Lawrence Anderson B

@SnowApe84586 @DunstabbJr @apocalypseos You make a valid point. But I believe not all Jews draw inspiration from the worst parts of the OT. Millions of Jews are horrified by Zionism. Jews have also contributed in science, literature, music etc out of all proportion to their nbrs on earth. Let's not condemn wholesale.

@lawrenceab @DunstabbJr @apocalypseos >Supremacism, racism, leaders openly naming those they oppress "human animals" and calling for their mass extermination, obsession w Lebensraum - sounds pretty fascist to me Sounds straight out of the Old Testament to me. So, jewish.

The jackboots are struggling to contain the protests inside the entity. Israelis are waking up to the Old Testament drag show Jabotinsky sold them as redemption. Fascism always turns on its own. The entity is cracking from within.

@DunstabbJr @apocalypseos These are Zionists first. The worst heresy ever to have befallen Judaism. Never confuse Jews with Zionists. Supremacism, racism, leaders openly naming those they oppress "human animals" and calling for their mass extermination, obsession w Lebensraum - sounds pretty fascist to me

@apocalypseos These are jews, not fascists

Simply beautiful. She sings like an angel. May she rest in peace, knowing she has touched our hearts. Jessye Norman – Ave Maria (Schubert) ✨

@GentedeCiudad @sanchezcastejon Iran, that has seats reserved in its parliament for Jewish Iranians; one of whose main metro stations in Teheran is dedicated to Jesus Christ and the Holy Virgin Mary with beautiful murals depicting both, is going to launch a missile against the Church of the Holy Sepulchre ??

@sanchezcastejon A diferencia de España, donde se mata a jóvenes de 25 años por depresión, en Israel se cuida y valora la vida de todas las personas. La prohibición de la celebración se debe al riesgo de que Irán lance un misil contra la procesión.

Netanyahu ha impedido a los católicos celebrar el Domingo de Ramos en los Lugares Santos de Jerusalén. Sin explicación alguna. Sin razones ni motivos. Desde el Gobierno de España condenamos este ataque injustificado a la libertad religiosa y exigimos a Israel que respete la diversidad de credos y el derecho internacional. Porque sin tolerancia es imposible convivir.

@BettyBVel @Megatron_ron And so it should be. Is there any end to the horrors committed by the US for decades on innocents around the world (not to mention the unspeakable crimes of your protégé, the "world's most moral army"). I sense a growing wave of revulsion, worldwide, momentous, finally.

This needs verification before anyone runs with it. Iranian state-affiliated sources posting names and photos of US military commanders framed as "criminals" is not a news story — it's a targeting operation dressed up as accountability. Whether the underlying claims are true or disputed, amplifying specific names and ranks of military officers from an enemy state's embassy account is something to think twice about before sharing. That last line isn't a moral question. It's a threat.

BREAKING: 🇮🇷🇺🇸The Iranian embassy in South Africa posted photos of the two commanders who ordered the attack on the school that killed 180 children and wrote: “Remember these two criminals. Leigh R. Tate, the commander, and Jeffrey E. York, the executive officer of the USS Spruance, who ordered the launch of Tomahawk missiles three times, killing 168 innocent children at a school in Minab. Don’t they have children of their own?”

As I age, my hatred for war and the stupidity of leaders who provoke it grows ever greater. I am deeply thankful to live in a country governed (largely!) by common sense, respect for others, hence for peace. Respected in turn by others. Well done Dato'Seri and God bless Malaysia!

Incredibly sad and heartbreaking

The Iranians have upped their PR game astoundingly. The West's one advantage, manipulating narratives through MSM control, is crumbling. The Russians never managed it. They just grimly slog their way to victory. (Ok they have Vovan and Lexus thanks to endless gullible EUcrats)

😂😂😂

Aiyoh! China nails it

Why, oh, why isn't everywhere like this?

@ChewIron @RothLindberg Plus Malaysia Indonesia

@RothLindberg 1. Algeria 2. Bangladesh 3. Brunei 4. Iran 5. Iraq 6. Kuwait 7. Lebanon 8. Libya 9. Pakistan 10. Saudi Arabia 11. Syria 12. Yemen. 13. Maldives recently added?

