Bryan Kyritz

4.6K posts

Bryan Kyritz banner
Bryan Kyritz

Bryan Kyritz

@kyritzb

CTO @Jori_health Building the worlds best ai copilot for oncologists

Hoboken, NJ Katılım Aralık 2021
1.6K Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Bryan Kyritz
Bryan Kyritz@kyritzb·
Precision medicine can’t scale with today’s workflows. Data is growing exponentially. But human time isn’t. At @jori_health, we built a multi-agent system for tumor boards. They think together. Learn together. Act fast. 40 hrs of human work → 5 mins. Every run makes them smarter. Every oncologist shapes the system. Agents as infra. This is how precision medicine scales to everyone.
English
3
2
13
1.7K
Bryan Kyritz retweetledi
David Gandara
David Gandara@drgandara·
#ASCO2026 Academy Awards according to @mukundiyngr Very nice. Thanks for posting
Mukund Iyengar@mukundiyngr

ASCO this year has 5,000+ abstracts. But maybe 24 will actually change practice. This is that map. (ERRATA: this plot fixes an error on VICTORIA which reflected incorrect data, thnx @Dr_RShatsky) Map spans 12 disease areas, 24 critical readouts, 5 plenaries & 2 confirmed misses already on the board. Few things jump out immediately: ▫️Pancreatic cancer gets the headline. Daraxonrasib: 13.2 vs 6.7 months. ▫️Sarcoma gets a plenary because public science funded what pharma would not. ▫️Lung cancer remains the most crowded battlefield in oncology: RET adjuvant, bispecific OS, post-osimertinib, next-gen EGFR. By next week, some of these cells will become new standards of care. This is your cheat sheet to keep score in real time. - - - - - Sources: @asco @OncLive @CancerNetwrk via @Jori_health - - - - -

English
1
3
5
1.5K
Bryan Kyritz retweetledi
Mukund Iyengar
Mukund Iyengar@mukundiyngr·
ASCO this year has 5,000+ abstracts. But maybe 24 will actually change practice. This is that map. (ERRATA: this plot fixes an error on VICTORIA which reflected incorrect data, thnx @Dr_RShatsky) Map spans 12 disease areas, 24 critical readouts, 5 plenaries & 2 confirmed misses already on the board. Few things jump out immediately: ▫️Pancreatic cancer gets the headline. Daraxonrasib: 13.2 vs 6.7 months. ▫️Sarcoma gets a plenary because public science funded what pharma would not. ▫️Lung cancer remains the most crowded battlefield in oncology: RET adjuvant, bispecific OS, post-osimertinib, next-gen EGFR. By next week, some of these cells will become new standards of care. This is your cheat sheet to keep score in real time. - - - - - Sources: @asco @OncLive @CancerNetwrk via @Jori_health - - - - -
Mukund Iyengar tweet media
English
2
50
118
9.7K
Bryan Kyritz retweetledi
Mukund Iyengar
Mukund Iyengar@mukundiyngr·
Every ASCO plenary drug started as an NIH grant nobody noticed. This year’s 5 plenary drugs trace back to: ▫️2,762 NIH grants ▪️$803M in public science ▫️29-41 years of runway Drugs need decades to mature. So before you watch the ASCO plenary, look at the staircase. Then ask: "which drugs will be missing from the 2031 version?" - - - - - Source: NIH RePORTER· @asco · via @Jori_health - - - - -
Mukund Iyengar tweet media
English
2
28
63
4.8K
ℏεsam
ℏεsam@Hesamation·
Remember this? 20 days ago SubQ claimed to have developed a model with 12M context window, 95% cheaper than Opus, and the same intelligence level. they promised to release the paper and model card “next week”. that was 10 days ago. NOTHING. the only update after this launch was a 3rd party eval by Appen, which mentioned it evaluated via Subquadratic API, and did not receive model weights, that’s normal, but not much of a proof. if this is not a scam (which so far sets off every obvious red flags of being one) it’s super shady. you cannot make revolutionary research claims and still act like you’re running a sales pitch in a YC launch post. the main problem is simple: they’re using a breakthrough claim to buy attention, credibility, and likely investor eyeballs before giving the community anything concrete to evaluate. very unprofessional compared to how an “ai lab” must conduct its research release.
Alexander Whedon@alex_whedon

Introducing SubQ - a major breakthrough in LLM intelligence. It is the first model built on a fully sub-quadratic sparse-attention architecture (SSA), And the first frontier model with a 12 million token context window which is: - 52x faster than FlashAttention at 1MM tokens - Less than 5% the cost of Opus Transformer-based LLMs waste compute by processing every possible relationship between words (standard attention). Only a small fraction actually matter. @subquadratic finds and focuses only on the ones that do. That's nearly 1,000x less compute and a new way for LLMs to scale.

