Ltbob

@peterpeccavi @JayDyer @paleochristcon @NickJFuentes @StoneChoir More condescension and holier than though . If you don’t study this and come to the conclusions I came to, you must not be X. If you don’t view masculinity the way I do you must not be Y. Funny enough, I agree with Luthers and Knoxs explanation of masculinity and femininity.

Are you a Christian of the Reformed faith? I ask because any regenerate man who studies Scripture and holds it as supreme for all matters of faith and practice wouldn’t dismiss it as “a word salad.” That’s definitively an effete copout. Instead they would grasp the concept, and if they disagreed, they would argue the point. Disagreement doesn’t mean disunity; I’m open to reasoned arguments. My post isn’t meant to be a generic pep talk about praying or reading Scripture. It’s about how a man expresses biblical manhood vs effeminacy, about faithful stewardship, self-discipline, and sanctification in all areas of life--spiritual, mental, and physical to the glory of God. Not every man who prays and reads Scripture is pursuing true strength to lead, provide, and protect. Many are effeminate in motive and nominal in profession, concerned only with themselves, their image, or their comfort. That is the problem I’m addressing. This isn’t abstract--it’s practical. It’s the difference between men who glorify Christ in their lives and those who misuse faith as a mask for weakness or self-interest.

Agreed. I wrote about this some years ago. I’d say the hyper patriarchy redpill trad bros do not understand patriarchy or biblical manhood and are themselves effeminate. You see, the effeminate man is most concerned with maintaining or improving his own position for his own benefit, his own wants, and his own needs. The godly man however, is concerned with being faithful in his work, winning the battle at hand, for the benefit of another--not to the glory of self, but to the glory of God. It’s the doctrine of stewardship. I’d also note while muscles themselves are not effeminate, why a man builds them may or may not be. Regenerate men pursue physical strength to be capable to protect, provide, and lead. Effeminate men pursue strength to look strong. No one cares about your thirst trap gym pics. True strength is spiritual, mental, and physical to the glory of God, reserved for purpose not for show. And there are abusive men. But most abusive men are not abusers because they are masculine, but because they’re effeminate. Lacking self-control and filling their minds with ungodly things, they inevitably spill corruption outward. Strength, status, or titles mean nothing if the man is not being sanctified. A man with bloody or calloused knees is the best external sign of godly masculinity. A man who prays daily, studies God’s Word, works faithfully, is a member in good standing with a local church, exercises his body and mind, and walks regenerate is pursuing discipline, and sanctification is true biblical manhood. This is how a man avoids the sins of effeminacy and abuse. Biblical manhood is faithful stewardship, courage, holiness, and sacrificial responsibility. If Christ be your root, your fruit will show.

@NeilShenvi 3/3 Some on the far right may be extreme, but at least they’re honest. This holier than thou attitude has run its course. We see through it. You’re dishonest, full of crap, and your contempt for us young men is obvious.

@NeilShenvi 2/3 No one on the Christian right disagrees with any of this, and they know it. They pretend we don’t value them so they can hide behind these platitudes while attacking us, without ever engaging the actual ideas.

If you want to protect your son from the Dissident Right: 1) teach him that he is sinner who is saved by grace alone 2) teach him to take responsibility for his actions rather than blaming others 3) praise his strengths 4) model a happy marriage 5) hug him

@MarioNawfal Me when I was 12 training to be a super soldier .

🚨🇰🇵 North Korea just released footage of its "elite" Special Forces going through intense training. Endurance drills, strength training with forceful impacts, combat maneuvers for mobility. Kim wants everyone to know his guys are scary.

@BradleyGrey_ I indubitably have more motion than you. The reason this makes people upset is because it destroys society you dunce, not some made up jealousy .

The only men who get mad at women for having sex are the men they aren’t having sex with. And every time you feel that resentment, you’re quietly confirming to yourself that you’re the kind of man women don’t choose.

Without drugs... what is the greatest weapon against anxiety and depression?

9/10 women will tell you that they either DON'T prefer a virgin man or are indifferent to it. Three main reasons: 1) Indicates low preselection by other women 2) Presumed to be bad in bed 3) Makes the woman feel slutty I am not saying guys shouldn't be virgins if that's what their conscience and faith tells them. These issues can be mitigated with the proper framing and timing (of revelation). But the last reason to be celibate is because you think it will improve your chances with women. And yes that includes virgin women... especially the ones who aren't crippled with shame around sex.