‼️ 13 countries ban israeli passport holders

by the way you should know that in France for example this is already our reality, the DGSI which is France’s domestic intelligence agency has been running on Palantir’s Gotham platform since 2016 right after the November 2015 Paris attacks the contract was supposed to be temporary, it was renewed in 2019 then in 2022 then again in december 2025 for another 3 years until 2028, every single time the government promised a sovereign french alternative & every single time they renewed with Palantir because the alternative was never ready I need you to grasp what this actually means, the entire french counterterrorism apparatus, surveillance data, human intelligence, administrative records, technical sources…all of it flows through an american platform cofounded by Peter Thiel & originally funded by the CIA’s venture capital arm +++ the Cloud Act passed in 2018 gives washington the legal authority to demand access to any data held by american companies regardless of where it’s stored, the Swiss understood this & refused Palantir entirely… France chose convenience, a country with Thales, Dassault and some of the best engineers on earth spent 10y failing to build what a single american startup delivered in months, that’s european technological sovereignty in 2026

A simulation that tells us a lot I want to share an exercise from 2002 that has a lot to do with the current war, but also shows how astute commanders didn't get the recognition they deserved. Today, Iran doesn't operate long or medium-range radars; it keeps almost all its equipment hidden inside mountains, including its planes, while deploying missiles, drones, and a asymmetric naval force. This is a war the U.S. doesn't know how to fight. Let me tell you a story, follow along: The Millennium Challenge 2002 (MC02) took place from July 24 to August 15, 2002, under the U.S. Joint Forces Command. Planned over two full years, it simulated a hypothetical 2007 scenario where the U.S. invaded a Middle Eastern country, clearly inspired by Iran or Iraq. The scale was massive: it cost $250 million and involved 13,500 personnel across 17 simulation sites and nine live locations. At the time, it was the largest and most expensive exercise in American history, designed to test the 'network-centric' warfare doctrine, featuring high-tech electronic surveillance and integrated command. Then came the twist: the opposing force, the 'Red Team' representing a simulated Iran, was led by retired Marine Corps Lieutenant General Paul K. Van Riper, a three-star general known for his unconventional tactics and for being 'devious' - shrewd and unpredictable. He was chosen specifically for that reason: to provide a realistic challenge. Van Riper did not disappoint. To bypass advanced U.S. electronic surveillance, he used 'old-school' asymmetric methods: motorcycle messengers for communication and World War II-style light signals, completely avoiding radars and digital systems. This neutralized the American command and control system, which relied heavily on cutting-edge technology. After receiving an ultimatum from the 'Blue Team' (the simulated U.S.) demanding surrender within 24 hours, Van Riper didn’t wait: he launched a devastating preemptive strike. In just 5 to 10 minutes, he used a massive salvo of cruise missiles combined with a fleet of small boats, including suicide attacks. The result? The Red Team sank 16 Blue Team ships: one aircraft carrier, ten cruisers, and five amphibious ships. In the real world, this would have equated to over 20,000 American military deaths, a total shock that paralyzed the exercise on the spot. But here is the part where you’ll understand the mistakes the U.S. is making today in fighting an asymmetric war with Iran: the exercise was abruptly halted, the sunken ships were 'refloated' as if nothing had happened, and the simulation was restarted with rigged rules. The Blue Team was given every advantage, and the Red Team was forced to follow a pre-written script with no freedom. Van Riper was forbidden from using his clever tactics: he was ordered to turn on anti-aircraft radars just so they could be destroyed, told not to shoot at 82nd Airborne aircraft or CV-22s, and even forced to reveal his unit positions. It was essentially a staged script to guarantee an American 'victory.' Outraged, the general resigned in protest, calling the whole thing 'propaganda' and 'scripted.'" Van Riper would be an ideal advisor for the situation in Hormuz, a situation for which I don't see even the slightest military solution.

Et ça, mes amis, c’est le chant d’une iranienne, qui crie sa peine et sa solidarité pour son peuple. J’ai rarement entendu une voix, un son aussi magnifique, puissant et pur. Notez également le style unique de sa burqa de femme tragiquement oppressée.

@Allanpetrie91 callous disregard for vulnerable women and the young, disqualify him from public office. Danger! This issue is not part of normal political argument. It strikes at the heart of our dimorphic reality, is a tool wielded by sinister v powerful forces. Our human future is at stake.

@Allanpetrie91 I am a long time admirer of Craig Murray. I don't agree w yr take that he's an unprincipled careerist. He's taken stands (re Assange, Salmond, his own FO career) that do him honour. But I agree his bizarre stand against biological truth, in favour of transhumanism, showing 1/2