English
25
15
360
46.8K
Bryan Kyritz
Bryan Kyritz@kyritzb·
BREAKING: My cat, Floofy, has joined Anthropic as a member of technical staff.
Bryan Kyritz tweet mediaBryan Kyritz tweet media
English
0
1
4
94
Kenji TechDad
Kenji TechDad@soondadkenji·
@kyritzb This is so real. More leverage just gave me more ideas and more building. That's been my experience too. Lets go!!
English
1
0
1
30
Bryan Kyritz
Bryan Kyritz@kyritzb·
ngl I haven't ever worked more in my life even though the work got way easier & get easily get more done. Ambition and capability just exploded. A physician with the same tooling would be able to treat more patients, easier, and faster, and with less burnout. "More work" doesn't mean needing to suffer more to complete it. It means getting more done with the correct systems around you that empower you.
Dan Shipper 📧@danshipper

We’ve automated every single thing we can @every with AI agents. And yet there’s way more human work to do than ever. We’ve gone from 4 -> 30 human employees since GPT-3. I wrote a report on the structural reasons: how AI makes expert competence cheap, why that drives up demand for experts, and why the dynamic only intensifies as we approach AGI. After Automation: every.to/p/after-automa…

English
3
3
13
4.6K
Bryan Kyritz
Bryan Kyritz@kyritzb·
If you want the vending machine to determine when you’re thirst and then ask you if you want to drink It needs to be able to monitor your thirst, and know to reach out to you when you are thirsty
English
0
0
0
24
Bryan Kyritz
Bryan Kyritz@kyritzb·
Ai today is a vending machine that you walk up to and ask for an answer, get it, and continue because apps lack the proactiveness. To be proactive is so hard. Not only do you have to be able to answer the proactive question. But you need to also know when to invoke that intelligence. This is like intelligence squared. Agentic harnesses today are still purely reactive unless you use “skills” and schedule them to run at certain times. Only way it makes sense for proactive is when teams are building agentic copilots for extremely specific use cases. Where the team itself decides when the agent should be proactive and reactive,
signüll@signulll

one of the most interesting things about ai products today is that almost none of them are *live*. there’s nothing running continuously, reacting to context as it changes.. maybe a scheduled digest here or a timer there, but that’s just pull dressed up as push. everything is fundamentally a vending machine where you walk up, ask, get an answer, & then leave. getting this right is obviously tricky & the business model behind must fit to justify the burn but this is where really interesting application layer problems live rn.

English
1
0
0
92
malshaalan 🇰🇼
malshaalan 🇰🇼@malshaalan·
@signulll the missing layer isn't inference, it's event detection. something has to notice that context changed and decide it's worth triggering the model. most products outsource that to the user.
English
3
0
7
626
signüll
signüll@signulll·
one of the most interesting things about ai products today is that almost none of them are *live*. there’s nothing running continuously, reacting to context as it changes.. maybe a scheduled digest here or a timer there, but that’s just pull dressed up as push. everything is fundamentally a vending machine where you walk up, ask, get an answer, & then leave. getting this right is obviously tricky & the business model behind must fit to justify the burn but this is where really interesting application layer problems live rn.
English
152
50
931
127.1K
Hamad Al Rumaithi
Hamad Al Rumaithi@theavidhamad·
@kyritzb This is where smart technology matters. Not replacing expertise but amplifying it. When doctors treat more patients with less burnout, that is real progress for quality of life.
English
1
0
1
52
Hongjian Zhou
Hongjian Zhou@itsEmZee_·
> Everyone else: let’s build agent harnesses from scratch. > Healthcare: yay, we put a chatbot in our 40-year-old EMR!!! > Huge healthtech win, genuinely. > But who’s building the agent-native EMR harness? How are we supposed to do ReAct loops, tool calls, swarm, and long memory in Epic?
OpenEvidence@EvidenceOpen

Until now, physicians using AI in clinic had to assemble the patient’s context themselves. Allergies, comorbidities, medications, prior procedures, copy-pasted in from the chart. Today we’re announcing a partnership with @CedarsSinai. OpenEvidence now works directly inside Epic, drawing on the patient’s full record and interpreting the medical literature through the lens of that specific patient. Cedars-Sinai is the first academic health system to deploy patient-aware clinical intelligence at enterprise scale. The clinician asks a complex question in natural language. The answer reflects both the best available evidence and the patient in front of them. Patient data is never stored after the clinical session or used for any other purpose.

English
11
6
119
21.7K
Mukund Iyengar
Mukund Iyengar@mukundiyngr·
Cancer survival in the U.S. just crossed 70%. It was 63% in the 1990s. That gap = 4.8M people alive today. This one chart captures survival gains across 29 cancer types. The wins are real. So is the unfinished work. ▪️CML: 31% → 72% ▪️Multiple myeloma: 32% → 62% ▫️Kidney: 59% → 82% ▫️Metastatic melanoma: 16% → 35% ▫️Childhood ALL: 80% → 92% But some cancers barely moved. Cervical cancer outcomes actually worsened. None of this is abstract progress, though. These are birthdays, grandkids, and years of life returned. This is what funded science does. Next time someone asks if cancer research works, show them this (full) chart. - - - - - Source: ACS Cancer Statistics 2026 · SEER · 𝘷𝘪𝘢 @Jori_health - - - - -
Mukund Iyengar tweet media
English
16
145
388
31.5K
Bryan Kyritz retweetledi