@fireflytypefour you’ve tweeted about me like six times you absolute fucking dipshit ❤️ but go off, send your lil army of overwatch bots after me LMAOOOOOOOO
@OyashirosTopGuy But… they do work. I just explained to you that they do. On a fundamental level, if a game functions and is able to be played, that’s a few points.
@OyashirosTopGuy I think that’s fair. Games are subjective past a point of playability. If you can at least play a game with relatively few issues and it isn’t overtly bad writing I think it should be around a 5 which is essentially like the watered down milk of games.
@OyashirosTopGuy@JJunkWarrior Cyberpunk on last gen at launch is a good example. The next gen is absolutely not a 4 by any means and it’s not badly written but ran horribly enough to warrant that kind of score. It was playable but barely and the bugs made it extremely annoying for the majority of people.
@OyashirosTopGuy@JJunkWarrior a 1/10 is offensively bad. Ride to Hell: Retribution levels of bad. Absolutely horrible gameplay, a sexist, misogynist, trashy plot, terrible graphics, and absolutely NOBODY enjoys it unless it’s for how bad it actually is.
you’re trying to have a dick measuring contest for the reason i said i don’t like old overwatch, you’re a trainwreck aruging with someone on twitter for over a hour for literally nothing
@OyashirosTopGuy@JJunkWarrior just because a game has a feature you don’t like doesn’t make it a 4/10. 4/10 should mean a game is legit buggy, horribly written, barely functions as a game.
@kudo_716@JJunkWarrior My friends and I once bought about 30€ worth of Steam random key packs and took turns trying them all out.
I've seen things you can't even imagine, but just because 0/10's exist doesn't mean that I have to call 4/10's good.