Lew

6.8K posts

Lew banner
Lew

Lew

@lewi5

words.

London Katılım Şubat 2009
697 Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
Lew
Lew@lewi5·
@Menneuw Give it 15 days of war and let's see where we are
English
1
0
0
9
Lew
Lew@lewi5·
@UncleOldFax Thank you, captain hindsight 🫡
English
1
0
2
135
Short Cube Capital
Short Cube Capital@UncleOldFax·
$100,000 into Chainlink $LINK 5 years ago today = $87,000 $100,000 into Tron $TRX 5 years ago today = $1,000,000
Short Cube Capital tweet media
English
8
7
50
2.2K
Lew
Lew@lewi5·
@bob4punk HNY Bubba, here's to 2026 🥂🍾
Čeština
1
0
3
156
Bubbafox
Bubbafox@bob4punk·
$Link Let’s be real ...2025 was massive on a fundamental level. SWIFT officially tied its name to Chainlink through the buildout of the SWIFT Ledger. DTCC announced work with Chainlink to streamline corporate actions processing. No spin... No hopium.... It became exactly what assblaster said it would become and more. But now let’s be honest… PA is not what we thought it would be at this stage... definitely lagging fundamentals. But....BUT....2026...this year the beast wakes up and becomes what everyone who’s done the homework knows it’s destined to be: a top-3 token. We were never wrong...just early. Here’s to 2026 and everything it brings. 🍻 Happy new years to all my Frens❤️
Bubbafox tweet media
English
43
14
316
11.5K
Lew
Lew@lewi5·
Had a dream $LINK went to 0.40c, makes you think...
English
1
1
15
290
TT 🥭 Farmer
TT 🥭 Farmer@TTLinkie3299·
The 2025 $Link @chainlink dump stats have been released. This year, $Link collected another Billy in USD.
TT 🥭 Farmer tweet mediaTT 🥭 Farmer tweet media
English
5
3
9
1.4K
LadyValor
LadyValor@lady_valor_07·
Can you name a Nicolas Cage movie you like that is not The Rock, Con Air or Face Off 🤔
LadyValor tweet media
English
6.8K
120
2.7K
879.3K
Zuet
Zuet@zuetnft·
@lewi5 @CatfishFish @chainlink @ChainLinkGod I think the main issue is chainlink labs. They are providing uncertainty. Whats wrong with saying 'we are waiting until the clarity act passes to give clarity on staking' It is also clearly centralised in terms of fees. Offchain revenues is there is no clarity on distribution
English
1
0
0
51
Lew
Lew@lewi5·
Whilst I agree with @CatfishFish 2 points that @chainlink needs to address: 1) Token releases are billions, reserve buys are millions - how can we know this is actually from revenue? 2) token releases are so profitable, why isn't the reserve receiving 100s $M? @ChainLinkGod
Fishy Catfish@CatfishFishy

x.com/chainlink/stat… >There is no revenue shares flowing back to holders. No dividends. No protocol earnings being redistributed downstream. Holding LINK does not entitle you to a slice of oracle fees in any direct, mechanical way. That alone should frame expectations properly. The value proposition is not “owning a piece of Chainlink’s revenue.” It is “owning exposure to a belief that this token will be more valuable later than it is today.” This is just patently false. 1) The weekly token buybacks (which have grown from $1M to $1.1M-$1.2M/week) that go into the Chainlink Reserve are literally revenue from the protocol's adoption going towards benefiting token holders. The offchain revenue that Chainlink generates is used to do buybacks of the token off the open market and store it into the Chainlink Reserve. This is value accrual being shared with all token holders; not just stakers. These buybacks will only continue to grow and will persist indefinitely, while token unlocks (until all are circulating) will stop. 2) The BUILD rewards for stakers, albeit not huge, are also real yield going to stakers. Distributing value into a token is not hard. That's incredibly easy. There are many ways to do it. The actual hard part is actually building the best tech, getting it widely adopted, and "winning." What's imporant about the current buybacks isn't the amount, but rather two points: 1) Signaling and clarifying the intent and recognition that the token is the sole destination for all value distribution; not to competing stakeholders' equity 2) Creating the actual onchain mechanism by which it can happen You can also layer on additional supply sinks (staking requirements for nodes) and value accrual beyond just token buybacks (yield). Most major tech companies took over a decade to initiate meaningful buybacks. Chainlink started it after 8 years. Mind you, the current buybacks are not Chainlink's total revenue, but just the buyback amount. Chainlink is reinvesting into itself to building the best protocol it can be to win the market. If you "win" and become the global standard orchestration layer protocol, everything else sorts itself out.

English
1
6
13
279
Lew retweetledi
Fishy Catfish
Fishy Catfish@CatfishFishy·
1) No crypto native token has guaranteed "equity rights." The Ethereum Foundation can change Ethereum to have 20% of ETH gas fees go to them. Solana could do the same. So, what is even your argument? Don't buy tokens at all? Only buy meme coins because you know they will never have claims to cash flows? It's a skill issue to identify the teams that have the execution and good-faith intent to win their market and to point the value at the token. 2) There is no "reward for Chainlink the company." This is just a story you've invented in your head. Ripple sells XRP, but they also sell equity in Ripple. XRP has no claims to cash flows of any kind. Uniswap sells UNI, but they sell equity in Uniswap Labs. The only fees that Uni had were going into the Uniswap Labs; none to token holders. Chainlink has *no* such conflict of interest. There is no valuations or fund-raising for Chainlink Labs. There is no selling of equity in Chainlink Labs. The labs entity simply exists to have a legal entity to be able to hire employees and to enter into legal contracts with enterprises who want to pay to use Chainlink services. The LINK token is the sole destination for all of Chainlink's success. There are no competing stakeholders.
English
2
7
24
672
Lew
Lew@lewi5·
@ChainlinkP Probably linked the chains in some sort of way
English
0
0
1
77
Lew
Lew@lewi5·
@AndrewB_UK @Voyager4IR If that 3x per year comes good, and if my current 1.69% is still worth that after 90 days unlock, then yes that would be ok
English
0
0
0
34
Andrew
Andrew@AndrewB_UK·
@Voyager4IR @lewi5 under 2% return but if we get like 3 seasons a year then that 6% and that on top of our 4.something percentage
English
1
0
0
39
STU ⬡
STU ⬡@Voyager4IR·
@lewi5 You’re disappointed you got free money? Isn’t everyone experiencing losses these days? That’s not on Chainlink.
English
4
0
15
982
Lew
Lew@lewi5·
@LINK_Zilla Bro hasn’t heard of cost of capital
English
1
0
3
440
Lew
Lew@lewi5·
@Zedzies You really can’t
English
0
0
0
586
Zedzies
Zedzies@Zedzies·
@lewi5 I can tell who has tik tok clip induced dopamine shortages.
English
1
0
5
813
Dalv
Dalv@DalvLinkler·
@spac3li0nx @chainlink You can either take the instant 80% cut or wait 3 months and hope that the token dump less in that time 😂 Insanely stupid design if you want to reward your Stakers even a tiny bit
English
1
0
3
106
Lew retweetledi
Chainlink
Chainlink@chainlink·
The claim period for Chainlink Rewards Season 1 is now live. rewards.chain.link Starting today, eligible LINK stakers who allocated Cubes during the 1-month allocation period can begin to claim tokens as they unlock over time. 🧵⬇️
Chainlink tweet media
English
40
72
432
100.3K