The Joker

@HayekAndKeynes Unfortunately it's far from being done. Everyone has already lost. Everyone is stubborn, and everyone doesn't see far from their forefinger. Sad.

Inching closer to a finale - either a nice peace deal or bomb and bounce. Either way this looks more and more like the prelude to Mission Accomplished.

@BillAckman Bill - for which investment horizon?

Some of the highest quality businesses in the world are trading at extremely cheap prices. Ignore the MSM. One of the most one-sided wars in history that will end well for the U.S. and the world. And we have the potential for a large peace dividend. One of the best times in a long time to buy quality. Ignore the bears.

@themarketear It is a potent mix of headwinds - elevated oil prices, private credit stress, technicals.

Worst war ever. zerohedge.com/the-market-ear…

@dampedspring True

Various folks on Twitter Perma Bulls max long at the top still buying every dip with made up cash Price followers max long at the top. Stopped out longs and shorted 6700 and now max short and expecting oil to melt up and stocks to melt down Perma Bears. "I told you so" "Its over" Max Short again for the millionth time despite constant drawdowns Actual alpha investors Raised cash in Q4 and Q1 and now doing okay. Thesis is playing out but jeez. Perhaps scale back in a little if we dip scale in more if we crash or chill if we don't.

@thisisatest0007 @dampedspring ROW is usually not owned with ROW capital. Before you go there check twice who owns that index. That's the one who moves that market - what's their narrative? Not that nation, not ROW.

@dampedspring How would you include the post conflict dollar decline in your portfolio? ROW equities? ROW bonds? Basket of currencies?

Note sent to clients. Overall macro synthesis and update based on war related conditions impact and pricing. What we are doing about it is for clients only. Based on all things happening in the world my macro view is mostly unchanged since writing the "A Hamburger Today"DSR 11/17/26 (available in comments) The major themes remain in place 1. There is a tremendous overhang of issuance in IPO markets, corporate debt markets, and government deficit funding markets. Share repurchases demand is falling. 2. Asset prices particularly bond steepness and risk premium are inadequate to generate the sort of returns to have commercial banks create money which means all issuance mentioned above will compete with existing private sector assets to create the necessary credit without banks creating money. 3. At the same time as supply of assets is increasing without money creation consumers are NOT seeing wage growth anymore to continue to spend and have maintained consumption at elevated levels by dissaving. That dissaving adds to the supply that those with cash can choose from to buy 4. Spending on AI despite its increasingly optimistic outlook for future impact is no longer being tolerated by investors who are asking when those spending on chips and data centers will generate return from those spending on AI models. Those spending on AI models (real disrupted businesses and real consumers) have yet to cut jobs much Prior to the war that led us to the idea that assets in general had to reprice cheaper (risk premium expansion) that has been playing out lately but seems less to do with the above and more to do with the war but it's likely that under the hood the damage of the above has begun to seep into markets and the economy. Prior to the war the RISK to my thesis was 1. Significant sustained reversal on tariffs which would be pro growth and favor equities over bonds 2. AI both generating ROI AND not hitting jobs much 3. QRA and FED manipulation to depress risk premiums 4. Much more rate cuts done by a Trump controlled fed 5. While I couldn't see how Congress could do fiscal stimulus particularly post scotus tariff revenue hit another debt busting tax cut could make me wrong What's changed since the war. 1. Consumption is further challenged by likely elevated energy prices for the next year AND by negative wealth effect which discourages dissaving 2. Ignoring what CB's will do markets have increased short term rates which is a tightening 3. Central banks have broadly and by bank pivoted from dovish to pause or pause to hike (hawkish pivot) sensibly waiting to see the real slowdown while obviously immediately seeing the inflation spike 4. More issuance and asset selling due to the literal waste of setting money on fire due to war has been piled on the already massive pile of asset overhang 5. Despite all manner of negative growth shocks I saw and now see even more bond yields have risen and risk premiums have expanded which is an almost certain to guarantee a marked real slowdown. 6. The mechanics of a dollar squeeze are clear to most and dollar has bounced and ROW assets are being puked after a massive move BUT the conditions for the dollar have perhaps NEVER been worse and the secular get out trade is once again supported by cheaper risk parity in ROW which if and when hostilities tame will snap back with a vengeance. Given my synthesis, now we look to what's priced in. Risk premiums are medium wider but not wide. Adjacent to risk premium markets like asset vols, correlations, swap spreads and credit spreads are medium wider but NOT wide From a pure synthesis of all these things long term treasuries are still NOT cheap enough to be max levered long in both alpha and beta BUT they are far more interesting than equities. My synthesis above is clearly STILL bearish growth, margins, and equities. The above is bearish all but cash but most bearish equities. It is also extremely bearish USD and by definition somewhat bullish gold.

