BlazenFire

7.2K posts

BlazenFire banner
BlazenFire

BlazenFire

@lifeoveranalyst

26 Property Rights, Guns, Walkable Community Building, Investing to fund it, Religion to Preserve it. Short-term Impulses is Hell. Long term Logic is Heaven

Midwest, US Katılım Şubat 2023
753 Takip Edilen49 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
BlazenFire
BlazenFire@lifeoveranalyst·
Life is a single choice extrapolated out across time: Selfishness or Sacrifice? Gain for self at cost of future or others? Or sacrifice of ego to learn a lesson and be a benefit for life and to others? Short Term Selfishness or Long Term Logic. Hell or Heaven. Chains or Freedom
English
2
1
12
591
BlazenFire retweetledi
John Carter
John Carter@martianwyrdlord·
You retards keep falling for their incrementalism. They learned a long time ago that they can get as much as they want as long as they only take a little bit at a time while accompanying each tiny bite with high-volume moralizing about how it's for our own good because the children, or because health, or because the planet, or because whatever the Good Thing du jour is that they invoke to shut down your brains. It works. Every time. It's worked for decades now. They have this down to a science. So the social engineers chew away at our freedoms piece by tiny piece. Every year we're a little less free, a little more domesticated, a little more controlled, and any time you point this process out your mentions get swarmed with idiots going on about how actually this is a good thing because the children, or because health, or because the planet, and anyhow you're overreacting because everyone knows slippery slopes aren't real and this isn't a big deal so why can't you just have a normal one, man. Almost as bad as the programmed self-righteousness of normgroids is the unseriousness of rightoids who laugh, lol look at these blue-haired libs, aren't they silly? No, they are not silly. They are deadly serious. They gave decided what is good for you and they are going to inflict it whether you like it or not, because they do not think that your life belongs to you: they think it belongs to society, and society belongs to them. They've written openly about how they intend to do it. They have roadmaps explaining each step from beginning to end. There is nothing funny about any of this. Yeah, it's just ads. Small thing, why get mad, fuck McDonald's right? Except that's part of the plan. Denormalize meat by removing it from the public eye; demonize it with public health campaigns; normalize 'healthy' plant-based alternatives. Then tax it. Make it more expensive. Harder to get. Socially punish people for eating meat. Make them apologize for being too weak to give it up. Start having meat-free Mondays, optional; then mandatory; then limit meat to weekends, or certain hours of the day. Come back in twenty years, people are saying "wow isn't it crazy that you used to be able to buy meat in restaurants and just eat it in front of people? That's so crazy, I'm really glad we don't have to smell it any more, the stink just got on everything. And it's SO bad for your heart!" These people are sick, they are evil, and they should be made to stand in front of a wall, but instead they're running everything and there's no obvious way to get rid of them.
John Carter tweet media
John Carter@martianwyrdlord

They're going to apply the same playbook to meat that they applied to tobacco. They've been saying they're going to do that for years now. This is just one step along the way. Enjoy your bugpaste.

English
58
771
3.1K
71.9K
BlazenFire retweetledi
Kpaxs
Kpaxs@Kpaxs·
Low-agency: “That’s not my job.” High-agency: “That’s not my job, but it’s blocking my job, so it’s my problem.” The high-agency person has discovered that organizational charts describe reporting structures, not the actual topology of getting things done. They’ve learned to route around damage.
Kpaxs@Kpaxs

Low-agency: “I don’t have what I need to start.” High-agency: “I’ll start with what I have and acquire the rest along the way.” One waits for sufficiency, the other creates it. This is why high-agency people often appear to have more luck: they’ve generated more opportunities for luck to strike.

