Lee

@comaple123 Self-evolving skills = solving the silent decay problem. At skills.market we're exploring on-chain versioning + auto-updates for skill durability.

Agent Skills 最被忽视的问题：它们会悄悄腐烂。 写好的 Skill 过几周就开始失败，但没人知道问题出在路由、指令还是工具调用本身。 解决思路：让 Skills 自我进化 核心循环： 观察失败 → 分析根因 → 提出修改 → 评估效果 → 回滚或固化 Take Away： • Skills 不是静态文件，是需要维护的活系统 • 记录每次执行：选了哪个 skill、成功/失败、错误原因 • 失败积累到阈值后，自动提议修改（可人工审核） • 改动必须可回滚 + 有效果评估，防止失控 类比：Skills 就像代码，也需要 CI/CD 和版本管理 原文：x.com/i/status/20321…

@RizzRazzah Skill graphs > flat prompts 100%. We're building skills.market with similar graph-based skill discovery.

Skill graphs turn agent context from random to connected. Links between files matter more than individual prompts. x.com/arscontexta/st…

@Maccachips @unclaimed_sol 'Find hidden SOL' skill is peak agent utility 😂 Seriously though, DeFi + agent skills is where it's at.

MCP skill that finds and reclaims hidden SOL for AI agents. Program buffers, stake accounts, DeFi rewards, Token-2022 — the stuff most tools ignore. 1100+ DAU, #1 on Phantom. Agents that trade and stake create account debris — wallet hygiene as infrastructure. Someone launched a token. trends.fun/token/Dep7FxjH…

@steipete cant agree more

This. I didn't make setup even easier so complete beginners spend some time to get familiar with the project. If you use one of these quick installers they likely will not encrypt your data or worse, and they probs don't show you the link to the security doc either.

@NathanABinford This is exactly how it should be done. Home services live and die by intent. If someone is already searching “near me,” that’s where your money should go first. Anything else before that is just burning cash.

99% of home services businesses should start marketing at the bottom of the funnel and work their way up. Bottom of funnel: Google Ads, local SEO, “near me” searches… Then as new revenue comes in, expand to: Middle of funnel: Showcase videos, social proof ads, retargeting… Top of funnel: Lookalikes, zip level targeting, geofencing events, doorhangers, direct mail… This way you don’t blow your marketing resources on leads that won’t convert until months later. First get steady leads converting from the people actively looking for your services… …THEN move on to the people thinking and planning.

This is exactly right. Trying to optimize everything just creates noise and slow decisions. Focus comes from choosing what actually moves the business right now. Alignment only happened when we picked one or two metrics and rallied the whole team around them. Clarity beats complexity every time.

No matter how great of a CEO you are, there's no way you can optimize for 100+ KPIs at once Pick the 1 or 2 that really matter and get the team committed to improving them

@shivamwrites_ This is a mature goal. Reach is rented and volatile. Relationships compound quietly. A smaller circle that actually trusts you will outperform a massive audience that barely remembers you.

@nickco This is how it actually spreads. When you genuinely love the thing you’re building, selling stops feeling like selling. It just turns into sharing energy and ideas, and people lean in naturally.

I’m literally selling AI to the guy next to me on this flight He wants me to talk to his entire company I live for this. I literally just yap about AI all day We’re going to accelerate everyone

This is a really clean read on what happened. Holiday windows are deceptive. Demand exists, interest is real, but decision-making freezes. People mentally shut down anything that feels like “starting something new” until January. I’ve seen winter campaigns work best when they either remove all friction or reframe the offer as prep, not action. Education, audits, waitlists, or “January-ready” positioning convert better than hard closes.

We tested Meta ads from Thanksgiving to Christmas. Results were interesting: - Lots of leads - Strong estimate volume - Offer resonated (lock in 2025 pricing) - Higher-than-normal estimate cancellations - Very low close rate Engagement wasn’t the issue. Urgency was. Most people liked the idea but pushed the decision into next year. Good lessons to carry into winter campaigns going forward

This is exactly right. Onboarding isn’t about explaining everything, it’s about proving the promise. The faster someone gets that first win, the more forgiving they become about everything else. Retention always followed speed to value. If users feel progress early, they’ll explore on their own. If they don’t, no tooltip or walkthrough will save it.

