liangreen

@RichardBentall @ronaldmcminn4 @stuey_beef Well it would be the democratic thing to do,so highly unlikely to happen.

@liangreen123 @ronaldmcminn4 @stuey_beef An excellent idea. Bring it on!

The forensic details of Starmer’s EU payments scandal are catastrophic. Brussels wants £1 billion annually based on a Swiss-style model: Switzerland pays €375 million per year to access the single market. Applying the GDP ratio between Switzerland and the UK produces the £1 billion figure Britain would pay. But here’s what makes this an obscene betrayal: Britain’s pre-Brexit net contribution was £8-9 billion per year. We’ve already paid over £44 billion in divorce bill settlements since 2020, with another £5.7 billion still owed. Those payments will continue until 2065 - yes, 2065 - at £95 million annually for decades. Now Starmer wants to add £1 billion per year on top, described by European diplomats as “pay to play”. And for what? Access without representation. Brussels has already made clear Britain will be “blocked from making any changes or amendments to the rules, making the UK an EU rule-taker”. We’ll be paying £1 billion yearly for the privilege of following laws we have zero say in shaping. Whether you voted leave or remain, surely at least both sides thought we’d STOP paying Brussels when Leave won. Instead, Starmer is negotiating to pay them forever. This is the biggest political con in modern British history.

I CANNOT emphasize enough, how desperate they are to contain a mass awakening. When people realize our entire history, our reality, our medicines, our media, and more, has been managed and policed by a secret society then there will be no going back

@Adrian_Hilton @uk_sf_writer He was obviously far more intelligent than she is,therefore was unable to debate him and gave a shitty lying response.

This boy quite bravely says Nigel Farage would be better than Keir Starmer. Instead of engaging with his reasons and inviting others to comment, Angela Rayner crushes him, saying Farage is “really dangerous” and “terrible”, and her son would probably be dead if he were PM. It's an appallingly manipulative way to treat nascent political engagement. If I were this boy's father, I'd be writing a robust letter to the headteacher. If I were Nigel Farage, I'd be writing him a personal letter of thanks.

@RichardBentall @ronaldmcminn4 @stuey_beef So why not a referendum?

@ronaldmcminn4 @stuey_beef If you're saying Brexiters won the vote in 2016, they did and they got what they asked for. Now people want to rejoin. That's how democracy works.

@JeromeDavies1 @GKC1970 @BritainisCool Being a kings council doesnt make him a leader or politician as proven.

@liangreen123 @GKC1970 @BritainisCool As a kings council, Starmer is one of the few people who is qualified.

Who would you rather have as Prime Minister?

@handsdealts @jan_murray There is always one ...and here he is 🤪

@jan_murray How charitable of you to charge a charity

In the email I received from Scope last week - cancelling us from their London Marathon “cheer team” because of my lawfully held views about sex and gender - they said they would pay our fee anyway, so no one was out of pocket. We had agreed a fee of £300. That just about covers singers’ train fares and a coffee. We typically sing for four hours without a break. For that fee, we also provide our own PA system, microphones, independent power source and other equipment Scope would otherwise need to buy or hire to have us there. Before the event, I had replaced some music stands - which get broken quite easily when you’re performing outside an and bought new props, masking tape, spare batteries and other bits. Out of my own money, with a view to reimbursing myself when there was enough in the choir account. When Scope reversed its decision at 6pm the night before the marathon, only one other singer felt comfortable performing at their cheer point. So we decided it was better to find another spot on the course - hence singing at Mile 15. Scope has not paid the invoice. In previous years, they paid before the event. So I am now scrabbling around to cover train fares for the singers who did come and sing - using the small amount left in the choir account from other gigs and a couple of kind donations received over the weekend. They’ve all said it’s fine. But it doesn’t feel fine to me. Covering singers’ travel is the least I can do. I won’t be able to reimburse myself for the equipment. Given all the upset Scope has caused, you might imagine they’d at least have paid the invoice they said they would pay. Just extraordinary.

