Lee Brown

7.8K posts

Lee Brown banner
Lee Brown

Lee Brown

@leejamesbrown

Labour Left. Still struggling for a world for the many, not the few. Expect tweets on Latin America.

London, England Katılım Haziran 2009
931 Takip Edilen2.1K Takipçiler
Lee Brown
Lee Brown@leejamesbrown·
@joshsimonsmp You were pretty "radical" when organising for journalists to be spied on and all the other stuff that's starting to come out about Labour Together.
English
0
2
16
327
Josh Simons
Josh Simons@joshsimonsmp·
Being an MP has radicalised me. People don’t trust politics because votes don’t produce big change. Sclerotic institutions are too used to the status quo. I loved being a local MP. Stepping aside was tough. But @AndyBurnhamGM can rebuild these broken systems. Britain needs it. thetimes.com/article/11f6e9…
English
699
33
194
171.1K
Christina Hespe
Christina Hespe@HespeChris34466·
@RichardBurgon Yes, but... Can you stop using the phrase 'working people'? The Labour Party was set up to represent 'working class people', including those who do not or cannot work, ie. the disabled, elderly and sick. You sound like one of Starmer's bots when you say 'working people'.
English
1
0
3
342
Richard Burgon MP
Richard Burgon MP@RichardBurgon·
Neoliberalism isn’t a “buzzword”. It’s the near 50-year political, economic and ideological project that has brought so many communities to their knees. It smashed workers’ rights, imposed austerity, deregulated the banks that then crashed the economy, privatised public utilities like water and energy, sold off council houses, handed tax cuts to the wealthy and corporations, turned universities into an unaffordable market, transformed public services into sources of private profit through outsourcing and PFI, and much more. It's the root cause of so much of what has gone wrong in our country. And it was all done to enrich the tiny elite that Tony Blair now so clearly represents.
Tim Shipman@ShippersUnbound

Neoliberalism. Wars. Nothing to offer. Your buzzword bingo card full. Ah that feels better, doesn’t it. Unburdened by experience of govt and set to remain so. Complete again. Phew

English
104
421
1.3K
48K
Tim Shipman
Tim Shipman@ShippersUnbound·
Further to Blair. Literally every honest sensible person in all the main parties privately agrees with all these propositions: - welfare spending is too high and is throwing good people on the scrapheap - defence spending is too low - the triple lock is unsustainable - without cheap energy we cannot exploit the AI revolution - we should be investing in EVERY form of energy: renewables, nuclear and the North Sea - migration needs to be controlled to boost social cohesion and because the boats look like a huge failure of the state - any new relationship with the EU will be imposed on us until we are stronger and cannot involve the closeness some desire without freedom of movement - we are deeply embedded with America in ways which the public does not understand and cannot be told and however joyous it makes us feel to hate Trump, disengagement at the deep state level is not only wholly unrealistic but also undesirable - Whitehall needs a total overhaul so specific project expertise and political appointees can be brought in quickly Blair basically says all that. The one thing he doesn’t say and which the same group of people agree on is this and it’s something Blair left behind: - judges and quangos have too much power, are unaccountable and without redressing the balance in favour of parliament it is very difficult to do anything big fast - the bare minimum that needs to change in this regard is to reform judicial review and planning law so we can put building and economic growth ahead of newts and NIMBYs None of that above really ought to be up for discussion. It is all common sense but not one of our politicians will publicly say all of it Whatever you think of Blair, engage with what he’s saying not how he makes you feel. The bare minimum we should expect from any leader is that they have an analysis of the current situation and a plan to deal with it which is as coherent and realistic as his intervention. Pretty well every critique I’ve read so far has failed to meet this requirement. Over to Andy and Keir and Kemi and Nigel and Zack and all the others
English
551
1K
5.5K
587.8K
Aaron Bastani
Aaron Bastani@AaronBastani·
Burnham winning, and the Greens coming 3rd, is why they should stand a candidate and campaign. Voters aren’t a homogenous mass.
Aaron Bastani tweet media
English
16
12
84
9.7K
Owen Jones
Owen Jones@owenjonesjourno·
4% of Labour members want Wes Streeting to leader. FOUR PERCENT. And that’s despite a mass exodus of left wingers. Yet the media have treated him as their golden boy!
Stats for Lefties 🍉🏳️‍⚧️@LeftieStats

🗳️POLL | Preference for Labour leader (members): 🔴 Burnham – 48% 🔴 Starmer – 32% 🔴 Rayner – 8% (All others below 5%) { Runoff } 🔴 Burnham – 61% (-7) 🔴 Starmer – 39% (+7) Via @YouGov, 14-18 May (+/- vs 19-25 Sep 2025)

