leux08

@emoflwer Ebaaa okkk

@leuxforbidden amoor eu ainda não descobri uma forma de aumentar a qualidade da foto (que seja sem ia E não seja pago), mas quando eu descobrir e postar eu lhe marco!!!

Brasil ❤️

O aborto é um direito legal da mulher / O feto seria uma minoria

kde eh uma BOSTA

@KagiHQ hey, kagi, is there any ETA for the stable version of Orion for linux??

¿Por qué Kratos luce como sucio y desarreglado? No es necesario dejarse ir la piel para matar dioses.

@KRR1751 @Dark_Goldenrod @stupidtechtakes

@Dark_Goldenrod nahh, I would let "\" for file systems and "/" for websites, it then makes easier what are you refering to xd

Did you know, that Windows "secretly" has its file system like Linux does? Those "C:\", "D:\",... are just an Win32 subsystem to make it easier for a human to understand + it comes from the MS-DOS days. But an original path what the kernel is using is just "\??\Device\HarddriveVolume1\Windows" as it is like our "C:\Windows" This also means, all the "stuff" with the "illegal names" of creating "...", CON, AUX, PRN,... are lies and you can create it just fine and use it just fine, because NT <> MS-DOS. The way why it "cant be made normally" is for the "Backwards compatibillity" and mostly Windows will not even be broken at that point, they don't care as a "kernel" the problem here is the "\\.\" prefix that Win32 subsystem uses alot. If you have 7-zip, try putting in the Address bar "\\?\" which is a whole made prefix of actually seeing the true FileSystem what is NT capable of. With this navigate for exp. to "C:\" and create a folder named "CON" Wow, the folder is there! You can move it, store file in it like it is a normal folder! (same with "...") But you must stay on "\\?\" while the "\\.\" (which is default) is made acting like MS-DOS for the compatibillity but the true NTFS has nothing to do with managing those folders/files at all. :)

@isochronous_ @eiranoirx Talking about Qt and GTK as if they're Linux exclusive ignoring that both of them are in Windows and Mac too lmfao

@eiranoirx "Qt or GTK, both of which produce apps that feel slightly wrong on every platform they target" huh? anyway electron is a solid portable framework for some things but there are many apps that just plainly don't need it, openvpn connect is probably the worst offender

Electron hate is one of the most confidently wrong opinions in tech. People say it like they've cracked something open. "Discord is just a website." "VS Code is Chrome with a titlebar." Yeah, and your kitchen knife is just shaped metal. The framing tells you nothing about whether the thing is actually good. Writing a real cross-platform native app is brutally hard, and not because the logic is complicated. Every platform has different UI conventions, different system APIs, different accessibility models, different font rendering, different input handling. Write a macOS app in Swift and it looks great on macOS and doesn't exist anywhere else. Want Windows? WinUI, WPF, take your pick, each with its own learning curve and its own special set of things that don't quite work right. Linux? Qt or GTK, both of which produce apps that feel slightly wrong on every platform they target, and you're maintaining all of this in parallel, same features across three codebases, three bug trackers, three build pipelines, three sets of platform-specific nonsense to debug Or use Electron with just oneOne codebase. "Electron uses too much RAM." VS Code idles around 150-300MB on a typical project. Sounds bad until you check what else is open. Chrome with four tabs is using 800MB. Your JetBrains IDE, fully native, compiled to the JVM, is sitting at 1.2GB before you've opened a single file. The native Slack alternative someone built in Qt uses 90MB, sure, but it also hasn't shipped a new feature in two years and the emoji picker breaks on HiDPI and nobody is fixing it. Memory is cheap. The RAM argument is almost always made by people who don't look at what their "good" native apps are actually consuming. Chromium is good. It is one of the most tested, most optimized pieces of software running on consumer hardware right now. The rendering is fast. V8 is fast. The security model has sandboxed processes and site isolation baked in, which is more than most native apps bother with. Embedding it in a desktop framework is not a betrayal of some pure native ideal. It's using a genuinely good piece of engineering for a job it's good at. The app is not slop because it runs on Chromium. The app is slop if the team who built it didn't care. Those are different things. Maybe stop confusing them.

@Andrezitosss feliz aniversario big goat!!! desejando tudo de melhor pra você!! <3

fiz 18 hj e o miseravel no grupo

@awesomekling I think gnome web has such a good ui and it would go perfectly with ladybird

Linux users, which GUI framework would you prefer your browser to use?

@idriss7m Bean

what vocaloid music sounds like when you’re not 14 anymore

Good morning

"entregue meu detergente, ensaboado ninguém vai me deter gente."

LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

@wind_temp0s Impressora hello kitty

POR QUE VOCÊ É ASSIM????

@wind_temp0s Tung tung tung sahur

quem advinhar o que é esse desenho vai ganhar um kebab

We've shipped more than a thousand versions of Zed, but all of them began with zero. Today, that changes. zed.dev/blog/zed-1-0

🇻🇦🇻🇦🇻🇦 the Vatican flag will get more likes than the Israeli flag