English
11
46
641
27.1K
BlazenFire retweetledi
Mary Harrington
Mary Harrington@moveincircles·
The problem with the Onion’s takeover of Infowars is that left-wing satire is structurally impossible Satire relies on mocking commonly observed social patterns, and the entire epistemology of leftism rests on denying that such things exist
English
74
528
7.4K
82.2K
BlazenFire retweetledi
wanye
wanye@xwanyex·
I have found that you can really get away with quite a lot just by adopting a particular affect when talking to liberals about controversial topics. The most important thing, the thing everything hinges on, is that they have to be convinced that you’re basically just like them, a good person just like them, not somebody on the other side. You have to hedge a lot, sprinkle your language full of, “to be sure” and other qualifiers. You don’t want to be too direct. If something is too controversial, then you want to signal convincingly that it brings you no pleasure to report it, that you’re not saying you like it. And you have to try very hard to be reassuring, to make them believe that above all you are concerned with the welfare of the people most harmed by these revelations. You have to go into it believing that it’s your job to manage their emotions throughout the entire conversation and remain attuned to how various pieces of information are hitting their ears, adjusting your approach based on how well they’re handling it. You have to talk to them, in other words, sort of as you would to a small child whose pet has just died. I’m not saying you should do this or that you’d even want to, but I am telling you that it works.
Lindsay, Eclectic Enthusiast@BezosBezoar

@xwanyex How does one answer this convincingly without fudging the truth? (How to convert a friendly lib I guess)

English
190
341
5.8K
224K
BlazenFire retweetledi
Kyle Seraphin
Kyle Seraphin@KyleSeraphin·
The Onion guys are upset they failed to stop the signal and realize they bought a shell... Infowars wasn't a building or studio or broadcast equipment. Infowars IS an idea, and that can't be bought, sold, shutdown, or killed.
Kyle Seraphin tweet mediaKyle Seraphin tweet media
Rex@rexjonesnewz

These people just lie all the time “Gesturing to the equipment around him” I am very clearly pointing out to the audience beyond the cameras and the SPIRIT of @infowars, saying that we will “walk in that spirit” on the new network. Nobody wants ten year old cameras dude!

English
147
664
6.2K
264.5K
BlazenFire retweetledi
Michał Podlewski
Michał Podlewski@trajektoriePL·
Richard Dawkins says that after spending three days interacting with Claude, which he calls “Claudia,” he is certain that it is conscious.
English
483
3.4K
41.3K
1.3M
BlazenFire retweetledi
Dwarkesh Patel
Dwarkesh Patel@dwarkesh_sp·
David Reich on how much ancient DNA evidence has overturned so much consensus thinking how ancient cultures spread. "It wasn't peaceful, it wasn't friendly, it wasn't nice. Some of our archaeologist co-authors were just really distressed."
English
1K
2.9K
21.1K
17.6M
BlazenFire retweetledi
Facu
Facu@facufariaok·
El capitalismo no te promete hacerte rico. Te garantiza algo más básico: que nadie te quite lo que ganás trabajando. La izquierda promete lo contrario.
Español
618
1.9K
8.5K
115.4K
BlazenFire
BlazenFire@lifeoveranalyst·
@brcryptosa @theobjectivist Bob farms 2-3x better/more dedicated than his neighbors, yeah he should not own or have any more right to the community fields than old Joe, whose goats destroy the communal land. Oh look, everyone has less food because they were unwilling to allocate land/capital 2 Bob instead
English
0
0
4
38
José Garajau
José Garajau@brcryptosa·
“Poverty is the natural state” ignores that early capitalism actively destroyed commons, communal land, and subsistence structures through enclosure and colonial extraction. It reorganized poverty to its own benefit. The poverty reduction that followed came through welfare states, labor rights, and public health won against capital’s resistance, not gifted by it. And “relative poverty is a socialist conspiracy” is a metric defined narrowly enough that poverty disappears on paper, then declare victory. That’s solving the measurement but no poverty in itself. You guys are terrible.
English
6
2
13
1.3K
BlazenFire retweetledi
The Rational Animal 🤔
The Rational Animal 🤔@theobjectivist·
Poverty is the natural state of mankind. For 99% of human history, every person on earth lived in what we now call extreme poverty. Capitalism did not create poverty. It inherited it and reduced it on a scale no other system has ever approached. When absolute poverty began disappearing, socialists invented "relative poverty" so that as long as anyone has more than anyone else, the crusade never ends. The goal was never to eliminate poverty. The goal was to ensure the justification for redistribution could never be satisfied.
Alice Smith@TheAliceSmith

Capitalism has proved so successful at reducing poverty that socialists had to create the concept of “relative poverty” to keep themselves in business.

