Lea Santilli

799 posts

Lea Santilli

Lea Santilli

@lea_santilli

Katılım Aralık 2022
2 Takip Edilen25 Takipçiler
Lea Santilli
Lea Santilli@lea_santilli·
@Partisan_12 Thumbs down 👎 to people that say we aren't allowed to criticize Israel then go on to criticize Israel.
English
0
0
0
861
The Resonance
The Resonance@Partisan_12·
The evolution of American people.
English
428
12.4K
92.2K
3.1M
Hodgetwins
Hodgetwins@hodgetwins·
Never seen Republicans go after somebody like they going after Massie They don’t even attack Democrats like this
English
2.5K
4.8K
46.1K
453.4K
Lea Santilli
Lea Santilli@lea_santilli·
@realstewpeters What are you saying? Its pointless to vote? Are you trying to make Massie lose?
English
0
0
0
55
Stew Peters
Stew Peters@realstewpeters·
They’re going to rig the election against Thomas Massie. The entire Trump admin would lose too much face if he wins.
English
1.1K
2K
13.4K
1M
Lea Santilli
Lea Santilli@lea_santilli·
@DaniHasReceipts When did we move past the idea of a conspiracy to fake the audio to the belief the audio may be real but its still bad? Just asking
English
0
0
0
35
Dani Digs
Dani Digs@DaniHasReceipts·
If the Charlie Kirk audio is real, think about what it actually means: a man who KNEW he was a target, who lived with constant threats, decided his succession plan was to hand that bullseye directly to his WIFE. Make that make sense.
Blake Neff@BlakeSNeff

Yeah, Candace, since I'm not a malignant narcissist, I don't actually care what my "ratio" is as long as I am speaking the truth rather than lies. But just to play along: "Wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it."

English
76
105
1.2K
18.5K
Cristina Crisp
Cristina Crisp@CristinaCrisp3·
Do y’all remember that very first podcast Erika joined after the fact? The one where she was gleaming and talking about how they have all this unseen footage and all of these unheard interviews. She went as far as to say she was so “excited”. 🙃 Recently, @RealCandaceO reported that allegedly a gentleman named Marcus who is affiliated with TPUSA had a consult with VFX LA (a company that specializes in deepfake technology) after Charlie’s passing. Given this reporting and thinking back to the initial Charlie Kirk Show episode she joined, I wonder about the timing of Marcus’s meeting with VFX LA and whether or not EK may have been present. 🤔 It never felt right to me but I tucked it away as another data point. Why on Earth would they have seemingly endless media and interviews from Charlie while also scrubbing all of his previous videos from the internet for a while? I’ll say allegedly, but I saw it—a lot of us did. I’m not even personally confident most of them are back up. I just wanted this out in the ether because it feels like it might all be connected and I’d like to know more.
English
11
31
342
7.9K
Lea Santilli
Lea Santilli@lea_santilli·
@CinemaShogun And by the way, if anyone happens to see Charlie the ghost can you please ask him about the afterlife? I don't understand the lack of curiosity on that from people that see Charlie the Ghost
English
0
0
0
25
Lea Santilli
Lea Santilli@lea_santilli·
@CinemaShogun Its kinda odd the 'ghost' appears to only those that already agree with their narrative. Methinks the ghost would be more impactful if he appeared to those that do not buy the narrative.
English
1
0
1
30
Cinema Shogun
Cinema Shogun@CinemaShogun·
Candace Owens creepy Scientologist backer/handler John Mappin is back at it again. He claims that Charlie Kirk’s force ghost is communicating with him. He even claims that their communications are fully “secured” whatever the hell that means… These people don’t have any real evidence or anything of value to back their claims. So they use their dreams and pretend Charlie’s spirit is communicating with them from the dead. Straight up wacko schizo shiznit. Whenever they need something to back up their latest conspiracy they suddenly have a dream or are “visited” by Charlie. Now I’m sure some of you are wondering why John Mappin is like this… Well it’s because he’s a Scientologist. I’ve attached audio describing Scientologists actual religious beliefs to give you a better understanding.
English
84
96
566
9.3K
Bren
Bren@bren45000·
This is just … sad. And cringe. Candace Owens is desperate for credibility as a serious journalist. Yet … her “investigations” rely on sources like Project Constitution and Mitch Snow—proven drug users, con artists, and slanderers. She’s built a large online audience, sure. The problem? That audience consists largely of bottom-feeding tabloid consumers who cheer spectacle and conspiracy over evidence-based reporting. Her feedback loop: trashy sources → low IQ audience → tabloid. Hard to take seriously when the foundation is this rotten.
English
44
36
384
9.5K
Lea Santilli
Lea Santilli@lea_santilli·
@RealCandaceO Candace using a child's image on social media is not ok. And your using. People please step back from your 'sides' and call this out so it will not happen again.
English
0
1
7
185
Candace Owens
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO·
😂😂😂 Everyone loves a midget horse. Adorable! LOL
Project Constitution@ProjectConstitu

‼️You Know It's OVER When Even Toddlers ROAST Ben Shapiro—Candace Is Raising A Whole NEW Generation Of Online Sleuths. 👣🧩 Had to repost this mom catching her kid watching @RealCandaceO and absolutely losing it over Benny Boy and his "midget horse." Forget Blue's Clues, we are officially in the era of Candace Clues! 🕵️‍♀️🍼 When even prescoolers see you as a Meme, the collapse of the Daily Wire is truly in its final stages. You can't even out-debate a toddler who thinks your tiny horse is hilarious, Ben. Candace, you have a whole new generation of investigators on the case! 😂👇 FROM: thatgirlm0m ONn FB

