azaninovantimony

@TheAvatarofEru @gorla88 Both

@kthunur @gorla88 Injekt or.?

Okay what the actual fuck Wtf is Fashfront This sounds very glowies af

@Duztsnetsov88 @gorla88 @TheAvatarofEru LOL… the groomee yearns to be groomed yet again. I find it funny how almost none of these people have the dignity, humility or honor to admit they cannot go full extremist without doing the long, arduous work that begets holding such views. Such hubris.

@gorla88 @kthunur @TheAvatarofEru yes, its owned by john smith who is an ex femboy and a southern italian mutt aswell as some spanish mutt who refuses to skindox

@gorla88 @TheAvatarofEru Have no clue; I started dismissing them almost entirely when they became absolute spergs regarding anything remotely satanic, even going insofar to call jews satanic (despite the people in power being kabbalah-obsessed, not even remotely alike satanism).

@kthunur @TheAvatarofEru does the injekt retard that bought it off aspien still own it? i havent kept up with it in a while.

@JimsonWaffen9 @_nihilisst Yes; because that is the calcination of culling the mundane & magian from your Soul/Self. The work of Nigredo is a concentrated form of the entire Great Work and quest of the Jewel of the Alchemist (Lapis Philosophicus). It is a good soup, though.

@kthunur @_nihilisst You can see how the dismantling of illusions, contradictions, fallacies, self-ruminations, ingrained prejudices and emotional/authoritative appeals can create a Dutch oven that burns so brightly to the point where it can cook both arguers into one soup.

My goal is to carry out Satan's work. It is absolute Evil and Chaos.

@gorla88 @TheAvatarofEru They also supposedly had other members be ex-trannies & ex-(or current) femboys. It is a complete trashfire of hypocrisy at its highest calibre.

@gorla88 @TheAvatarofEru Oh haha, they did not just do that. The site is filled with mixed-race individuals, halfbreeds and lesser “pure” (whatever that means to most anymore) folk. Aspien, the hapa founder of this Ironmarch fork; supposedly fucked a tranny, this tranny being a 7FW LARPer; a pretender.

@JimsonWaffen9 @_nihilisst This is all I have been trying to convey, as with my other most recent reply which aforementioned such.

@JimsonWaffen9 @_nihilisst Which is why I am not mad, nor quick to assume your position; I understand that throughout all of this, we are symbiotically making a growth of ‘existing’; an unfolding of Physis. I realize these arguments help both of us, if both of us realize it does.

@JimsonWaffen9 @_nihilisst —I have said words aren’t enough. Acta, non verba; Erga, ouk Dogma. That ‘existing’ is the only thing even close to being good enough to define what is ACTUALLY essence vs. form (of the Eldritch / Exeatic), not mere words, which is why I care less for “Evil”. That is all.

@JimsonWaffen9 @_nihilisst Hubris is not just assuming you “know everything”, it is also an act of exuberance & decadence. What word describes the Sinisterly-Numinous in full? What word can communicate the “essence” (of that which is Eldritch & Exeatic?) I too work with that ‘existing’, which is why—

@JimsonWaffen9 @_nihilisst It is because “Evil/Sinister/Wicked” is a form, to use another form is hubris; to identify solely with a form is also hubris. I don’t care for “the Sinister/Evil/Wickedness” because it is one perspective of many. I am proving that essence > form; many perspectives > one.

@kthunur @_nihilisst If that's the case, then I'll humbly admit that I'm wrong. But either way, what is it that you're genuinely trying to prove to me besides the semantics argument and the redefinition fallacy? Is it because you identify with "evil" and thus you are more inclined to defend it?

@JimsonWaffen9 @_nihilisst These definitions were never made myself, they come from others & come from gnosis I have learned by myself. I never argued against such, however, implying Evil is mainly uncontrolled frenzy & hubris; is but only one perspective of many.

