Don't eff it up

10.2K posts

Don't eff it up

Don't eff it up

@lateToSupper

Time to eat

The Hills Katılım Mart 2024
273 Takip Edilen137 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Don't eff it up
Don't eff it up@lateToSupper·
Do not worry about being called a fascist by the historically illiterate
English
1
0
3
478
Corey
Corey@CoreysName·
@bonchieredstate To pass the SAVE Act via reconciliation they’d need to override the Byrd Rule that only allows budgetary items. A rule override vote doesn’t require cloture and 60 votes. Might as well just nuke the filibuster.
English
1
0
1
48
Disclose.tv
Disclose.tv@disclosetv·
NOW - Netanyahu: "Jesus Christ has no advantage over Genghis Khan. Because if you are strong enough, ruthless enough, powerful enough, evil will overcome good."
English
7.8K
6.3K
26.1K
17.4M
Ares
Ares@Skynet030303·
Netanyahu just declared: “Jesus Christ has no advantage over Genghis Khan. Because if you are strong enough, ruthless enough, powerful enough, evil will overcome good.” He’s not quoting some ancient scroll—he’s talking about himself. This is the same man whose military campaign turned Gaza into a wasteland, looking like Grozny after the Russians flattened it, Aleppo under Assad’s barrel bombs, or Mariupol after Putin’s siege. Block after block reduced to rubble. Families buried under concrete. Entire neighborhoods erased. He calls it “strength.” History calls it what it is: the Khan playbook. Conquer. Destroy. Dominate. Morality? Justice? It's irrelevant if you’re powerful enough. The irony? Jesus’ message outlasted every empire built on ruthlessness. Genghis Khan’s didn’t. Netanyahu might want to reread the actual lessons of history before proving which side he truly supports.
English
2
0
1
1.3K
Aysha
Aysha@AyshaSusmaz·
@disclosetv Jesus doesn’t have advantage over Genghis Khan? He’s saying be like Genghis not Jesus. How can the evangelical Christians support and defend him?
English
34
13
204
12.2K
Megan Basham
Megan Basham@megbasham·
You guys will be shocked to hear that all of the people with rainbow flags and pronouns in their bios don’t like the fact that I don’t let my kids have unfettered access to social media or the Internet. I wonder why…🤔
English
7
2
75
2.2K
VCO
VCO@VCOgbodo247·
@RupertLowe10 If you believe your policies are justified, why not defend them with arguments instead of dismissing criticism outright?
VCO tweet media
English
42
0
34
12.7K
Rupert Lowe MP
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10·
I’ve been called racist and islamophobic hundreds of times today for outlining Restore Britain’s policy on banning halal slaughter, the burqa, sharia law, cousin marriage and plenty more. I want to be really clear about our party’s official response. We do not give a shit.
English
2.6K
11.4K
80.2K
2.4M
Don't eff it up
Don't eff it up@lateToSupper·
@zarahussain999 @RupertLowe10 Yeah, now look in the mirror and truly ask yourself why. None of these other groups form rape gangs, murder en masse or randomly explode or start stabbing people.
English
0
0
0
33
Zara Hussain
Zara Hussain@zarahussain999·
@RupertLowe10 Fortunately Restore Britain won’t win enough votes to form a government They never target Jews, Sikhs or Hindu’s, it’s always us because we’re Muslims
English
242
4
169
14.1K
Don't eff it up
Don't eff it up@lateToSupper·
@Cernovich I do. It’s proof of the lies they tell everyone about themselves, and is part of the brand they used to get elected. I want them exposed for the frauds they are. The actual racists and hucksters.
English
0
0
0
140
Cernovich
Cernovich@Cernovich·
A Tucker Carlson / Joe Kent ticket would steam roll anything Democrats or Republicans could bring. It's laughable when people try to argue this with me. Spend some time offline. Good looking, physically fit white men are back "in."
English
2.1K
498
5.6K
691.9K
Craig Bruce Smith
Craig Bruce Smith@craigbrucesmith·
So Caesar Rodney who went on a “midnight ride” to Philadelphia to vote for independence (breaking a deadlock for Delaware) and then became a signer of the Declaration of Independence will be commemorated for the 250th anniversary and this is the headline?
Craig Bruce Smith tweet media
English
59
280
2.1K
66K
Rick Shepherd 🇵🇸
Rick Shepherd 🇵🇸@RepRickShepherd·
Islamic law (from Quran and hadith) strictly forbids deliberately targeting or harming non-combatants ("innocents") women, children, elderly, clergy, farmers, etc. unless they directly participate in fighting. This principle explains why Iran's strikes in the current conflict have focused on military, command, and strategic infrastructure targets rather than mass civilian areas: deliberate civilian harm is considered haram (forbidden) and would undermine their religious/moral legitimacy.
English
69
46
760
49.8K
Maitreya Bhakal
Maitreya Bhakal@MaitreyaBhakal·
Israel is so small that Iran can destroy all of its desalination plants and its entire power grid within just a few hours. Just imagine what will happen to the settler population then, without water and electricity. Ask yourself why Iran is not doing that.
English
858
2K
23.8K
1.2M
Maitreya Bhakal
Maitreya Bhakal@MaitreyaBhakal·
Two minutes' silence for those who think Israel's air defences are still effective, especially now that Iran has started using its advanced hypersonic missiles.
English
44
14
1.1K
87.9K
Amelia Adams
Amelia Adams@neuroticjewgay·
Just so we are clear, @hasanthehun is referring to a woman who hijacked two airplanes as “awesome”
Amelia Adams tweet media
English
148
222
2.9K
308.9K
David Frum
David Frum@davidfrum·
If you wonder why Europeans flinch from helping US in Gulf - in January, NATO allies were seriously preparing for a US sneak attack on Greenland, planning to blow up runways to prevent a Trump re-enactment of Putin's failed strike on Kyiv.
Orla Joelsen@OJoelsen