@GKC1970 @BritainisCool Neither is Keir Starmer,yet here we are

@BritainisCool Are people being paid to say Rupert Lowe? In no way shape or form is he even remotely qualified to be an MP, let alone PM.

So let's get this straight... two sitting black councillors are deselected in Croydon. The Party's bureaucrats enforce a mandatory shortlist... and the result is KEIR STARMER'S MID-20s NIECE gets picked to stand for the 2nd safest ward? She might be very smart and capable, and might eventually be a credit to the role, but this sort of mad top-down management invites scepticism. If I was a local resident, I'd be pretty miffed. insidecroydon.com/2026/04/30/kei…

@p2ndtdpt26 @RosesJB1 @I_amMukhtar But like bots like you on here

@RosesJB1 @I_amMukhtar What so much more interesting than everyone else that he interrupts constantly.

Zia Yusuf is due to appear on Question Time again, but why is he given so much airtime? He hasn’t been elected to anything. He has simply appointed himself as shadow home secretary. It's going to be his 7th appearance in a period of about 16 months.

@SeddSezz @heath6789 Seeing the labour MPs were whipped and have a massive majority why woukd he waste his time?

Farage refused to vote in a very important debate. We all want an investigation into Starmer except Farage! 558 MPs voted but Farage had already given up hope! He was elected as Clacton MP to vote in such matters but thinks he's above it. He could have been on the campaign trail before and after the vote. Why is this man an MP, let alone a party leader, if he's nowhere to be seen in Parliament?

@snowleopardess @Samcheese3 Glas you are concernrd about the two men hes just stabbed you utter moron. Its people like you that are sickening.

@Samcheese3 Yes indeed. Sickening.

So essentially his officers were repeatedly and violently kicking a mentally ill man in the head when he was already incapacitated by taser.

A young couple in England, the day before they were due to exchange contracts on what was to be their first home, received two phone calls in quick succession. The first was from their estate agent. The second was from their solicitor. The information was the same in both. The local council had outbid them for their house, by £20,000. The seller had accepted. The couple had been bidding for the house since the asking price was £150,000. The bidding had taken the price up to £190,000, already, by their own account, the upper edge of what they could afford. The council had come in at £210,000, a level they could not match. Their offer was abandoned. Their survey, costing £900, was wasted. They still owe legal fees of £2,200 plus VAT regardless. The fixed-rate mortgage offer they had secured, in a market where rates have been rising again, will now expire before they find another property. Their landlord has new tenants moving in to their current rental in the second week of June. They are looking, on the calendar in front of them, at potential homelessness inside two months. The reason the council bought the house was disclosed to them, after some pushing, by a councillor they happened to know personally. The council needed urgent additional accommodation for asylum seekers. The property they had been buying was already previously registered as a House in Multiple Occupation, which made the conversion straightforward. The taxpayer money the council used to outbid them comes from a £500 million national pilot scheme, established under the present government, in which local authorities are funded to buy properties on the open market in order to house asylum seekers and reduce the cost of asylum hotels. In other words, local government is, on the order of central government, using your own money to give housing that you should It's a representative case. 134,760 British households were in temporary accommodation as of September 2025, which is a record. 4,793 people were sleeping rough on a single night in autumn 2025, also a record, and 171% higher than in 2010. 28% of all new social housing lettings in England in 2024/25, approximately 75,000 households, went to people deemed statutorily homeless. The number of new social housing lettings that included a member of the Armed Forces community was, in the same year, approximately 2,600. The number of new lettings that went to non-UK nationals, on the basis of the nationality data published by central government, was substantially in excess of that veteran figure, by, depending on how the data is cut, about 10x. This is the British state, in 2026, using the working tax contributions of two young people in the first weeks of trying to buy a home, to outbid those same two young people for that same home, in order to provide free accommodation for foreign nationals whose claims to be in this country have not yet been assessed and may well be completely worthless. The young people will, on the present trajectory, be made homeless in the same June in which the asylum seekers move into the property they were trying to buy. The young people will be paying, through their council tax for the rest of their working lives, for the accommodation in which the asylum seekers will live. It is likely, given the number of migrants to Britain whose lifetime tax contribution is net negative, that they will be paying tax to offset these new arrivals for the rest of their lives. It goes without saying that we need the most fundamental imaginable reconstruction of our asylum, housing, planning, and immigration laws to prevent such travesties of justice from happening again. We all know what is required by way of change in those areas. Progress has written a more extensively policy testament on this subject than any other political organisation in Britain. Beyond that there is one last thing worth saying. The young couple, on the available account, are not in a position to fight any of this through the courts. They cannot afford to. Their solicitor, on their telling, was pressing them for the legal fees on a debit card before the rest of the conversation was over. They will, in all likelihood, lose the home, the deposit, the survey, the rate deal, and the remainder of their tenancy in a single short summer. They will then watch the property they were trying to buy be filled, at the public's expense, by the people the British state has decided to prioritise over them. If that does not make you furious enough to do something about what is happening in Britain, nothing will.

