same people today: Bitcoin is failing because the blocks aren't full! Bitcoin is done for! 🚩🚩🚩

English

28

40

355

26.9K

krvopije@krvopije·2 Şub

@prochronist @sethforprivacy It's more about simple economics, we don't "devolve" and use more expensive stuff. Fees in a general sense have to go done. x.com/krvopije/statu…

@BitcoinIsaiah @tiredfornow The fees are so low, because they were always gonna be so low, on chain has to compete with every other way to transact. It can't be simply 10 times as expensive as a Visa transaction or PayPal or some shitcoin for the rest of time. When that happens businesses and customers..

English

18

Chase@prochronist·2 Şub

@sethforprivacy think it's more of a combo of users hodling long-term and migrating to L2s for transactions: speed (Lightning) and confidentiality (Liquid)

English