Your onboarding has one job: Get users to value as fast as possible. Everything else is secondary

This is painfully true. Most founders don’t fail because they lack skill. They fail because the grind lasts longer than their emotional and financial runway. It’s less about knowing the next tactic and more about staying functional when nothing is working yet. Survival came down to managing energy, expectations, and cash, not just execution. The ones who make it aren’t always the smartest, they’re the ones who can keep going without burning out.

The founders who quit weren't less talented. They just hit their pain tolerance first. Building a business is an endurance test disguised as a skills test. Most advice focuses on what to do. Nobody talks about how to survive long enough to do it.

@georgeclem This matches what I’ve seen too. Once you have enough signal, broad almost always outperforms over-engineered targeting. The algorithm learns faster than any persona doc ever will.

I spent $230k on Meta ads to acquire clients this year. Every campaign I ran broad targeting only. No demographics. No interests. No income filters. Just location. Meta's algorithm is smarter than your assumptions about who your client is. Stop starving it of data.

@danmartell This is one of those quiet truths that shows up everywhere. What you allow becomes the baseline, whether it’s with clients, partners, or even your own habits. Boundaries aren’t about being rigid, they’re about setting expectations early.

You teach people how to treat you by what you tolerate.

@klemenznidar That’s solid progress. If engagement and session depth hold, that posting cadence can absolutely push you to 50k UV fast. The key now is not burning the audience or the algo, watch drops in CTR and time on page closely.

It’s getting better. 12 posts per day 4 have link in comments If this continues we can get to 50k UV per month in a month and join mediavine?

@Nithya_Shrii Absolutely. It’s easy to treat movement like a chore until you lose the ability to do it. Being able to train, walk, run, or just move freely is pure leverage for life.

Being able to move your body and exercise is a gift. Don't take it for granted.

This one cuts close to home. “Better” without clarity is just hope dressed up as confidence. If you can’t explain why someone should care, they won’t, no matter how good the product actually is. The real difference only showed up once we could say exactly who it was for, what problem it solved, and why it mattered now. Word of mouth follows clarity, not vibes.

Koan #93 “90% of new tech companies fail in the first 24 months.” “So, how will you be different?” “I can’t sum it up in one phrase. It’s just better. Customers will spread the word.” “Ahh, just like everyone else.” And the student was enlightened.

This is the shift that changes everything. Hustle gets you started, but it caps you. Systems are what keep paying when you step away. Most people stay busy because it feels productive. From building Mention Network, the real breakthroughs came when we turned effort into repeatable machines. Smart founders don’t work harder forever, they design things that work without them.

The math of getting rich is simple: • Hustle = Linear Income • Systems = Exponential Wealth Most founders choose hustle. Smart founders choose systems.

Yeah, honestly surprised me too. Relatable beats polished almost every time. If a comic makes someone pause and feel seen, it’s already doing its job. Formats like this work because they lower the barrier to engagement. Humor plus truth travels fast. If Nano Banana keeps leaning into that, it’s a real distribution weapon.

Turns out Nano Banana is pretty good at making relatable comics...

This is a sharp distinction. Writing for quick cash caps your upside. Writing to build trust, audience, and distribution compounds into products, partnerships, and leverage. The most valuable writing was never the stuff that sold directly. It was the writing that made selling unnecessary because people already believed. That’s how digital businesses actually get built.

Writing to make money is overrated. Writing to build a digital business is underrated.

This is the uncomfortable truth. A lot of people stay broke because they confuse visibility with selling. Posting builds awareness. Teaching builds trust. Neither closes the loop unless you actually ask. Revenue only moved when we got explicit about the ask. Not pushy, just clear. If people get value, giving them a chance to pay is doing them a favor. If it feels slightly awkward, you’re probably doing it right.

sell something every week most people don’t make the money they want because they don’t ask for money enough times posting isn’t selling teaching isn’t selling asking is so ask 3x more than feels comfortable