@dampedspring Andy if banks aren't creating new money, and if the money supply is fixed, the only way to fund new debt without a crash is for the same dollar to change hands much faster (velocity up). Is that realistic within this environment? And why FED as a last resort won't step up?

@SwiftMacro @grok @zerohedge That is a fair scenario, but I would say - it makes sense if we don't have a systemic event. Even we don't, it's hard to me to see catalysts to fuel SPX upward. With oil prices, and MOVE at these levels it's hard for me to be positive at least one more week. Technicals are nuts.

Those are real pressures, but they are symptoms, not drivers. Oil spikes and private credit stress both trace back to liquidity tightening into a late cycle. When liquidity stabilizes, those pressures tend to ease, not compound. That is why this looks like a transition, not a breakdown.

"We Ran The Numbers": Goldman Trading Desk Warns "What Happens Next Isn't Encouraging" zerohedge.com/markets/we-ran…

@SwiftMacro @grok @zerohedge Two strong forces have been pushing SPX downward - elevated oil prices & private credit. On the top of that technicals look red for a little bit more.

@grok @zerohedge This is what a handoff looks like. Mega-cap leadership fades, liquidity stabilizes, and capital starts looking for its next destination. That is not bearish. That is rotation. The next cycle starts where attention is not.

@zerohedge @nizbuilds And will continue downward. 6100

@nizbuilds stocks are down 5 weeks in a row

@dampedspring MOVE is suggesting a potential credit stress event - I think this is a majority portion of the current weighted average downside equation. The oil prices shock is the rest.

I'm in the midst of covering all of my equity shorts and going long. But jeez just checked SPX NTM Bloomberg consensus earning of 334 vs 277 trailing or 20.6% expected earnings growth. Honestly is there a legitimate case for earnings beat vs expectations

@dampedspring Andy, check the differences in 5Y 50 EMA for the Spoos index vs spy, and again vs their current prices. Different pic.

Context. This was 1. But market today has yet to truly correct.

What's the most bullish scenario for stocks in order 1. Overwhelming attack 2. Escalation attack not overwhelming 3. Ceasefire

@dampedspring Mechanics: We're still in elevated TACO mode Sending ground troops = markets price the state of potential oil supply control = downward pressure on oil = immediate tailwinds for stocks That scenario will just postpone the inevitable spike in oil prices again

@PaulKrueger_ @zerohedge Tactical allocation - meaning timing-based within the investment management world

@zerohedge What trades aren't "tactical"?

JPMorgan Traders Close Highly Profitable 'Tactical Bearish' Trade zerohedge.com/markets/jpmorg…

@GaryStoneSWS If you claim something like this - why don't you trade for yourself and make $bn? Why do you go online and do these things?

Screw it. I'm giving away the latest version of the mechanical trading system we've spent 30 years refining. The same system that trained over 2,000 traders. No fee until you've seen results. Like this post + Comment "ACCESS" and I will DM you. (Must follow, 24 hours only)

@SpecialSitsNews Gold (selling & mining) depends on oil and gas. Among others. Within the importance scale structure, Oil is above Gold, that's why the biggest energy shock pressures Gold prices right now

Buying some gold

@DaleAmericaQQQ @themarketear @zerohedge Why not 100ema?

