lonnyluv96
2K posts
I'm starting to understand lynchings
HJB News@HJB_News__
These people are incompatible with the West. We don’t share the same values.
English
@Betwitbizzy Because they’re gambling, everyone is running the starters for 20-30+ points on their parlays, if they let them play the whole game they’ll hit their lines.
English
@OMApproach The aliens only started coming out after nukes were being detonated (allegedly). Prior to than their presence wasn’t as overt. Also radar and satellites etc and whatever other tech the government might have that civilians don’t is why they have a monopoly of info on UFOs.
English
Why would they reveal that aliens are here after 6,000 years of written human history if they have been here since ancient times? Do you think the aliens waited for the U.S. government to reveal them? Think about it…
English
I TOLD YALL YESTERDAY THE HEATER STARTS NOW JUNE IS COMING😈
SENDING $250 💕 and reply
GET ALL PLAYS 25% OFF VIP
DONT MISS THE NIGHT SLATE⬇️
dubclub.win/r/p/pri-64wqs/…
BlazinHotBets@BlazinHotBets
TWO GEMS💎💎
English
America's going to be 90% white by 2050. 150 million mass deportations.
Remarks@remarks
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 US is projected to become majority non-white for the first time by 2050.
English
@emmywayne64 They had Black noir but apparently that’s bad writing or something
English
@Airaxora “Big booty white girls twerking”
“RuneScape Money making guide”
English
po imagina se o black noir não falasse e o ryan não aparecesse na série até o último episódio, e na cena final ele chegasse na casa branca e revelasse ser ele o Noir pra ajudar o Bruto, seria um plot foda
｢𝑹𝒐𝒔𝒆𝒓𝒄𝒉 𝑷𝒂𝒔𝒂 ｣@Condor_Noel
Estoy a nada de cometer una locura
Português
@Uncommonsince76 Getting punched in the face isn’t attempted murder
English
What is so asinine about this case is shouldn’t the black guy be charged with assault or attempted murder for literally hunting down and attacking this White man????
Dexerto@Dexerto
A judge has decided that if ChudTheBuilder makes bond, he will be required to: - Wear a GPS ankle monitor - Surrender his weapons - Avoid giving interviews - Avoid posting about the incident on social media
English
Only 14 percent of ALL workers in the trades make over 100k a year. The average is closer to 50k a year. Do not let conservatives lie to you. Go to college. Get an education. Do not break your body down for 25 dollars an hour.
English
@BinaryBit01 @MyronGainesX @ChudTheBuilder Doesn’t matter, you can’t murder someone for punching you.
English
@MyronGainesX @ChudTheBuilder "Chud never called him the n-word or provoked physical violence."
Did you see the video? Or do you have the audio of when this happened that you can share?
English
Day by day, @ChudTheBuilder’s self-defense case strengthens under Tennessee law (TCA § 39-11-611 Stand Your Ground).
Joshua Luvv’s own Facebook posts prove he wanted to confront and fight Chud to launch his “Twitch career.”
This directly corroborates multiple witnesses who saw the livestream before it was removed from the streaming service Pumpfun:
Luvv followed Chud, threw the first punch, and Chud never called him the n-word or provoked physical violence.
On top of that, the criminal complaint makes zero mention of Chud instigating or provoking the fight.
Instead, the complaint mentions that Chud took a “bladed stance” and reached for his firearm.
A bladed stance is a recognized defensive posture in firearms training.
It is not illegal to reach for a weapon when you have reason to believe someone is trying to cause you imminent serious bodily injury or death.
This supports a reasonable fear of the imminent unlawful force that Luvv initiated.
The Pumpfun livestream footage was subpoenaed.
The full video will likely confirm the self-defense claim.