@kthunur @_nihilisst By defining, cohering, selecting and ultimately manufacturing the definitions yourself - you are indeed not just creating a casual abstraction but resisting against the tide. I'm saying we have to strip away the Magian undertones and scaffolding this entire time.

@JimsonWaffen9 @_nihilisst So which is it then? Is using but another form used to describe an essence, which is hubris; better than simply describing said essence? You hold nuance for yourself, yet call me a deconstructionist for AGREEING with you but with minor nitpicks; then say you wont argue with me.

@JimsonWaffen9 @_nihilisst You insisted since the beginning someone else use a word that is a synonym of the same exact thing you say is an illusion, and an abstraction. That IS semantics; by definition of the word. You argued that “Evil” is a poor word to describe it, but then use another that is poor.

@JimsonWaffen9 @_nihilisst Once again; you misconstrue the idea of “Evil” with magian implications. I am not talking about magian abstractions, which describe a form, to the inexplicable & inextricable essence I have discussed this entire time. There is a balance; what is the Sinisterly-Numinous then?

@kthunur @_nihilisst ONA praxis emphasizes earned progression through real experience, pathei-mathos (learning from suffering), and disciplined sorcery — not automatic identity or unreflective impulse. "Evil" might be intensely potent, but it is NOT balance, and you don't have to appeal to authority.

@JimsonWaffen9 @_nihilisst The form that is known as “evil” (e.g. True Evil) is actually what the essence of what is known as “exeatic living” actually entails. Thus, describing the form of “Evil/Wicked/Sinister” is pointless; because the essence is already known & practiced. It is but semantics again.

@kthunur @_nihilisst Practitioners ARE "evil" in the eyes of mundanes, questioning and transgressing causal (everyday moral, societal) limits to presencing acausal energies, fostering personal evolution via the Seven-Fold Way, culling, insight roles, and exeatic (boundary-breaking) living.

@JimsonWaffen9 @_nihilisst Yes, however the social behavior often conflicted with the morality of said societies, often leading to dissonance between actions (rape, cannibalism, infanticide, etc.) which in turn, created a balance between them both: True Evil. True Evil, as defined in ONA mss.

@kthunur @_nihilisst OH, you're talking about the primordial? I see, you could've just said that. But you can't conflate the observed violence rates with the underlying wiring for prosocial behavior. Hunter-gatherer life DID include raids and coalitionary aggression but coexisted with the ultrasocial

@JimsonWaffen9 @_nihilisst Except that is only true for around the last 10,000~ years. I am talking way, way before that. If you look at human history before then, we were barely different than animals; if not even worse.

@kthunur @_nihilisst Selection against excessive aggression in favor of greater tolerance, cooperation, and empathy within groups. Our baseline wiring prioritizes bonding, tribal reciprocity, and affective attunement (mirror neurons, oxytocin-driven care), which inhibit random or gratuitous harm.

@JimsonWaffen9 @_nihilisst Even wolves possess some empathetic capabilities, as has been scientifically proven. I would agree, but indifference to what & whom? They would most certainly not be indifferent to if some other animal killed, raped or ate them, thus it’s not necessarily “indifference”.

@kthunur @_nihilisst You're trying to insert a humanistic catch-all on non-human animals, that is a fallacy, by the way. Animals do not possess the same logical, judgmental and selective wiring that we do neurologically and thus you cannot judge them by human standards. They are indifferent not cruel

@JimsonWaffen9 @_nihilisst Except the OP never said it was an identity; if anything he agreed with you, as being a trait of character in the unfolding of Physis. He merely stated he practiced evil as a trait to get closer to the Dark Immortals, and become like them; which is vindicated in ONA mss.

@kthunur @_nihilisst Semantics are neither nothing nor everything, this whole discussion in my eyes has been nothing but auto-diagnostic revealing more about the nature of us for as evil and wickedness are traits of character that you earn along the way. I'm against evil as in identity.