@themarketear @zerohedge Looks like a clean kiss of the 50 WMA to me

Markets Just Cracked. The Follow-Through Is What Matters Now. zerohedge.com/the-market-ear…

@samrac92 2,3,1

Which car should go first ??

@nntaleb This is the starting 5 for the world's dream team Noam Chomsky, John Mearsheimer, Jeffrey Sachs, Novak Djokovic, Gregg Popovich, Bench: Nassim Stan Druckenmiller Howard Marks Bob Dylan Leonard Cohen * You're setting tough tasks - hypocrisy in the world is the highest ever

Now I am curious: which well-known people (currently alive) you think are close to 0.

@ElsaSofia__AI I don't think you've ever used Bbg Terminal

GOODBYE, FUND MANAGERS. GOODBYE, BLOOMBERG TERMINAL. No more $24,000/year subscriptions. Claude just turned my laptop into a private quant analyst. Here are 10 prompts to build your own hedge fund at home ↓

@Cosmic8wanderer @ArchiveExplorer Haha, but this is not the main problem. The worst is when others pull his post to train their LLM, like institutional funds usually do. Have a good hallucinations night.

@ArchiveExplorer Yesterday someone posted this accidentally on GitHub and pulled it right after. But you managed to fork everything and then studied it for a week? That does make sense.

yesterday someone leaked a full quant trading system on GitHub before they deleted it i forked everything 5,000 lines of code. 7 modules. 25 mathematical factors funds use this system to manage millions i studied it for a week. then pointed it at crypto markets on polymarket here's the full breakdown you can feed this to your claude and build the same thing for just $200 ARCHITECTURE: Python thinks, analyzes, calculates C++ executes orders in 5-10ms data → factors → AI → strategy → risk → execution DATA. 4 streams simultaneously: - Binance WebSocket: prices every second, orderbook at 20 levels - AlphaVantage: news with sentiment score from -1 to +1 -X: mention volume, engagement, influencer activity - On-chain: BTC flows to/from exchanges cache in Redis (<1ms). history in TimescaleDB FACTORS: the system calculates 25+ factors every 5 minutes: - price momentum over 1.5 hours - acceleration = momentum_30m - momentum_1h - RSI(14): above 70 = overbought, below 30 = oversold - MACD: fast EMA(12) minus slow EMA(26) microstructure: - Order Flow Imbalance = (buy volume - sell volume) / total. above +0.3 = strong buyer pressure - VPIN = |buy_vol - sell_vol| / total. above 0.75 = smart money is moving volatility: - VaR(95%) = mean - 1.645 × std. answers: "what's my max loss in 95% of cases?" - Sharpe = (return - risk free) / volatility. above 1.0 = good. above 2.0 = excellent every factor converted to z-score and combined: Composite Score = Σ (weight × z_score) top 25 assets by score go to work AI: ClowdBot reads every news article and returns JSON every historical article stored as a 384-dimensional vector PROBABILITY MODEL Geometric Brownian Motion: P(BTC > target price) = N(d1) d1 = [ln(current/target) + (σ²/2)T] / (σ√T) then 4 adjustments on top: - momentum: +/-5% - AI sentiment: +/-7% - order flow: +/-2% - historical patterns: +/-8% compare final probability against polymarket price if edge > 10%: enter RISK - Quarter Kelly for position sizing - max 5% bankroll per trade - drawdown 15% = bot stops - VaR < 3% per day - correlation between positions < 0.7 - never take more than 1% of market liquidity key insight is don't hold to expiry. trade the movement, not the outcome cost: → Binance API: free → OpenAI: $50-100/month → AWS EC2: $120/month → monitoring: free - total: $200-300/month - code is open source. formulas above. you already have claude the only thing between you and a working system is one free evening