@carla_denyer The full on destruction of this country will be on the back of people like you.

More cruelty from Labour today, who will send riot police to stop migrants in small boats These are human beings fleeing war and persecution If govt really wants to end dangerous channel crossings, they must open safe and managed routes to the UK bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…

@Rasmine2 @Ersin0X Makes the situation even worse if thats the case. The audacity to think you can call each other that yet if spoken by someone white it makes them deserve a beating. Jesus wept

@Ersin0X I’m interested to see what happened before. She probably called them the N-word then tried to walk away like she didn’t do anything. That’s the only thing I can think of that could have caused this. Because she clearly had white friends there videoing and not helping.

She was simply trying to head home, but the situation suddenly escalated into a tense and chaotic moment that quickly got out of control 😳

@kapboy59 @RealCarlVernon Dont smoke..just do drugs instead

@RealCarlVernon Yes, because NOT trying to get young people addicted to a lifetime of nicotine and the resulting redpiohealth risks is….freedom? Freedumb is more like it.

Here in the UK they just banned smoking for under 17s for a lifetime. They’re just about to do the same in Canada. You’re not meant to notice how seemingly independent countries are all being systematically destroyed and taken over together.

@RealCarlVernon @GillBen41125571 Totally in step ,like a plan 🤔

@TRAK1812358 @writethewrongs2 @ExposedGreens Utter savages

@writethewrongs2 @ExposedGreens Vote Green to ensure more savages are allowed illegally to come here and commit horrendous violent crimes unconditionally!

🚨GREEN EXTREMISTS IN TOTAL MELTDOWN! Zack Polanski’s radical Green cult is in full PANIC … desperately axing their own deranged agenda: 1. Scrapping the Monarchy 2. Outlawing private landlords with Marxist rent control 3. hammering motorway speeds down to a pathetic 55mph! After flooding Britain with anti-car tyranny, royal witch-hunts, and socialist property seizures, their eco-woke nightmare is collapsing under public outrage. Voters are waking up! Britain says NO to Green madness! 🇬🇧🔥

@writethewrongs2 @wwwPurityOrg @ExposedGreens Whats the reason for immigrants flooding the rest of Europe? or is that due to Brexit too?

@wwwPurityOrg @ExposedGreens The biggest cause of people coming into this country was Brexit. Freedom of movement was far from the curse people thought it was. As for democratic allies, I assume you are talking about the US? How are the US under Trump a reliable partner with us?

@xdeanozoff @GBPolitcs It wasng a free market was it,it cost us 7.9 billion a year. The 40 billion you refer to is the cost of the 'divorce' and we have paid roughly 23 billion of that to date. There is financial commitments to run longer which is to pay EU MEP's massive pensions.

@GBPolitcs Can anyone list any benefits? I quite like my passport being stamped when I go abroad but that doesn't seem to be worth the £40billion annual cost of leaving the free market 🤷‍♂️

🚨BREAKING: The World Economic Forum allegedly manipulated data to persuade the UK public that Brexit has been unsuccessful