Fix JuanPabloF -- 🌈🇺🇦

When you NEED to abstract over passing a parameter.

Trump and Axios are spreading a large amount of questionable news today. Today is also an OPEX day. If there is not even 1% confirmation of this news, it should be recorded as one of the biggest cases of market manipulation of the century. Trump is saying another manipulative news: “Iran agreed to a suspension of its nuclear program.” However, Iran has not confirmed this.

@enajas 1. Limitando la expansión geográfica de la ciudad. Incluso el centro norte está lleno de predios abandonados y terrenos baldíos y sub-utilizados 2. Otorgando autonomía recaudatoria y de ejecución de obra pública a los barrios de Quito. Adicional al Municipio del DMQ.

Video de 1990 • La Av. Amazonas de #Quito. Pregunta para ustedes, sin nostalgias y dejando de lado los claros cambios demográficos y generacionales. ¿Cómo creen que se pueden “revivir” las avenidas, calles y los barrios? Fuente: Explorando el misterio.

@enajas Sería increíble reducir el número de parqueaderos en la Shyris y añadir cientos de arupos.

¿Se imaginan #Quito en agosto y septiembre completamente rosada por los arupos? Al aterrizar en #CDMX durante la temporada de jacarandás, la ciudad se ve teñida de lila desde el aire. Allá lo asumieron como temporada. ¿Aquí podríamos? . ¿Qué nos falta?

@CryptoCyberia @abra55513382 Basically says LLMs can be profitable if they stop training better models. Interviewer then asks about open source models catching up and eating his lunch in that case. Dario doesn’t have a good answer and rambles until stopped by the interviewer.

@abra55513382 tab saved for later review 🫡🫡🫡

Good news guys, Sonnet 4.5 would only be like $500 a month when the VC bucks dry up. Opus would only cost $3000-$15,000 bucks a month, unless you use Ralph and then it'll be way more. Keep in mind this is one instance. You all starting to see the problem yet?

How is "Various units" a reasonable axis label?! I expect nothing from CloudWatch, yet it manages to disappoint me.

@specialCaseDev Especially when they happen to rhyme 😍

Don't you love when words have the same number of letters?

@Feru Que no falte el tigrillo!

Entre todas las desventajas de la migración, al menos tengo la suerte de vivir en un sitio donde puedo comprar verdes en casi cualquier esquina. Café y patacones para sobrellevar el frío invernal ☕🍌🥶

@HKGuwu @int_index CI is supposed to tell you if your code is broken in production. If you introduce behavior deviations only for CI, your software has the potential to only work in CI.

@int_index what's actually so bad about it

Inherited a codebase where someone wrote this unironically. Reminds me of the Volkswagen emissions scandal.

> linear > early returns Pick one

@ShriramKMurthi Euronet targets touristy areas. You often find them in the most random places. It’s one of the warning I give people going to Europe Ignoring your rejection is par for the course for them.

@lambdase I'm not sure, but it was some generic thing in a tourist area, so could well be. If not Euronet, something similar.

A frustrating new(?) tourist scam: I go to a cash machine; it lists various absurd markups (that come to a nearly 25% extra); I cancel the transaction; it…gives me the money anyway (presumably at this absurd rate).

@tollyferro @NiceDay42 @JLarky This is mostly because `return` is a mistake. Its goto-like semantics are the gross part.

@NiceDay42 @JLarky To clarify, i meant specifically that adding this syntax to JS would be gross because it would create inconsistency in the behavior of `return`. Generally speaking, i really like it, its one of the things i really like about Rust

If JavaScript could do this, I would die happy: let x = { let now = new Date() return now.toString() } console.log(x.length)

@DebugSteven Personally, I did think about this. It’s rough socially when growing it out, since it WILL look bad and people won’t like it at first. It’s an experience all bearded people remember. Many cis men can only grow it well into adulthood, so it changes your sense of self somewhat!

@DebugSteven It looked awful for a few weeks and I was tempted to shave it every morning. It got worse with time and everyone was telling me to shave. I persisted, went to a good barber shop and now I love it! Definitely more work than clean shaved and it can easily look bad if unkempt.

The Scala urge to add an ugly PartiallyApplied class for partial type application for a function with a single call site.

@rickasaurus Doesn't help that XML has been made as inconvenient as possible. Lighter syntax and some feature trimming would have helped. For instance, are XML attributes really necessary? URIs as namespaces? Sometimes I think it was made so clumsy to create a tooling industry around it.

The bitter lesson of Json vs XML is that convenience beats correctness every time

@premun_ @ChShersh Definitely clearer. I don't typically expect my users to know about concrete classes in my implementations, so my brain went to "interface" immediately.

@lambdase @ChShersh I think your original comment just could have said "new method to a class", not interface. No one needs to call this method and it's not a breaking change imho then.

I never understood why versioning is so overcomplicated for no reason. A version should be just MAJOR.MINOR Increase MAJOR for breaking changes. Increase MINOR for non-breaking changes. That’s all.

@ChShersh Depends if this interface is sealed or not. If the interface is sealed and therefore depend solely on implementations provided by a library, the change is strictly additive and definitely not breaking.

@lambdase In my world, it’s a breaking change. Upgrading to an interface with a new method forces you to define this method. But I agree that sometimes it’s not obvious what is a breaking change.

@alexelcu that's cool! I hadn't seen it! Crowd sourcing this is a must until we get a more general solution.