English
394
530
6.5K
346.7K
Opinionated Times
Opinionated Times@Williams47554Jl·
Candace covers a lot more than just Charlie Kirks fishy death. More than Erika awkward choices. You paid trolls and obcessed fans need to view her show more before you yak....
Opinionated Times tweet media
English
38
16
276
4.4K
Lea Santilli
Lea Santilli@lea_santilli·
@RavenGrace0613 Wait I thought the going theory was he was murdered over Iran? What does Iran have to do with data centers?
English
0
0
9
131
Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
In her last podcast she said she has SOLVED Charlie’s murder and states our govt used Erika and TPusa to do it. All over AI and Data centers. Our government used Erika as a piece of Israel military tech to socially engineer Charlie and now us. If she socially engineered Charlie why would she need to murder him. And TPUsa helped. So there you have it. Charlie was murdered over AI and data centers. Make it make sense. Has TPusa or Erika even talked about AI and data centers? Also she doesn’t think we should compete with China on AI. If we want it we should move to China. I wonder if she is really that stupid. What goes on in China doesn’t stay in China. It’s military technology that if we don’t compete we lose. So now that we have solved Charlie’s murder what’s next?
Cinema Shogun@CinemaShogun

A brand new Candace Owens conspiracy just dropped‼️ Just in case you aren’t keeping track the latest Candace Owens conspiracy is that Erika Kirk is some sort of “Military Tech” cyborg that the government is using to “socially engineer” us. Candace is now basically trying to convince fans that Erika is a T-900 robot from the Terminator that the government deployed to destroy us all. These people constantly speak down on Erika yet they hype her up as if she’s the most powerful person on earth. Erika is just minding her business meanwhile these people are writing comic book Super Villain storylines about her daily.

English
35
29
281
13.6K
Alisha
Alisha@_Alisha_114·
Yes. Nitpicking. "I wanted to meet some of them face-to-face, quite frankly. Why have a conversation about me when you can have a conversation with me?”, sounds an awful lot like one wants to confront those who are criticizing them. LOGIC lead me to that conclusion. But I could put logic away for a bit, and then yes, I suppose it's plausible that she meant that in the most friendly way, and didn't actually want to confront anyone. And maybe she didn't really mean that she wanted to have a conversation with anyone, bc therefore, she would've had to have meant she was planning to confront them about their criticism. But then again, that's exactly what she claimed to have done. So I actually do need to pull my logic back out. It's common sense! She claimed that these "journalists" were the reason she went to the WHCD. And she named the Daily Mail. Period. What are we even doing here?
English
1
0
0
29
Alisha
Alisha@_Alisha_114·
You are a liar @charliespiering . @MrsErikaKirk specifically said she went to the WHCD to confront people from The Daily Mail for some bad press. Yet they trusted The Daily Mail with this sacred video footage that they refuse to show to anyone else? I mean, if that's the case, why not just share the video with @RealCandaceO ? I hope they paid you an awful lot to make yourself look this stupid.
Charlie Spiering@charliespiering

You’re right, Candace. The video is crucial, which is why I asked @TPUSA to see it. I approached them in good faith, and they agreed. It’s real, and multiple people who were in Aspen that day remember the moment. The video does matter, but it’s not the only reason the board voted to appoint Erika. I spoke to several Turning Point donors and close friends of Charlie who revealed that after Butler, there was a very real fear about his safety and the future of his organization. Charlie reassured them: He would leave Turning Point to Erika and the board to carry on the mission if the worst happened.

English
1
0
1
82
Alisha
Alisha@_Alisha_114·
No. You're nitpicking. I did say she specifically said the daily mail. Bc she specifically said the daily mail! Who else did she expect to see at that event? @RealCandaceO ? @imelizabethlane ? @baroncoleman ? Intelligence agent @leahfiles ? NOBODY who criticizes her, would've been at that event. And she knew this. So when she (or whoever) wrote that odd speech, she knew she needed to give an example of what journalists she could possibly be referring to, as we all know, her critics wouldn't be at that dinner- she chose the daily mail. It's really not that hard to understand
English
1
0
0
32
Lea Santilli
Lea Santilli@lea_santilli·
@JustTheTweets17 Some viral (and often AI-generated or edited) images/posts circulate showing Trump tributes with captions like “Shlomo Perl". These are not verified statements from Trump and are widely treated as fabrications or misinterpretations in discussions.
English
3
0
0
449
Lea Santilli
Lea Santilli@lea_santilli·
@Meldougherty77 Agree. Candace doesn't really matter but the ones pushing the narratives, even the ones that are easily debunked are the issue.
English
0
0
0
55
Melissa Dougherty
Melissa Dougherty@Meldougherty77·
At this point, the people enabling Candace Owens bother me more than she does. She has an entire team behind the camera who are actually helping and supporting her. And she doesn't have fans, she truly has followers. The people defending and platforming her nonsense are just as responsible at this point. I do look forward to the day when one of those behind the scenes people eventually comes forth and talks about it.
English
178
65
1.1K
15.2K
Lea Santilli
Lea Santilli@lea_santilli·
@Niss_Cee Where are people getting the made up quotes? The video is so easy to listen to, why are people making up things she said and thinking noone would notice?
English
0
0
0
37
Lea Santilli
Lea Santilli@lea_santilli·
@Niss_Cee When did she say 'I went to the WHCD to confront those MEANIES at the Daily Mail'?
English
1
0
0
60
Nissy💮
Nissy💮@Niss_Cee·
Erika Kirk: 'I went to the WHCD to confront those MEANIES at the Daily Mail' Also Erika: Gives 'exclusive footage' to the Daily Mail of 'Charlie appointing her his successor'. Only the MEANIES get to see it 😂
English
150
688
6.1K
61.4K