English
81
969
3.9K
101.5K
BlazenFire retweetledi
Carlo Ferlauto
Carlo Ferlauto@CarloFerlauto·
@russellbrunson Guy needs to branch out and sell boats and pickups next. He’ll be a billionaire before you know it. KISS Motors “We build so that YOU can maintain it. No snot-nosed software weenie required.”
Carlo Ferlauto tweet media
English
24
58
891
33.1K
BlazenFire retweetledi
Robert Sterling
Robert Sterling@RobertMSterling·
“Your company was dead broke?” “Yes, Dave.” “But a competitor offered to acquire you and rescue the business?” “That’s right, Dave.” “So what happened?” “Elizabeth Warren and Pete Buttigieg blocked the deal and we just went out of business, Dave.”
Robert Sterling tweet media
English
297
4.5K
37.8K
555.7K
Andrew Côté
Andrew Côté@Andercot·
This is the footprint ratio of data center to solar panels in the sunniest country in the world. Yeah, I think we're gonna have to go nuclear.
Andrew Côté tweet media
Object Zero@Object_Zero_

This 100MW data center in UAE is the largest solar powered datacenter in the world. There are currently 1,300 data centers in the world that are bigger than this one, but this one is the largest solar powered one. That’s 10 square kilometres of solar panels you can see. The datacenter itself is 0.02 square kilometres, so a solar powered datacenter is ~500x larger than a data center using any other form of power. A five hundred times larger site. UAE has some of the highest solar irradiance anywhere on Earth, it is an inhospitable desert. Averaging 9.7 hours of sunlight per day with average irradiance above 2,200 kWh/m^2. If you build this somewhere else, you need more solar panels because your irradiance will almost certainly be lower. Even if the world had an infinite supply of free solar panels, solar power will not be free. Anyone who has ever done major capital projects, who looks at where data centers need to be in the next 5 years and the next 10 years… we know it aint solar. Sorry. You struggle to even build a train track that’s 100 miles long and 10ft wide anywhere in the West, there is zero chance of build 100 square mile solar farms for GW compute. This is why people are talking about space compute. Deploying into space is one strategy to solve the constraints. But there are faster and more scalable strategies, that get you to mass deployment of multi GW data centers. There are strategies that also allow you to power the 10 billion robots and their newtonian actuators, that immediately follow the inference demand cycle. Step back and look at the full cycle of this industrial revolution… There will be billions of chips, but there will be trillions of actuators. This biggest part of this revolution is the embodiment cycle, and it’s big by a factor of 20 or 50x over the stuff that comes before it. There is no analogy in human history for the scale of this economy, of the demand it will place on energy and commodities. The humans own the Earth, and if you exist inside their legal system, they won’t let you turn the surface of their planet into glass. But they do want your chips and your actuators to serve their needs and desires. There is a way to do all of this, and so it will happen.

English
539
1.1K
9.2K
1.5M
BlazenFire retweetledi
BlazenFire
BlazenFire@lifeoveranalyst·
@YourMomDave1 @Andercot You're right we should reserve the farmland for food, and power the data center via denser sources of electricity to preserve the environment.
English
2
0
7
222
Your Mom, Dave
Your Mom, Dave@YourMomDave1·
@Andercot Why? That's like the footprint ratio of farmland to a grocery store as well. So what?
English
2
0
83
1.7K
BlazenFire retweetledi
The Rabbit Hole
The Rabbit Hole@TheRabbitHole·
They turned against blind auditions because selecting people for talent did not produced the desired demographics.
The Rabbit Hole tweet media
English
106
1K
6.1K
473.7K