Denmark prepared for a possible U.S. attack: Flew blood supplies to Greenland and planned to blow up runways Key sources in Denmark and Europe are now revealing for the first time what happened during the most critical days, when Donald Trump threatened to take Greenland “the hard way.” When Danish soldiers were rapidly deployed to Greenland in January this year, they brought explosives with them. The plan was to destroy runways in Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq to prevent American military aircraft from landing troops on the island, should the U.S. president ultimately decide to seize Greenland by force. They also transported blood supplies from Danish blood banks so wounded personnel could be treated in case of combat. This is reported by DR, which over the past year has spoken with central sources in the Danish government, top military officers, and high-ranking officials and intelligence sources in Denmark, France, and Germany. All sources have played—and continue to play—key roles in the international crisis triggered by the United States’ demand for control over Greenland. Together, the sources describe an unprecedented year marked by sleepless nights. None of them had concrete intelligence of specific American attack plans against Greenland. Still, many feared in January that the historically important ally, the United States, could attack at any moment. At the same time, Denmark reached out to its European allies, leading to closer cooperation. “With the Greenland crisis, Europe realized once and for all that we must be able to handle our own security,” said a French senior official involved in the intense period. A rapid-response force consisting of Danish, French, German, Norwegian, and Swedish soldiers was first deployed to Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq. Shortly after, a main force followed, including: -Soldiers from the Danish Dragoon Regiment in Holstebro -Elite troops from the Jaeger Corps -French alpine troops trained for cold and mountainous warfare At the same time, Danish fighter jets and a French naval vessel were sent to the North Atlantic. According to several sources, the goal of having multinational troops on the ground was to ensure that any U.S. attempt to take Greenland would require a large-scale hostile action—thereby deterring such an attempt. “We have not been in such a situation since April 1940,” said a Danish defense source, referring to the days before Denmark’s occupation during World War II. Unlike in 1940, when Denmark chose not to resist militarily, the government and defense leadership this time decided—after extensive confidential discussions—to take the opposite approach: If the U.S. attempted an attack, Danish forces would be armed and ready to fight. Danish F-35 fighter jets deployed north were also fully armed. All this despite the understanding that Denmark could not realistically withstand a U.S. military attack. “The cost for the U.S. had to be raised. The U.S. would have to carry out a hostile act to take Greenland,” said a senior Danish defense source. Source: DR

English
549
2.1K
8.5K
540.5K