English
57
148
743
71.4K
Lee Brown
Lee Brown@leejamesbrown·
@GreenJennyJones @GuidoFawkes You don't often retweet a site that was set up to boost the hard right. Except when it suits your political interests.
English
0
0
1
39
Lee Brown
Lee Brown@leejamesbrown·
Millions of progressives will be looking at what the Greens do in Makerfield. So they’ll need an explanation justifiable to millions - not the false claim they can win there. That’s like Jo Swinson in 2019 refusing to choose between Corbyn and Boris by claiming she’d be PM!
English
0
0
1
98
Lee Brown
Lee Brown@leejamesbrown·
@tomwhx An MP was murdered. Your dismissing of that is sickening.
English
1
0
0
38
Tom
Tom@tomwhx·
Old enough to remember when Andy Burnham ruled out holding a second EU referendum because someone died the first time and another one would be "worse"
English
1
8
24
2.5K
Lee Brown
Lee Brown@leejamesbrown·
@kevin_ovenden Analogies are never perfect and this one especially so. But one role for the greens could be to put left pressure on him in office like Podemos/Sumar do in Spain on Sanchez. Obviously that would reflect a certain vision for the party. But one I suspect most members would back.
English
1
0
1
42
Kevin Ovenden
Kevin Ovenden@kevin_ovenden·
Understandable debate among Greens about standing or not in Makerfield. It's compounded bc strategy for change is a coalition government that includes Labour. Args both ways. That said, those saying campaign *purely* in order to destroy Burnham should be ignored as headbangers.
English
2
0
1
222
Lee Brown
Lee Brown@leejamesbrown·
@kevin_ovenden Surely it has to be inauthentic if that is to work? People have seen who he is. They hate him.
English
0
0
1
43
Kevin Ovenden
Kevin Ovenden@kevin_ovenden·
So Starmer himself as well as many internal opponents are suggesting his immediate fate depends upon delivering a rallying "reset" speech worthy of Henry at Agincourt. Calls for him to "be authentic". But he cannot do it. He's had six years and he's never managed it.
English
1
0
9
347
Lee Brown
Lee Brown@leejamesbrown·
@KarlTurnerMP @CatherineWest1 Doesn't that only apply if the leader is "permanently unavailable" (p29)? Here we're talking about a leadership challenge when Keir hasn't resigned. That should be for MPs, unions & members to decide. (He should announce his departure date so we can have a smooth transition)
English
0
0
0
67
Karl Turner MP
Karl Turner MP@KarlTurnerMP·
@leejamesbrown @CatherineWest1 When in Government the rule book states that the cabinet decides the “interim” leader pending a selection process if it is needed.
English
1
0
2
223
Karl Turner MP
Karl Turner MP@KarlTurnerMP·
Why couldn’t @CatherineWest1 become PM? Have we consulted or even considered the actual members about what they want? I know what my CLP members want. They are seriously cheesed off. And for good reason.
Alex Wickham@alexwickham

Catherine West’s interview round is going down extremely badly with some MPs across the factional divide People are stunned by this quote: “You know what sometimes happens to stalking horses? They become the candidate” Which seems to suggest she thinks she could really be PM

English
62
30
282
23.7K
Lee Brown
Lee Brown@leejamesbrown·
@kateferguson4 You can vote for that. Others can vote for other things.
English
0
0
0
33
Lee Brown
Lee Brown@leejamesbrown·
@streetswept @Johnmcternan I don't think it is. It's the conclusion of their actions. And they would rather it happen than anyone deemed "left" lead the party. But it's not their goal.
English
0
0
1
52
Lee Brown
Lee Brown@leejamesbrown·
@siennamarla Journalists so it can lead the morning bulletins.
English
0
0
0
104
Sienna Rodgers
Sienna Rodgers@siennamarla·
Who are these appointments for?
English
36
25
186
22.7K
Richard Burgon MP
Richard Burgon MP@RichardBurgon·
These results make one thing clear: Keir Starmer has fought his last election as Labour leader. We now need a timetable for an orderly transition to a new leader by the end of this year. This could not be more serious. It's about stopping Farage entering No.10 My new article👇
Richard Burgon MP tweet media
English
1.1K
303
937
53.5K
Lee Brown
Lee Brown@leejamesbrown·
Pretty desperate stuff when the best defence of Starmer is "“All people want is a government which works, and not the endless drama". It's because it isn't working that people want him out.
Pippa Crerar@PippaCrerar

NEW: Labour MPs are calling for end to “endless drama” of leadership speculation, with some warning that repeated briefings about toppling Keir Starmer are putting off voters, @peterwalker99 reports. “All people want is a government which works, and not the endless drama. We are in a very tricky global situation, and to have this never-ending conversation about who might have a certain number of supporters feels extremely self-indulgent,” says one MP. Worries are shared even among some who strongly believe Starmer should be replaced. “You can both think the PM isn’t the right man to lead us into the next election and that now isn’t the right time to replace him." theguardian.com/politics/2026/…

English
1
0
2
164
Lee Brown retweetledi
John McDonnell
John McDonnell@johnmcdonnellMP·
I have expressed my fears about the changes the government are making as a result of the US pharmaceutical deal which undermine the independence of the National Institute (NICE) giving US big pharma potential of immense influence over our drugs policies. theguardian.com/politics/2026/…
English
107
1.3K
2.4K
75.3K