I don't necessarily agree with this, but there's a very real problem being exposed here. If you are waiting for sex until marriage, you need to get married quickly. It is bad for sexual polarity to be celibate and date secularly as an adult (longer than 2 years) before tying the knot. Really by the time you're in your 20s you should be getting hitched within a year of seeing each other. This was pretty standard historically for a reason: it's absolutely unreasonable to expect adults to be romantically close for years without getting sexual with each other. This wastes the honeymoon phase and undermines the bond for the future. I've had numerous clients THANK me for pushing them forward because by month 9-10 they noted a growing vibe shift due to the lack of sex. Fortunately they were in the homestretch and were to be married in the next couple months. All was well, but it might not have been. But the downside of this approach is that you have less time to vet the woman. Don't get me wrong, you CAN do this for the most part, especially if you have the proper guidance from people who know what to look for (I do this regularly for clients). But most people lack the discernment and important things slip under the radar, especially younger inexperienced guys. In the past this personal vetting mattered less because your community had already pre-vetted the woman and would also essentially be acting as a guarantor of the union, both directly and indirectly. Everyone was a known quantity in values and mental health. Older generations (including even elder christian millennials) grew up in some semblance of this "christian network" and are consequently pretty naive about how things have changed. It's not like that anymore. Not remotely. So I tell the guys I work with who are in this situation the truth: you will have to be comfortable with more risk than the guy who doesn't wait until marriage. Holding off longer can actually manifest the bad outcome you'd wait to prevent; your restraint makes the woman feel undesired, which makes her question moving forward. I understand a lot of Christians don't like the existence of this conundrum, but you can't simply dismiss it either. The response I'm seeing that "you're not supposed to get married just to have sex" is a VERY secular mindset and would have been considered absurd to prior generations. "He struggled with lust" is more feminist nonsense pathologizing the male drive - this is a 20 something year old man, you think it's a moral failing that sex is on his mind? Having sex was the entire point of marriage for all of human history. It was a way to consecrate and contain this natural human impulse. Yes, it's not the only thing you should be taking into consideration when picking a wife, but (absent some dynastic plan to get inheritance / a political alliance) it was and always has been the main thing. Remember sex is the ONLY form of human connection you are unable to get from anybody else besides your spouse. The bottom line is as a theological policy you can't expect people to wait to have sex until after 25, but you also can't expect them to pick their spouse by anything much more than sheer attraction under the age of 25 either - especially if you are not helping guide them in their romantic choices in a practical or effective manner. Which I know for a fact 90%+ of these churches are not doing. These are real questions that are impacting the lives of both young men and women... but especially the men. There are many guys who have tried to do the right thing and now they are in their 30s, sometimes late 30s, and they're still unmarried virgins. They've asked their pastors or priests for help navigating this because dates are blowing up in their faces, but all they've been told are boilerplate platitudes like "to pray," or have even been chastised because the places they're meeting women aren't godly enough (night life etc.) Few godly women, meanwhile, are being presented to them - certainly not in a way that allows either side to feel attraction. This is why these guys end up working with me. The church expects them to be saints, but could care less about their earthly outcomes.

I wouldn’t be opposed to locking this person up in an asylum, along with 10 of her biggest supporters. And maybe make the rest of them second class citizens .

Growing up in an extremely well run patriarchal church, I never understood the criticisms about churches being feminism machines. It was a blind spot based on privilege . It is now evident to me that there much more credance to this critique than I had understood .

All this time, the Illuminati was just AIPAC lol.

@WurzelRoot You want to see even lower IQ self reporting ? Look at the people explaining the joke in the comments .

this joke has resulted in some of the craziest low IQ self reporting ive ever seen on this website

We owe every breath to Jesus Christ.

@TROLGA3 @JoelWebbon @LostMyHats Why don’t you take the full leap into Catholicism?

@JoelWebbon @LostMyHats You already got the beard Joel, take the full leap into Orthodox Christianity!

It's Biblical and good to convey something along the lines of, "God can give your future husband the supernatural capacity to get over it, and give your marriage the grace to overcome your past." That's godly. While you're at it, you should also explain that "many quality Christian men won't want to touch you with a ten-foot pole, and that's okay, because God's got plans." But this sounds more like, "Your previous whorishness has given you a bouquet of imperishable glory roses" or "your past harlotries will turn into holy rubies and purity pearls." Redeemed sin is a blessing paid for by a bloody Savior. But there's nothing "beautiful" about it. It's still ugly as sin. Something ugly, baptized in blood, is still ugly. It's just covered. Romans 8:1 says, "There is, therefore, now no condemnation for those of us in Christ Jesus." But the lack of shame in forgiven sins does NOT mean those sins are something you take pride in. That's the error here. God allows your sins to be overcome, but He doesn't turn them into purity piñatas full of little chastity medals. Romanticize whoredom any more for the easy X-likes, and you'll have church girls aiming for slut-trophies so they get a good testimony out of it. I promise you that's not far-fetched.

@realmikolson I’m assuming you’re saying this about pretty much any of the guys that don’t throw us young men under the bus. Ogden, Fuentes, Mahler, Andrew Wilson, Dyer.

@ltbobbery True. And the WR do so in vice, which is my whole point.

Btw, Joel Webbon and his ilk are no different than the “we’re coming for your kids” LGBTQ Mafia They both target young, impressionable, idealistic young people with their twisted ideals

@peterpeccavi @JayDyer @paleochristcon @NickJFuentes @StoneChoir It’s word salad. A lot of words to say nothing . Every Christian agrees that Christian men should “pray and read the scriptures”. Things that ALL of those men, tell their followers to do constantly. You’re not saying much of value in either direction on the topic .

@ltbobbery @JayDyer @paleochristcon @NickJFuentes @StoneChoir I have no regard for apostates and reprobate. My post was in regard to regenerate men. What do you disagree with in my post?

@HilaireNereus The funniest thing is I wasn’t a big Webbon fan from the start, but the amount of gossip and slander going his way, has made me an avid supporter of his. @JoelWebbon . Us young men are praying for you and supporting . God bless .

"Biggest take away from CPAC Check if my clip-on bowtie is straight before the picture"

@FightofFaith Corresponding to that, baptism now saves you, not the removal of dirt from the flesh, but an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ,

Baptism doesn’t save you. The blood of Jesus does.