αΩ - OPERATION FREE DALTON 'Chud the Builder'@ArchetypeTheory
Evidence Exonerating "Chud the Builder" discovered: (by friend of family) Screenshots showing premeditation by Joshua Luvv to fight Dalton to launch his "twitch streaming." Joshua Fox / Joshua Luvv Facebook comments from Jan 10, 2026 (18 weeks before the Eatherly incident) Direct quotes from Fox's own account, in a thread with users "Kudo Menace" and "Bishop Reemo Yeezy": • Fox: "I been hopping to run into the chud mf but he don't be on this side of town. But outside of him ima call them a bitch and go about my day 😂😂😂" • Kudo Menace (responding): "chud just trolling us for a reaction. Don't let him bother you either. I don't think he's really racist anyway. Just click bait." • Fox: "trying to get some traction on my end so when I start my twitch I got a little fan base 😂😂😂" • Fox: "oh he don't bother me I just wanna fight 😂😂😂" • Bishop Reemo Yeezy: "on the internet correct. In person? Neutralizing the threat" (followed by a "NO PROBLEM…" meme image) What this establishes: • Fox publicly stated his intent to physically seek out "the chud" months before the incident • Even his own friend characterized the target as "just click bait" and "not really racist" • Fox's stated motivation was Twitch traction and a fan base, not a response to any actual harm • Fox explicitly said "I just wanna fight" • This is documented premeditation. The encounter at the Montgomery County Courthouse was not a chance escalation. It was the outcome Fox had been openly telling people he wanted.
English
@CourtneeHendrix Don’t matter, we all going to the same place and we can’t any of it with us.
English
Yeah but you gon forever be behind the ppl who was on they shit
scar@imfat
Can a 29-year-old start all over again?
English
Breaking news on Dalton's Case!
Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly case update
Affidavit of Complaint just made public. Andrew Branca (self-defense law attorney) breakdown:
• No racial slur alleged. Zero. The state's affidavit contains not one word of Eatherly provoking Fox with a slur. That was the biggest threat to his self-defense claim. Gone.
• Affidavit describes zero criminal conduct. Not one sentence states what Eatherly did that was unlawful.
• "Verbal altercation" is not a crime. At most a misdemeanor that would apply equally to both men. Neither is charged with it.
• "Bladed stance" is not a crime. Taking a defensive posture against an angry antagonist is legal.
• "Reached for his firearm" is not a crime. Preparing to defend yourself is legal.
• "A physical altercation ensued" is written in passive voice. The state does not allege Eatherly started it. By omission, the inference points to Fox as the initiator.
• "Discharged his firearm, striking Fox multiple times" is not inherently unlawful. Thousands of lawful self-defense shootings fit this exact description annually.
• Ricocheting rounds near bystanders is not a crime absent recklessness. The affidavit alleges no recklessness. Police miss roughly 70% of shots in lawful shootings.
• Lawful self-defense shots are, as a matter of law, not reckless.
• Affidavit does not contest any element of self-defense. Not Innocence, Imminence, Proportionality, Avoidance, or Reasonableness. Not a single one.
• Charges: attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, employing a firearm during a dangerous felony.
• Branca's verdict: "Hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance." Sees no realistic path to conviction beyond a reasonable doubt on these facts.
Andrew Branca Show@TheBrancaShow
WHAT A GREAT DAY FOR DALTON EATHERLY! TLDR: The State's case against Eatherly appears to be utterly lacking in ANY LEGAL MERIT WHATEVER, based upon what appears to be the official Affidavit of Complaint just made public (attached). This in a case in which the State's BURDEN is proof of guilt, and disproof of self-defense, beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT. All of it: So, it appears the affidavit of complaint against Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly has been made public, and the contents will ABSOLUTELY SHOCK many of you. FIRST SHOCKER: THERE IS NOT A SINGLE WORD ABOUT DALTON HAVING UTTERED ANY RACIAL SLUR TOWARDS JOSHUA FOX WHATEVER, SO AS TO HAVE PROVOKED THE FIGHT AND THUS TO HAVE LOST THE LEGAL JUSTIFICATION OF SELF-DEFENSE. NOT. ONE. WORD. That was Dalton's biggest potential vulnerability on self-defense, and we can now be confident that we can put that concern to rest. But it gets even BETTER for Dalton. SECOND SHOCKER: Even if self-defense IS NOT EVEN CONSIDERED, the Affidavit of Complaint fails to present ANY evidence-based narrative that Dalton has committed ANY CRIME WHATEVER. (But, of course, self-defense WILL be raised, only further buttressing Dalton's legal