İlker S.

@theo Yes with one difference, you'll have to go through every agent's slop output and fix the issues one by one.

This is kind of what it feels like to run lots of agents in parallel

Chatting with deepseek feels like GPT 3.5. It's incredibly useless.

@Zeeskylaw They would probably come up with a tax, for not paying tax.

3 days later, it’s actually not « free ». You just prepay the tax, lol.

@alexkehr looks like the entire app is wrapped with ScrollView

the Lovable app is shockingly bad. how did a team build this and feel proud enough to ship this hyper-slop?

Ladies and gentlemen, Opus 4.7

Becuase it will take you 6 to 18 weeks to clean that shit up and get it working properly

This is utterly fascinating. We’ve known code written by AI is harder to untangle. It appears this is the case with writing as well. Tricia is an editor and she says that when an author submits work that is written by AI, she has a much harder time editing it. It’s all one interconnected black-box piece of writing that is not amenable to change. Whereas she finds that human writing, while seemingly messier, is actually much more structurally straightforward. My theory as to why this is is that LLMs think one token at a time. And after every token, they essentially look back and ask, “have I said the thing the prompt wants me to say?” If not, it keeps elucidating. The result is tight chain of thought writing that requires each preceding token to make sense of the next. Whereas human writing starts from a pre-language idea in the author’s head, and looks forward many sentences and paragraphs ahead to approximate the author’s intent. It’s somewhat fuzzy. But I think LLMs fundamentally “think” in a much different way than humans. They are certainly not useless. But I think it’s a grave mistake to equate them with human intelligence.

So AI doesn't understand how messy this is. Imagine a big structure with complex business logics and stuff. This is just a single style object.

@pascal_bornet Criticizing autonomy with an AI written article..

A few self-driving taxis in San Francisco just demonstrated the real problem with autonomy. They were too rational. For a brief moment, several robotaxis aligned at an intersection and created a perfectly polite deadlock. No aggression. No improvisation. No human-style “you go, I’ll go.” Just algorithms waiting for clarity. And that is exactly why this moment matters. What interests me is that this was not a failure of sensing. The vehicles could see. The problem was social judgment. Because cities are not just physical systems. They are negotiation systems. They run on: → tiny signals → hesitation → assertiveness → eye contact → imperfect timing That is where autonomy gets much harder than people think. We are not only teaching machines how to detect objects and follow lanes. We are asking them to operate inside messy human environments where the right move is not always the most logical one. To me, that is the deeper lesson. The next frontier in self-driving is not just better perception. It is better judgment under uncertainty. And that is a much more difficult problem. What do you think matters more for autonomous vehicles now: seeing the road better, or learning how to navigate human ambiguity? #AI #AutonomousVehicles #SelfDrivingCars #FutureOfMobility #Innovation #Technology #SmartCities #MachineLearning #FutureOfWork

@theo Best model ever made in the entire universe. Havent tried tho

How are you guys feeling about 5.5 so far?

@atmoio I guarantee those videos would get at least 200-300k views. You'll get more money than memberships lol.

@lkerS12 these are longer form monologues i dont think a broader audience would have the patience for 😅

Come on @atmoio . really? members only? I am a member at heart

@code That animal will by itself since no one even open the editor anymore.

Add a little fun to your coding sessions 🐶🐱 This extension lets you keep a virtual pet right inside VS Code.

@oncekiyazilimci "Yazılım Başkanı" dediyse vardır bi bildiği. Bence 0 ila 8.5 yıl tecrübeli yazılımcılara ihtiyaç pek yok, 9 yıllıklar şimdilik kalabilir.

Neden 6 yıl? 🤔

my commits lately

@ericmitchellai I hate how it overexplains things every time. It gives me bullet points with subtitles, as if it's trying to hit a word count. Claude doesn't do that, if a question needs one sentence answer it just gives me one sentence.

why isn't chatgpt the perfect personal AGI? what is most disappointing about it? what feature, model improvement, or bugfix would do the most to make it more useful in your daily life? what is most frustrates you that chatty can't do, or can't do well enough?

You mean this one?

How can a person keep saying this shit and be surprised about getting hate?

@thdxr I play guitar lol

so what do you do when your agent is working and don't say start another agent because i know you're lying

We've been tricked, again. Many of the thousands of bugs and vulnerabilities Mythos found are in older software are impossible to exploit. And the severe zero-day reports rely on just 198 manual reviews tomshardware.com/tech-industry/…