When Principles Are Broken I did not join or help create the Alliance to Liberate Scotland for titles, positions or personal advancement, I joined because it was presented as something different, a movement built on one simple principle, Independence, Nothing less. We told people across Scotland that this would not become another political vehicle for careerists or grifters, we said clearly that it would not become a refuge for those simply looking for their next platform or parliamentary seat. It was supposed to be about outcomes before incomes, independence first and always. For many of us, that promise mattered. I personally spent over six months working to get the party registered, including countless hours amending the constitution and dealing with the Electoral Commission, anyone who has gone through that process knows how demanding it is, the rules are strict, the scrutiny is constant and every line of a constitution must be fought for and defended. I did not do that work so that the Alliance could simply turn into the same old party politics we set out to challenge, sadly, that is exactly what appears to have happened. The recent selection of Craig Murray as a candidate has forced me to confront a reality that many of us had hoped would never arise. Murray has spent years moving between political parties and platforms in pursuit of a parliamentary seat, the Alliance was meant to stand firmly against that culture. Equally concerning to me are his long-standing views supporting gender self-identification policies. For many people this may be seen as just another political debate, but for others particularly women, vulnerable people and those who depend on strong safeguarding protections these beliefs raise very serious concerns. In my view, such policies/beliefs risk undermining women’s rights, safeguarding for children and dignity and protection for disabled people. These are not abstract issues for me, my own family includes disabled loved ones, including my granddaughter and I will never sit quietly while protections for vulnerable people are weakened. People can disagree on these matters, but I cannot in good conscience remain part of a political organisation that promotes or endorses a candidate with these views which I believe place those protections at risk. What makes this situation even more disappointing is not only the decision itself, but how it appears to have been made, instead of the transparency and integrity we promised the public, this was done by deals carried out behind the backs of office bearers and party members, that is precisely the behaviour we criticised in the traditional parties. Even more troubling is that members who helped build the party from nothing now appear to be pushed aside, while those with long histories of party hopping and political opportunism are welcomed with open arms and even given preference. That is not what we promised the people of Scotland, it is not the movement many of us worked so hard to create. For years I have fought unionists and devolutionists without hesitation, that is the easy fight, I can do that twenty four hours a day without breaking a sweat but when you find yourself being stabbed in the back by people you believed were dear friends, the damage runs far deeper, it does not just frustrate you it tears something out of you, it takes the fight out of your soul. Because of this, I have made the difficult decision to withdraw from the upcoming election and to leave the Alliance to Liberate Scotland, this is not a decision taken lightly. The cause of Scottish independence remains just and necessary but independence cannot be delivered by organisations that abandon their founding principles before they have even fought their first election. We promised the people of Scotland something different, that promise has now been broken. After many years in political campaigning, I will now be retiring from politics, instead, I will return to what I have been doing for more than thirty years standing alongside and defending the most vulnerable people in our society. the people who suffer most from the decisions of political grifters and careerists are often those with the least power to fight back, that is where my time and energy will now return, not for payment, not for titles but as an unpaid volunteer, doing the work that matters most, not giving them false hope to line grifters pockets. Yours for Scotland Allan Petrie

@LauraAboli_X I rather think Whitkoff means a "one nuclear bomb" country. Israel is losing badly and that is the clear & present danger over which bought & paid for Washington has no control. It terrifies everyone. We are in the hands of religious crazies who prefer apocalypse to defeat.

Pay attention to Whitkoff’s answers. I find them very revealing… When asked why the planned trip to Israel had been cancelled, and whether it had anything to do with Israel striking Iranian energy infrastructure, he said it wasn’t really about that, the trip was about going there to “discuss things” and see whether “there is a deal or there is not a deal”. The obvious question is: what deal? Officially, the war narrative is framed around Iran; its nuclear ambitions, its regional proxies, its confrontation with Israel. But Whitkoff’s wording sounded like the conversation wasn’t really about Iran at all, it sounded like it was about Israel. As in: Are we done here, or do you want to keep pushing this further? Then came another remark that felt even more revealing. When asked whether America’s endgame is the same as Israel’s, Whitkoff said something unusual: “I would say. Listen, Israel is a one-bomb country.” That was reminder that despite the image of military power, Israel is geographically tiny, extremely vulnerable, and ultimately dependent on the strategic umbrella of the United States. Without that umbrella, the equation changes very quickly. Which raises a possibility that few in the media are willing to discuss; what if this war is not primarily about Iran at all? What if one of its real purposes is to force a strategic reset on Israel itself? For decades, Israeli leadership has pursued the dream of regional dominance — the so-called “Greater Israel” project, but Israel cannot sustain perpetual war without American backing. Economically, politically, and militarily, the cost eventually becomes unsustainable. Which brings us back to Whitkoff’s words: “Is there a deal or is there no deal.” That doesn’t sound like a message to Tehran. It sounds like a message to Jerusalem. A message that says: You’ve pushed this as far as it goes. Now the question is whether you’re ready to step back… or whether you intend to keep testing a system that ultimately keeps you alive. And when he says Israel is a “one-bomb country,” it sounds like a warning. @MJTruthUltra @NakedHedgie @Real_MrGoode

Priez du fond de votre áme et de toutes vos forces pour ces chrétiens innocents du Liban massacrés par les Zionistes au service du Malin