position.) Specifically, there's literally not a SINGLE WORD in this Affidavit of Complaint that describes ANY criminal conduct whatever. I've embedded the Affidavit in my possession, but for purposes of succinctness, the relevant portions reads: "... Dalton Eatherly and Joshua Fox engaged in a verbal altercation in front of the Montgomery County Courthouse." This is not a crime, unless it's merely the misdemeanor of disorderly conduct, which would apply equally to both Eatherly AND Foxx. And in any case Eatherly has not been charged with disorderly conduct (nor Fox, of course). "During this verbal altercation, Mr. Eatherly turned his body in a bladed stance towards Mr. Fox ..." There's nothing unlawful about taking a defensive stance when dealing with an angry antagonist. Certainly Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "taking a bladed stance." "... and reached for his firearm located in his right jacket pocket." Again, there's nothing unlawful about reaching for a firearm in one's pocket in preparation for possible necessary self-defense. Note that Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "reaching for a firearm in located in his right jacket pocket." "Thereafter, a physical altercation ensued." Note the passive voice. The "altercation ensued." There's no claim that EATHERLY initiated the "altercation." Indeed, if anything, to the extent the affidavit has detailed Eatherly's conduct, the absence of any representation of his conduct to indicate that it was EATHERLY who initiated the altercation, we can only infer that it was instead FOX who initiated the altercation. This would, of course, make Eatherly the VICTIM of Fox's unlawful attack upon him. The next paragraph: "Mr. Eatherly discharged his firearm, striking Mr. Fox multiple times." There's nothing inherently unlawful about discharging a firearm and shooting someone multiple times. Thousands of shootings that fit this description occur every year, and qualify as perfectly lawful self-defense. Of course, now self-defense need actually be put on the table. Then there's a discussion of Fox being flown to a hospital, followed by: "In addition, at the time shots were fired, there were several innocent bystanders in the area. Surveillance video fo the incident shows a ricocheting projectile hitting nearby walls." Again, there is nothing inherently unlawful about firing shots that miss the intended target. Police involved in lawful shootings of suspects routinely miss about 70% of the shots fired. Those shots ALSO go flying about the neighborhood until they hit something. None of that is a crime, absent evidence of recklessness--and the affidavit provides no statement of recklessness. Indeed, not a word of recklessness. Note that if the shots were fired in lawful self-defense, as a matter of law they were not fired recklessly. I would also note that there's not a word in this affidavit that even contests, much less contradicts, even a single legal element of Dalton's anticipated claim of self-defense. Not Innocence, not Imminence, not Proportionality, not Avoidance, and Not Reasonableness. Not a single element. Not a word of it. If this were a civil case, I would argue that this complaint fails to state a cause of action. Indeed, it's hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance whatever. At this point I have to say that I've never felt more positive about Dalton Eatherly's claim of self-defense, at least based upon the representations of this apparently official "Affidavit of Complaint." If these facts provided in this Affidavit of Complaint are all the State of Tennessee has on which to prosecute Dalton on the attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, and malicious firearms possession charges brought against him, I simply don't see any prospect to any reasonable degree of legal certainty of prosecutors securing a conviction on any of those charges beyond a reasonable doubt on the legal merits. HEY! IF YOU LIKE THIS KIND OF USE-OF-FORCE LEGAL ANALYSIS, and would like to know more about how to be HARD TO CONVICT if YOU are ever compelled to defend yourself, your family, or your property against criminal predation, consider picking up a FREE copy of my best-selling plain-English book, "The Law of Self-Defense: Principles" (we only ask that you cover the S&H). lawofselfdefense.com/FREEBOOK @AmiriKing @ArchetypeTheory @JackPosobiec @DLoesch @Timcast @TheOfficerTatum @MyronGainesX @TateTheTalisman
English
@JustRaging01 So they scored so low they were given Americas most advanced air craft to pilot in combat? Can’t take this seriously
English
@BritanniaArthur That’s because China India and Africa population grew not because white people are being “ethnically cleansed”.
English
Whites were 30% of people in 1900 and now they’re only 7%.
English
